CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT03023878Updated Sep 14, 2020Results posted

Safety and Efficacy of Blinatumomab in Adults With Newly Diagnosed High-risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

A Phase 2 interventional study of Blinatumomab and Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in High-risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Amgen. Completed at 24 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-09-14.

Sponsored by Amgen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A phase 2, multicenter, open-label, single arm clinical trial in adults with newly diagnosed aggressive high-risk DLBCL.

Read the detailed description

The safety profile of blinatumomab after frontline rituximab (R)-chemotherapy, consisting of either R-CHOP (14 or 21) (rituximab/cyclophosphamide/doxorubicin/vincristine/prednisone) or R-DA-EPOCH (rituximab and dose adjusted-etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin), or R-CHOEP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide), will be determined. The study will consist of a screening period of up to 14 days, a standard of care (SOC) R-chemotherapy run-in period of approximately 21 weeks, a 12 to 16 week blinatumomab treatment period, a 30-day safety follow-up visit, and a long-term follow-up period that begins after the safety follow-up visit is completed until 1 year from the first dose blinatumomab.

02

Conditions studied

  • High-risk Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma
03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is above the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Amgen is the lead sponsor of 1,015 studies on the registry; 49 are open to participants now.

Of its 245 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 159 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subject has provided informed consent prior to initiation of any study-specific activities/procedures
  • Age ≥ 18 at time of informed consent
  • Subject must have untreated histologically proven high-risk DLBCL defined by atleast one of the following:

    • International Prognostic Index (IPI) for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma 3 to 5 (representing high intermedidate - high ratings),
    • Double-hit or higher or double protein expression
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2.
  • Subject meets the criteria per investigator's institution to receive standard of care (SOC) rituximab-chemotherapy (ie, R-CHOP [14 or 21] or R-DA-EPOCH or R-CHOEP) of 6 cycles. Subjects may be enrolled on study prior to cycle 1 or cycle 2 of SOC R-chemotherapy
  • Adequate organ and bone marrow function determined within 14 days prior to enrollment defined as:

    • Hematological: Absolute neutrophil count ≥1*10\^9/L; Platelet count ≥75*10\^9/L;Hemoglobin ≥8g/dL
    • Renal: Creatinine clearance ≥50mL/min;
    • Hepatic: Aspartate aminotransferase/Alanine aminotransferase \<3*upper limit of normal (ULN); Total bilirubin \<2*ULN (unless Gilbert's Disease or if liver involvement with lymphoma)
  • Subject must have completed 6 cycles of SOC R-chemotherapy and achieved CR, PR or stable disease by PET/CT performed 3 weeks (± 3 days) after cycle 6 of SOC R-chemotherapy. Subjects with progressive disease (PD) are not eligible for treatment with blinatumomab and will end the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically relevant central nervous system (CNS) pathology requiring treatment such as epilepsy, seizure, paresis, aphasia, stroke, severe brain injury, dementia, Parkinson's disease, cerebellar disease, organic brain syndrome, and psychosis
  • Evidence of CNS involvement with DLBCL at disease evaluation obtained prior to starting blinatumomab
  • Current autoimmune disease or history of autoimmune disease with potential of CNS involvement
  • Subject has active infection requiring systemic therapy
  • Prior anti-CD19 therapies
  • Known infection with HIV or chronic infection with hepatitis B virus or hepatitis C virus
  • History of other malignancy within the past 3 years with the following exceptions:

    • Malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for ≥ 3 years before enrollment and felt to be at low risk for recurrence by the treating physician
    • Adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo malignancy without evidence of disease
    • Adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
    • Adequately treated breast ductal carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
    • Prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia without evidence of prostate cancer
    • Adequately treated urothelial papillary non-invasive carcinoma or carcinoma in situ
  • Subject has known hypersensitivity to immunoglobulins or any of the products or components to be administered during dosing.
  • Subject likely to not be available to complete all protocol-required study visits or procedures, and/or to comply with all required study procedures to the best of the subject's and investigator's knowledge.
  • History/evidence of any other clinically significant disorder, condition or disease (with the exception of those outlined above) that, in the opinion of the investigator or Amgen physician, if consulted, would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures or completion.
  • Females who are pregnant or breastfeeding or planning to become pregnant or breastfeed while receiving blinatumomab and for an additional 48 hours after the last treatment dose of blinatumomab.
  • Currently receiving treatment in another investigational device or drug study or less than 30 days since ending treatment on another investigational device or drug study. Other investigational procedures while participating in this study are excluded.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Blinatumomab

    Blinatumomab was administered as a continuous intravenous (IV) infusion. Cycle 1 was 12 weeks (84 days) in duration with step dosing of 9 µg/day for 7 days, 28 µg/day for 7 days, 112 µg/day for 6 weeks, followed by a 4-week treatment free time. An optional 4-week Cycle 2 of blinatumomab was available for participants whose disease did not progress, with step dosing of 9 µg/day for 7 days, 28 µg/day for 7 days, and 112 µg/day for 14 days. There was a safety follow-up for 30 days. And a long-term follow-up of up to 8 months for a maximum of 1 year from first dose of blinatumomab or until participant death.

    Drug: Blinatumomab · Drug: Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy · Drug: Dexamethasone

Interventions

  • DrugBlinatumomab

    Blinatumomab monotherapy was supplied in single-use sterile glass injection vials and administered as an IV infusion.

    Also known as: AMG103, BlinCyto

  • DrugInvestigator's Choice Chemotherapy

    During the run-in period participants received 6 cycles of standard of care rituximab-chemotherapy dosed per investigator's institution standard as follows: * R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine,prednisone) * R-DA-EPOCH (rituximab and dose adjusted-etoposide, prednisone, vincristine, cyclophosphamide, and doxorubicin) or * R-CHOEP (rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone, and etoposide).

  • DrugDexamethasone

    Dexamethasone 20 mg IV: within 1 hour prior to start of treatment in each treatment cycle, and within 1 hour prior to dose-step (increase).

    Also known as: corticosteroid

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Participants With Treatment-Emergent (Blinatumomab) Adverse Events

    Overall incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events occurring during the blinatumomab investigative product (IP) treatment period graded by investigators according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and based on the scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity, assistance may be needed; minimal medical intervention required; Grade 3 = Severe - marked limitation in activity, assistance usually required; medical intervention required, hospitalization is possible; Grade 4 = Life threatening - extreme limitation in activity, assistance required; medical intervention, hospitalization or hospice care probable; Grade 5 = death.

    Time frame: From the start of first infusion of IP to 30 days after the end of last infusion of IP; median (min, max) treatment duration was 56 (16, 84) days

  2. Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Blinatumomab Treatment

    Overall incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events deemed by investigators to be related to blinatumomab treatment. Severity was graded by investigators according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and based on the scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity, assistance may be needed; minimal medical intervention required; Grade 3 = Severe - marked limitation in activity, assistance usually required; medical intervention required, hospitalization is possible; Grade 4 = Life threatening - extreme limitation in activity, assistance required; medical intervention, hospitalization or hospice care probable; Grade 5 = death.

    Time frame: From the start of first infusion of IP to 30 days after the end of last infusion of IP; median (min, max) treatment duration was 56 (16, 84) days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) and Partial Metabolic Response (PMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period

    Tumor response assessment was performed by a central reader according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. Overall objective response rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete metabolic response (CMR) or partial metabolic response (PMR). CMR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with/without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PMR: a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than \[\>\] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline.

    Time frame: Cycle 1: Day 78 (3 weeks following end of Cycle 1 IP treatment) Treatment Period: Either the Cycle 1 timeframe or approximately Day 128 (3 weeks after Cycle 2 ended) for participants who completed Cycle 2

  2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response

    Duration of response was calculated only for responders during cycle 1. For participants who had CR or PR on the PET/CT scan at the end of the run-in period, response was measured from the start of blinatumomab treatment. For participants who had stable disease at the end of the run-in period, duration was calculated from documentation of the first assessment of either PR or CR on blinatumomab. Progression was defined as the first diagnosis of progressive metabolic response/progressive disease based on PET/CT scan per central or investigator review during the treatment period or relapse based on clinical tumor assessment during the long-term follow up period. Response duration was calculated until the start of new anti-tumor treatment (excluding any stem cell transplantation), PD, or death, whichever was the earliest event. Participants who did not have new anti-tumor treatment (excluding stem cell transplantation), PD, or death were censored at the last tumor assessment date.

    Time frame: The median (range) follow-up time was 11.5 (8.2, 14.5) months

  3. Complete Response Rate Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period

    Tumor response assessment was performed by a central reader according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CMR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with/without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology.

    Time frame: Cycle 1: Day 78 (3 weeks following end of Cycle 1 IP treatment) Treatment Period: Either the Cycle 1 timeframe or approximately Day 128 (3 weeks after Cycle 2 ended) for participants who completed Cycle 2

  4. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab

    OS was calculated as the time from the date of first IP infusion until death due to any cause. Participants who are alive at the date that triggers the analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive. Months were calculated as days from the first dose date of blinatumomab to death/censor date, divided by 30.5.

    Time frame: The median (range) follow-up time was 12.0 (10.7, 14.5) months.

  5. Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival (PFS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab

    PFS was calculated as the time from the date of first IP infusion until the date of diagnosis of progression of DLBCL or the date of death, whichever was the earliest. The diagnosis of progression of DLBCL was defined as the first diagnosis of progressive metabolic response/progressive disease based on PET/CT scan per central or investigator review during the treatment period or relapse based on clinical tumor assessment during the long-term follow up period. Participants who were alive and did not have progression were censored at the last evaluable non-missing tumor assessment date prior to the analysis trigger date.

    Time frame: The median (range) follow-up time was 12.0 (8.2, 14.5)

  6. Percentage of Participants Who Had Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

    Percentage of participants who had HSCT during the Long Term Follow-Up Period.

    Time frame: Day 1 up to 14.5 months

  7. Pharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Steady-State Concentrations at Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3 for Cycle 1

    The steady-state serum concentration (Css), summarized as the observed concentrations collected after at least 10 hours after the start of continuous IV infusion. PK blood samples were analyzed in a central lab.

    Time frame: Day 2 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab was started and on Day 9 and Day 16 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab dose was increased in the cycle

  8. Pharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Clearance for Cycle 1

    PK blood samples were analyzed in a central lab.

    Time frame: Day 2 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab was started and on Day 9 and Day 16 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab dose was increased in the cycle

07

Results

Posted Mar 26, 2020

Participant flow

This study was conducted at 12 centers in the European Union (France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom), the United States, and Canada. Of the 54 subjects screened, 47 subjects were enrolled.

Pre-Study Run-In Period
Participant flow — Pre-Study Run-In Period
MilestoneBlinatumomab
Started47
Completed30
Not completed17
Withdrew: Protocol-specified criteria11
Withdrew: Death1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject5
Between Run-In and Treatment Periods
Participant flow — Between Run-In and Treatment Periods
MilestoneBlinatumomab
Started30
Completed28
Not completed2
Withdrew: Protocol-specified criteria2
Treatment Period
Participant flow — Treatment Period
MilestoneBlinatumomab
Started28
Started cycle 128
Started cycle 211
Completed25
Not completed3
Withdrew: Disease progression1
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject1
Withdrew: Adverse event1
Long Term Follow-Up Period
Participant flow — Long Term Follow-Up Period
MilestoneBlinatumomab
Started28
Completed26
Not completed2
Withdrew: Death2

Outcome measures

PrimaryParticipants With Treatment-Emergent (Blinatumomab) Adverse Events

Overall incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events occurring during the blinatumomab investigative product (IP) treatment period graded by investigators according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and based on the scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity, assistance may be needed; minimal medical intervention required; Grade 3 = Severe - marked limitation in activity, assistance usually required; medical intervention required, hospitalization is possible; Grade 4 = Life threatening - extreme limitation in activity, assistance required; medical intervention, hospitalization or hospice care probable; Grade 5 = death.

Time frame:
From the start of first infusion of IP to 30 days after the end of last infusion of IP; median (min, max) treatment duration was 56 (16, 84) days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent (Blinatumomab) Adverse Events
ParticipantsBlinatumomab
TEAE28
TEAE severity grade >=311
TEAE severity grade >=45
Serious TEAE7
TEAE leading to interruption of IP3
Serious TEAE leading to interruption of IP2
TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP2
Serious TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP1
Fatal TEAEs0
PrimaryParticipants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Blinatumomab Treatment

Overall incidence and severity of treatment-emergent adverse events deemed by investigators to be related to blinatumomab treatment. Severity was graded by investigators according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 and based on the scale: Grade 1 = Mild - transient or mild discomfort; Grade 2 = Moderate - mild to moderate limitation in activity, assistance may be needed; minimal medical intervention required; Grade 3 = Severe - marked limitation in activity, assistance usually required; medical intervention required, hospitalization is possible; Grade 4 = Life threatening - extreme limitation in activity, assistance required; medical intervention, hospitalization or hospice care probable; Grade 5 = death.

Time frame:
From the start of first infusion of IP to 30 days after the end of last infusion of IP; median (min, max) treatment duration was 56 (16, 84) days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Related to Blinatumomab Treatment
ParticipantsBlinatumomab
Treatment-related TEAE23
Related TEAE severity grade >=39
Related TEAE severity grade >=43
Related Serious TEAE5
Related TEAE leading to interruption of IP3
Related Serious TEAE leading to interruption of IP2
Related TEAE leading to discontinuation of IP2
Related Serious TEAE leading to discon of IP1
Related and Fatal TEAEs0
SecondaryOverall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) and Partial Metabolic Response (PMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period

Tumor response assessment was performed by a central reader according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. Overall objective response rate (ORR) is the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete metabolic response (CMR) or partial metabolic response (PMR). CMR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with/without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology. PMR: a score 4 (uptake moderately greater than \[\>\] liver) or 5 (uptake markedly \>liver and/or new lesions) with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size on PET 5-PS for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; and reduced residual uptake in bone marrow compared with baseline.

Time frame:
Cycle 1: Day 78 (3 weeks following end of Cycle 1 IP treatment) Treatment Period: Either the Cycle 1 timeframe or approximately Day 128 (3 weeks after Cycle 2 ended) for participants who completed Cycle 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Overall Objective Response Rate (ORR) Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) and Partial Metabolic Response (PMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period
percentage of participantsBlinatumomab
Cycle 189.3 (71.8 to 97.7)
Entire Treatment Period92.9 (76.5 to 99.1)
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response

Duration of response was calculated only for responders during cycle 1. For participants who had CR or PR on the PET/CT scan at the end of the run-in period, response was measured from the start of blinatumomab treatment. For participants who had stable disease at the end of the run-in period, duration was calculated from documentation of the first assessment of either PR or CR on blinatumomab. Progression was defined as the first diagnosis of progressive metabolic response/progressive disease based on PET/CT scan per central or investigator review during the treatment period or relapse based on clinical tumor assessment during the long-term follow up period. Response duration was calculated until the start of new anti-tumor treatment (excluding any stem cell transplantation), PD, or death, whichever was the earliest event. Participants who did not have new anti-tumor treatment (excluding stem cell transplantation), PD, or death were censored at the last tumor assessment date.

Time frame:
The median (range) follow-up time was 11.5 (8.2, 14.5) months
Reported as:
Median · months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of Response
monthsBlinatumomab
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Duration of ResponseNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryComplete Response Rate Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period

Tumor response assessment was performed by a central reader according to modified Lugano classification using PET/CT scan. CMR: a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \</=mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \</=liver) with/without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow; and normal/IHC-negative bone marrow morphology.

Time frame:
Cycle 1: Day 78 (3 weeks following end of Cycle 1 IP treatment) Treatment Period: Either the Cycle 1 timeframe or approximately Day 128 (3 weeks after Cycle 2 ended) for participants who completed Cycle 2
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Complete Response Rate Expressed as the Percentage of Participants Achieving Complete Metabolic Response (CMR) Using Lugano 2014 Criteria During Cycle 1 and During Treatment Period
percentage of participantsBlinatumomab
Cycle 185.7 (67.3 to 96.0)
Entire Treatment Period89.3 (71.8 to 97.7)
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab

OS was calculated as the time from the date of first IP infusion until death due to any cause. Participants who are alive at the date that triggers the analysis were censored at the date last known to be alive. Months were calculated as days from the first dose date of blinatumomab to death/censor date, divided by 30.5.

Time frame:
The median (range) follow-up time was 12.0 (10.7, 14.5) months.
Reported as:
Median · months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab
monthsBlinatumomab
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Overall Survival (OS) From First Dose of BlinatumomabNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryKaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival (PFS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab

PFS was calculated as the time from the date of first IP infusion until the date of diagnosis of progression of DLBCL or the date of death, whichever was the earliest. The diagnosis of progression of DLBCL was defined as the first diagnosis of progressive metabolic response/progressive disease based on PET/CT scan per central or investigator review during the treatment period or relapse based on clinical tumor assessment during the long-term follow up period. Participants who were alive and did not have progression were censored at the last evaluable non-missing tumor assessment date prior to the analysis trigger date.

Time frame:
The median (range) follow-up time was 12.0 (8.2, 14.5)
Reported as:
Median · months
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival (PFS) From First Dose of Blinatumomab
monthsBlinatumomab
Kaplan-Meier Estimates for Progression Free Survival (PFS) From First Dose of BlinatumomabNA (NA to NA)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants Who Had Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)

Percentage of participants who had HSCT during the Long Term Follow-Up Period.

Time frame:
Day 1 up to 14.5 months
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Who Had Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)
percentage of participantsBlinatumomab
Percentage of Participants Who Had Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT)3.6 (0.1 to 18.3)
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Steady-State Concentrations at Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3 for Cycle 1

The steady-state serum concentration (Css), summarized as the observed concentrations collected after at least 10 hours after the start of continuous IV infusion. PK blood samples were analyzed in a central lab.

Time frame:
Day 2 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab was started and on Day 9 and Day 16 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab dose was increased in the cycle
Reported as:
Mean · pg/mL
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Steady-State Concentrations at Week 1, Week 2 and Week 3 for Cycle 1
pg/mLBlinatumomab
Cycle 1 Week 1: 9 mcg/day288 ± 289
Cycle 1 Week 2: 28 mcg/day795 ± 280
Cycle 1 Week 3: 112 mcg/day3160 ± 782
SecondaryPharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Clearance for Cycle 1

PK blood samples were analyzed in a central lab.

Time frame:
Day 2 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab was started and on Day 9 and Day 16 at least 24 hours after blinatumomab dose was increased in the cycle
Reported as:
Mean · L/Hour
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Clearance for Cycle 1
L/HourBlinatumomab
Pharmacokinetics (PK) Results for Blinatumomab: Clearance for Cycle 11.61 ± 0.496

Adverse events

Collected over Mortality is reported for all enrolled participants from enrollment in the Run-in Period to the end of long-term follow-up. Adverse events are reported from the first dose of blinatumomab through 30 days after last dose; median duration of treatment was 56 days. In addition, serious adverse events related to blinatumomab collected during the long-term follow-up period are reported; median time on follow-up was 12 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Blinatumomab3/47 (6.4%)7/28 (25%)26/28 (92.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventBlinatumomab
PyrexiaGeneral disorders2/28
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/28
BacteraemiaInfections and infestations1/28
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/28
SepsisInfections and infestations1/28
AphasiaNervous system disorders1/28
NeurotoxicityNervous system disorders1/28
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 41
Most frequent other events
EventBlinatumomab
PyrexiaGeneral disorders10/28
TremorNervous system disorders10/28
FlushingVascular disorders9/28
FatigueGeneral disorders8/28
CoughRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders8/28
HeadacheNervous system disorders7/28
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders5/28
Cytokine release syndromeImmune system disorders5/28
ArthralgiaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/28
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders5/28

Baseline characteristics

The full analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of blinatumomab.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Blinatumomab
Mean60.2 ± 11.1
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Blinatumomab
< 65 years18
>=65 years10
<75 years25
>=75 years3
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Blinatumomab
Female18
Male10
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Blinatumomab
Hispanic or Latino7
Not Hispanic or Latino21
Unknown or Not Reported0
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Blinatumomab
Asian1
Black and African American2
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
White21
Other4
Disease Stage at Time of Diagnosis
Disease Stage at Time of Diagnosis(Participants)Blinatumomab
Stage I0
Stage IE1
Stage II0
Stage III5
Stage IV22
International Prognostic Index Score at Diagnosis
International Prognostic Index Score at Diagnosis(Participants)Blinatumomab
Score 22
Score 317
Score 47
Score 52
08

Study locations

24 sites
  • Research Site
    Chicago, Illinois 60612, United States
  • Research Site
    Maywood, Illinois 60153, United States
  • Research Site
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Research Site
    Baltimore, Maryland 21201, United States
  • Research Site
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, United States
  • Research Site
    Oklahoma City, Oklahoma 73104, United States
  • Research Site
    Portland, Oregon 97213, United States
  • Research Site
    Greenville, South Carolina 29607, United States
  • Research Site
    Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1Z2, Canada
  • Research Site
    Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario P6B 0A8, Canada
  • Research Site
    Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada
  • Research Site
    Créteil Cedex, 94010, France
  • Research Site
    Paris Cedex 10, 75475, France
  • Research Site
    Dresden, 01307, Germany
  • Research Site
    Ulm, 89081, Germany
  • Research Site
    Sevilla, Andalucía 41013, Spain
  • Research Site
    Salamanca, Castilla León 37007, Spain
  • Research Site
    Barcelona, Cataluña 08003, Spain
  • Research Site
    L Hospitalet De Llobregat, Cataluña 08907, Spain
  • Research Site
    Valencia, Comunidad Valenciana 46026, Spain
  • Research Site
    A coruña, Galicia 15006, Spain
  • Research Site
    Madrid, 28007, Spain
  • Research Site
    Bristol, BS2 8ED, United Kingdom
  • Research Site
    Sheffield, S10 2JF, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Katz DA, Morris JD, Chu MP, David KA, Thieblemont C, Morley NJ, Khan SS, Viardot A, Martin Garcia-Sancho A, Rodriguez-Garcia G, Bastos-Oreiro M, Lee ST, Kormany W, Chen Y, Wong HL, Anderson AA, Katlinskaya Y, Avilion AA, Dai T, Gonzalez-Barca E. Open-label, phase 2 study of blinatumomab after frontline R-chemotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed, high-risk DLBCL. Leuk Lymphoma. 2022 Sep;63(9):2063-2073. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2064981. Epub 2022 May 3. PubMed 35503708 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jun 3, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Sep 12, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap, Icf, Csr

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT03023878
Lead sponsor
Amgen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 18, 2017
Start date
Mar 13, 2017
Primary completion
Apr 4, 2019
Completion
Oct 28, 2019
Results posted
Mar 26, 2020
Last update
Sep 14, 2020

Study contacts

MD
study director · Amgen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion