ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02970799Updated Oct 19, 2021Results posted

Tear Production by Nasal Neurostimulation Compared to Active Control

An interventional study of Intranasal Neurostimulator in Dry Eye, Dry Eye Syndromes and Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, sponsored by Oculeve, Inc.. Completed. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-10-19.

Primary conditionKeratoconjunctivitis SiccaRegistry: Dry Eye SyndromesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Dry Eye Syndromes — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, a narrower term within Dry Eye Syndromes.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Oculeve, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
27
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This crossover design study evaluates the effectiveness of the Oculeve Intranasal Neurostimulator comparing the effect of intranasal (active) versus extranasal (control) stimulation on tear production as measured by the Jones Schirmer test in participants with dry eye disease.

Read the detailed description

In this randomized, controlled study, participants will receive two applications of approximately a three-minute duration, one intranasal (active) and one extranasal (control), in randomized sequence at Visit 2 (Day 1). At Visits 3 (Day 15) and 4 (Day 29), participants will undergo two applications of approximately an eight-minute duration, one intranasal (active) and one extranasal (control), in randomized sequence. The Schirmer test is a clinically relevant and accepted measure to assess tear production over a specified time interval, generally five minutes. Tear meniscus height (TMH) and, to a lesser extent, tear meniscus area (TMA) have been reported as measures of tear quantity and/or production and have been used to diagnose dry eye disease (DED). One reliable means of measuring TMH and TMA is via use of optical coherence tomography (OCT), an established medical imaging technique that uses light to capture micrometer-resolution images from within optical scattering media such as biological tissue. Due to the non-invasive nature of the technique, this study was designed to explore the utility of TMH and TMA captured by OCT as a means of evaluating stimulated tear production following use of the study device.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye
  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dry Eye Disease
03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca Reclassified

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 27 is below the median of 82 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca studies →

Lead sponsor

Oculeve, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Dry Eye Syndromes. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Mild to severe dry eye disease
  • Have not worn contact lenses for at least seven days prior to the Screening Visit and willing to forego the use of contact lenses for the duration of the study
  • Literate, able to speak English or Spanish, and able to complete questionnaires independently

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previously used the Intranasal Neurostimulator at any time
  • Used commercial lid hygiene product within 14 days of the Screening Visit or plan to use at any time during the study
  • Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may lead to the risk of increased bleeding
  • Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma to these areas
  • Severe nasal airway obstruction (e.g. severe septal deviation or inferior turbinate hypertrophy) or vascularized polyp as confirmed by nasal endoscopic examination at the Screening Visit
  • Have an implanted metallic or other electronic device in the head, a cardiac demand pacemaker, or an implanted defibrillator
  • Participation in any clinical trial with a new active substance or a new device within 30 days of the Screening Visit
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Crossover assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
27 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intranasal then Extranasal Application

    Intranasal Neurostimulator applied intranasally (active) followed by extranasal application on Day 1. Participants were randomized to determine the intranasal and extranasal sequence for Days 15 and 29.

    Device: Intranasal Neurostimulator

  • Experimental
    Extranasal then Intranasal Application

    Intranasal Neurostimulator applied extranasally (control) followed by intranasal application on Day 1. Participants were randomized to determine the intranasal and extranasal sequence at Days 15 and 29.

    Device: Intranasal Neurostimulator

Interventions

  • DeviceIntranasal Neurostimulator

    The device delivers small electrical currents, activating nerves that stimulate the body's natural tear production system.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Acute Tear Production by Jones Schirmer Test

    Time frame: Day 1

Other outcomes

  1. Tear Meniscus Height

    Time frame: Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

  2. Tear Meniscus Area

    Time frame: Pre and Post Application Days 15 and 29

  3. Number of Secreting Meibomian Glands

    Time frame: Day 1

  4. Tear Film Lipid Layer Thickness by Tearscope

    Time frame: Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

  5. Lower Lid Margin Temperature

    Time frame: Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

  6. Tear Film Temperature

    Time frame: Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

  7. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Time frame: Up to 41 days

07

Results

Posted Oct 19, 2021
Limitations and caveats
During transfer and acquisition of study record by sponsors, no study data has been located and all efforts to locate study data have been exhausted. Therefore, no study data is available to report at this time.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneIntranasal Then Extranasal ApplicationExtranasal Then Intranasal Application
Started00
Completed00
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryAcute Tear Production by Jones Schirmer Test
Time frame:
Day 1

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedTear Meniscus Height
Time frame:
Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedTear Meniscus Area
Time frame:
Pre and Post Application Days 15 and 29

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Secreting Meibomian Glands
Time frame:
Day 1

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedTear Film Lipid Layer Thickness by Tearscope
Time frame:
Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedLower Lid Margin Temperature
Time frame:
Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedTear Film Temperature
Time frame:
Pre and Post Application on Days 15 and 29

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Other pre-specifiedNumber of Participants With Adverse Events
Time frame:
Up to 41 days

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

Adverse events

Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Intranasal Application———
Extranasal Application———

Baseline characteristics

During transfer and acquisition of study record by sponsors, no study data has been located and all efforts to locate study data have been exhausted. Therefore, no study data is available to report at this time.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Intranasal Then Extranasal ApplicationExtranasal Then Intranasal ApplicationTotal
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(participants)Intranasal Then Extranasal ApplicationExtranasal Then Intranasal ApplicationTotal
Female———
Male———
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 19, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02970799
Lead sponsor
Oculeve, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 22, 2016
Start date
Aug 31, 2016
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2016
Completion
Oct 31, 2016
Results posted
Oct 19, 2021
Last update
Oct 19, 2021

Study contacts

Gail Torkildsen, MD
principal investigator · Andover Eye Associates

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion