CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02953938ZIPANGUUpdated Feb 25, 2020Results posted

Study to Show a Superior Benefit in Terms of Reduction of Ranibizumab Injections in Patients Receiving Ranibizumab Plus Laser Photocoagulation Combination Therapy Without Loss of Efficacy and Safety

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ranibizumab and Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation in Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO), sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Completed at 7 sites in Japan. Open to participants aged 20 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-25.

Sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
59
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a Phase IV, randomized, open-label, active-controlled, 2-arm, multicenter study. The primary objective was assessed by the difference in the mean number of ranibizumab injections applied up to Month 11 between the 2 treatment arms. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to 1 of the 2 treatment arms; i.e. Arm 1 ranibizumab monotherapy, Arm 2 ranibizumab with Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation combination therapy. There were 3 periods in this study: Screening Period (visit 1), Treatment Period (visit 2 to Visit 13) and Follow-up Period (visit 14). In addition to screening and Baseline (visit 2), there were monthly visits from Month 1 to Month 12. This study included male and female patients (≥20 years old) diagnosed with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO.

02

Conditions studied

  • Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)

Keywords

  • Ranibizumab
  • Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation
  • Macular edema
  • Branch retinal vein occlusion
  • BRVO
  • BCVA
  • CSFT
  • pro re nata
03

In context

Neoplasm Metastasis

3,517 studies on the registry are indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis; 885 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 59 is close to the median of 54 across 2,767 interventional studies indexed under Neoplasm Metastasis.

Browse Neoplasm Metastasis studies →

Lead sponsor

Novartis Pharmaceuticals is the lead sponsor of 2,673 studies on the registry; 228 are open to participants now.

Of its 576 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 431 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO
  • Best-corrected visual acuity score at Screening and Baseline (Day 1) between 0.5 and 0.05 decimal (i.e., between 73 and 19 letters in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) testing) with Landolt C charts inclusively (i.e., approximate logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units of 0.3 to 1.30).
  • At Baseline (Day1), a maximum BCVA gain of 0.2 units logMAR conversion inclusively from screening is allowed as long as the BCVA score does not exceed the upper limit of 0.3 units logMAR.
  • Increased central subfoveal thickness (> 300 µm at Baseline (Day 1) when measured by SD-OCT)
  • Duration of vision deterioration ≤6 months (determined by self-report) at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline (Day 1) Antihypertensive treatment can be initiated and must be taken for at least 30 days after which the patient can be assessed for study eligibility a second time
  • Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation (e.g., blepharitis, conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, uveitis, endophthalmitis) at the time of Screening or Baseline (Day 1) in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma (intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥30 mm Hg on medication or according to investigator's judgment) at the time of Screening or Baseline (Day 1) or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline (Day 1) in either eye
  • Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye
  • Use of any systemic anti-VEGF drugs within 6 months before Baseline (Day1) (e.g., sorafenib (Nexavar®), sunitinib (Sutent®), bevacizumab (Avastin®), ziv-aflibercept (ZALTRAP®))
  • Treatment (or anticipated treatment in the fellow eye for non-RVO indications during the study) with any anti-angiogenic drugs (including any anti-VEGF agents) within 3 months before Baseline (Day1) in fellow eye or before Baseline (Day 1) in the study eye (e.g., pegaptanib (Macugen®), ranibizumab (Lucentis®), bevacizumab (Avastin®), and aflibercept (EYLEA®))
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 1 month before Baseline (Day1) or anticipated or scheduled within the next 12 months (Study periods) following Baseline (Day1) in the study eye
  • Any giving of focal or grid laser photocoagulation before Baseline (Day1) in the study eye
  • Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye.
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (e.g., dexamethasone (Ozurdex®), fluocinolone acetonide (Iluvien®)) in the study eye
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
59 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    mono therapy

    ranibizumab alone

    Biological: Ranibizumab

  • Experimental
    combination therapy

    ranibizumab with Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation

    Biological: Ranibizumab · Radiation: Grid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation

Interventions

  • BiologicalRanibizumab

    Ranibizumab is a biologic and known anti-VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) medication approved for treatment of ME (Macular Edema) due to RVO (Retinal Vein occlusion) 0.5 mg ranibizumab applied one + PRN as intravitreal injection of 0.05 mL, with or without laser treatment

    Also known as: RFB002E

  • RadiationGrid&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation

    Grid\&Direct short pulse laser photocoagulation is a kind of laser treatment to retina within vascular arcades and used to suppress macular edema

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Difference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections

    Number of ranibizumab treatments from Day 1 to Month 11 using full analysis set (observed) based on a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (\<0.3, or =\>0.3). Difference of mean number of injections, 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference and one-sided p-value of the CMH test was reported. Analysis was conducted within the FAS with observed data. Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (\<0.52, \>=0.52). Test was one-sided.

    Time frame: Month 1 through Month 12

Secondary outcomes

  1. The Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using Decimal Chart and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Compared to Baseline

    Summary of BCVA (letters) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (\<0.3, or =\>0.3). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (\<0.52, \>=0.52). Test was one-sided.

    Time frame: Month 1 through Month 12 (for ETDRS: Month 6 and Month 12)

  2. The Mean Change in BCVA From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day 1) by the Treatment Arms

    Summary of BCVA (logMAR) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity (\< 0.52, \>= 0.52). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach

    Time frame: Month 1 through Month 12

  3. BCVA (Letters) Number and Proportion of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs. Baseline, Loss Less Than 15 Letters, or Attainment of Greater Than or Equal to 85 Letters at Month 6 and at Month 12 in the Study Eye

    Endpoints related to the number and proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline (Day1) was analyzed via stratified CMH test with stratification factors as described in primary model. The mean (SD) average (per patient) BCVA (logMAR) change from Baseline through Month 12 Summary of BCVA (logMAR) mean average change from Baseline from Month 1 through Month 12 in the study eye

    Time frame: Month 6 and Month 12

  4. The Mean Change in Change in Central Subfield Foveal Thickness (CSFT) From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day1) by the Treatment Arms

    The mean change in investigator-assessed CSFT from Month 1 through Month 12 was compared to Baseline (Day1) by the treatment arms. The analyses at each visit was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model as analogous to BCVA. The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) approach

    Time frame: Month 1 through Month 12

07

Results

Posted Feb 25, 2020

Participant flow

73 patients were screened and 59 were randomized on a 1:1 ratio to the ranibizumab group (29 patients) and ranibizumab with laser group (30 patients). Of the randomized patients, 56 (94.9%) completed the study and 11 months of treatment. 3 (5.1%) discontinued both study and study treatment: 2 (3.4%) withdrew consent and 1 (1.7%) had adverse event

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg and Laser
Started2930
Completed2828
Not completed12
Withdrew: Adverse event01
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject11

Outcome measures

PrimaryDifference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections

Number of ranibizumab treatments from Day 1 to Month 11 using full analysis set (observed) based on a stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel (CMH) test. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (\<0.3, or =\>0.3). Difference of mean number of injections, 95% confidence interval (CI) of difference and one-sided p-value of the CMH test was reported. Analysis was conducted within the FAS with observed data. Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (\<0.52, \>=0.52). Test was one-sided.

Time frame:
Month 1 through Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · number of injections
Difference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections
number of injectionsRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg Laser
Difference in Mean Number of Ranibizumab Injections4.3 ± 2.514.1 ± 2.41
Statistical analysis
  • Ranibizumab 0.5 mg vs Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Laser · Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel · p = 0.3680 · Mean difference (net): -0.21 · 95% CI -1.49 to 1.07
SecondaryThe Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using Decimal Chart and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Compared to Baseline

Summary of BCVA (letters) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline decimal VA (\<0.3, or =\>0.3). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity on logMAR scale (\<0.52, \>=0.52). Test was one-sided.

Time frame:
Month 1 through Month 12 (for ETDRS: Month 6 and Month 12)
Reported as:
Mean · letters read correctly
The Mean Change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Using Decimal Chart and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) Compared to Baseline
letters read correctlyRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg Laser
baseline52.86 ± 13.38454.03 ± 9.828
month 1274.83 ± 9.74069.59 ± 8.842
change from baseline to month 1221.97 ± 14.74915.00 ± 10.296
Statistical analysis
  • Ranibizumab 0.5 mg vs Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Laser · ANOVA · p = 0.0349 · Mean difference (final values): -6.58 · 95% CI -12.67 to -0.48
SecondaryThe Mean Change in BCVA From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day 1) by the Treatment Arms

Summary of BCVA (logMAR) absolute value and change from Baseline at Month 12 in the study eye - full analysis set (LOCF) was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model with treatment group, and stratification factors. Stratification was based on baseline visual acuity (\< 0.52, \>= 0.52). The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the LOCF approach

Time frame:
Month 1 through Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · logMAR
The Mean Change in BCVA From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day 1) by the Treatment Arms
logMARRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg Laser
baseline0.553 ± 0.22760.558 ± 0.1719
month120.075 ± 0.19090.143 ± 0.1682
change from baseline to month 12-0.478 ± 0.2586-0.413 ± 0.1969
Statistical analysis
  • Ranibizumab 0.5 mg vs Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Laser · ANOVA · p = 0.2707 · Mean difference (final values): 0.06 · 95% CI -0.045 to 0.158
SecondaryBCVA (Letters) Number and Proportion of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs. Baseline, Loss Less Than 15 Letters, or Attainment of Greater Than or Equal to 85 Letters at Month 6 and at Month 12 in the Study Eye

Endpoints related to the number and proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline (Day1) was analyzed via stratified CMH test with stratification factors as described in primary model. The mean (SD) average (per patient) BCVA (logMAR) change from Baseline through Month 12 Summary of BCVA (logMAR) mean average change from Baseline from Month 1 through Month 12 in the study eye

Time frame:
Month 6 and Month 12
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
BCVA (Letters) Number and Proportion of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs. Baseline, Loss Less Than 15 Letters, or Attainment of Greater Than or Equal to 85 Letters at Month 6 and at Month 12 in the Study Eye
ParticipantsRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg Laser
Month 6 - BCVA improvement of >=12724
month 6 - BCVA improvement of >=52621
month 6 - BCVA improvement of >=102216
Month 6 - BCVA improvement of >=151712
Month 6 - BCVA improvement of >=3041
month 6 Score >=731210
month 6 Score >=8082
month 6 Score >=8531
month 6 loss of <152829
Month 12 - BCVA improvement of >=12728
Month 12 - BCVA improvement of >=52725
Month 12 - BCVA improvement of >=102418
Month 12 - BCVA improvement of >=152115
Month 12 - BCVA improvement of >=3093
month 12 Score >=732010
month 12 Score >=80813
month 12 Score >=8540
month 12 Loss of <152929
SecondaryThe Mean Change in Change in Central Subfield Foveal Thickness (CSFT) From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day1) by the Treatment Arms

The mean change in investigator-assessed CSFT from Month 1 through Month 12 was compared to Baseline (Day1) by the treatment arms. The analyses at each visit was based on an analysis of variance (ANOVA) model as analogous to BCVA. The analyses was conducted within the FAS using the Last-Observation-Carried-Forward (LOCF) approach

Time frame:
Month 1 through Month 12
Reported as:
Mean · mm
The Mean Change in Change in Central Subfield Foveal Thickness (CSFT) From Month 1 Through Month 12 Compared to Baseline (Day1) by the Treatment Arms
mmRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg Laser
baseline563.3 ± 146.92553.3 ± 182.39
month 12257.0 ± 43.44285.1 ± 82.80
change in baseline from month 12-306.3 ± 164.35-261.3 ± 180.23
Statistical analysis
  • Ranibizumab 0.5 mg vs Ranibizumab 0.5 mg Laser · ANOVA · p = 0.7602 · Mean difference (final values): 11.32 · 95% CI -62.65 to 85.28

Adverse events

Collected over AEs and SAEs were collected for the maximum duration of treatment and follow up for a participant per protocol for approximately 12 months.. Non-serious events are listed at a 2% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg0/29 (0%)1/29 (3.4%)16/29 (55.2%)
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg+ Laser0/30 (0%)2/30 (6.7%)15/30 (50%)
Total0/59 (0%)3/59 (5.1%)31/59 (52.5%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg+ LaserTotal
HaematuriaRenal and urinary disorders1/290/301/59
Bowen's diseaseNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/291/301/59
Putamen haemorrhageNervous system disorders0/291/301/59
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 30
Most frequent other events
EventRanibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg+ LaserTotal
NasopharyngitisInfections and infestations6/295/3011/59
HeadacheNervous system disorders3/290/303/59
Intraocular pressure increasedInvestigations0/293/303/59
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/291/303/59
HypertensionVascular disorders2/291/303/59
Dry eyeEye disorders1/291/302/59
KeratitisEye disorders1/290/301/59
Hepatic function abnormalHepatobiliary disorders1/290/301/59
Seasonal allergyImmune system disorders1/291/302/59
InfluenzaInfections and infestations1/291/302/59

Baseline characteristics

Randomized Set

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Ranibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg and LaserTotal
Mean66.8 ± 9.9166.7 ± 9.8366.8 ± 9.78
Age, Customized
Age, Customized(Participants)Ranibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg and LaserTotal
<65 years121123
>=65 years171936
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Ranibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg and LaserTotal
Female101929
Male191130
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Ranibizumab 0.5 mgRanibizumab 0.5 mg and LaserTotal
Asian293059
08

Study locations

7 sites
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Nagakute-city, Aichi 480-1195, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Fukuoka city, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Kita-gun, Kagawa 761-0793, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Tsu-city, Mie 514-8507, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Matsumoto-city, Nagano 390-8621, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Mitaka-city, Tokyo 181-8611, Japan
  • Novartis Investigative Site
    Hokkaido, 078-8510, Japan
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Jan 21, 2018
  • Statistical analysis plan · Jul 30, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Novartis is committed to sharing access to patient-level data and supporting clinical documents from eligible studies with qualified external researchers. Requests are reviewed and approved by an independent review panel on the basis of scientific merit. All data provided is anonymized to protect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial in line with applicable laws and regulations. This trial data availability is according to the criteria and process described on www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 25, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02953938
Lead sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 3, 2016
Start date
Dec 15, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 28, 2018
Completion
Dec 28, 2018
Results posted
Feb 25, 2020
Last update
Feb 25, 2020

Study contacts

Novartis Pharmaceuticals
study director · Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion