ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT04604730DIVERTI2Updated Jun 8, 2026

Role of Protective Stoma After Primary Anastomosis for Generalized Peritonitis Due to Perforated Diverticulitis

An interventional study of Primary anastomosis without protective stoma and Anastomosis with protective stoma in Peritonitis, sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen. Recruiting at 20 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-08.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Rouen · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jun 2021; still recruiting 5 years 5 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
204
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is designed to be a multicentre, prospective, comparative, randomised trial, evaluating the efficacy of two surgical strategies for the treatment of generalised peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Results will be analysed according to an intention to treat principle (after selection and patient consent). Immediately before surgery, the patient will be randomly assigned to sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis or to sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis and diverting stoma. Sigmoidectomy will be performed through a midline laparotomy or laparoscopically according to the standard technique. In the control arm, a protective stoma will be performed at the end of surgery. A stoma reversal operation will be performed at least 3 months after the first operation and after performing a cologram by water soluble contrast between 4 and 8 weeks to check for the absence of fistula or stenosis at the level of the anastomosis. Stoma reversal will be performed with a trephine incision.

Post-stoma closure follow-ups will be planned and all morbidity/mortality will be recorded. All patients will be examined at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the initial surgery, in the surgical department where they were operated; a final study visit will be carried out 12 months (evaluation of primary endpoint) after surgery. The parameters explored at medical examinations will be: • Occurrence of complications • Quality of life assessment

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to be a multicentre, prospective, comparative, randomised trial, evaluating the efficacy of two surgical strategies for the treatment of generalised peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis. Results will be analysed according to an intention to treat principle. The diagnosis will be established by the surgeon investigator on clinical data, imagery and operative findings during a laparotomy or laparoscopy. After selection and patient consent and immediately before surgery, the patient will be randomly assigned to sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis or to sigmoidectomy with primary anastomosis and diverting stoma. Sigmoidectomy will be performed through a midline laparotomy or laparoscopically according to the standard technique, with lateral to medial mobilisation of the left colon, mobilisation of splenic flexure and identification of left ureter. The rectosigmoid junction will be exposed and transected with a stapler. Proximal section will be performed on a healthy colonic segment. The anastomosis will be performed according to the surgeon investigator's preference (mechanical or manual anastomosis; end to end or side to end).

Decisions to clean the colon intraoperatively and to place a drain will be left to the surgeon's discretion. In the control arm, a protective stoma will be performed at the end of surgery. A stoma reversal operation will be performed at least 3 months after the first operation and after performing a cologram by water soluble contrast between 4 and 8 weeks to check for the absence of fistula or stenosis at the level of the anastomosis. Stoma reversal will be performed with a trephine incision.

Post-stoma closure follow-ups will be planned and all morbidity/mortality will be recorded. All patients will be examined at 6, 12, and 24 weeks after the initial surgery, in the surgical department where they were operated; a final study visit will be carried out 12 months (evaluation of primary endpoint) after surgery. The parameters explored at medical examinations will be: • Occurrence of complications • Quality of life assessment

02

Conditions studied

  • Peritonitis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • peritonitis
  • perforated diverticulitis
  • primary anastomosis
  • protective stoma
03

In context

Peritonitis

167 studies on the registry are indexed under Peritonitis; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 204 is above the median of 79 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Peritonitis.

Browse Peritonitis studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Rouen is the lead sponsor of 418 studies on the registry; 106 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Patients operated for purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III and IV) secondary to perforated diverticulitis of the left colon and treated by resection with primary anastomosis
  3. Person informed and having signed his consent. If the patient is unable to sign his consent, the consent will be signed by his representative ((1) the trusted person, or failing that, (2) a family member, or (3) a relative of the person concerned) (Article L1122-1-1 of the CSP). In this case, consent to continue the study will subsequently be requested from the patient. --> In addition, due to the vital urgency represented by hospitalisation in intensive care for purulent or fecal peritonitis, inclusion without prior collection of the consent of the patient or his/her representative is possible in the case where the patient is not capable of giving consent and his/her representative is not present at the time of inclusion (Article L1122-1-3 of the CSP). In this case, the patient or his/her representative will be informed as soon as possible and his/her written consent will be requested for the possible continuation of this research and the use of the data concerning him/her.
  4. Patient able to comply with the study protocol, in the investigator's judgment
  5. Patient affiliated with, or beneficiary of a social security (health insurance) category

Non-inclusion Criteria:

  1. Physical states that prevent patient participation (e.g. septic shock or multivisceral failure)
  2. treatment > 20 mg daily
  3. Prior pelvic irradiation
  4. status
  5. Known progressive cancer
  6. grade IV
  7. Peritonitis secondary to perforated diverticulitis of the right colon
  8. Patient is a pregnant (positive blood pregnancy test) or breastfeeding (lactating) woman or intending to become pregnant during the study
  9. Person deprived of liberty by administrative or judicial decision or placed under judicial protection (guardianship or supervision)
  10. Simultaneous participation in another interventional research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Failure to obtain the consent of the patient or the patient's representative

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
204 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Primary anastomosis without protective stoma

    Primary anastomosis without protective stoma

    Procedure: Primary anastomosis without protective stoma

  • Active comparator
    Anastomosis with protective stoma

    Anastomosis with protective stoma

    Procedure: Anastomosis with protective stoma

Interventions

  • ProcedurePrimary anastomosis without protective stoma

    Primary anastomosis without protective stoma

  • ProcedureAnastomosis with protective stoma

    Anastomosis with protective stoma

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of overall morbidity between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    Overall morbidity graded 0 to 5 according to the Clavien-Dindo classification All complications occurring during hospitalization will be collected. Late complications occurring after hospitalization will be collected during follow-up.

    Time frame: 12 months posteoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of the rate of death between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    rate of death at 3 months after surgery (%)

    Time frame: 3 months postoperatively

  2. Comparison of the rate of reinterventions between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    the rate of reinterventions after the surgery (%)

    Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

  3. Comparison of the rate of incisional surgical site infection (SSI) between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    the rate of incisional SSI (%)

    Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

  4. Comparison of the rate of organ/space SSI between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    the rate of organ/space SSI (%)

    Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

  5. Comparison of the rate of wound disruptions between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    the rate of wound disruptions (%)

    Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

  6. Comparison of the rate of anastomotic leaks between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    the rate of anastomotic leaks (%)

    Time frame: 12 months postoperatively

  7. Comparison of operating time between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    time of surgery (hours)

    Time frame: surgery

  8. Comparison of length of postoperative hospital stay between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    Length of postoperative hospital stay (days)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  9. Comparison of Intensive Care Unit (ICU) length of stay between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    ICU length of stay (days)

    Time frame: 6 months postoperatively

  10. Comparison of the number of patients alive without stoma between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    Number of patients alive without stoma at 12 months after initial surgery

    Time frame: 12 months after initial surgery

  11. Comparison of the quality of life between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    Quality of life evaluated using the Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery Score from 1 to 30

    Time frame: 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery

  12. Comparison of the quality of life between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma" with "EuroQol-5 Dimensions" questionnaire

    Quality of life evaluated using EuroQol-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery Each dimension has three levels of response: no problems (coded 1), some problems (coded 2) and major problems (coded 3), which defines 243 possible health states (35), to which can be added unconscious and dead states, for a total of 245 states. Thus, the health states range from "11111" (no problems on all dimensions) to "33333": major problems on all dimensions + visual analog scale from 0 to 100, 0 being the worst and 100 the best

    Time frame: 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery

  13. Comparison of the quality of life between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma" with the Gastrintestinal Quality of Life Index questionnaire

    Quality of life evaluated using Ethe Gastrintestinal Quality of Life Index questionnaire at baseline, 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery Score from 0 to 144, the higher the score, the better the quality of life

    Time frame: 6, 12, 26 and 52 weeks after primary surgery

  14. Comparison of the cost utility between "with protective stoma" and "without protective stoma"

    Quality-Adjusted Life Year (QALY) derived from the EQ5D-5L questionnaire

    Time frame: 12 months after primary surgery

07

Study locations

6 of 20 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Pinson J, Tuech JJ, Ouaissi M, Mathonnet M, Mauvais F, Houivet E, Lacroix E, Rondeaux J, Sabbagh C, Bridoux V. Role of protective stoma after primary anastomosis for generalized peritonitis due to perforated diverticulitis-DIVERTI 2 (a prospective multicenter randomized trial): rationale and design (nct04604730). BMC Surg. 2022 May 16;22(1):191. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01589-w. PubMed 35578267 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Jun 2021 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Sep 2026, 62 months after the start.

Of 23 interventional studies with no phase under Peritonitis, half reached primary completion within 31 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 44. This study's planned 62 months is above that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 15, 2020
First posted
Oct 27, 2020
StartActual
Jun 11, 2021
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2026
Last update
Jun 8, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 8, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT04604730
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 27, 2020
Start date
Jun 11, 2021
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 8, 2026

Study contacts

Valérie BRIDOUX, Pr
Contact
valerie.bridoux@chu-rouen.fr
02 32 88 81 42
Valérie BRIDOUX, Pr
principal investigator · University Hospital, Rouen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion