An interventional study of Point of care ocular ultrasound in Papilledema Associated With Increased Intracranial Pressure, sponsored by michal roll. Status unknown. Open to participants aged Up to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-12-14.
Sponsored by michal roll · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Pediatric emergency department (PED) physicians frequently encounter children with symptoms that warrant evaluation of the optic disc for suspected increased intracranial pressure (ICP) such as headache, blurred vision, recurrent vomiting etc. Fundoscopic examination, by the PED physician, is considered an essential modality for assessment of the optic disc and the diagnosis of papilledema. Obtaining good visualization of the optic disc requires patient compliance, the ability to open the eyelids, the absence of opacities in the ocular media and a sufficiently large pupillary aperture. Hence, different levels of PED physician training, lack of cooperation, significant ocular or periorbital trauma, contraindications to mydriasis and severe photophobia may hinder direct fundoscopic evaluation.
In the investigators' PED, children requiring fundoscopy are sent to a formal ophthalmologic examination. The investigators aim to evaluate the yield of optic disc height as measured with ocular point of care ultrasound to detect optic disc swelling in comparison to ophthalmologic examination as the gold standard.
185 studies on the registry are indexed under Intracranial Hypertension; 45 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 50 across 95 interventional studies indexed under Intracranial Hypertension.
Browse Intracranial Hypertension studies →michal roll is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
The yield of ocular POCUS in diagnosing optic disc swelling in comparison to ophthalmology evaluation as the gold standard.
Time frame: Up to 24h from inclusion or until hospital discharge if admitted
No study locations are listed for this record.
This study is status unknown, as verified in Dec 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
michal roll