CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02526290Updated Oct 31, 2017Results posted

Six Month Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of the Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator

An interventional study of Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator (Oculeve) in Dry Eye Syndromes and Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, sponsored by Oculeve, Inc.. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 22 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-10-31.

Sponsored by Oculeve, Inc. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
22 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

In this study, the safety and effectiveness of the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator after 180 days of use in participants with aqueous tear deficiency will be evaluated.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, open-label clinical trial in which participants will use the Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator to stimulate tear production for 180 days. Participants will have a Screening Visit within 60 days prior to the initial device application. Device application will be initiated at Day 0, at which time participants will receive training on the proper use of the device. Participants will receive follow-up visits at Days 7, 30, 90 and 180.

02

Conditions studied

  • Dry Eye Syndromes
  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
03

In context

Dry Eye Syndromes

1,292 studies on the registry are indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes; 192 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 60 across 1,077 interventional studies indexed under Dry Eye Syndromes.

Browse Dry Eye Syndromes studies →

Lead sponsor

Oculeve, Inc. is the lead sponsor of 7 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
22 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects with moderate to severe dry eye disease
  • Literate, able to speak English or Spanish, and able to complete questionnaires independently
  • Willing to sign the informed consent and deemed capable of complying with the requirements of the study protocol

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic or recurrent epistaxis, coagulation disorders or other conditions that, in the opinion of the investigator, may lead to clinically significant increased bleeding
  • Nasal or sinus surgery (including history of application of nasal cautery) or significant trauma
  • Cardiac demand pacemaker, implanted defibrillator or other implanted electronic device
  • Diagnosis of epilepsy
  • Corneal transplant in either or both eyes
  • Participation in any clinical trial with a new active substance or a new device within 30 days of the Screening Visit
  • Women who are pregnant, planning a pregnancy, or nursing at the Screening Visit
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Active - Device

    The Oculeve Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator will be administered two to ten times per day for up to three minutes per administration.

    Device: Intranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator (Oculeve)

Interventions

  • DeviceIntranasal Lacrimal Neurostimulator (Oculeve)

    Neurostimulation device

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Stimulated Acute Tear Production

    Stimulated acute tear production in the study eye at Day 180 as measured by the difference between the Schirmer test score during stimulation and the test score before stimulation (basal). The Schirmer strip is placed just under the eyelid and wicks up the tears. It measures tear production on a linear scale of 0-35 mm.

    Time frame: The stimulated and prestimulation (basal) measures were both performed at Day 180.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Corrected Distance Visual Acuity

    Change from baseline (Day 0) in corrected distance visual acuity at Day 180. Corrected visual acuity was obtained using the subject's own glasses (for subjects that wear glasses) and measured in logMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) units using an appropriate eye chart. A logMAR score of 0.0 is equivalent to a visual acuity of 20/20 and larger logMAR values indicate a poorer visual acuity (eg. A value of 0.3 corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/40).

    Time frame: Baseline and 6 months

  2. Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy

    Number of subjects with clinically significant (CS) findings noted from the slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations. A slit lamp biomicroscopy examination of the eyelids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, and lens was performed at each visit for each eye. The results were graded as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), or abnormal CS. In addition, the cornea was scored specifically for corneal edema using a 4-point scale (0=None, +1=Mild, +2=Moderate and +3=Severe). An increase in corneal edema grade of two or more was considered clinically significant and evaluated as a potential AE by the investigator.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Device-related Adverse Events

    Number of subjects who experienced any device-related adverse events.

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Results

Posted Oct 31, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneActive - Device
Started97
Completed89
Not completed8
Withdrew: Adverse event3
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject4
Withdrew: Physician decision1

Outcome measures

PrimaryStimulated Acute Tear Production

Stimulated acute tear production in the study eye at Day 180 as measured by the difference between the Schirmer test score during stimulation and the test score before stimulation (basal). The Schirmer strip is placed just under the eyelid and wicks up the tears. It measures tear production on a linear scale of 0-35 mm.

Time frame:
The stimulated and prestimulation (basal) measures were both performed at Day 180.
Reported as:
Mean · Scores on a scale
Stimulated Acute Tear Production
Scores on a scaleActive - Device
Stimulated Schirmer Test17.28 ± 11.948
Unstimulated Schirmer Test7.92 ± 6.386
SecondaryCorrected Distance Visual Acuity

Change from baseline (Day 0) in corrected distance visual acuity at Day 180. Corrected visual acuity was obtained using the subject's own glasses (for subjects that wear glasses) and measured in logMAR (log of the Minimum Angle of Resolution) units using an appropriate eye chart. A logMAR score of 0.0 is equivalent to a visual acuity of 20/20 and larger logMAR values indicate a poorer visual acuity (eg. A value of 0.3 corresponds to a visual acuity of 20/40).

Time frame:
Baseline and 6 months
Reported as:
Mean · LogMAR
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity
LogMARActive - Device
Right Eye-0.028 ± 0.0905
Left Eye-0.033 ± 0.0809
SecondarySlit Lamp Biomicroscopy

Number of subjects with clinically significant (CS) findings noted from the slit lamp biomicroscopy examinations. A slit lamp biomicroscopy examination of the eyelids, cornea, conjunctiva, anterior chamber, and lens was performed at each visit for each eye. The results were graded as normal, abnormal not clinically significant (NCS), or abnormal CS. In addition, the cornea was scored specifically for corneal edema using a 4-point scale (0=None, +1=Mild, +2=Moderate and +3=Severe). An increase in corneal edema grade of two or more was considered clinically significant and evaluated as a potential AE by the investigator.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy
participantsActive - Device
Slit Lamp Biomicroscopy0
Other pre-specifiedDevice-related Adverse Events

Number of subjects who experienced any device-related adverse events.

Time frame:
6 months
Reported as:
Number · participants
Device-related Adverse Events
participantsActive - Device
Serious device-related AEs0
Non-serious device-related AEs36

Adverse events

Collected over 6 months. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Active - Device—8/97 (8.2%)40/97 (41.2%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventActive - Device
Prostate cancerNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/97
Chronic lymphocytic leukemiaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/97
Lung adenocarcinomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/97
Manic episode secondary to medication non-compliance for bipolar disorderPsychiatric disorders1/97
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/97
Pulmonary embolismRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/97
Shortness of breath (asthma)Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders1/97
Left-sided lower back pain with left-sided sciaticaMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/97
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventActive - Device
Cold/flu symptomsInfections and infestations18/97
Nasal pain or discomfortRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders11/97
NosebleedRespiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders6/97
Transient electrical discomfortProduct Issues5/97

Baseline characteristics

Age, Customized
Age, Customized(participants)Active - Device
< 50 years15
50 to <60 years25
60 to <70 years40
≥70 years17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Active - Device
Female77
Male20
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Cornea & Cataract Consultants of Arizona
    Phoenix, Arizona 85032, United States
  • Andover Eye Associates
    Andover, Massachusetts 01810, United States
  • Total Eye Care
    Memphis, Tennessee 38119, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Sheppard JD, Torkildsen GL, Geffin JA, Dao J, Evans DG, Ousler GW, Wilson J, Baba SN, Senchyna M, Holland EJ. Characterization of tear production in subjects with dry eye disease during intranasal tear neurostimulation: Results from two pivotal clinical trials. Ocul Surf. 2019 Jan;17(1):142-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 22. PubMed 30472141 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 31, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02526290
Lead sponsor
Oculeve, Inc.
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Aug 18, 2015
Start date
Aug 31, 2015
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2016
Completion
Apr 30, 2016
Results posted
Oct 31, 2017
Last update
Oct 31, 2017

Study contacts

Edward Holland, MD
study director · Cincinnati Eye Institute

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion