CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02951156Javelin DLBCLUpdated Dec 17, 2020Results posted

Avelumab In Combination Regimens That Include An Immune Agonist, Epigenetic Modulator, CD20 Antagonist and/or Conventional Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL)

A Phase 3 interventional study of Avelumab and Utomilumab in Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, sponsored by Pfizer. Terminated at 30 sites in 8 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-12-17.

Sponsored by Pfizer · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Study was terminated due to closure of study arms following futility analysis and difficulty in enrolling participants due to evolving treatment landscape
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
29
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Study B9991011 is a multi-center, international, randomized, open label, 2 component (Phase 1b followed by Phase 3), parallel-arm study of avelumab in combination with various agents for the treatment of Relapsed/Refractory (R/R) Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL).

Read the detailed description

The target study population of this Phase 1b/3 registrational study is patients with R/R DLBCL who have completed at least 2 (but not more than 4) lines of prior rituximab-containing multi-agent chemotherapy, and/or in whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has failed, or who are not candidates for ASCT or who are not eligible for intensive chemotherapy. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. The study will assess the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), immunogenicity of the 3 avelumab-based combination regimens tested, and collect patient reported outcome (PRO) data.

02

Conditions studied

03

In context

Lymphoma

5,578 studies on the registry are indexed under Lymphoma; 825 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 29 is below the median of 40 across 4,508 interventional studies indexed under Lymphoma.

Browse Lymphoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Pfizer is the lead sponsor of 3,244 studies on the registry; 139 are open to participants now.

Of its 582 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 381 (65%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria:

-Any of the following as defined by the WHO, 2016 lymphoid neoplasm classifications and histologically confirmed:

  • Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), Not Otherwise Specified (NOS): Germinal center B-cell type (GCB), Activated B-cell type (ABC)
  • High-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBCL) NOS
  • HGBCL with MYC and BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements
  • T-cell histocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma
  • EBV+ DLBCL, NOS
  • HHV8+ DLBCL, NOS

Relapsed or refractory disease following at least 2 lines (and a maximum of 4 lines) of prior rituximab containing multi-agent chemotherapy which may include an autologous stem cell transplantation unless patients are not considered suitable for intensive second-line chemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplantation. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy,must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen. Patients who are ineligible for intensive second line chemotherapy, must have received at least one prior rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy regimen.

  • Baseline measurable disease with at least 1 bi dimensional lesion with longest diameter (LDi) >1.5cm on CT scan which is FDG avid on PET scan.
  • A biopsy (archived or Screening/recent) will be collected at Screening.
  • At least 18years of age (or ≥20 years in Japan).
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status (PS) 0 or 1.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma.
  • Prior organ transplantation including prior allogeneic SCT.
  • Prior therapy with an anti PD 1, anti PD L1, anti PD L2, anti CD137, or anti cytotoxic T lymphocyte associated antigen 4 (CTLA 4) antibody (including ipilimumab, tremelimumab or any other antibody, or drug specifically targeting T cell co stimulatory or immune checkpoint pathways).
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
29 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Phase 1b Arm A

    avelumab/utomilumab/rituximab

    Biological: Avelumab · Biological: Utomilumab · Biological: Rituximab

  • Experimental
    Phase 1b Arm B

    avelumab/utomilumab/azacitidine

    Biological: Avelumab · Biological: Utomilumab · Other: Azacitidine

  • Experimental
    Phase 1b Arm C

    avelumab/rituximab/bendamustine

    Biological: Avelumab · Biological: Rituximab · Drug: Bendamustine

  • Experimental
    Phase 3 Arm D (selected from Phase 1b)

    Selected regimen from Phase 1b component which may be i) avelumab/utomilumab/rituximab OR ii) avelumab/rituximab/azacitidine OR iii) avelumab/rituximab/bendamustine

    Biological: Avelumab · Biological: Utomilumab · Biological: Rituximab · Other: Azacitidine · Drug: Bendamustine

  • Active comparator
    Phase 3 Arm E

    Investigator's Choice of either rituximab/bendamustine or rituximab/gemcitabine/oxaliplatin

    Biological: Rituximab · Drug: Bendamustine · Drug: Gemcitabine · Drug: Oxaliplatin

Interventions

  • BiologicalAvelumab

    Investigational fully human anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody

    Also known as: MSB0010718C

  • BiologicalUtomilumab

    Investigational, fully human IgG2 CD 137/4-1BB agonist

    Also known as: PF-05082566

  • BiologicalRituximab

    CD20-directed cytolytic antibody

    Also known as: Rituxan

  • OtherAzacitidine

    Antimetabolite antineoplastic agent and demethylation agent.

    Also known as: Vidaza

  • DrugBendamustine

    Alkylating drug

    Also known as: Treanda

  • DrugGemcitabine

    Nucleoside analogue

    Also known as: Gemzar

  • DrugOxaliplatin

    Platinum-based drug

    Also known as: Eloxatin

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

    AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management.

    Time frame: Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks

  2. Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

    ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\<=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.

    Time frame: Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

    AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

  2. Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

    Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

  3. Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

    ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (\>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value \>450 ms, \>480 ms and \>500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline \>=20 bpm; absolute value \>=120 bpm and increase from baseline \>=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value \>=120 ms.

    Time frame: From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)

  4. Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

    Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake \<=mediastinum),or 3(uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS,for lymph nodes extralymphatic sites;no new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,\>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments.

    Time frame: First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

  5. Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

    TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)

  6. Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

    Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: \<50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed \>=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

  7. Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

    Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)

  8. Overall Survival

    Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)

  9. Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab

    Time frame: 1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6

  10. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

    Time frame: Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  11. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

    Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  12. Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

    Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  13. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

    Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  14. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

    Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  15. Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

    nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

    Time frame: From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

  16. Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline

    Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline.

    Time frame: Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)

  17. Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status

    Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure.

    Time frame: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18

07

Results

Posted Dec 17, 2020
Limitations and caveats
Data for Phase 3 outcome measures were not collected as study was terminated early and phase 3 was not conducted.

Participant flow

This study included participants with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) after completion of at least 2 and not more than 4 lines of rituximab-containing multi-agent chemotherapy (prior to this study), and/or in whom autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) has failed, or who were not candidates for ASCT or who were not eligible for intensive chemotherapy.

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Started9911
Completed001
Not completed9910
Withdrew: Death385
Withdrew: Progressive disease101
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject001
Withdrew: Study terminated by sponsor001
Withdrew: Other512

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

AEs occurring in first 4 weeks of treatment,attributable to 1 of study drugs. Hematology:1)Grade 4 neutropenia,2)Grade \>=3 febrile neutropenia with single temperature of \>38.3 degrees Celsius (C)/sustained temperature of \>=38.0 degrees C for more than 1 hour with/without associated sepsis,3)Grade \>=3 neutropenic infection,4)Grade 4 thrombocytopenia/Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding,5)Grade 4 anemia 6)Any grade \>=3 non-hematology toxicity except:transient Grade 3 flu like symptoms/fever controlled with standard medical management;transient Grade 3 fatigue,localized skin reactions/headache that resolves to Grade \<=1;Grade 3 nausea,vomiting/diarrhea resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂72 hours after initiation of adequate medical management;Grade 3 skin toxicity resolved to Grade \<=1 in ˂7 days;tumor flare;Single laboratory values that are out of normal range,that have no clinical correlate and resolve to Grade \<=1 within 7 days with adequate medical management.

Time frame:
Day 1 Cycle 1 up to 4 Weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLT)100
PrimaryObjective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

ORR was defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), as assessed by investigator per lugano response classification criteria. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake less than or equal to \[\<=\] mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \[\<\] mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-point scale (5-PS), for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in sum of products of diameters (SPD) of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.

Time frame:
Randomization until date of PD, start of new anticancer therapy, discontinuation from study or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
Percentage of participantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria11.1 (0.3 to 48.2)0 (0.0 to 33.6)27.3 (6.0 to 61.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. As per NCI-CTCAE version 4.03,severity was graded as Grade 1:asymptomatic/mild symptoms,clinical/diagnostic observations only, intervention not indicated; Grade 2:moderate, minimal, local/noninvasive intervention indicated,limiting age-appropriate instrumental activities of daily life (ADL); Grade 3:severe/medically significant but not immediately life-threatening, hospitalization/prolongation of existing hospitalization indicated, disabling, limiting self-care ADL; Grade 4:life-threatening consequence, urgent intervention indicated; Grade 5:death related to AE. TEAE was defined as events which occurred during on-treatment period beginning with first dose of study treatment through minimum (30 days + last dose of study treatment or start of new anti-cancer drug therapy). In this outcome measure participant with any TEAE of Grade 3 or above are reported.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) Greater Than or Equal to (>=) Grade 3, As Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria For Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.034710
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03

Laboratory parameters included hematological and biochemistry: Hematological parameters included: anemia, haemoglobin increased, lymphocyte count decreased, lymphocyte count increased, neutrophil count decreased, platelet count decreased and white blood cells decreased. Biochemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase increased, alkaline phosphatase increased, aspartate aminotransferase increased, blood bilirubin increased, cholesterol high, creatine kinase(cpk) increased, creatinine increased, gamma glutamyl transferase(ggt) increased, hypercalcemia, hyperglycemia, hyperkalemia, hypermagnesemia, hypernatremia, hypertriglyceridemia, hypoalbuminemia, hypocalcemia, hypoglycemia, hypokalemia, hypomagnesemia, hyponatremia, hypophosphatemia, lipase increased,serum amylase increased.Test abnormalities were graded by NCI CTCAE version 4.03 as Grade 1=mild; Grade 2=moderate; Grade 3/Grade 4=severe/life-threatening. Number of participants with abnormalities of any grade were reported.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities As Per National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Version 4.03
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Anemia6810
Hemoglobin increased000
Lymphocyte count decreased479
Lymphocyte count increased000
Neutrophil count decreased229
Platelet count decreased438
White blood cell decreased148
Alanine aminotransferase increased252
Alkaline phosphatase increased346
Aspartate aminotransferase increased363
Blood bilirubin increased033
Cholesterol high233
Cpk increased212
Creatinine increased6610
GGT increased346
Hypercalcemia032
Hyperglycemia312
Hyperkalemia002
Hypermagnesemia111
Hypernatremia001
Hypertriglyceridemia337
Hypoalbuminemia346
Hypocalcemia102
Hypoglycemia001
Hypokalemia114
Hypomagnesemia004
Hyponatremia013
Hypophosphatemia105
Lipase increased123
Serum amylase increased213
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

ECG abnormalities included: 1) QT interval, QT interval corrected using Bazett's formula (QTcB) and QT interval corrected using Fridericia's formula (QTcF): increase from baseline greater than (\>) 30 millisecond (ms) or 60 ms; absolute value \>450 ms, \>480 ms and \>500 ms; 2) heart rate (HR): absolute value \<=50 beats per minute (bpm) and decrease from baseline \>=20 bpm; absolute value \>=120 bpm and increase from baseline \>=20 bpm; 3) PR interval: absolute value \>=220 ms and increase from baseline \>=20 ms; 4) QRS interval: absolute value \>=120 ms.

Time frame:
From first dose of study treatment up to at least 30 days after the last dose of study treatment or initiation of new anti-cancer therapy (up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
QT: Increase from baseline >30 ms444
QT: Increase from baseline >60 ms132
QT: >450 ms222
QT: >480 ms011
QT: >500 ms000
QTcB: Increase from baseline >30 ms134
QTcB: Increase from baseline >60 ms110
QTcB: >450 ms459
QTcB: >480 ms234
QTcB: >500 ms121
QTcF: Increase from baseline >30 ms133
QTcF: Increase from baseline >60 ms020
QTcF: >450 ms436
QTcF: >480 ms020
QTcF: >500 ms020
Heart rate: <=50 bpm and decrease from baseline >=20 bpm010
Heart rate: >=120 bpm and increase from baseline >=20 bpm001
PR: >=220 ms and increase from baseline >=20 ms000
QRS: >=120 ms112
SecondaryDuration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed DOR: was defined for participants with OR as time from first documentation of OR to time of first documentation of disease progression/death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. CR: score of 1(no uptake above background),2(uptake \<=mediastinum),or 3(uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS,for lymph nodes extralymphatic sites;no new lesions;no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 of largest dominant lymph nodes,no increase in size of other nodes,liver,spleen volume,\>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic splenic nodules,absence of other organ involvement,no new sites of disease. PD: appearance of new lesion more than 1.5 cm in any axis,at least a 50% increase from nadir in SPD/longest diameter of previous lesion/node. Data was censored on date of last adequate tumor assessment in participants with no event,started new anti-cancer therapy/had 2 or more missing assessments.

Time frame:
First response (CR or PR) to date of PD, start of new anti-cancer therapy, discontinuation from the study, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
MonthsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria1.81 (1.81 to 1.81)—NA (NA to NA)
SecondaryTime to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

TTR was defined for participants who achieved objective response as time from randomization to first documentation of objective tumor response (CR or PR) that was subsequently confirmed. CR was defined as a score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR was defined as \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the first documentation of objective response (CR or PR) (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
MonthsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Time to Tumor Response (TTR) as Assessed by Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria1.8 (1.8 to 1.8)—1.9 (1.7 to 2.6)
SecondaryDisease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Disease control rate was defined as percentage of participants with disease control. Disease Control (DC) was defined as the best overall response of CR, PR, or stable disease (SD). CR: score of 1 (no uptake above background), 2 (uptake \<= mediastinum), or 3 (uptake less than \<mediastinum but \<=liver) with or without a residual mass on PET 5-PS, for lymph nodes and extralymphatic sites; no new lesions; no evidence of FDG-avid disease in bone marrow. PR: \>=50% decrease in SPD of up to six of the largest dominant lymph nodes, no increase in size of other nodes, liver, or spleen volume, a \>=50% decrease in SPD of hepatic and splenic nodules, absence of other organ involvement, and no new sites of disease. SD: \<50% decrease in SDP of up to 6 dominant, measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no criteria for progressive disease met. To qualify as a best overall response of SD, at least one SD assessment must be observed \>=6 weeks after start date and before disease progression.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD, study discontinuation, start of new anti-cancer therapy or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
Percentage of participantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Disease Control Rate as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria22.2 (2.8 to 60.0)0 (0 to 33.6)36.4 (10.9 to 69.2)
SecondaryProgression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria

Investigator assessed PFS was defined as time (in months) from date of randomization to the first documentation of disease progression or death (due to any cause), whichever occurred first. PFS data was censored on the date of the last adequate tumor assessment for participants who had no an event (PD or death), for participants who start a new anti-cancer therapy prior to an event or for participants with an event after 2 or more missing or inadequate post-baseline tumor assessment. Participants without an adequate baseline or post-baseline tumor assessment were censored on the date of randomization unless death occurred on or before the time of the second planned tumor assessment in which case the death was considered as an event.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to progression of disease, study discontinuation, censoring date or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first (up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria
MonthsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Progression-Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Investigator Per Lugano Response Classification Criteria1.8 (0.6 to 3.5)1.5 (0.3 to 1.8)2.7 (1.3 to NA)
SecondaryOverall Survival

Overall survival was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants last known to be alive were censored at date of last contact. Analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method.

Time frame:
From the date of randomization to discontinuation from the study or death, whichever occurred first (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Median · Months
Overall Survival
MonthsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Overall Survival14.8 (0.9 to NA)4.0 (0.3 to 11.3)5.2 (1.3 to NA)
SecondaryConcentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
Time frame:
1 hour Post dose Day 2 Cycle 1, 144 hour Post dose Day 8 of Cycle 1, 0 hour Post dose Day 16 of Cycle 1, Day 1 of Cycle 4 and Cycle 6
Reported as:
Mean · microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Concentration Verses Time Summary of Avelumab
microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)Avelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Cycle 1 Day 2183.29 ± 83.809198.43 ± 29.387193.30 ± 29.702
Cycle 1 Day 875.14 ± 21.35768.44 ± 18.55365.33 ± 17.913
Cycle 1 Day 1625.33 ± 13.19726.53 ± 9.23719.36 ± 7.810
Cycle 4 Day 125.00 ± 4.66762.00 ± NA120.88 ± 165.187
Cycle 6 Day 1—7.57 ± NA39.43 ± 18.327
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

Time frame:
Baseline: 2 hours pre-dose of first dose of avelumab, Post baseline: post first dose up to up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Baseline: ADA ever-positive001
Baseline: ADA never-positive8910
Post Baseline: ADA ever-positive000
Post Baseline: ADA never-positive8911
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

Time frame:
From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
ADA ever-positive00
ADA never-positive811
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

ADA never-positive was defined as no positive ADA results at any time point. ADA ever-positive was defined as at least one positive ADA result at any time point.

Time frame:
From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Anti-Drug Antibodies (ADA) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
ADA ever-positive12
ADA never-positive77
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Avelumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

Time frame:
From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Rituximab by Never and Ever Positive Status

nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

Time frame:
From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)

No measurements were reported for this outcome.

SecondaryNumber of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status

nAb never-positive was defined as no positive nAb results at any time point and nAb ever-positive was defined as at least one positive nAb result at any time point.

Time frame:
From the date of first study treatment up to 30 Days after the end of treatment (maximum up to 36 months)
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Neutralizing Antibodies (nAb) Against Utomilumab by Never and Ever Positive Status
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab
nAb ever-positive00
nAb never-positive12
SecondaryProgrammed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline

Percentage of Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry at Baseline.

Time frame:
Screening (prior to first dose of study treatment)
Reported as:
Median · Percentage of cells staining positive
Programmed Death Receptor-1 Ligand-1 (PD-L1) Biomarker Expression in Tumor and Immune Cells as Assessed by Immunohistochemistry (IHC) at Baseline
Percentage of cells staining positiveAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Tumor Cells (membrane)0 (0 to 5)0.5 (0.0 to 10.0)0 (0 to 30)
Immune Cells7.5 (0.0 to 30.0)7.5 (0.0 to 70.0)17.5 (0.0 to 50.0)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status

Number of participants with MRD positive, negative and not evaluable status were reported in this outcome measure.

Time frame:
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Minimal Residual Disease Burden (MRD) Positive, Negative and Not Evaluable (NE) Status
ParticipantsAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Baseline: Positive313
Baseline: Negative002
Baseline: NE586
Cycle 3 Day 1: Positive311
Cycle 3 Day 1: Negative003
Cycle 3 Day 1: NE211
Cycle 6 Day 1: Positive010
Cycle 6 Day 1: Negative002
Cycle 6 Day 1: NE002
Cycle 9 Day 1: Positive000
Cycle 9 Day 1: Negative001
Cycle 9 Day 1: NE002
Cycle 12 Day 1: Positive000
Cycle 12 Day 1: Negative001
Cycle 12 Day 1: NE002
Cycle 18 Day 1: Positive000
Cycle 18 Day 1: Negative000
Cycle 18 Day 1: NE001

Adverse events

Collected over Baseline up to follow up (36 months). Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Avelumab+Rituximab+Utomilumab4/8 (50%)3/8 (37.5%)8/8 (100%)
Avelumab+Azacitidine+Utomilumab8/9 (88.9%)6/9 (66.7%)9/9 (100%)
Avelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab6/11 (54.5%)7/11 (63.6%)11/11 (100%)
Most frequent serious events
Showing 10 of 25
Most frequent serious events
EventAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
Disease progressionGeneral disorders0/81/92/11
DeathGeneral disorders1/80/90/11
Febrile neutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders1/80/91/11
Herpes zosterInfections and infestations1/80/90/11
Ophthalmic herpes zosterInfections and infestations1/80/90/11
Septic shockInfections and infestations1/80/90/11
Gastrointestinal haemorrhageGastrointestinal disorders1/80/90/11
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/81/90/11
HypercalcaemiaMetabolism and nutrition disorders0/81/90/11
Non-Hodgkin's lymphomaNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)0/81/90/11
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 132
Most frequent other events
EventAvelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+Rituximab
ConstipationGastrointestinal disorders1/85/94/11
NeutropeniaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/81/95/11
ChillsGeneral disorders3/81/91/11
Decreased appetiteMetabolism and nutrition disorders3/80/93/11
PyrexiaGeneral disorders3/81/93/11
AnaemiaBlood and lymphatic system disorders2/82/94/11
FatigueGeneral disorders1/81/94/11
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/82/94/11
Back painMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders2/83/90/11
Lymphocyte count decreasedInvestigations0/81/93/11

Baseline characteristics

Full analysis set included all randomized participants.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Avelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabTotal
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years23510
>=65 years76619
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Avelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabTotal
Female0325
Male96924
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Avelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabTotal
Hispanic or Latino0101
Not Hispanic or Latino781126
Unknown or Not Reported2002
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Avelumab+Rituximab+UtomilumabAvelumab+Azacitidine+UtomilumabAvelumab+Bendamustine+RituximabTotal
Race: White881127
Race: Other1102
08

Study locations

30 sites
  • City of Hope
    Duarte, California 91010, United States
  • Norton Cancer Institute
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Norton Diagnostic Center - Dupont
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Norton Women's and Children's Hospital
    Louisville, Kentucky 40207, United States
  • Tulane Medical Center
    New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, United States
  • Parexel International
    Billerica, Massachusetts 01821, United States
  • University of Michigan Health System
    Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, United States
  • Mayo Clinic
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
  • North Shore Hematology Oncology Associates
    East Setauket, New York 11733, United States
  • St. George Hospital
    Kogarah, New South Wales 2217, Australia
  • Monash Health
    Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia
  • Cancer Clinical Trials Centre, Austin Health, Level 4
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • Genesis Care
    Heidelberg, Victoria 3084, Australia
  • UZ Gent
    Gent, 9000, Belgium
  • UZ Leuven
    Leuven, 3000, Belgium
  • Farmacia Studi Clinici
    Rozzano, MI 20089, Italy
  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
    Rozzano, MI 20089, Italy
  • Samsung Medical Center Clinical Trial Pharmacy
    Seoul, 06351, Korea, Republic of
  • Samsung Medical Center
    Seoul, 06351, Korea, Republic of
  • Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. Sw. Jana z Dukli
    Lublin, Lubelskie 20-090, Poland
  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne S.C.
    Krakow, Malopolskie 30-510, Poland
  • Nzoz McD Voxel Osrodek Pet-Tk-Nmr
    Krakow, 30-006, Poland
  • Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej im. Sw. Jana z Dukli Oddzial Hematologiczny
    Lublin, 20-090, Poland
  • NU-MED Centrum Diagnostyki i Terapii Onkologicznej Zamosc Sp. z o.o.
    Zamosc, 22-400, Poland
  • Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
    Caceres, 10003, Spain
  • Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
    Cáceres, 10003, Spain
  • Centro de Investigación Medicina Especializada Sanitaria (CIMES)
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
    Málaga, 29010, Spain
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
  • The Christie Pathology Partnership
    Manchester, M20 4BX, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Hawkes EA, Phillips T, Budde LE, Santoro A, Saba NS, Roncolato F, Gregory GP, Verhoef G, Offner F, Quero C, Radford J, Giannopoulos K, Stevens D, Thall A, Huang B, Laird AD, Sandner R, Ansell SM. Avelumab in Combination Regimens for Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL: Results from the Phase Ib JAVELIN DLBCL Study. Target Oncol. 2021 Nov;16(6):761-771. doi: 10.1007/s11523-021-00849-8. Epub 2021 Oct 23. PubMed 34687398 ↗

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Dec 11, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 12, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 17, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02951156
Lead sponsor
Pfizer
Collaborators
EMD Serono
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2016
Start date
Dec 16, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2, 2019
Completion
Dec 2, 2019
Results posted
Dec 17, 2020
Last update
Dec 17, 2020

Study contacts

Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
study director · Pfizer

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion