CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02830191CICLOSPOTUpdated Apr 18, 2019

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) of Cyclosporine in Kidney Transplant Patients by Dried Blood Spot Assay. Interest and Feasibility.

An observational study in Kidney Transplantation, sponsored by University Hospital, Caen. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-04-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Caen · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Ciclosporin A (CsA) is an immunosuppressive drug used in organs and tissues transplantations (kidney, heart, liver, bone marrow ...) to prevent rejection, and in different autoimmune or inflammatory diseases. A therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is required during a CsA treatment. It is justified by a narrow therapeutic range between efficiency and nephrotoxicity, and by large intra- and interindividual pharmacokinetic variability. TDM of CsA is conventionally performed by determining residual concentration, and sometimes concentration at 2 hours after administration. TDM of CsA is currently performed by venous sampling on ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Dried blood spot (DBS) sampling could be a particularly interesting alternative to conventional blood sampling. With DBS, capillary blood is obtained from a finger prick by the patient himself, and the blood drop obtained is deposited on filter paper, which can be stored at room temperature and then be sent to the laboratory by mail.

This sampling method has several advantages : it requires small blood volumes, it is less invasive than conventional venous sampling, sampling can be performed by the patient himself at home few days before the consultation, and the results of the analysis can be available to the clinician on the day of consultation, allowing dose adjustment more quickly.

Several studies have been published in recent years using DBS sampling method, for various drugs such as antimalarials, antiepileptics, antiretrovirals, metformin, benzodiazepines, or immunosuppressants. Only one clinical validation study of TDM of CsA using DBS method was published by Wilhelm et al. (2013) in a population of 38 patients who received allogeneic stem cell transplant recipients. The results showed excellent correlation between the concentrations determined by the two sampling methods.

The investigators propose an observational study at the University Hospital of Caen for clinical validation of DBS sampling for TDM of CsA in kidney transplantation, for which there are no data published. During a nephrology consultation, for each patient, venous and finger prick blood samples are simultaneously collected. CsA assays were performed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) for the two sampling methods. A specific LC-MS/MS assay method applied for DBS samples was developed and validated for this study (DBS/LC-MS/MS). Correlation between the results obtained from the two sampling methods will be evaluated, on at least 100 samples. Patients have to answer a questionnaire to assess pain and comfort of DBS sampling, and feasibility of self-sampling at home by this method. The aim of this clinical validation study of DBS sampling is the establishment of the systematic TDM of CsA for renal transplant patients by DBS sampling at the University Hospital of Caen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Kidney Transplantation

Keywords

  • Cyclosporine, Dried blood spot
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Caen is the lead sponsor of 505 studies on the registry; 80 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Renal transplant patients treated with cyclosporine at nephrology department of the University Hospital of Caen.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult Patient (18 years or older) treated with CsA and monitored for dose adjustment
  • Kidney transplantation
  • Not objecting to participate in study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Objecting to the additional sample by finger prick
  • Anticoagulant treatment
  • Hemostatic disorder (risk of hematoma)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
22 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Correlation between CsA concentrations determined from DBS sampling and conventional venous sampling for each patient (coefficient correlation, Bland-Altman difference plot)

    Time frame: 8 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of pain, comfort and practicality of the two sampling methods by a patient questionnaire.

    Time frame: 8 months

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 18, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02830191
Lead sponsor
University Hospital, Caen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 12, 2016
Start date
Nov 2014
Primary completion
Jul 2015
Completion
Jul 2015
Last update
Apr 18, 2019

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion