CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02771990Updated Mar 29, 2023Results posted

tDCS for Chronic Low Back Pain

An interventional study of Sham transcranial direct current stimulation and transcranial direct current stimulation in Chronic Low Back Pain, sponsored by Providence VA Medical Center. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2023-03-29.

Sponsored by Providence VA Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this study is to investigate the role of central neural pathways in mediating chronic pain. The aim of the study is to test the effect of stimulating brain regions that are part of a network underlying central pain processing using a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS). Prior studies have used tDCS to target both sensory related cortical areas and those important for higher-order representations of pain. This study will target brain regions important for the behavioral response to the chronic sensation of pain. The hypothesis is that stimulation of these brain regions can modulate not only the affective component of pain, but ultimately also improve functioning and quality of life. This hypothesis will be tested by treating study participants eighteen and older with chronic low back pain (CLBP) of greater than six months using tDCS. To be part of this study, participants must meet all the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

02

Conditions studied

  • Chronic Low Back Pain

Keywords

  • Back Pain
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Chronic Low Back Pain ≥ 6 months duration in the lumbar region, present more than half the days of the month, and on average be at a moderate level of severity in the last month
  • At least one trial of physician recommended medication (e.g. acetaminophen, NSAIDS, skeletal muscle relaxants)
  • Pre-existing opioid and non-opioid pain medication must be non-existent or stable (medications have not changed for one month)
  • Be able to understand, read and write English
  • If female and of childbearing age, agree to use acceptable birth control during the study treatment period (oral contraceptives, history of tubal ligation, history of a hysterectomy, or a reliable barrier method)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lifetime Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM) IV diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or other chronic psychotic condition
  • Current DSM-IV diagnosis of substance dependence for alcohol, sedative/hypnotic drugs, stimulants, cocaine
  • Current cancer, infection, or inflammatory arthritis
  • Broken skin or other lesions in the area of the electrodes
  • Uncontrolled medical problems, such as diabetes mellitus, hypertension, pulmonary or airway disease, heart failure, coronary artery disease, or any other condition that poses a risk for the subject during participation
  • Presence of metal in the cranial cavity
  • Holes in the skull made by trauma or surgery
  • Pacemakers, medication pumps, and other implanted electronic hardware
  • Pregnancy
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Sham comparator
    sham tDCS

    10 sessions sham transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Device: Sham transcranial direct current stimulation

  • Experimental
    active tDCS

    10 sessions active transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)

    Device: transcranial direct current stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceSham transcranial direct current stimulation

    sham stimulation

  • Devicetranscranial direct current stimulation

    2 milliamp (mA) 20 minutes

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHY-MPI) General Activity Subscale Rating

    The WHY-MPI General Activity subscale contains 18 items summed to give a score ranging from 0 to 108 (higher scores indicate more activity \[better\]).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS-20) Rating

    The PASS-20 contains 20 items and scores could range from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate greater pain anxiety).

    Time frame: 8 weeks

06

Results

Posted May 4, 2021
Limitations and caveats
small sample size (N = 21), participants were not stratified by premorbid anxiety levels, inability to guarantee optimal targeting of the left dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, inability to address laterality effects of pain perception

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSham tDCSActive tDCS
Started1110
Completed1110
Not completed00

Outcome measures

PrimaryWest Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHY-MPI) General Activity Subscale Rating

The WHY-MPI General Activity subscale contains 18 items summed to give a score ranging from 0 to 108 (higher scores indicate more activity \[better\]).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHY-MPI) General Activity Subscale Rating
score on a scaleSham tDCSActive tDCS
West Haven-Yale Multidimensional Pain Inventory (WHY-MPI) General Activity Subscale Rating35.3 ± 17.748.4 ± 21.2
Statistical analysis
  • Sham tDCS vs Active tDCS · Regression, Linear · p = 0.002 · Z-score: 3.11
PrimaryPain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS-20) Rating

The PASS-20 contains 20 items and scores could range from 0 to 100 (higher scores indicate greater pain anxiety).

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS-20) Rating
score on a scaleSham tDCSActive tDCS
Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale (PASS-20) Rating26.4 ± 22.026.3 ± 23.6
Statistical analysis
  • Sham tDCS vs Active tDCS · Regression, Linear · p = 0.67

Adverse events

Collected over 8 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Sham tDCS0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)0/11 (0%)
Active tDCS0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)0/10 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Sham tDCSActive tDCSTotal
Mean60.7 ± 1.865.7 ± 8.863.1 ± 10.5
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Sham tDCSActive tDCSTotal
Female213
Male9918
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)Sham tDCSActive tDCSTotal
White7714
Black or African American101
Hispanic or Latino011
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian000
Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander000
Other325
Years of Education
Years of Education(years)Sham tDCSActive tDCSTotal
Mean14.7 ± 2.614.0 ± 2.614.4 ± 2.7
07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 19, 2018

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Only de-identified data will be shared.

09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02771990
Lead sponsor
Providence VA Medical Center
Responsible party
Benjamin Greenberg (Associate Director, CfNN, Providence VA Medical Center) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 13, 2016
Start date
Oct 2013
Primary completion
Apr 3, 2018
Completion
Apr 3, 2018
Results posted
May 4, 2021
Last update
Mar 29, 2023

Study contacts

Frederick Burgess, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Providence VA Medical Center
Benjamin Greenberg, MD, PhD
principal investigator · Providence VA Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Mar 2023. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion