ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03033381IHRUpdated Jan 26, 2017

A Comparison of Testicular Volume and Blood Flow in Patients With Inguinal Hernia, Hydrocele, and Cord Cyst

An interventional study of Color Doppler Ultrasound and Color Doppler Ultrasound in Inguinal Hernia Repair, sponsored by Kocatepe University. Completed. Open to male participants aged Up to 17 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-26.

Sponsored by Kocatepe University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
23
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
Up to 17 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Here, investigators aimed to evaluate the effect of inguinal operations performed with a modified Ferguson technique upon testicular volume and blood flow. This study involved 23 patients receiving surgery for inguinal hernia, hydrocele, and cord cyst. The color Doppler ultrasound (CDUS) was used to assess testicular volume and blood flow before and after a modified Ferguson technique surgery. The pre- and postoperative testicular volume and blood flow were compared with the contralateral testes. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software was used to statistically analyze the data arising; the Mann-Whitney U test and Friedman test were used to compare samples, and P \< 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Read the detailed description

Patients and Methods The study was performed prospectively with the approval of the Local Human Ethics Committee. All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. All patients included in the study were provided with a patient consent form.

Study Group The analysis included male patients who were younger than 17 years and possessing one-sided inguinal hernia, hydrocele, or cord cyst and who were otherwise healthy. The study was performed prospectively between April 2016 and June 2016 in a medical faculty pediatric surgery unit.

Study plan Following diagnosis, patients received a CDUS and testicular volume and blood flow were measured preoperatively. All patients then received surgery with modified Ferguson repair. Testicular volume and blood flow were then reassessed by CDUS on days 7 and 30 following surgery.

Radiological evaluation Radiological evaluation was performed by a single radiologist using color doppler ultrasound (CDUS) preoperatively and on days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters of the testis were measured, and the testicular volume was calculated automatically using the CDUS device (volume = 0.523 × D1 × D2 × D3, where D1, D2, and D3 were the maximal longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters defined by CDUS) for both testicles in each patient [1]. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was calculated using the CDUS system (in cm3/s) for both testicles in each patient.

Statistical analysis The SPSS 15.0 (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) software package was used for all statistical analysis. Testicular volumes and blood flow were analyzed as mean±standard deviation. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences in testicular volume and blood flow between the testis receiving surgery and the contralateral testis. Differences in preoperative, early postoperative (7 days post-surgery), and late postoperative (30 days post-surgery) testicular volume and blood flow of each testicle were compared using the Friedman test and P \< 0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inguinal Hernia Repair

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Children
  • Inguinal hernia
  • Testis
  • Doppler ultrasonography
03

In context

Hernia, Inguinal

543 studies on the registry are indexed under Hernia, Inguinal; 92 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 23 is below the median of 90 across 395 interventional studies indexed under Hernia, Inguinal.

Browse Hernia, Inguinal studies →

Lead sponsor

Kocatepe University is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 17 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Our analysis included boys who were younger than 17 years and possessing one-sided inguinal hernia, hydrocele, or cord cyst and who were otherwise healthy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who had bilaterally inguinal hernia, hydrocele, or cord cyst
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
23 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    operated side testis

    Operated side testis volume and blood flow will be evaluated with color doppler ultrasound before and after the surgery (Preoperative, 7 day and 30 day)

    Device: Color Doppler Ultrasound

  • Sham comparator
    Contralateral testis

    Nonoperated side testis volume and blood flow will be evaluated with color doppler ultrasound before and after the surgery (Preoperative, 7 day and 30 day)

    Device: Color Doppler Ultrasound

Interventions

  • DeviceColor Doppler Ultrasound

    Radiological evaluation was performed by a single radiologist using CDUS for operated side testis of each patient preoperatively and on days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters of the testis were measured, and the testicular volume was calculated automatically using the CDUS device (volume = 0.523 × D1 × D2 × D3, where D1, D2, and D3 were the maximal longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters defined by CDUS) for both testicles in each patient . Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was calculated using the CDUS system (in cm3/s) for both testicles in each patient.

    Also known as: Operated side testis

  • DeviceColor Doppler Ultrasound

    Radiological evaluation was performed by a single radiologist using CDUS for nonoperated side testis of each patient preoperatively and on days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters of the testis were measured, and the testicular volume was calculated automatically using the CDUS device (volume = 0.523 × D1 × D2 × D3, where D1, D2, and D3 were the maximal longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters defined by CDUS) for both testicles in each patient . Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was calculated using the CDUS system (in cm3/s) for both testicles in each patient.

    Also known as: Nonoperated side testis

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of testicular volume

    Radiological evaluation was performed by a single radiologist using CDUS preoperatively and on days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters of the testis were measured, and the testicular volume was calculated automatically using the CDUS device (volume = 0.523 × D1 × D2 × D3, where D1, D2, and D3 were the maximal longitudinal, anteroposterior, and transverse diameters defined by CDUS) for both testicles in each patient

    Time frame: Change of testicular volume from preoperative to postoperative 30 days

  2. Change of blood flow

    Radiological evaluation was performed by a single radiologist using CDUS preoperatively and on days 7 and 30 post-surgery. Peak systolic velocity (PSV) was calculated using the CDUS system (in cm3/s) for both testicles in each patient.

    Time frame: Change of blood flow from preoperative to postoperative 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Apr 2016, a primary completion of Jun 2016 and a completion of Aug 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 5, 2017
First posted
Jan 26, 2017
Start
Apr 2016
Primary completionActual
Jun 2016
CompletionActual
Aug 2016
Last update
Jan 26, 2017
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 26, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03033381
Lead sponsor
Kocatepe University
Responsible party
Ahmet Ali Tuncer (Asst Prof Dr, Kocatepe University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 26, 2017
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Jun 2016
Completion
Aug 2016
Last update
Jan 26, 2017

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion