ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03031561Updated May 15, 2025

Ultrasound Imaging Technique in Detecting Breast Microcalcifications in Patients Undergoing Biopsy for a Breast Abnormality

An interventional study of Ultrasound and MicoPure ultrasound in Breast Carcinoma and Microcalcification, sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University. Completed. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-05-15.

Sponsored by Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Screening

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 4 years 10 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Mar 2012, registered Jan 2017).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This clinical trial studies a new type of ultrasound technique, MicroPure, in detecting breast microcalcifications in patients undergoing biopsy for a breast abnormality. Ultrasound sends sound waves into the body, and the sound waves reflected back are interpreted by the machine into a grayscale image. MicroPure uses a filter that adjusts the brightness and gives color to the ultrasound images, which may allow doctors to better identify microcalcifications. Microcalcifications are tiny deposits of calcium in the breast that cannot be felt but can be detected by imaging. A group of microcalcifications may indicate that cancer is present.

Read the detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate MicroPure relative to grayscale ultrasound imaging for the identification of microcalcifications with mammography as the reference standard.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Evaluate MicroPure compared to grayscale ultrasound imaging and mammography for the characterization of breast abnormalities associated with microcalcifications using biopsy results as the reference standard (sensitivity and specificity will be calculated).

II. Evaluate MicroPure relative to specimen x-ray imaging for the identification of breast microcalcifications with pathology as the reference standard.

III. Estimate the improvements in patient care that may be achievable if MicroPure guided core needle biopsy procedures can replace some surgical excisions for the evaluation of breast abnormalities.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Carcinoma
  • Microcalcification
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University is the lead sponsor of 120 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Of its 23 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 7 (30%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Give written
  • Be scheduled for a sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle or surgical excision for the evaluation of a breast lesion or abnormality containing microcalcifications seen on mammography

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Is clinically unstable, severely ill, or moribund
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Biopsy and archival tissue

A biopsy takes a small piece of tissue to examine. “Archival tissue” is a sample already taken, for example at diagnosis, and kept by the hospital.

Whether a stored sample will do depends on when it was taken, how much there is and what the study needs. Ask whether the study accepts your stored sample or needs a new biopsy.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Screening
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diagnostic (standard ultrasound, MicroPure, biopsy)

    Patients undergo grayscale and MicroPure ultrasound imaging followed by sonographic or stereotactic guided core needle biopsy or surgical resection. Surgical specimens are then x-rayed.

    Device: Ultrasound · Device: MicoPure ultrasound · Procedure: Biopsy of Breast

Interventions

  • DeviceUltrasound

    Undergo standard ultrasound

    Also known as: Ultrasound Imaging, US

  • DeviceMicoPure ultrasound

    Undergo MicoPure ultrasound

  • ProcedureBiopsy of Breast

    Undergo breast biopsy or surgical resection

    Also known as: Breast Biopsy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound

    The number of microcalcifications seen on MicroPure ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard). The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant. A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.

    Time frame: Baseline

  2. Number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound

    The number of microcalcifications seen on grayscale ultrasound will be recorded and compared to x-ray imaging of the area undergoing the biopsy procedure (as the reference standard). The difference in agreement between the two ultrasound modes (relative to mammography) will be assessed using McNemar's test for correlated proportions, where p-values less than 0.05 are considered significant. A dichotomous parameters indicating agreement with mammography with respect to the exact number of microcalcifications (as yes or no) will be calculated and compared.

    Time frame: Baseline

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of microcalcifications determined by pathology findings

    The results of the three imaging methods will be compared to the pathology findings using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System lexicon for the assessment of breast lesions.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 15, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03031561
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 25, 2017
Start date
Mar 1, 2012
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2015
Completion
Mar 10, 2016
Last update
May 15, 2025

Study contacts

Flemming Forsberg, PhD
principal investigator · Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion