CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02726087QUALITY-AVRUpdated Feb 5, 2020

Quality of Life After Ministernotomy Versus Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacement

An interventional study of ministernotomy and Full sternotomy in Aortic Valve Stenosis, Heart Valve Diseases and Aortic Valve Disease, sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud. Completed at 1 site in Spain. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-02-05.

Sponsored by Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
96
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a single-center, single-blind, all comer, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to aortic stenosis at "Virgen de la Victoria Universitary Hospital", Málaga, Spain, will be eligible. Ninety-six patients will be randomly assigned to either partial upper sternotomy (ministernotomy, 48 patients) or full sternotomy AVR (48 patients). Sample size was determined for an Alpha error of 0.05,and Beta error of 0.1 for a power of 90% in detecting 0.10 difference points in quality of life EQ-5D-5L-index or 10 points in EQ-5D-5L-Visual Analogic Scale (QOL).

Read the detailed description

This is a single-center, single-blind, all comer, randomized controlled trial. Patients scheduled for isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) due to aortic stenosis at "Virgen de la Victoria Universitary Hospital", Málaga, Spain, will be eligible. Ninety-six patients will be randomly assigned to either partial upper sternotomy (ministernotomy, 48 patients) or full sternotomy AVR (48 patients). Sample size was determined for an Alpha error of 0.05,and Beta error of 0.1 for a power of 90% in detecting 0.10 difference points in quality of life EQ-5D-5L-index or 10 points in EQ-5D-5L-Visual Analogic Scale.

Inclusion criteria is severe aortic stenosis referred for medically indicated isolated aortic valve replacement due to aortic stenosis in patients >18 years.

Exclusion criteria are left ventricular ejection fraction less than 40%, previous cardiac surgery, urgent/emergent surgery, infective endocarditis, need of concomitant procedures other than isolated Morrow miectomy and thorax deformity.

CE-marked and FDA-approved mechanical (Sorin Carbomedics®) and stented bioprosthetic aortic valves will be implanted (Carpentier Edwards Perimount® and Sorin Crown®). Perceval S Sutureless bioprosthetic valves (LivaNova®) could be used if needed in very small aortic annulus or high risk patients Quality of Life postoperative outcomes will be assessed, as QOL measurements and health status with the EQ-5D-5L® questionnaire (QOL index, health visual analogic scale, severity index and health index), repeatedly assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1-6-12 months. Clinical postoperative complications and outcomes will be registered at 1 month and 1 year as main secondary and safety end-point (combined end-point of 4 and 6 major complications) Patient Satisfaction will be assessed with a 20 question cardiac-surgery specific satisfaction questionnaire (SATISCORE®).

Survival will be assessed at 1 year. Clinical pre and postoperative characteristics will be registered. Routine blood sampling will be performed pre- and postoperatively. All available data will be collected prospectively. Informed consent) will be obtained from patients meeting the inclusion criteria before the initiation of any study-specific procedures.

The Institutional Review Board Ethic Comittee approved this study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Aortic Valve Stenosis
  • Heart Valve Diseases
  • Aortic Valve Disease

Keywords

  • Ministernotomy
  • aortic valve stenosis
  • quality of life
  • satisfaction
  • cardiac surgery
03

In context

Aortic Valve Stenosis

985 studies on the registry are indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis; 283 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 96 is below the median of 120 across 525 interventional studies indexed under Aortic Valve Stenosis.

Browse Aortic Valve Stenosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud is the lead sponsor of 71 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • ≥ 18 years of age
  • Severe aortic stenosis defined as aortic valve area of less than 1 cm2 or index area of 0.6 cm2/m2 or mean gradient greater than 40 mmHg by echocardiography or double lesion with predominant stenosis.
  • Referred for medically indicated aortic valve replacement
  • Provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Left ventricular ejection fraction less than 0.40
  • Presence of any coexisting severe valvular disorder
  • Previous cardiac surgery
  • Urgent or emergent surgery
  • Infective endocarditis
  • Need for concomitant procedures other than isolated myectomy
  • Severe COPD
  • Severe thorax deformity.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
96 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ministernotomy

    Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement with Partial "J" upper hemisternotomy through right 4th intercostal space, performed according to current standard of care practice.

    Procedure: ministernotomy

  • Active comparator
    full sternotomy

    Full sternotomy AVR through a standard median sternotomy, performed according to current standard of care practice.

    Procedure: Full sternotomy

Interventions

  • Procedureministernotomy

    Partial upper "J" hemisternotomy trough 4th right intercostal space)

  • ProcedureFull sternotomy

    Conventional full median sternotomy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® Index at 1, 6 or 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® Visual Analogic Scale for pain at 1, 6 or 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months

  2. Early postoperative combined endpoint of 6 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2, nosocomial infections (Pneumonia, early endocarditis, mediastinitis, sepsis) and need of any reintervention

    Time frame: 1 month

  3. Satiscore Questionnaire

    Satisfaction in cardiac surgery

    Time frame: 1-6 months

  4. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® severity index at 1, 6 and 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months

  5. Differences between intervention groups in change from baseline Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® health index (severity index inverse) at 1, 6 and 12 months

    Questionnaire EQ-5D-5L® for quality of life

    Time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months

  6. Late postoperative combined endpoint of 6 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2, nosocomial infections (Pneumonia, early endocarditis, mediastinitis, sepsis) and need of any reintervention

    Time frame: 1-5 years

  7. Total in-Hospital and Intensive Care Unit stay (in days)

    Time frame: From date of surgery until the date of discharge or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to 1 year

  8. Cardiopulmonary bypass time in minutes and cross-clamp ischemic heart time in minutes needed in the surgery

    Time frame: day 1 after surgery

  9. Mechanical Ventilatory Support time needed after surgery (in hours)

    Time frame: 7 days

  10. Transfusional requirements (number of red packed cells, fresh frozen plasma and platelets)

    Time frame: First 72 hours after surgery

  11. New York Heart Association functional class scale for heart failure

    To assess heart failure status between participants

    Time frame: baseline-1-6-12 months

  12. Number of participants alive (Survival)

    To assess first year mortality

    Time frame: 6-12 months

  13. Number of participants alive (Survival)

    To assess 5 year mortality

    Time frame: 5 years

  14. Early postoperative combined endpoint of 4 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, and acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2,

    Time frame: 1 month

  15. Late postoperative combined endpoint of 4 complications

    All cause Mortality, acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular or transient ischemic accident, and acute renal failure AKIN (acute kidney injury classification) greater or equal than 2,

    Time frame: 1-5 years year

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de La Victoria
    Malaga, 29010, Spain
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rodriguez-Caulo EA, Guijarro-Contreras A, Otero-Forero J, Mataro MJ, Sanchez-Espin G, Guzon A, Porras C, Such M, Ordonez A, Melero-Tejedor JM, Jimenez-Navarro M. Quality of life, satisfaction and outcomes after ministernotomy versus full sternotomy isolated aortic valve replacement (QUALITY-AVR): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Feb 17;19(1):114. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2486-x. PubMed 29454380 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 5, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02726087
Lead sponsor
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud
Responsible party
Emiliano Rodriguez-Caulo (MD, PhD, FETCS, Fundación Pública Andaluza para la Investigación de Málaga en Biomedicina y Salud) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 1, 2016
Start date
Mar 20, 2016
Primary completion
May 20, 2019
Completion
Oct 20, 2019
Last update
Feb 5, 2020

Study contacts

Emiliano A Rodriguez-Caulo, MD,PhD,FECTS
principal investigator · Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, spain

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion