CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02970591CARIBSUpdated Oct 27, 2022

A Comparison of Three Different Treatment Options for Irritable Bowel Syndrome

An interventional study of Traditional dietary advice and low FODMAP content and Low carbohydrate diet in Irritable Bowel Syndrome, sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Completed at 1 site in Sweden. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-27.

Sponsored by Sahlgrenska University Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
300
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Irritable Bowel Syndrome is a common disease to which there is no curable treatment. Diet is considered to trigger symptoms associated with the clinical picture of IBS, and dietary treatment is thus believed to relieve the symptoms of IBS. As the disease is very heterogeneous in its manifestation, different treatment options might be indicated depending on the predominant symptom. To investigate the response to different dietary treatment options, a randomized controlled intervention trial will be carried out in adult patients (>18 y) with IBS according to Rome IV criteria. The aim of this study is to compare the response to two different dietary treatments or optimized medical treatment.

Read the detailed description

The study is a randomized controlled trial comparing three different treatments during four weeks:

  1. Combination of low FODMAP diet + traditional dietary advice (based on NICE recommendations)

    • Eat at regular hours; 3 main meals and 3 snacks
    • Eat in peace, chew the food properly
    • Peel all fruits and vegetables
    • Limit intake of spicy and fatty foods, coffe, alcohol, avoid fizzy drinks and chewing gum
    • Choose soluble rather than insoluble fibres
    • Avoid foods high in FODMAPs
  2. Diet low in carbohydrates

    • 10 E% carbohydrates, 23 E% protein, 67 E% fat
    • Larger amounts of fish, shellfish, meat, egg, dairy products (lactose free if wanted) nuts, seeds, oil, vegetables
    • No sugary or starchy foods, e.g pasta, potatoes, bread, rice, most fruits
    • No specific consideration about FODMAP content
  3. Optimized pharmacological tretament based on predominant symptom and previous experience with pharmacological treatmment.

Pain/discomfort:

  • Pain: Amitriptyline 25 mg. Increase to 50 mg if needed
  • Episodic pain: Hyoscyamine 0,2mg 2x2; adjust dose if needed
  • Pain with diarrhea: Amitriptyline 25 mg. Increase dose if needed
  • Pain with constipation: Linaclotide 290 microgram 1x1

Constipation:

  • Bulking agent (Sterculia gum (Inolaxol) 1x1. Increase to 1x3 if needed
  • Osmotic laxative (Macrogol (Movicol) 1x1
  • Linaclotide 290 microgram 1x1 Diarrhea
  • Loperamide 1x2 . Adjust dose if needed
  • Cholestyramine 1x1. Increase ever 3-5 d as needed
  • Ondansetron 4mg 1x1. Increase to 1x2-3 if needed
  • Eluxadoline 100mg 1x2

Primary endpoint: IBS-SSS reduction >50 points

02

Conditions studied

  • Irritable Bowel Syndrome

Keywords

  • FODMAPS
  • carbohydrates
  • metabolomics
  • microbiota
03

In context

Irritable Bowel Syndrome

1,062 studies on the registry are indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 300 is above the median of 71 across 853 interventional studies indexed under Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

Browse Irritable Bowel Syndrome studies →

Lead sponsor

Sahlgrenska University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 259 studies on the registry; 68 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • IBS according to ROME IV criteria, BMI 18-35, ability to communicate in Swedish, Gothenburg region resident

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Heart, liver, neurologic or psychiatric disease or illness
  • Serious gastrointestinal diseases
  • Celiac disease
  • Diabetes
  • Other conditions or surgery that affects the gastrointestinal function
  • Hyperlipidemia
  • Food allergy or intolerance other than lactose
  • Adherence to a specific diet
  • Being pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Previously been treated with any of the intervention arms, including having tested all of the pharmacological treatment options of relevance for the symptom profile of the patient
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
300 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Diet A

    Low carbohydrate diet

    Other: Traditional dietary advice and low FODMAP content

  • Active comparator
    Medical treatment

    Optimized Medical treatment

    Other: Optimized Medical treatment

  • Experimental
    Diet B

    Traditional dietary advice and low FODMAP content

    Other: Low carbohydrate diet

Interventions

  • OtherTraditional dietary advice and low FODMAP content

    Traditional dietary advice according to the Brittish Dietetic Association including reducing the intake of fermentable carbohydrates.

  • OtherLow carbohydrate diet

    Diet that contains a maximum of 10 energy percent of carbohydrates, 23 energy % proteins and 67 energy % fat.

  • OtherOptimized Medical treatment

    Standard consultation by physician and if needed patients will receive medical treatment based on the most prominent symptom. Constipation: osmotic laxatives, linaclotide. Diarrhea: loperamid, bile acid binders. Pain: anti depressent, antispasmodics, linaclotide.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The proportion (%) of patients who respond to treatment

    A responder is defined as having an IBS-SSS reduction \>50 points @ 4 weeks

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in symptom severity

    Absolute and percentage change in IBS-SSS

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months

  2. Determinants for GI symptoms by IBS-SSS

    GI symptoms measured by IBS-SSS

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months

  3. Determinants for GI symptoms by GSRS-IBS

    GI symptoms measured by GSRS-IBS

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months

  4. Predictors of response to treatment

    Potential predictors include demographics, questionnaire data, microbiota, metabolites, immunology

    Time frame: Baseline to 4 weeks

  5. Adherence to allocated intervention

    Including compliance to dietary intervention during 4 weeks, and long-term adherence during follow-up

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months

  6. Change in microbiota content

    Fecal microbiota analysis using 16S technique

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

  7. Change in extra-intestinal symptoms and quality of life

    As assessed by IBS specific questionnaires

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 3 and 6 months

  8. Change in metabolic profile

    Metabolomics in serum and urine samples

    Time frame: Baseline, 4 weeks, 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Qualitative assessment

    Patient's subjective experiences related to the dietary intervention described by qualitative methods.

    Time frame: Approx. at 3 months follow-up

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Magnus Simren
    Gothenburg, Non-US/Non-Canadian 44331, Sweden
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Nybacka S, Tornblom H, Simren M, Storsrud S. The Role of Carbohydrates in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Three Different Treatment Options. JMIR Res Protoc. 2022 Jan 17;11(1):e31413. doi: 10.2196/31413. PubMed 35037893 ↗
  • Algera JP, Storsrud S, Lindstrom A, Simren M, Tornblom H. Gluten and fructan intake and their associations with gastrointestinal symptoms in irritable bowel syndrome: A food diary study. Clin Nutr. 2021 Oct;40(10):5365-5372. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.09.002. Epub 2021 Sep 9. PubMed 34560607 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 27, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02970591
Lead sponsor
Sahlgrenska University Hospital
Responsible party
Magnus Simrén (Professor, Sahlgrenska University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 22, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Apr 15, 2022
Completion
Apr 29, 2022
Last update
Oct 27, 2022
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion