CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02739308Updated Apr 15, 2016

Effects of Proprioceptive Training on Neurofunctional Control and Ankle Sprains Incidence

An interventional study of Proprioceptive Training and Control Group in Ankle Injuries, sponsored by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Status unknown at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 14 Years to 30 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-04-15.

Sponsored by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Apr 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
18
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
14 Years to 30 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The aim of this study is to investigate the influence of a 12-week proprioceptive training program on the neurofunctional control and the incidence of ankle sprains in fencing athletes. The study will be developed in six stages: familiarization, pre intervention, intervention, post intervention follow-up of three and six months. In the pre intervention stage will evaluate muscle strength inverters, everter, dorsal plantar flexors and ankle flexors through the isokinetic dynamometer; the reaction time of these muscles during Lunge Test; neuromuscular control during the Star Excursion Balance Test and performance in Drop Vertical Jump Test. In the intervention athletes will perform proprioceptive training for 12 weeks, three times a week, lasting 30 minutes. In the post intervention, the follow up of three to six months will be held the same pre intervention of the tests and recording the incidence of injuries occurred during the study. The expected result at the end of the study is to improve all variables, increasing the performance of athletes and decreasing the incidence of ankle sprains.

Read the detailed description

Fencing is an agility sport, with higher incidence of injuries in the lower limbs, with the ankle sprain the most prevalent. Injury prevention is very important to improve performance and reduce time off of athletes. Proprioceptive training programs can be added to the training of athletes, since in addition to the easy application and low cost, proprioception serves to stabilize the joint, preventing injuries. Therefore the aim of this study is to investigate the influence of a 12-week proprioceptive training program on the neurofunctional control and the incidence of ankle sprains in fencing athletes. The study will be a randomized clinical trial, with fencing athletes from 14 to 25, a multi-sport club of Porto Alegre/RS, and developed in six stages: familiarization, pre intervention, intervention, post intervention follow-up of three and six months. The first step will be to familiarize themselves with the force of testing and registration of injuries in the previous year. In the pre intervention stage will evaluate muscle strength inverters, everter, dorsal plantar flexors and ankle flexors through the isokinetic dynamometer; the reaction time of these muscles during Lunge Test; neuromuscular control during the Star Excursion Balance Test and performance in Drop Vertical Jump Test. In the intervention athletes will perform proprioceptive training for 12 weeks, three times a week, lasting 30 minutes. In the post intervention, the follow up of three to six months will be held the same pre intervention of the tests and recording the incidence of injuries occurred during the study. For statistical analysis, the data will be presented as mean and standard deviation and submitted to the Shapiro-Wilk test, ANOVA will be held for repeated measures and post hoc Bonferroni to determine differences. The effect size is calculated using Cohen's d test.o significance level is 0.05. The expected result at the end of the study is to improve all variables, increasing the performance of athletes and decreasing the incidence of ankle sprains.

02

Conditions studied

  • Ankle Injuries

Keywords

  • proprioception
  • ankle sprain
  • fencing
03

In context

Sprains and Strains

217 studies on the registry are indexed under Sprains and Strains; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 18 is below the median of 60 across 166 interventional studies indexed under Sprains and Strains.

Browse Sprains and Strains studies →

Lead sponsor

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 20 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
14 Years to 30 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • practicing fencing at least a year
  • have between 14 and 30 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • be in physical therapy or participating in prevention programs
  • have damage to lower limbs that compromise the tests
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
18 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention: Proprioceptive Training

    The intervention will be the implementation of a proprioceptive training program for the fencing athletes in the intervention group. In this study the training program will be developed for 12 weeks and will be applied during the heating of the athletes, three times a week and the duration of each session is 30 minutes. Each week will be chosen three of the 14 exercises adapted for fencing athletes, and preferably one of each category. The categories have exercises with different levels of difficulty and can change the exercises occur by different proposed levels or the complexity of the exercise by changing category. The training program will be implemented by the same evaluator over the 12 weeks.

    Other: Proprioceptive Training

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    The control group will not make the intervention and will continue with the usual training fencing.

    Other: Control Group

Interventions

  • OtherProprioceptive Training

    In this study the training program will be developed for 12 weeks and will be applied during the heating of the athletes , three times a week and the duration of each session is 30 minutes. Each week will be chosen three of the 14 exercises adapted for fencing athletes , and preferably one of each category.

  • OtherControl Group

    The control group will not make the intervention and will continue with usual training fencing.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Onset muscle

    The muscular reaction time will be assessed by electromyography during Lunge Test.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Muscle Strength

    The muscle strength of ankle will be assessed by isokinetic dynamometer.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  2. Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT)

    The SEBT will be used to measure the dynamic neuromuscular control.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  3. Drop Vertical Jump Test (DVJT)

    The DVJT be used to assess the height of the heels, from surfaces 30, 40 and 50cm .

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  4. Cumberland Ankle Instability Tools (CAIT)

    The CAIT will be used to assess whether the ankle has istabilidade

    Time frame: 12 weeks

  5. Injury questionnaire

    This questionnaire will be used to assess the number of injuries and to joints they occurred.

    Time frame: 12 weeks

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02739308
Lead sponsor
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Responsible party
Gabriela Souza de Vasconcelos (Physical Therapy and Student of Post Graduate of UFRGS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 15, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Apr 2016
Completion
Apr 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 15, 2016

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Apr 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion