ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02930941Updated Nov 30, 2021Results posted

Topical Intranasal Tranexamic Acid for Epistaxis in the Emergency Department

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tranexamic Acid and 0.9% Sodium Chloride in Epistaxis, sponsored by University of California, Davis. Terminated at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-11-30.

Sponsored by University of California, Davis · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Terminate due to slow enrollment rate.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
35
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

It is estimated that epistaxis results in 4.5 million emergency department visits per year throughout the United States. Due to the adverse effects of standard treatment options for epistaxis, tranexamic acid (TXA) may be considered an attractive option. In previous studies, when used with nasal packing, TXA showed faster time to control of bleeding. The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of topical intranasal TXA applied via atomizer for patients with epistaxis who present to the emergency department.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, single-center, double-blinded, placebo controlled study comparing efficacy and safety of topical intranasal tranexamic acid for epistaxis. The primary outcome was time to control of bleeding and secondary outcomes were length of stay in the emergency department, re-bleeding within the first 24 hours, and re-bleeding at one week. Safety outcomes were the incidence of thromboembolic events and other drug-related adverse events.

Patients aged 18 years of age or older and diagnosed with anterior epistaxis were included. Patients were excluded if they were unable to consent, do not have a valid telephone number, pregnant women, prisoners, cognitively impaired individuals, diagnosis of posterior epistaxis, major trauma, bleeding disorder (such as thrombocytopenia or hemophilia), hemodynamically unstable, or had a known hypersensitivity to study medication.

Patients were randomly assigned to tranexamic acid treatment group or placebo group. After consenting, patients received TXA (100 mg/1mL) or 0.9% sodium chloride (1 mL) in to the affected nostril(s) via intranasal atomization device. If bleeding did not cease, two repeat doses were allowed and after twenty minutes of continued bleeding the study physician could treat with any additional treatment options. Patients were contacted via telephone within one week to inquire about incidences of re-bleeding or any complications.

02

Conditions studied

  • Epistaxis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • tranexamic acid
  • epistaxis
  • emergency medicine
  • intranasal
  • TXA
03

In context

Epistaxis

96 studies on the registry are indexed under Epistaxis; 22 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 35 is below the median of 64 across 81 interventional studies indexed under Epistaxis.

Browse Epistaxis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of California, Davis is the lead sponsor of 809 studies on the registry; 142 are open to participants now.

Of its 67 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 43 (64%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Diagnosed with anterior epistaxis

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to consent, do not have a valid telephone number, pregnant women, prisoners, cognitively impaired individuals, diagnosis of posterior epistaxis, major trauma, bleeding disorder (such as thrombocytopenia or hemophilia), hemodynamically unstable, or had a known to study medication
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
35 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tranexamic Acid (100 mg/mL)

    TXA (100 mg/1mL) sprayed in to the affected nostril(s) via intranasal atomization device. May repeat 2 doses in each affected nostril(s).

    Drug: Tranexamic Acid

  • Placebo comparator
    0.9% Sodium Chloride

    0.9% Sodium Chloride (1mL) in to the affected nostril(s) via intranasal atomization device. May repeat 2 doses in each affected nostril(s).

    Drug: 0.9% Sodium Chloride

Interventions

  • TXA (100 mg/1mL) in to the affected nostril(s) via intranasal atomization device. May repeat 2 doses in each affected nostril(s).

    Also known as: Cyklokapron

  • Drug0.9% Sodium Chloride

    0.9% Sodium Chloride (1mL) in to the affected nostril(s) via intranasal atomization device. May repeat 2 doses in each affected nostril(s).

    Also known as: Saline solution

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to Control of Bleeding (Minutes, Median, Interquartile Range)

    Time to control of bleeding was defined as the time from the start of enrollment and direct pressure and administration of study drug to the resolution of bleeding

    Time frame: During emergency department (ED) visit

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of Stay in the Emergency Department (Minutes, Median, Inter-Quartile Range)

    Length of stay was defined as time from enrollment in study to discharge from the emergency department

    Time frame: During emergency department (ED) visit

  2. Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at 24 Hours

    The number of participants with re-bleeding at 24 Hours was evaluated during follow up phone call

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at One Week

    The number of participants with re-bleeding at one week was evaluated during the follow-up phone call

    Time frame: 7 days

  4. Thromboembolism

    Patient reported thromboembolic events during follow-up phone calls at 24 hours and at one week

    Time frame: 7 days

  5. Drug-Related Adverse Events

    Patient-reported drug-related adverse events during ED visit

    Time frame: during emergency department (ED) visit

07

Results

Posted Nov 30, 2021
Limitations and caveats
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic significantly impacted the ability to enroll patients; early termination leading to a small number of patients; single-center study;

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneTranexamic Acid (100 mg/mL)0.9% Sodium Chloride
Started1718
Completed1616
Not completed12
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up12

Outcome measures

PrimaryTime to Control of Bleeding (Minutes, Median, Interquartile Range)

Time to control of bleeding was defined as the time from the start of enrollment and direct pressure and administration of study drug to the resolution of bleeding

Time frame:
During emergency department (ED) visit
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Time to Control of Bleeding (Minutes, Median, Interquartile Range)
minutesTXA GroupNS Group
Time to Control of Bleeding (Minutes, Median, Interquartile Range)64 (33 to 104)42 (26 to 131)
SecondaryLength of Stay in the Emergency Department (Minutes, Median, Inter-Quartile Range)

Length of stay was defined as time from enrollment in study to discharge from the emergency department

Time frame:
During emergency department (ED) visit
Reported as:
Median · minutes
Length of Stay in the Emergency Department (Minutes, Median, Inter-Quartile Range)
minutesTXA GroupNS Group
Length of Stay in the Emergency Department (Minutes, Median, Inter-Quartile Range)268 (195 to 607)346 (283 to 410)
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Re-bleeding at 24 Hours

The number of participants with re-bleeding at 24 Hours was evaluated during follow up phone call

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at 24 Hours
ParticipantsTXA GroupNS Group
Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at 24 Hours39
SecondaryNumber of Participants With Re-bleeding at One Week

The number of participants with re-bleeding at one week was evaluated during the follow-up phone call

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at One Week
ParticipantsTXA GroupNS Group
Number of Participants With Re-bleeding at One Week26
SecondaryThromboembolism

Patient reported thromboembolic events during follow-up phone calls at 24 hours and at one week

Time frame:
7 days
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Thromboembolism
ParticipantsTXA GroupNS Group
Thromboembolism00
SecondaryDrug-Related Adverse Events

Patient-reported drug-related adverse events during ED visit

Time frame:
during emergency department (ED) visit
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Drug-Related Adverse Events
ParticipantsTXA GroupNS Group
Nasal burning20
Nasal irritation00
Unpleasant taste10

Adverse events

Collected over One week from initial ED visit. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
TXA Group0/17 (0%)0/17 (0%)4/17 (23.5%)
NS Group0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)0/18 (0%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventTXA GroupNS Group
Nasal BurningGeneral disorders2/170/18
Unpleasant tasteGeneral disorders1/170/18
RhinorrheaGastrointestinal disorders1/170/18

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years7916
>=65 years10919
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Mean61 (28 to 83)62 (21 to 95)62 (21 to 95)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Female61218
Male11617
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected
Race and Ethnicity Not Collected(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Count of participants——0
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
United States171835
Past Medical History
Past Medical History(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Anemia112
Atrial Fbrillation or flutter426
Cancer224
Chronic Kidney Disease527
Congestive Heart Failure415
Diabetes4610
Hyperlipidemia5510
Ischemic Stroke101
Obesity202
Pulmonary Embolism011
Deep Vein Thrombosis011
Myocardial infarction101
Coronary Artery Bypass112
Hypertension11718
Antiplatelet
Antiplatelet(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Aspirin8210
Clopidogrel213
Prasugrel101
Ticagrelor101
Anticoagulation
Anticoagulation(Participants)TXA GroupNS GroupTotal
Warfarin426
Apixaban325
Rivaroxaban000
Dabigatran000

3 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • University of California, Davis Medical Center
    Sacramento, California 95817, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Morgan DJ, Kellerman R. Epistaxis: evaluation and treatment. Prim Care. 2014 Mar;41(1):63-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pop.2013.10.007. PubMed 24439881 ↗
  • Dunn CJ, Goa KL. Tranexamic acid: a review of its use in surgery and other indications. Drugs. 1999 Jun;57(6):1005-32. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957060-00017. PubMed 10400410 ↗
  • Pallin DJ, Chng YM, McKay MP, Emond JA, Pelletier AJ, Camargo CA Jr. Epidemiology of epistaxis in US emergency departments, 1992 to 2001. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Jul;46(1):77-81. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.12.014. PubMed 15988431 ↗
  • Kucik CJ, Clenney T. Management of epistaxis. Am Fam Physician. 2005 Jan 15;71(2):305-11. PubMed 15686301 ↗
  • Villwock JA, Jones K. Recent trends in epistaxis management in the United States: 2008-2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013 Dec;139(12):1279-84. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5220. PubMed 24136624 ↗
  • Singer AJ, Blanda M, Cronin K, LoGiudice-Khwaja M, Gulla J, Bradshaw J, Katz A. Comparison of nasal tampons for the treatment of epistaxis in the emergency department: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2005 Feb;45(2):134-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2004.10.002. PubMed 15671968 ↗
  • White A, O'Reilly BF. Oral tranexamic acid in the management of epistaxis. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci. 1988 Feb;13(1):11-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2273.1988.tb00275.x. PubMed 3286068 ↗
  • Tibbelin A, Aust R, Bende M, Holgersson M, Petruson B, Rundcrantz H, Alander U. Effect of local tranexamic acid gel in the treatment of epistaxis. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec. 1995 Jul-Aug;57(4):207-9. doi: 10.1159/000276741. PubMed 7478455 ↗
  • Zahed R, Moharamzadeh P, Alizadeharasi S, Ghasemi A, Saeedi M. A new and rapid method for epistaxis treatment using injectable form of tranexamic acid topically: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1389-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.043. Epub 2013 Jul 30. PubMed 23911102 ↗
  • Utkewicz MD, Brunetti L, Awad NI. Epistaxis complicated by rivaroxaban managed with topical tranexamic acid. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Sep;33(9):1329.e5-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.02.049. Epub 2015 Mar 6. No abstract available. PubMed 25895714 ↗
  • Klepfish A, Berrebi A, Schattner A. Intranasal tranexamic acid treatment for severe epistaxis in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia. Arch Intern Med. 2001 Mar 12;161(5):767. doi: 10.1001/archinte.161.5.767. No abstract available. PubMed 11231712 ↗
  • Aguilera X, Martinez-Zapata MJ, Hinarejos P, Jordan M, Leal J, Gonzalez JC, Monllau JC, Celaya F, Rodriguez-Arias A, Fernandez JA, Pelfort X, Puig-Verdie Ll. Topical and intravenous tranexamic acid reduce blood loss compared to routine hemostasis in total knee arthroplasty: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2015 Jul;135(7):1017-25. doi: 10.1007/s00402-015-2232-8. Epub 2015 May 7. PubMed 25944156 ↗
  • Waldow T, Szlapka M, Haferkorn M, Burger L, Plotze K, Matschke K. Prospective clinical trial on dosage optimizing of tranexamic acid in non-emergency cardiac surgery procedures. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2013 Jan 1;55(4):457-68. doi: 10.3233/CH-131782. PubMed 24113504 ↗
  • Wolfe TR, Braude DA. Intranasal medication delivery for children: a brief review and update. Pediatrics. 2010 Sep;126(3):532-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-0616. Epub 2010 Aug 9. PubMed 20696726 ↗
  • Reuben A, Appelboam A, Stevens KN, Vickery J, Ewings P, Ingram W, Jeffery AN, Body R, Hilton M, Coppell J, Wainman B, Barton A. The Use of Tranexamic Acid to Reduce the Need for Nasal Packing in Epistaxis (NoPAC): Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2021 Jun;77(6):631-640. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2020.12.013. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33612282 ↗
  • Akkan S, Corbacioglu SK, Aytar H, Emektar E, Dagar S, Cevik Y. Evaluating Effectiveness of Nasal Compression With Tranexamic Acid Compared With Simple Nasal Compression and Merocel Packing: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2019 Jul;74(1):72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.03.030. Epub 2019 May 9. PubMed 31080025 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2016, a primary completion of Dec 2020 and a completion of Dec 2020. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Nov 2021, 10 months after primary completion.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 10, 2016
First posted
Oct 12, 2016
Start
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
Dec 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2020
Results first posted
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 30, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02930941
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 12, 2016
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2020
Completion
Dec 31, 2020
Results posted
Nov 30, 2021
Last update
Nov 30, 2021

Study contacts

Aimee Moulin, MD
principal investigator · University of California, Davis

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tranexamic Acid

Start the discussion