ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02943486MSCDTDFUUpdated Oct 24, 2016

Mesenchymal Stromal Cell Derivatives in the Treatment of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcers Type 1 and 2

A Phase 1/2 interventional study of dac-MSCs and MSCs in Foot Ulcer, Diabetic, sponsored by Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga. Status unknown. Open to participants aged 40 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-24.

Sponsored by Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga · Phase 1/2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2016), so the status shown — last known as Not yet recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 1/2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
40 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using mesenchymal stromal cell derivatives (dac-MSCs) in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers (type 1 and 2) in adults. A third of the participants will receive dac-MSCs and Triticum vulgare (Fitostimoline) in combination, the other third MSCs and Fitostimoline in combination, and the last third only Fitosimoline. This study will be a randomized, blind, and parallel and controlled-group trial.

Read the detailed description

Conventional treatments such as dry, wet or active dressings are effective only in 50% of patients with diabetic foot ulcer. The remaining 50% of patients have non-responding recoveries that leads to amputation of the compromised limbs. Currently, the administration of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) in animal models or in small groups of patients with diabetic foot ulcer has shown to be safe and effective. Particularly, the use of these cells induce regeneration, both in the dermis and the epidermis. Nevertheless, MSC transplantation has some limitations, for instance, time restrictions in the availability of cells due to their isolation and expansion as well as the complex and costly large-scale production. In the same manner, the cryopreservation might cause deleterious effects that affect the biological activity of the cells and a medical professional should conduct the cell administration. In addition, different studies report variability in the results due to the inconsistency in the methods that they used (extraction protocols, cultivation, expansion and administration). The investigators' recent studies in mice with skin lesions, particularly type 1 diabetes, have shown that the presence of the cells is not necessary to promote skin regeneration and the administration of dac-MSCs is sufficient to stimulate would healing.

02

Conditions studied

  • Foot Ulcer, Diabetic

Keywords

  • Mesenchymal stromal cells
  • Fitostimoline
  • MSC derivatives
  • Diabetes
03

In context

Diabetic Foot

1,077 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Foot; 222 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 51 is below the median of 60 across 847 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Foot.

Browse Diabetic Foot studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Males and females between the ages of 40 and 80 years, inclusive, with Type 1 or 2 diabetes as defined by the American Diabetes Association
  • Stable glycemic control
  • Transcutaneous oxygen measurement > 30 mmHg
  • Ulcer present at least for 1 month
  • Wound size between 0.5 and 5 cm2
  • Subjects that require endovascular surgical intervention
  • Subjects must have adequate nutrition (albumin level > 2 g/dL and prealbumin level > 15 mg/dL)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous or current diagnoses with one of the following: cancer, symptomatic coronary artery disease, brain disease, kidney failure, blood disorders
  • Taking and cytotoxic drugs
  • Presence of active systemic infection
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1 / Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
51 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    dac-MSCs and Fitostimoline

    Intradermic application of dac-MSCs (1 mL ) in four equidistant points around the ulcer (twice: day 0 and 7) and topical application of fitostimoline every other day

    Other: dac-MSCs · Drug: Fitostimoline

  • Active comparator
    MSCs and Fitostimoline

    Intradermic application of MSCs (500,000 cells/mL) in four equidistant points around the ulcer (once: day 0 ) and topical application of fitostimoline every other day

    Other: MSCs · Drug: Fitostimoline

  • Active comparator
    Fitostimoline

    Topical application of fitostimoline every other day

    Drug: Fitostimoline

Interventions

  • Otherdac-MSCs

    Cell-free therapy

    Also known as: Cell-free therapy

  • OtherMSCs

    Cell-based therapy

    Also known as: Cell-based therapy

  • DrugFitostimoline

    Triticum vulgare

    Also known as: Triticum vulgare

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound size change

    Wound size will be assessed using a SilhouetteMobile camera (digital planimetry)

    Time frame: One year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Granulation tissue percentage

    Images will be used to assess the amount of granulation tissue present in the wound

    Time frame: One year

  2. Pigmentation change

    Digital images will be used to evaluate color changes in the wound

    Time frame: One year

  3. Presence of Exudate

    Visual observation of the wound to determine the presence of exudate

    Time frame: One year

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jan 2017, a primary completion of Jun 2018 and a completion of Jan 2019. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 19, 2016
First posted
Oct 24, 2016
Start
Jan 2017
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2018
CompletionEst.
Jan 2019
Last update
Oct 24, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 24, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02943486
Lead sponsor
Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga
Collaborators
Fundación Oftalmológica de Santander Clínica Carlos Ardila Lulle, Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
Responsible party
Claudia Lucia Sossa Melo (Associate Professor, Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 24, 2016
Start date
Jan 2017
Primary completion
Jun 2018 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 24, 2016

Study contacts

Claudia L Sossa-Melo, MD
Contact
claudiasossa@gmail.com
+57 7 643 6261 ext. 587
Martha L Arango-Rodríguez, Ph.D.
Contact
martha.arango@fosunab.com
+57 679 7979 ext. 6086
Claudia L Sossa-Melo, MD
principal investigator · Universidad Autónoma de Bucaramanga

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion