ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02991703EPIPOPUpdated Sep 14, 2026

Simplified Pulse Wave Velocity Measurement, Validation Study of the pOpmètre in Children

An interventional study of pOpmètre® and Sphygmocor in Cardiovascular Diseases, Arteriosclerosis and Atherosclerosis, sponsored by Nantes University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 8 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Primary conditionAtherosclerosisRegistry: Cardiovascular DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Cardiovascular Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Atherosclerosis
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Atherosclerosis, a narrower term within Cardiovascular Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Nantes University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
4 Years to 8 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Arterial stiffness is an important marker of cardiovascular risk. It is measured by pulse wave velocity. The reference device to measure pulse wave velocity is the Sphygmocor which uses applanation tonometry. It is used in adults and children. An easier method called pOpmètre using saturation sensors is validated in adults but not in children. The objective of this study is to compare the pulse wave velocity values measured with the pOpmètre® with those of the SphygmoCor® to validate the pOpmètre in children between 4 and 8 years old.

Read the detailed description

Prematurity is associated with an increased risk of developing cardio-vascular diseases in adulthood : a low birth weight linked to prematurity is correlated to a higher coronary disease mortality rate, a higher blood pressure level in adulthood, to abnormal glucose metabolism regulation, and to signs of nephron reduction. An independent marker of cardiovascular risk is arterial stiffness: it is associated with a higher risk of major cardiovascular events including stroke, acute coronary syndrome and complications of end-stage renal disease. It is measured by pulse wave velocity which is the gold standard in adulthood. Pulse wave velocity is also correlated to cardiovascular risk in childhood. National cohort EPIPAGE II is made of 4290 premature babies born in 2011. A study is scheduled at 5 years old and a half including a medical examination and a neuropsychological evaluation. An ancillary study lengthening medical consultation for 15 minutes is scheduled with 750 to 1000 of these children for a more precise vascular evaluation including pulse wave velocity. Different methods can be used to measure pulse wave velocity in children: these include applanation tonometry devices such as the SphygmoCor ® system. Its reference values are well known in adulthood and were determined more recently in childhood. It is the reference device but it is expensive, can be used only in expert health centres and time of measurement is long. In children, an easier-to-use and faster device would be more advantageous. The pOpmètre® uses 2 distal oxygen saturation sensors on finger and toe to deduce pulse wave velocity. This device has already been validated in adults. The aim of this study is to validate the pOpmètre in children between 4 and 8 years old. In that purpose, patients are installed in the supine position, at rest. The child's mensurations are measured. The two pOpmètre sensors are put on finger and toe. Blood pressure is measured by an armband on the right limb. Then another armband is put around the thigh and a tonometer is applied on the right carotid which allows pulse wave velocity measuring by the Sphygmocor. Pulse wave velocity is measured with the pOpmètre using the time delay between finger pulse signal and toe pulse signal. The values got with the two devices are compared using a Bland and Altman graph. The pOpmètre is considered to be validated if the 95% confidence interval of the bias is included between -0.5 m/sec and 0.5 m/sec that is about 10% of the normal value at that age (5.0 m/s +/-0.13).

02

Conditions studied

  • Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Arteriosclerosis
  • Atherosclerosis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Arterial stiffness
  • pulse wave velocity
  • Sphygmocor
  • applanation tonometry
  • pOpmètre
  • children
  • EPIPAGE cohort
03

In context

Atherosclerosis Reclassified

1,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Atherosclerosis; 224 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 100 across 879 interventional studies indexed under Atherosclerosis.

Browse Atherosclerosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Nantes University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 839 studies on the registry; 195 are open to participants now.

Compared within Atherosclerosis, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Cardiovascular Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 8 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • children between 4 and 8 years old hospitalized in the Mother and Children Hospital in Nantes during the study period.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Vasoconstrictor treatment,
  • compressive bandage on the measured area,
  • peripheral venous access on the measured side,
  • vascular surgery or pathology on the measured area,
  • significant pain or agitation,
  • parental or legal representative disapproval,
  • child disapproval.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    SphygmoCor®

    Device: Sphygmocor

  • Experimental
    pOpmètre®

    Device: pOpmètre®

Interventions

  • DevicepOpmètre®

    the pOpmètre® uses saturation sensors,

  • DeviceSphygmocor

    the Sphygmocor uses applanation tonometry

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference between the two simultaneous measurements of velocity of the pulse wave by the pOpmeter® and the Sphygmocor®.

    Time frame: Day One

07

Study locations

1 site
  • CHU de Nantes
    Nantes, 44093, France
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Willum-Hansen T, Staessen JA, Torp-Pedersen C, Rasmussen S, Thijs L, Ibsen H, Jeppesen J. Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population. Circulation. 2006 Feb 7;113(5):664-70. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.579342. PubMed 16461839 ↗
  • Urbina EM, Williams RV, Alpert BS, Collins RT, Daniels SR, Hayman L, Jacobson M, Mahoney L, Mietus-Snyder M, Rocchini A, Steinberger J, McCrindle B; American Heart Association Atherosclerosis, Hypertension, and Obesity in Youth Committee of the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young. Noninvasive assessment of subclinical atherosclerosis in children and adolescents: recommendations for standard assessment for clinical research: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension. 2009 Nov;54(5):919-50. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.109.192639. Epub 2009 Sep 3. PubMed 19729599 ↗
  • Ancel PY, Goffinet F; EPIPAGE 2 Writing Group. EPIPAGE 2: a preterm birth cohort in France in 2011. BMC Pediatr. 2014 Apr 9;14:97. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-97. PubMed 24716860 ↗
  • Reference Values for Arterial Stiffness' Collaboration. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: 'establishing normal and reference values'. Eur Heart J. 2010 Oct;31(19):2338-50. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq165. Epub 2010 Jun 7. PubMed 20530030 ↗
  • Reusz GS, Cseprekal O, Temmar M, Kis E, Cherif AB, Thaleb A, Fekete A, Szabo AJ, Benetos A, Salvi P. Reference values of pulse wave velocity in healthy children and teenagers. Hypertension. 2010 Aug;56(2):217-24. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.110.152686. Epub 2010 Jun 21. PubMed 20566959 ↗
  • Curcio S, Garcia-Espinosa V, Arana M, Farro I, Chiesa P, Giachetto G, Zocalo Y, Bia D. Growing-Related Changes in Arterial Properties of Healthy Children, Adolescents, and Young Adults Nonexposed to Cardiovascular Risk Factors: Analysis of Gender-Related Differences. Int J Hypertens. 2016;2016:4982676. doi: 10.1155/2016/4982676. Epub 2016 Feb 18. PubMed 26989504 ↗
  • Alivon M, Vo-Duc Phuong T, Vignon V, Bozec E, Khettab H, Hanon O, Briet M, Halimi JM, Hallab M, Plichart M, Mohammedi K, Marre M, Boutouyrie P, Laurent S. A novel device for measuring arterial stiffness using finger-toe pulse wave velocity: Validation study of the pOpmetre(R). Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2015 Apr;108(4):227-34. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2014.12.003. Epub 2015 Feb 11. PubMed 25682547 ↗
  • Bichali S, Bruel A, Boivin M, Roussey G, Romefort B, Roze JC, Allain-Launay E. Simplified pulse wave velocity measurement in children: Is the pOpmetre valid? PLoS One. 2020 Mar 27;15(3):e0230817. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230817. eCollection 2020. PubMed 32218581 ↗

Related links

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02991703
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Dec 13, 2016
Start date
Dec 14, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 6, 2017
Completion
Jul 6, 2017
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion