CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07759388Updated Aug 12, 2026

Effects of Foam Rolling on Plantar Flexor Recovery in Healthy Individuals

An interventional study of Foam rolling in Roam Rolling and Muscle Recovery, sponsored by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Brazil. Open to male participants aged 18 Years to 40 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-12.

Sponsored by Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 40 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

Foam rolling (FR) is a self-myofascial release technique that involves using body weight to apply pressure to soft tissues through a foam roller. This technique has been widely used in rehabilitation and physical training settings, aiming at the treatment of myofascial dysfunctions, enhancement of physical performance, and recovery from exercise-induced muscle damage (EIMD). EIMD occurs following the performance of intense exercise, resulting in increased muscle stiffness and delayed onset muscle soreness (DOMS), as well as reductions in force production and range of motion (ROM).

However, few studies have investigated the effects of FR on the recovery of musculotendinous and functional properties. Although there is evidence suggesting a reduction in muscle stiffness, this finding does not appear to be consistent across the literature. Furthermore, no studies have been identified that evaluated the effects of FR on the recovery of fascial and tendinous tissues. Regarding functional properties, although FR application may promote improved recovery of DOMS, ROM, vertical jump performance, and muscle strength, contradictory findings have been reported.

Therefore, the aim of the present study is to investigate the effects of FR on the recovery of musculotendinous and functional properties of plantar flexors in healthy individuals. A total of 69 healthy male participants, aged between 18 and 40 years, will be included in the study. Participants will undergo an EIMD protocol using an isokinetic dynamometer and will be randomly assigned to either the FR (self-myofascial release with FR: 3 sets of 30 s) or a control group (CON; rest for 90 s).

The mechanical properties of the myofascial tissues of the triceps surae and the Achilles tendon (AT) will be assessed using shear wave elastography, while echo intensity (EI) of the triceps surae will be obtained through grayscale analysis of ultrasound (US) images. DOMS will be assessed using a visual analog scale. Maximum dorsiflexion ROM, peak torque production (isometric and isokinetic), and rate of torque development of the plantar flexors will be evaluated using the isokinetic dynamometer. Drop jump performance will be assessed using a force platform.

Ultrasound imaging will also be used to determine cross-sectional area, resting length, and deformation of the AT during maximal voluntary isometric contractions. Based on these data, force-deformation and stress-strain relationships of the AT will be determined.

Assessments will be conducted before (Pre-1 and Pre-EIMD), immediately after the EIMD protocol (Post-EIMD), and at 24 h (Post-24h), 48 h (Post-48h), and 72 h (Post-72h) following the interventions (FR or CON). Descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, and standard error) will be used to present the results. Reliability of US measurements, as well as data normality and sphericity, will be assessed. A two-way ANOVA (group × time) will be used for comparisons, followed by Bonferroni post hoc tests to identify differences. Additionally, effect sizes will be calculated for each intervention, and correlation analyses will be performed to examine the influence of adipose tissue thickness on the evaluated parameters.

02

Conditions studied

  • Roam Rolling
  • Muscle Recovery

Keywords

  • Self-massage
  • foam rolling
  • Plantar flexors
  • muscle damage
  • muscle recovery
  • ultrassound
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 40 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Male individuals (aged 18-40 years);
  • Who had not engaged in any form of lower limb strength training and;
  • Had no prior experience with FR participated in this study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

  • Presence of musculoskeletal injuries in the lower limbs;
  • Contraindications for performing maximal tests (including cardiovascular, respiratory, musculoskeletal or neurological conditions);
  • Engagement in high-intensity physical activity within 72 hours prior to assessments;
  • Current usage of dietary or anabolic supplements.
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control
  • Experimental
    Foam rolling

    Other: Foam rolling

Interventions

  • OtherFoam rolling

    Participants will undergo an exercise Induced muscle damage protocol (4 sets of 25 maximal eccentric contractions) using an isokinetic dynamometer and will be assigned to the Foam Rolling (FR) group (self-myofascial release with FR: 3 sets of 30 s).

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. delayed-onset muscle soreness (DOMS) assessed by the 10cm visual analog scale (VAS)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  2. Maximum voluntary isometric contraction (MVIC)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Range of motion (ROM)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  2. Torque (concentric and eccentric)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  3. Single-leg drop jump height

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  4. echo intensity (EI)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  5. pennation angle (PA)

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  6. Plantar flexors' Muscle Thickness (MT) assessed by ultrasound imaging

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

  7. Plantar flexors' stiffness assessed by shear wave elastography

    Time frame: Baseline (before the muscle damage protocol), immediately after the muscle damage protocol, and 24 hours, 48 hours, and 72 hours after the muscle damage protocol.

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Esefid/Ufrgs
    Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul 90690-200, Brazil
07

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07759388
Lead sponsor
Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Collaborators
Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior.
Responsible party
Jeam Marcel Geremia (Professor, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 12, 2026
Start date
Aug 24, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 8, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 8, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 12, 2026

Study contacts

Jeam M Geremia, Professor
Contact
jeam.geremia@ufrgs.br
+55 51 9316-6603

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Aug 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion