An observational study in Muscle Injury and Muscle Atrophy, sponsored by University of Valencia. Withdrawn. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 30 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-06-02.
Sponsored by University of Valencia · Observational
No previous studies have compared the association between muscle thickness (MT) and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in healthy volunteers. The main aim of this study is to investigate the validity of ultrasound in assessing the muscle thickness of hamstrings muscle.
Study design:
A cross-sectional-validity study.
Setting:
University
Participants:
X football players of an amateur football team (X healthy volunteers and X patients with a previous hamstring injury).
X healthy volunteers, from an amateur football team, and X football players with previous history of hamstring injury from an orthopaedic clinic, comprised the subjects in this study. Hamstring muscle injury was defined as "a traumatic distraction or overuse injury to the hamstring muscle leading to a player being unable to fully participate in training or match play".
The Control Group (CG) were healthy, had neither surgery/trauma in their lower extremities, nor history of hamstring injury, and there were no abnormal findings in their physical examination. The exclusion criteria included participants who: (1) had metal implants or pace makers, (2) weighted more than 200 kg (MRI table limitations), and (3) were unable to complete testing. In the Injured Group, patients were also excluded if their previous injury was originated from a non-muscular source (e.g., inguinal or femoral hernia, nerve entrapment, lumbosacral pathology), or if still had symptoms, had not returned to practice and had not been participating in track and field since their last injury.
The Study Group (SG) had history and diagnosis of hamstring injury assessment with diagnosis image technique (ultrasound or MRI), and at least 2 of the next criteria: 1. When the injury happened disability to practise with the team at least one week; 2. Lost at least one match; 3. Felt pain when trying to kick the ball or run fast; 4. Receive specific treatment (medical or physiotherapy) for the injury; 5. Needed a period plan to return to play.
Participants were screened for contraindications to MRI before ultrasound assessment and an MRI scan of the hamstring muscles of both legs were performed. MRI was performed within 24 h of the ultrasound scan. The subjects were instructed not to consume alcohol or perform any moderate to heavy exercise for 24 hours prior to each imaging session.
Muscle thickness was defined as the distance between the bone-muscle interface and the adipose tissue-muscle interface. The measurement was made from the most superficial edge of the bright line representing the interface of the bony cortex and the muscle to the most superficial edge of the bright line representing the interface of the outer fascial layer of the muscle and the subcutaneous adipose tissue. When the bone was not in contact of the muscle the two fascial layer were used.
503 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Atrophy; 94 are open to participants now.
Browse Muscular Atrophy studies →University of Valencia is the lead sponsor of 355 studies on the registry; 74 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Healthy volunteers from an amateur soccer team
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Injuries players:
At least 2 of the next criteria:
Hamstring muscles thickness in millimeters by Ultrasound
Time frame: 30 minutes
Hamstring muscles thickness in millimeters by Magnetic Resonance Image
Time frame: 1 hour
Cross-Sectional Area of the hamstring muscles in square millimeters by Ultrasound
Time frame: 30 minutes
Cross-Sectional Area of the hamstring muscles in square millimeters by Magnetic Resonance Image
Time frame: 1 hour
No study locations are listed for this record.
Plan to share: Undecided
This study is withdrawn, as verified in May 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.