ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02995551DREAMUpdated Feb 1, 2022

Danish Rct on Exercise Versus Arthroscopic Meniscal Surgery for Young Adults

An interventional study of Arthroscopic meniscal repair or resection and Exercise and education in Tear of Meniscus of Knee, sponsored by University of Southern Denmark. Completed at 7 sites in Denmark. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-02-01.

Sponsored by University of Southern Denmark · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
122
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are two cartilage structures in each knee joint called a meniscus. A torn meniscus can be caused by either a smaller or larger trauma or be a degenerative age-related tear. Arthroscopic meniscal surgery is the most common orthopedic procedure, but no high-quality studies have investigated the efficacy of meniscal surgery for younger patients (i.e. 40 years or younger) in comparison to non-surgical treatments.

The purpose of this study is to determine if a strategy of early arthroscopic meniscal surgery (repair or resection) is superior to a strategy of initial individualized supervised exercise therapy including patient education with the option of later surgery if needed in improving pain, function and quality of life in young patients (18-40 years) with meniscal tears.

The hypothesis is that patients treated with early arthroscopic meniscal surgery will improve more than patients treated with exercise and education.

Read the detailed description

Arthroscopic meniscal surgery is the most common orthopedic procedure. In Denmark, meniscal surgeries have doubled from around 9.000 yearly procedures in 2000 to more than 17.000 in 2011, with the total number of meniscal surgeries exceeding 150.000 in this period. Similar trends have been observed in the US, where more than 700.000 orthopedic procedures are carried out annually. Numerous randomized controlled trials (RCT) have investigated the efficacy of meniscal surgery compared with placebo surgery, in addition to non-surgical treatment and in direct comparison to exercise in middle-aged and older patients.

However, no RCTs have investigated the efficacy of meniscal surgery for younger patients (i.e. 40 years or younger) in comparison to non-surgical treatments. In contrast to middle-aged and older adults with degenerative meniscal tears of unknown origin, most tears in younger adults (18-40 years) are of traumatic origin (i.e. such as a sports related trauma), which highlights the need for a high-quality trial in the younger population.

The aim of this RCT is to investigate if early arthroscopic meniscal surgery (repair or resection) is superior to individualized supervised exercise therapy and education, with the option of later surgery if needed, in improving pain, function and quality of life in young patients (18-40 years) with meniscal tears. The study hypothesis is that patients randomized to surgery will improve significantly more in pain, function and quality of life after 12 months than those randomized to exercise and education.

Patients fulfilling eligibility criteria and willing to participate in the study will be randomized to one of the two groups after the baseline assessment with follow-up after 3, 6 and 12 months (Subsequently, a 24-month follow-up has been added):

  1. Arthroscopic meniscal surgery: Arthroscopic meniscal repair or resection will be conducted at the discretion of the operating surgeon (this cannot be determined before the surgeon has visual confirmation about the exact knee pathology and extend of the meniscal tear by scope).

    After surgery, patients will receive the standard rehabilitation in the postoperative period depending of type of surgery, since this differs for patients who have had resection and repair. A standard folder with exercises will be given to those having a partial meniscectomy to ensure a minimum level of rehabilitation after the surgery across the hospitals.

  2. Exercise therapy and patient education: Patients allocated to exercise therapy and education will participate in a 12-week (2 exercise sessions per week) supervised neuromuscular and strengthening exercise program tailored to 18-40 years old patients with a meniscal tear. Furthermore, they will participate in a patient education program developed through interviews with pilot study participants, from our experiences from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) program for patients with knee and hip pain. Both the exercise and education will take place in a number of private physiotherapy clinics associated with the GLA:D program, specifically trained to supervise and lead the treatment in this study. A similar exercise program and educational program have been shown to be effective in improving pain, function and quality of life in patients with other types of knee injuries and knee pain.

Observational cohort:

Patients fulfilling all eligibility but unwilling to participate in the randomized study and patients 18-40 years of age with a clinical history and symptoms consistent with a meniscal tear that does not fulfill the other criteria are asked to participate in an observational cohort with the same questionnaires as in the RCT, but following usual clinical practice.

02

Conditions studied

  • Tear of Meniscus of Knee

Keywords

  • Menisci, Tibial
  • Knee Injuries
  • Arthroscopy
  • Exercise
  • Young adults
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Humans
03

In context

Knee Injuries

255 studies on the registry are indexed under Knee Injuries; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 122 is above the median of 50 across 165 interventional studies indexed under Knee Injuries.

Browse Knee Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Southern Denmark is the lead sponsor of 335 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults aged 18 to 40 years with knee pain
  • Clinical history and symptoms consistent with meniscal tear and meniscal tear verified on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  • Deemed eligible for meniscal surgery (i.e. repair or resection) by the examining orthopedic surgeon
  • Willing to participate in 12 weeks of supervised exercise twice a week or undergo surgery for the meniscal tear as soon as possible

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous knee surgery on the affected knee
  • Clinical suspicion (acute locking of knee AND/OR extension deficit) of displaced bucket-handle tear confirmed by MRI
  • Fracture of the affected extremity within the previous 12 months
  • Complete rupture of one or more knee ligaments.
  • Participation in supervised systematic exercise for knee problems within the last 3 months prior to recruitment
  • Other reasons for exclusion (Unable to understand Danish, mentally unable to participate, etc.)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Investigator)
Enrollment
122 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Arthroscopy

    Arthroscopic meniscal repair or resection will be conducted at the discretion of the operating surgeon (this cannot be determined before the surgeon has visual confirmation about the exact knee pathology and extend of the meniscal tear by scope).

    Procedure: Arthroscopic meniscal repair or resection

  • Active comparator
    Exercise and Education

    Patients allocated to exercise therapy and education will participate in a 12-week (2 exercise sessions per week) supervised neuromuscular and strengthening exercise program tailored to 18-40 years old patients with a meniscal tear. Furthermore, they will participate in a patient education program developed through interviews with pilot study participants, from our experiences from the Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D) program for patients with knee and hip pain. Both the exercise and education will take place in a number of private physiotherapy clinics associated with the GLA:D program, specifically trained to supervise and lead the treatment in this study.

    Behavioral: Exercise and education

Interventions

  • ProcedureArthroscopic meniscal repair or resection

    Arthroscopic meniscal repair or resection following standard procedures.

  • BehavioralExercise and education

    A 12-week (2 exercise sessions per week) supervised neuromuscular and strengthening exercise program tailored to 18-40 years old patients with a meniscal tear combined with patient education teaching the participants about their disease and how to manage it through exercise and in their daily life.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4)

    The mean score for the KOOS subscales Pain, Symptoms, Function in sports and recreational activities, and Quality of life. All visits (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months) will be included in the analysis. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 12 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. The five KOOS subscales

    To allow for clinical in-depth interpretation, the primary outcome will be complemented by subscale scores from each of the five individual KOOS subscales. All visits (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months) will be included in the analysis. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 12 months.

  2. Western Ontario Meniscal Evaluation Tool (WOMET)

    WOMET is a meniscus specific patient-reported outcome measure that will be used to complement the KOOS score. All visits (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months) will be included in the analysis. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 12 months.

  3. Isometric muscle strength

    Isometric muscle strength will be assessed using the FysioMeter. Assessed at baseline, 3 and 12 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 3 months.

  4. The maximum number of knee-bends in 30s

    The maximum number of knee-bends in 30s is one of three measures of functional performance. All visits (baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months) will be included in the analysis.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 12 months.

  5. The one-leg hop for distance

    The one-leg hop for distance is one of three measures of functional performance. Assessed only at 12 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  6. The 6 m timed hop

    The 6 m timed hop is one of three measures of functional performance. Assessed only at 12 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  7. Adverse events

    Adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) will be recorded at all follow-ups by asking the participants about potential AEs using open-probe questioning to ensure that all AEs are recorded. Furthermore, the medical records from the participating hospitals will be checked at the primary endpoint (12 months) for all AEs occurring from inclusion until the 12 months follow-up. AEs will be categorized into index knee or other sites and will be recorded and assessed for severity independent of whether or not there is a causal relationship with study treatments. Assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  8. Structural knee joint changes

    Structural knee joint changes from baseline to 24 months will be assessed using the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS).

    Time frame: Baseline to 24 months

Other outcomes

  1. EQ-5D

    General health will be assessed using the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (5-level version), both the descriptive index and the EQ-VAS. This will also allow for a later cost-effectiveness analysis. Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: Change from baseline to 12 months.

  2. Questions on function with Short Message Service (SMS)

    The subscale Sport/Rec from the KOOS

    Time frame: Each week during the first 3 months and after that each month until the 12 months follow-up

  3. Questions on pain with Short Message Service (SMS)

    Pain intensity going up/down stairs and pain intensity during sitting/lying on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Time frame: Each week during the first 3 months and after that each month until the 12 months follow-up

  4. Physical activity level

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months. Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

  5. Participation in sports (Tegner activity scale)

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months. Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

  6. Global Perceived Effect (GPE)

    Answered on 7-point Likert scale. Assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  7. Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS)

    "When you think of your knee function, will you consider your current condition as satisfying? By knee function, you should take into account your activities of daily living, sport and recreational activities, your pain and other symptoms and your quality of life". Answered by "yes" or "no". Assessed at 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  8. Patient-reported treatment failure.

    Only answered by patients answering "no" to PASS. "Would you consider your current state as being so unsatisfactory that you consider the treatment to have failed?". Answered by "yes" or "no".

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

  9. Patient-reported mechanical symptoms related to the knee

    Patient-reported mechanical symptoms, i.e. catching and locking of the knee. Presence and frequency answered on 5-point scale.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months.

  10. Knee instability

    Patient-reported knee instability. Presence and frequency of knee instability answered on a 6-point scale and how much it affects activity level answered on a 6-point scale.

    Time frame: Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months. Will also be assessed after 24 months.

  11. Compliance with exercise (only for patients in the exercise group)

    The number of exercise sessions that the patient participate in out of the total 24 supervised sessions.

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 months

  12. Patient-reported participation in post-surgery exercise (only for patients in the surgery group)

    Supervised or unsupervised and number of sessions.

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 months

  13. Surgery and other treatments during follow-up

    Assessed at baseline, 3, 6 and 12 months by self-report and review of medical journals (surgery only). Other knee surgery will also be assessed at 24 months.

    Time frame: Primary endpoint: 12 months.

  14. Pain intensity on a 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)

    Before and after each of the 24 supervised exercise sessions the patients will report their pain intensity. Only the patients in the group randomized to exercise and education.

    Time frame: Assessed at 3 months

  15. Expanded version of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears questionnaire

    Information about location of tear, type of tear and type of treatment (repair or resection) will be collected using an expanded version of the International Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS) classification of meniscal tears questionnaire by the operating surgeon. This will be supplemented with data from surgery reports.

    Time frame: Day 1 after surgery

07

Study locations

7 sites
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Aalborg University Hospital
    Aalborg, Denmark
  • Department of Sports Traumatology, Aarhus University Hospital
    Aarhus, Denmark
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre
    Copenhagen, Denmark
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Lillebælt Hospital in Kolding
    Kolding, Denmark
  • Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Næstved Hospital
    Næstved, Denmark
  • Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Odense University Hospital
    Odense, Denmark
  • Elective Surgery Centre, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
    Silkeborg, Denmark
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Skou ST, Holmich P, Lind M, Jensen HP, Jensen C, Garval M, Thorlund JB. Early Surgery or Exercise and Education for Meniscal Tears in Young Adults. NEJM Evid. 2022 Feb;1(2):EVIDoa2100038. doi: 10.1056/EVIDoa2100038. Epub 2022 Jan 25. PubMed 38319181 ↗
  • Clausen SH, Skou ST, Boesen MP, Radev DI, Kurt EY, Damsted C, Holmich P, Lind M, Torring S, Isaksen C, Varnum C, Englund M, Thorlund JB. Two-year MRI-defined structural damage and patient-reported outcomes following surgery or exercise for meniscal tears in young adults. Br J Sports Med. 2023 Nov 30;57(24):1566-1572. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107352. PubMed 37879858 ↗
  • Damsted C, Thorlund JB, Holmich P, Lind M, Varnum C, Villumsen MD, Hansen MS, Skou ST. Effect of exercise therapy versus surgery on mechanical symptoms in young patients with a meniscal tear: a secondary analysis of the DREAM trial. Br J Sports Med. 2023 May;57(9):521-527. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2022-106207. Epub 2023 Mar 6. PubMed 36878666 ↗
  • Skou ST, Lind M, Holmich P, Jensen HP, Jensen C, Afzal M, Jorgensen U, Thorlund JB. Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of meniscal surgery compared with exercise and patient education for treatment of meniscal tears in young adults. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 21;7(8):e017436. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017436. PubMed 28827270 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2017 to primary completion in Feb 2021, 49 months.

Of 90 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Knee Injuries, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 51. This study's 49 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 94 studies reached it within 20 months; a quarter within 8 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Dec 8, 2016
First posted
Dec 16, 2016
StartActual
Jan 2017
Primary completionActual
Feb 2021
CompletionActual
Feb 2022
Last update
Feb 1, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02995551
Collaborators
Aarhus University Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hvidovre, Aalborg University Hospital, Sygehus Lillebaelt, Naestved Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Slagelse Hospital, Danish Council for Independent Research, IMK Almene Fond, Lundbeck Foundation, The Danish Rheumatism Association, Spar Nord Foundation, Association of Danish Physiotherapists, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg
Responsible party
Søren Thorgaard Skou (PT, PhD, Professor, University of Southern Denmark) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 16, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Feb 2021
Completion
Feb 2022
Last update
Feb 1, 2022

Study contacts

Søren T. Skou, PT, PhD
principal investigator · University of Southern Denmark and Næstved-Slagelse-Ringsted Hospitals
Jonas B Thorlund, MSc, PhD
study chair · University of Southern Denmark
Martin Lind, Prof, MD, PhD, DMSc
study chair · Aarhus University Hospital
Per Hölmich, Prof, MD, DMSc
study chair · Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager-Hvidovre
Hans P Jensen, MD
study chair · Aalborg University Hospital
Carsten Jensen, MSc, PhD
study chair · Lillebælt Hospital in Kolding
Muhammad Afzal, MD
study chair · Naestved Hospital
Uffe Jørgensen, Prof, MD, DMSc
study chair · Odense University Hospital
Mogens Strange Hansen, MD, PhD
study chair · Elective Surgery Centre, Regionshospitalet Silkeborg

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion