An interventional study of vitamin D in Chronic Peritonitis, sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-18.
Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care
The object of the study was to evaluate the direct effect of high dose vitamin D supplementation on chronic periodontitis, and suggest the recommended dose for clinic use.
Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by periodontal tissues inflammation and alveolar bone loss. Vitamin D is involved in stimulating osteoblasts to enable normal bone growth and preservation, also the regulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation, innate immune response and anti-inflammatory effect.Previous studies have reported the association of vitamin D levels and gingivitis and periodontitis. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on chronic periodontitis.
The study was divided into two phases. Recruitment including baseline clinical measurements was obtained and standard periodontal treatments were performed in Phase One. The randomization and intervention of vitamin D were performed in Phase Two. The 323 subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=105,110,108) to receive a supplement kit containing 90 capsules of 2000 IU vitamin D, 1000 IU vitamin D, or placebo capsule for 3 months. After intervention, all the subjects were followed up after 3 months and received standard periodontal examination, including attachment loss (AL), probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), and panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH).
185 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 25 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 360 is above the median of 95 across 118 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.
Browse Peritonitis studies →Beijing Chao Yang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects took 2000IU vitamin D per day
Dietary Supplement: vitamin D
Subjects took 1000IU vitamin D per day
Dietary Supplement: vitamin D
Subjects took placebo
Dietary Supplement: vitamin D
Subjects took vitamin D or placebo
Attachment Loss (AL)
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
Time frame: at baseline
Attachment Loss (AL)
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment
Attachment Loss (AL)
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects
Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment
Probing Depth (PD)
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
Time frame: at baseline
Probing Depth (PD)
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment
Probing Depth (PD)
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
Time frame: at baseline
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment
Bleeding Index (BI)
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: at baseline
Bleeding Index (BI)
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment
Bleeding Index (BI)
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment
| Milestone | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 120 | 120 | 120 |
| Completed | 105 | 110 | 108 |
| Not completed | 15 | 10 | 12 |
| Withdrew: Lost to follow-up | 15 | 10 | 12 |
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment Loss (AL) | 4.7 ± 1.1 | 4.8 ± 0.9 | 4.8 ± 0.9 |
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment Loss (AL) | 3.5 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.6 |
Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Attachment Loss (AL) | 3.4 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.6 | 3.3 ± 0.7 |
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probing Depth (PD) | 3.6 ± 0.8 | 3.7 ± 0.8 | 3.6 ± 0.7 |
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probing Depth (PD) | 2.5 ± 0.5 | 2.6 ± 0.4 | 2.6 ± 0.5 |
Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Probing Depth (PD) | 2.4 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.4 | 2.5 ± 0.4 |
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alveolar Crest Height (ACH) | 7.7 ± 2.3 | 7.7 ± 2.2 | 7.8 ± 2.4 |
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alveolar Crest Height (ACH) | 7.7 ± 2.1 | 7.6 ± 2.3 | 7.7 ± 2.1 |
Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.
| mm | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alveolar Crest Height (ACH) | 7.7 ± 2.3 | 7.7 ± 2.2 | 7.7 ± 2.0 |
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
| score on a scale | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding Index (BI) | 3.5 ± 1.1 | 3.2 ± 1.3 | 3.8 ± 1.2 |
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
| score on a scale | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding Index (BI) | 1.5 ± 0.8 | 1.7 ± 0.6 | 1.6 ± 0.8 |
Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.
| score on a scale | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bleeding Index (BI) | 0.9 ± 0.3 | 1.2 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.6 |
Collected over Through study completion, an average of 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2000IU/Day | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) |
| 1000IU/Day | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) |
| Placebo | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) | 0/120 (0%) |
| Age, Categorical(Participants) | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| <=18 years | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Between 18 and 65 years | 103 | 110 | 107 | 320 |
| >=65 years | 17 | 10 | 13 | 40 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 49 ± 5.4 | 51 ± 6.3 | 53 ± 5.2 | 51 ± 5.3 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 59 | 62 | 57 | 178 |
| Male | 61 | 58 | 63 | 182 |
| Region of Enrollment(participants) | 2000IU/Day | 1000IU/Day | Placebo | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| China | 120 | 120 | 120 | 360 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital