ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02925806Updated Oct 6, 2016

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Patterns for Extended Release/Long Acting Opioids and Comparator Products

An observational study in Opioid Related Disorders, Opiate Addiction and Narcotic Abuse, sponsored by ER/LA Opioid REMS Program Companies (RPC). Status unknown. Open to participants aged Up to 100 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-10-06.

Sponsored by ER/LA Opioid REMS Program Companies (RPC) · Observational

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Oct 2016), so the status shown — last known as Enrolling by invitation — may be out of date.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
5,575,834
Ages
Up to 100 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A drug utilization study will be performed to describe trends in the number of prescriptions and patients for class REMS ER/LA opioids and comparator products.

Read the detailed description

A drug utilization study will be performed to describe trends in the number of prescriptions and patients for class REMS ER/LA opioids and comparator products.

The specific objectives of the Drug Utilization Study are:

  1. To estimate trends by month in the number of prescriptions for a one-year period before, and each month after, the implementation of the REMS
  2. To compare average number of prescriptions per 3 month (quarter) period in the 2 years before as compared to the same measure during Implementation and the Active Period
  3. To evaluate change by patient characteristics (age group, gender, pay type, prescriber specialty)
  4. To compare the trends in prescribing, both number of prescriptions and patients, by prescriber specialty

    These trends and changes over time will be estimated for the following groups of opioids:

    • ER/LA opioids included in the class REMS
    • Comparator products/classes

      • Immediate release (IR) opioids
      • Celecoxib
      • Benzodiazepines
  5. To show switches (absolute and rates of switching) from ER/LA opioids to comparator analgesics (IR opioids or celecoxib) with introduction of REMS
02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid Related Disorders
  • Opiate Addiction
  • Narcotic Abuse
  • Drug Abuse
03

In context

Opioid-Related Disorders

1,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders; 291 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 5,575,834 is above the median of 129 across 175 observational studies indexed under Opioid-Related Disorders.

Browse Opioid-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

ER/LA Opioid REMS Program Companies (RPC) is the lead sponsor of 6 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Up to 100 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Subjects filling a prescription for a product of interest as gathered from the IMS National prescription Audit™ and IMS Health, LifeLink™

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Subjects filling a prescription for a product of interest during the specified time period will be included.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • None
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
5,575,834 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • ER/LA opioids included in the class REMS

    Other: Non-interventional study - retrospective database review

  • IR Opioids

    Other: Non-interventional study - retrospective database review

  • Celecoxib

    Other: Non-interventional study - retrospective database review

  • Benzodiazepines

    Other: Non-interventional study - retrospective database review

Interventions

  • OtherNon-interventional study - retrospective database review
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of opioid prescriptions filled

    Time frame: Monthly over 54 months

  2. Compare average number of prescriptions per time period in the 2 years before as compared to the same measure in implementation and active periods

    Time frame: Pre REMS Implementation (July 10-June 12)

  3. Compare trends in prescribing, both number of prescriptions and patients, by prescriber specialty

    Time frame: Pre REMS Implementation (July 10-June 12)

  4. Number and Rate of Switches from ER/ LA opioids to comparator analgesics with introduction of REMS

    Time frame: Monthly over 54 months

  5. Compare average number of prescriptions per time period in the 2 years before as compared to the same measure in implementation and active periods

    Time frame: Implementation (July 12-June 13)

  6. Compare average number of prescriptions per time period in the 2 years before as compared to the same measure in implementation and active periods

    Time frame: Active Period (July 13-Dec 14)

  7. Compare trends in prescribing, both number of prescriptions and patients, by prescriber specialty

    Time frame: Implementation (July 12-June 13)

  8. Compare trends in prescribing, both number of prescriptions and patients, by prescriber specialty

    Time frame: Active Period (July 13-Dec 14)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 6, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02925806
Lead sponsor
ER/LA Opioid REMS Program Companies (RPC)
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 6, 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2019 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 6, 2016
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Oct 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion