CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03044886Updated Feb 18, 2019Results posted

Effects of Vitamin D on Moderate to Severe Periodontitis

An interventional study of vitamin D in Chronic Peritonitis, sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital. Completed. Open to participants aged 30 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-02-18.

Sponsored by Beijing Chao Yang Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
360
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
30 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The object of the study was to evaluate the direct effect of high dose vitamin D supplementation on chronic periodontitis, and suggest the recommended dose for clinic use.

Read the detailed description

Periodontitis is a chronic inflammatory disease characterized by periodontal tissues inflammation and alveolar bone loss. Vitamin D is involved in stimulating osteoblasts to enable normal bone growth and preservation, also the regulation of cellular proliferation, differentiation, innate immune response and anti-inflammatory effect.Previous studies have reported the association of vitamin D levels and gingivitis and periodontitis. This study was designed as a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effect of vitamin D supplementation on chronic periodontitis.

The study was divided into two phases. Recruitment including baseline clinical measurements was obtained and standard periodontal treatments were performed in Phase One. The randomization and intervention of vitamin D were performed in Phase Two. The 323 subjects were randomly divided into 3 groups (n=105,110,108) to receive a supplement kit containing 90 capsules of 2000 IU vitamin D, 1000 IU vitamin D, or placebo capsule for 3 months. After intervention, all the subjects were followed up after 3 months and received standard periodontal examination, including attachment loss (AL), probing depth (PD), bleeding index (BI), and panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH).

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Peritonitis

Keywords

  • Vitamin D
03

In context

Peritonitis

185 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 25 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 360 is above the median of 95 across 118 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Beijing Chao Yang Hospital is the lead sponsor of 135 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
30 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age from 30 years old to 70 years old
  2. More than 20 teeth remaining in the mouth
  3. Clinical diagnosis of moderate to severe periodontitis
  4. Not receiving periodontal treatment within 6 months
  5. Not taking antibiotic drugs within 3 months.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diabetes, thyroid and parathyroid endocrine associated diseases
  2. Severe systemic diseases, such as cancer
  3. Taking vitamin D and / or calcium drugs during observation
  4. Taking aspirin, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and steroids
  5. Pregnant or prepare to pregnant within one year
  6. Have been suffering from hypercalcemia, malabsorption syndrome.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Factorial assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
360 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    2000IU/day

    Subjects took 2000IU vitamin D per day

    Dietary Supplement: vitamin D

  • Experimental
    1000IU/day

    Subjects took 1000IU vitamin D per day

    Dietary Supplement: vitamin D

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Subjects took placebo

    Dietary Supplement: vitamin D

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementvitamin D

    Subjects took vitamin D or placebo

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Attachment Loss (AL)

    Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

    Time frame: at baseline

  2. Attachment Loss (AL)

    Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

    Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment

  3. Attachment Loss (AL)

    Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects

    Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Probing Depth (PD)

    Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

    Time frame: at baseline

  2. Probing Depth (PD)

    Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

    Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment

  3. Probing Depth (PD)

    Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

    Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment

  4. Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)

    Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

    Time frame: at baseline

  5. Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)

    Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

    Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment

  6. Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)

    Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

    Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment

  7. Bleeding Index (BI)

    Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: at baseline

  8. Bleeding Index (BI)

    Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 3 months after periodontal treatment

  9. Bleeding Index (BI)

    Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

    Time frame: 6 months after periodontal treatment

07

Results

Posted Feb 18, 2019
Limitations and caveats
The observation time was short. Mechanical periodontal therapy might be too close in time to the vitamin D treatment. Did not adjust for possible confounding factors (e.g., dietary vitamin D) . The study was performed at one single center.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
Milestone2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Started120120120
Completed105110108
Not completed151012
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up151012

Outcome measures

PrimaryAttachment Loss (AL)

Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

Time frame:
at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Attachment Loss (AL)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Attachment Loss (AL)4.7 ± 1.14.8 ± 0.94.8 ± 0.9
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.576
PrimaryAttachment Loss (AL)

Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

Time frame:
3 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Attachment Loss (AL)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Attachment Loss (AL)3.5 ± 0.73.6 ± 0.73.6 ± 0.6
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.489
PrimaryAttachment Loss (AL)

Examination of AL was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects

Time frame:
6 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Attachment Loss (AL)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Attachment Loss (AL)3.4 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.63.3 ± 0.7
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.042
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.041
SecondaryProbing Depth (PD)

Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

Time frame:
at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Probing Depth (PD)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Probing Depth (PD)3.6 ± 0.83.7 ± 0.83.6 ± 0.7
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANCOVA · p = 0.710
SecondaryProbing Depth (PD)

Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

Time frame:
3 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Probing Depth (PD)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Probing Depth (PD)2.5 ± 0.52.6 ± 0.42.6 ± 0.5
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.340
SecondaryProbing Depth (PD)

Examination of PD was performed with Williams probe, included six sites of each tooth: mesial buccal, buccal, distal buccal, mesial lingual, lingual and distal lingual. The outcome was the mean value of all the sites of all subjects.

Time frame:
6 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Probing Depth (PD)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Probing Depth (PD)2.4 ± 0.52.5 ± 0.42.5 ± 0.4
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.048
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.038
SecondaryAlveolar Crest Height (ACH)

Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

Time frame:
at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)7.7 ± 2.37.7 ± 2.27.8 ± 2.4
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.521
SecondaryAlveolar Crest Height (ACH)

Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

Time frame:
3 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)7.7 ± 2.17.6 ± 2.37.7 ± 2.1
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.742
SecondaryAlveolar Crest Height (ACH)

Panoramic radiographs were taken to evaluate alveolar crest height (ACH) with measuring software (i-Dixel, One Volume Viewer, version 6.00, J. MORITA MFG. CORP. Japan). The alveolar crest height is defined as the mean of the two-dimensional vertical distance between mesial and distal alveolar crest to apical point.

Time frame:
6 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · mm
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)
mm2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Alveolar Crest Height (ACH)7.7 ± 2.37.7 ± 2.27.7 ± 2.0
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = <0.05
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.073
SecondaryBleeding Index (BI)

Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
at baseline
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bleeding Index (BI)
score on a scale2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Bleeding Index (BI)3.5 ± 1.13.2 ± 1.33.8 ± 1.2
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.348
SecondaryBleeding Index (BI)

Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
3 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bleeding Index (BI)
score on a scale2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Bleeding Index (BI)1.5 ± 0.81.7 ± 0.61.6 ± 0.8
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.685
SecondaryBleeding Index (BI)

Examination of BI was performed with Williams probe, explored under the gingival margin about 1mm, and bleeding was observed after 30 seconds. BI was scored on a 0-5 scale, higher scores mean a worse outcome.

Time frame:
6 months after periodontal treatment
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Bleeding Index (BI)
score on a scale2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlacebo
Bleeding Index (BI)0.9 ± 0.31.2 ± 0.71.1 ± 0.6
Statistical analysis
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.075
  • 2000IU/Day vs 1000IU/Day vs Placebo · ANOVA · p = 0.083

Adverse events

Collected over Through study completion, an average of 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
2000IU/Day0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)
1000IU/Day0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)
Placebo0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)0/120 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlaceboTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years103110107320
>=65 years17101340
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlaceboTotal
Mean49 ± 5.451 ± 6.353 ± 5.251 ± 5.3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlaceboTotal
Female596257178
Male615863182
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)2000IU/Day1000IU/DayPlaceboTotal
China120120120360
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03044886
Lead sponsor
Beijing Chao Yang Hospital
Responsible party
Zuo Min Wang (Dean of Stomatology Department, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Beijing Chao Yang Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 7, 2017
Start date
Jan 2013
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Feb 18, 2019
Last update
Feb 18, 2019

Study contacts

Zuomin Wang, Doctor
principal investigator · Dean of Stomatology Department

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion