CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03043573PATH-MCIUpdated Aug 12, 2025Results posted

Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitive Impairment and Depression

An interventional study of PATH-MCI and Supportive Therapy in Cognitive Impairment and Depression, sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University. Completed at 4 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-12.

Sponsored by Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
80
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The present collaborative R01 study, between Cornell and Johns Hopkins, aims to compare Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (PATH-MCI) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (ST-CI) in improving cognitive, affective, and functioning outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The present collaborative R01 study, between Cornell and Johns Hopkins, aims to compare Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (PATH-MCI) vs. Supportive Therapy for Cognitively Impaired Older Adults (ST-CI) in improving cognitive, affective and functioning outcomes. Psychotherapy, also known as talking therapy, is the use of psychological methods to help a person change and overcome problems in desired ways. PATH-MCI differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver. Supportive Therapy incorporates standard of care approaches by using non-specific techniques to provide a supportive environment and help patients to express their feelings \& focus on their strengths and abilities.

The investigators plan to randomize 80 treatment subjects, older adults (40 at Cornell and 40 at Johns Hopkins) with MCI-depression. 80 study partners may also be potentially recruited. Both sites have shown feasibility of recruitment, randomization, retention, and assessment procedures for patients with MCI. Cornell has shown evidence of administration of PATH in this population. Certified mental health clinicians in PATH-MCI and ST-CI will administer 15 in-office sessions in six months.

The investigators propose to compare the effects of 15 sessions (12 weekly in first 12 weeks and 3 monthly booster sessions afterwards) of PATH-MCI vs. ST-CI in 80 older adults (treatment subjects) with MCI-depression. Research assistants, unaware of study hypotheses and participant randomization status, will perform research assessments at baseline and at 6 (no cognitive measures), 12, 24, 36 (no cognitive measures) and 52 weeks after randomization.

There will also be optional blood draws at study entry, 12, and 52 weeks. The purpose of the blood draws is to better understand whether response to psychotherapy treatment is affected by genes, by inflammation, or by the possible memory factor called BDNF (brain-derived neurotrophic factor). Also, all therapy sessions will be audiotaped (if the patient consents) and Dr. Shermer (a clinician outside of the Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry) will evaluate randomly selected sessions and rate the therapists' adherence and competence based on the PATH-MCI and ST Adherence Scales

The study partner will provide information about the treatment subject and participate in treatment if agreed by the treatment subject. To explore the effects of PATH-MCI on the study partner, the investigators will collect the following data from the study partner: demographic, burden (Short Zarit Burden interview), and treatment satisfaction (Client Satisfaction Questionnaire).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cognitive Impairment
  • Depression
03

In context

Cognitive Dysfunction

3,843 studies on the registry are indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction; 1,100 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 80 is above the median of 65 across 2,808 interventional studies indexed under Cognitive Dysfunction.

Browse Cognitive Dysfunction studies →

Lead sponsor

Weill Medical College of Cornell University is the lead sponsor of 867 studies on the registry; 160 are open to participants now.

Of its 119 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 91 (76%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Amnestic MCI as defined by Albert et al
  • Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) greater than 7 and MADRS total less than 30
  • Participants will be off antidepressants, cholinesterase inhibitors or memantine, or on a stable dosage for at least 12 weeks without any medical recommendation to adjust dosage in next 3 months (during treatment)
  • Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) = 0.5 at screening
  • Subjects will have capacity to consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Deemed to have a significant suicide risk as assessed by site PI and clinical team
  • Deemed too unstable medically or neurologically to safely enroll in a research trial
  • Deemed too psychiatrically unstable to safely enroll in randomized trial of psychotherapy. Requiring psychiatric hospitalization at baseline for safety.
  • Current involvement in psychotherapy
  • Lack of English fluency
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
80 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    PATH-MCI

    Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Adults (PATH-MCI) differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver.

    Behavioral: PATH-MCI

  • Active comparator
    Supportive Therapy

    Supportive Therapy focuses on: 1. Facilitating expression of affect; 2. Conveying to the patient that he or she is understood; 3. Offering empathy; and 4. Highlighting positive experiences. The ST manual aims to standardize nonspecific therapeutic factors.

    Behavioral: Supportive Therapy

Interventions

  • BehavioralPATH-MCI

    Problem Adaptation Therapy for Mild Cognitively Impaired Adults (PATH-MCI) differs from standard of care psychotherapy by offering a combination of emotion regulation techniques with the provision of environmental adaptation tools (notes, checklists, calendars, etc.), the use of the WellPATH app, and the participation of a willing and available caregiver.

  • BehavioralSupportive Therapy

    ST focuses on: 1. facilitating expression of affect; 2. conveying to the patient that he or she is understood; 3. offering empathy; and 4. highlighting positive experiences. The ST manual aims to standardize nonspecific therapeutic factors.

    Also known as: ST

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Global Cognition Assessed by RBANS

    Global cognition will be assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Score (RBANS). The total score represents the simple sum of the five cognitive domain index scores (Immediate Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional, Language, Attention, and Delayed Memory). Total raw scores are converted based on the subjects age and a RBANS scoring manual. Higher scores indicate better functionality. The total scores range from 200 to 800.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Disability Function Assessed With WHODAS-II

    The 12-item WHODAS-II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule) assesses functional impairment across six domains of daily living. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (No difficulty), 1 (Mild Difficulty), 2 (Moderate Difficulty), 3 (Severe Difficulty) and 4 (Extreme difficulty or cannot do). Each individual item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 4. The total raw score is computed by summing all 12 items, resulting in a possible score range of 0 to 48. Higher score reflect greater functional impairment. Lower scores indicate better functional status and less reported difficulty with daily activities.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks

  2. Change in Depression Assessed by MADRS

    Depression assessed by Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score. The MADRS is a 10 item questionnaire assessing severity of depression by scoring participants on mood, anxiety, sleep, concentration, appetite, and suicidal thoughts. The lowest score is 0, no depression symptoms, and the highest possible score is 60, severe depression symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks

  3. Change in Episodic Memory Assessed by Delayed Recall Subscale of RBANS

    The Delayed Recall subscale of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) assesses memory function across multiple tasks. It includes the following components: List Recall Total Score (range: 0-10), List Recognition Total Score (range: 0-20), Story Recall Total Score (range: 0-12), and Figure Recall Total Score (range: 0-20). The raw scores from these four components are summed to yield a Delayed Memory Index raw total score ranging from 0 to 62, with higher scores indicating better memory performance. To facilitate standardized interpretation, raw total scores are converted to age-adjusted Index Scores using normative data provided in the RBANS manual. These Index Scores have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, and are normed by decade (e.g., 60-69, 70-79, 80-89). Higher Index Scores reflect better memory functioning relative to age-matched peers.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

  4. Change in Executive Function Assessed by Trail Making Test

    Trail Making Test is a neuropsychological assessment where raw scores are converted into a scaled score range from 1 to 25. Participants with scores between 1 - 8 have impaired performance; Mid range scores typically fall between 10 - 16, and subjects who fair the best on this measure have scores ranging from 20 - 25.

    Time frame: Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Change in Stress Reduction Assessed by Perceived Stress Scale

    Perceived Stress Scale s the most widely used psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. The 10-item measure has 4 choice options; (0=Never, 1=Almost Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Fairly Often, 4=Often). 4 items are reversed scored and the total score is summed across all items ranging from 0 to 40. Lower scores are better and indicate less stress.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks

07

Results

Posted Aug 12, 2025

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Started3941
Completed3629
Not completed312
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up33
Withdrew: Physician decision05
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject04

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange in Global Cognition Assessed by RBANS

Global cognition will be assessed by the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status Total Score (RBANS). The total score represents the simple sum of the five cognitive domain index scores (Immediate Memory, Visuospatial/Constructional, Language, Attention, and Delayed Memory). Total raw scores are converted based on the subjects age and a RBANS scoring manual. Higher scores indicate better functionality. The total scores range from 200 to 800.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Global Cognition Assessed by RBANS
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals434.66 ± 68.96435.36 ± 68.27
Week 12 Totals438.46 ± 70.27436 ± 67.51
Week 24 Totals448.57 ± 71.78449.08 ± 64.75
Week 52 Totals435 ± 111.04419.33 ± 101.93
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9644 · Mean difference (final values): -0.7011 · 95% CI -31.8605 to 30.4583
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.8880 · Mean difference (final values): 2.4595 · 95% CI -32.3472 to 37.2661
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9773 · Mean difference (final values): -0.5119 · 95% CI -36.5024 to 35.4785
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 1 sided · p = 0.6173 · Mean difference (final values): 15.6667 · 95% CI -47.0598 to 78.3931
SecondaryChange in Disability Function Assessed With WHODAS-II

The 12-item WHODAS-II (World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule) assesses functional impairment across six domains of daily living. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (No difficulty), 1 (Mild Difficulty), 2 (Moderate Difficulty), 3 (Severe Difficulty) and 4 (Extreme difficulty or cannot do). Each individual item has a minimum score of 0 and a maximum of 4. The total raw score is computed by summing all 12 items, resulting in a possible score range of 0 to 48. Higher score reflect greater functional impairment. Lower scores indicate better functional status and less reported difficulty with daily activities.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Disability Function Assessed With WHODAS-II
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals12.08 ± 7.7410.95 ± 8.57
Week 6 Totals12.43 ± 8.729.47 ± 7.16
Week 12 Totals10.68 ± 7.559.58 ± 8.17
Week 24 Totals8.51 ± 8.0110.07 ± 7.97
Week 36 Totals9.97 ± 8.459.08 ± 8.19
Week 52 Totals11.79 ± 8.678.84 ± 6.36
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5454 · Mean difference (final values): 1.1302 · 95% CI -2.5767 to 4.8371
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1212 · Mean difference (final values): 2.9618 · 95% CI -0.8038 to 6.7275
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5710 · Mean difference (final values): 1.0950 · 95% CI -2.7476 to 4.9377
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4377 · Mean difference (final values): -1.5524 · 95% CI -5.5256 to 2.4209
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6813 · Mean difference (final values): 0.8937 · 95% CI -3.4439 to 5.2312
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1620 · Mean difference (final values): 2.9457 · 95% CI -1.2234 to 7.1148
SecondaryChange in Depression Assessed by MADRS

Depression assessed by Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score. The MADRS is a 10 item questionnaire assessing severity of depression by scoring participants on mood, anxiety, sleep, concentration, appetite, and suicidal thoughts. The lowest score is 0, no depression symptoms, and the highest possible score is 60, severe depression symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Depression Assessed by MADRS
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals16.62 ± 5.816.59 ± 6.01
Week 6 Totals14.97 ± 8.5715.03 ± 5.47
Week 12 Totals13.53 ± 6.8112.47 ± 6.38
Week 24 Totals10.67 ± 6.6112.67 ± 5.85
Week 36 Totals12.32 ± 6.411.96 ± 6.76
Week 52 Totals12.67 ± 6.1711.4 ± 6.40
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9813 · Mean difference (final values): 0.0319 · 95% CI -2.6668 to 2.7305
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.9735 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0564 · 95% CI -3.4397 to 3.3268
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5164 · Mean difference (final values): 1.0611 · 95% CI -2.1885 to 4.3107
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1970 · Mean difference (final values): -2.0 · 95% CI -5.0651 to 1.0651
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.8342 · Mean difference (net): 0.3620 · 95% CI -3.0907 to 3.8146
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4717 · Mean difference (final values): 1.2667 · 95% CI -2.2424 to 4.7758
SecondaryChange in Episodic Memory Assessed by Delayed Recall Subscale of RBANS

The Delayed Recall subscale of the Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neuropsychological Status (RBANS) assesses memory function across multiple tasks. It includes the following components: List Recall Total Score (range: 0-10), List Recognition Total Score (range: 0-20), Story Recall Total Score (range: 0-12), and Figure Recall Total Score (range: 0-20). The raw scores from these four components are summed to yield a Delayed Memory Index raw total score ranging from 0 to 62, with higher scores indicating better memory performance. To facilitate standardized interpretation, raw total scores are converted to age-adjusted Index Scores using normative data provided in the RBANS manual. These Index Scores have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15, and are normed by decade (e.g., 60-69, 70-79, 80-89). Higher Index Scores reflect better memory functioning relative to age-matched peers.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Episodic Memory Assessed by Delayed Recall Subscale of RBANS
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals76.66 ± 20.1879.59 ± 18.92
Week 12 Totals77.81 ± 22.3681.78 ± 22.12
Week 24 Totals81.89 ± 21.8987.04 ± 20.40
Week 52 Totals84.71 ± 22.9183.60 ± 23.66
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5130 · Mean difference (final values): -2.9318 · 95% CI -11.8176 to 5.9539
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.4835 · Mean difference (final values): 0.4835 · 95% CI -15.2306 to 7.2967
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3590 · Mean difference (final values): -5.1560 · 95% CI -16.3357 to 6.0238
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.8760 · Mean difference (final values): 1.1083 · 95% CI -13.1598 to 15.3765
SecondaryChange in Executive Function Assessed by Trail Making Test

Trail Making Test is a neuropsychological assessment where raw scores are converted into a scaled score range from 1 to 25. Participants with scores between 1 - 8 have impaired performance; Mid range scores typically fall between 10 - 16, and subjects who fair the best on this measure have scores ranging from 20 - 25.

Time frame:
Baseline, 12, 24, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Executive Function Assessed by Trail Making Test
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals (Trails A)24.94 ± 0.3525 ± 0.00
Week 12 Totals (Trails A)24.19 ± 4.1324.89 ± 0.47
Week 24 Totals (Trails A)25 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00
Week 52 Totals (Trails A)25 ± 0.0025 ± 0.00
Baseline Totals (Trails B)23.63 ± 5.1622.63 ± 6.36
Week 12 Totals (Trails B)22.65 ± 5.9624.71 ± 0.85
Week 24 Totals (Trails B)24.11 ± 3.3325 ± 0.00
Week 52 Totals (Trails B)23.57 ± 4.1325 ± 0.00
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3248 · Mean difference (final values): -0.0606 · 95% CI -0.1841 to 0.0628
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3615 · Mean difference (final values): -0.6953 · 95% CI -2.2261 to 0.8354
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5046 · Mean difference (final values): 0.9917 · 95% CI -1.9664 to 3.9498
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.0679 · Mean difference (final values): -2.0607 · 95% CI -4.2821 to 0.1607
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.1669 · Mean difference (final values): -0.8929 · 95% CI -2.1825 to 0.3968
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2178 · Mean difference (final values): -1.4286 · 95% CI -3.8115 to 0.9543
Other pre-specifiedChange in Stress Reduction Assessed by Perceived Stress Scale

Perceived Stress Scale s the most widely used psychological instrument for measuring the perception of stress. It is a measure of the degree to which situations in one's life are appraised as stressful. The 10-item measure has 4 choice options; (0=Never, 1=Almost Never, 2=Sometimes, 3=Fairly Often, 4=Often). 4 items are reversed scored and the total score is summed across all items ranging from 0 to 40. Lower scores are better and indicate less stress.

Time frame:
Baseline, 6, 12, 24, 36, and 52 Weeks
Reported as:
Mean · Score on a Scale
Change in Stress Reduction Assessed by Perceived Stress Scale
Score on a ScalePATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Baseline Totals19.76 ± 6.8118.21 ± 6.07
Week 6 Totals18.35 ± 7.4516.65 ± 5.90
Week 12 Totals17.25 ± 7.4816.33 ± 6.31
Week 24 Totals16.34 ± 8.3317.37 ± 7.88
Week 36 Totals16.24 ± 7.9614.31 ± 7.26
Week 52 Totals17.07 ± 7.8515.00 ± 6.06
Statistical analysis
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2932 · Mean difference (final values): 1.5580 · 95% CI -1.3747 to 4.4908
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2871 · Mean difference (final values): 1.7043 · 95% CI -1.4659 to 4.8744
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.5910 · Mean difference (final values): 0.9167 · 95% CI -2.4737 to 4.3070
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.6128 · Mean difference (final values): -1.0238 · 95% CI -5.0469 to 2.9993
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.3326 · Mean difference (final values): 1.9276 · 95% CI -2.0231 to 5.8783
  • PATH-MCI vs Supportive Therapy · t-test, 2 sided · p = 0.2935 · Mean difference (final values): 2.0741 · 95% CI -1.8522 to 6.0004

Adverse events

Collected over 52 Weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
PATH-MCI0/39 (0%)5/39 (12.8%)4/39 (10.3%)
Supportive Therapy0/41 (0%)1/41 (2.4%)6/41 (14.6%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventPATH-MCISupportive Therapy
Major Depressive EpisodePsychiatric disorders1/390/41
MasectomySurgical and medical procedures1/390/41
Breast ReconstructionSurgical and medical procedures1/390/41
TachycardiaCardiac disorders1/390/41
Back PainMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/390/41
Chest PainCardiac disorders0/391/41
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventPATH-MCISupportive Therapy
FallInjury, poisoning and procedural complications2/392/41
SinusitisInfections and infestations1/390/41
Skin BiopsyInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/390/41
Retinal DetachmentEndocrine disorders0/391/41
Laminectomy and discectomySurgical and medical procedures0/391/41
CataractEye disorders0/391/41
Skin LesionInjury, poisoning and procedural complications0/391/41

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PATH-MCISupportive TherapyTotal
Mean73.87 ± 7.8273.56 ± 7.4273.71 ± 7.57
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PATH-MCISupportive TherapyTotal
Female222042
Male172138
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PATH-MCISupportive TherapyTotal
Hispanic or Latino145
Not Hispanic or Latino383775
Unknown or Not Reported000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PATH-MCISupportive TherapyTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American437
White343367
More than one race123
Unknown or Not Reported033
08

Study locations

4 sites
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine
    Baltimore, Maryland 21224, United States
  • Weill Cornell Medicine
    New York, New York 10065, United States
  • Montefiore Medical Center
    The Bronx, New York 10461, United States
  • Weill Cornell Institute of Geriatric Psychiatry, Weill Cornell Medicine
    White Plains, New York 10605, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 30, 2020
  • Informed consent form · May 15, 2023

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data will be available as per NIH's data sharing policy.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 12, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03043573
Lead sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University
Collaborators
Johns Hopkins University, Montefiore Medical Center, National Institute on Aging (NIA)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 6, 2017
Start date
Jul 1, 2017
Primary completion
Sep 19, 2024
Completion
Sep 19, 2024
Results posted
Aug 12, 2025
Last update
Aug 12, 2025

Study contacts

Dimitris Kiosses, PhD
principal investigator · Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion