CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02721173Updated Jan 18, 2017

Tazarotene Plus Clindamycin vs. Adapalene Plus Clindamycin in the Treatment of Facial Acne Vulgaris

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tazarotene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel and Adapalene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel in Acne Vulgaris, sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar. Completed at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 12 Years to 35 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-01-18.

Sponsored by All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Years to 35 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The combination therapy of retinoid and clindamycin for acne is preferred because it targets multiple areas of acne pathogenesis that could not be accomplished with monotherapy, thereby improving outcome. Literature review reveals that till date there is no published comparative study assessing safety and efficacy of tazarotene plus clindamycin and adapalene plus clindamycin. So the present study has been designed to compare these two combination therapy in acne vulgaris.

Read the detailed description

Acne vulgaris is one of the most common disorders treated by dermatologists. The pathogenesis of acne is multifactorial. Critical components include abnormal follicular keratinocyte desquamation leading to the formation of a follicular plug (microcomedo), increase of sebum production in pilosebaceous unit, colonization by Propionibacterium acnes, and inflammation. Topical retinoids, which target comedogenesis and have anti-inflammatory activity, are recommended as first-line therapy for both inflammatory and non-inflammatory acne. The adjunctive use of anti-acne agents like clindamycin by its complementary mechanism of action can help to enhance the efficacy of topical retinoid therapy still further.

Tazarotene is a synthetic retinoid and a prodrug that is converted by the skin to its active form, tazarotenic acid. The active form binds to retinoic acid receptors (RARs) and regulates gene transcription and helps to normalize the abnormal keratinization in the follicular infundibulum, this in turn changes the microenvironment of the follicle and thereby reduce the proliferation of Propionibacterium acnes. Adapalene is a synthetic naphthoic acid derivative with retinoid activity. Adapalene also acts through RARs and modulates cellular keratinization and inflammatory process. Clindamycin is bactericidal to Propionibacterium acnes. Due to the inhibition of P. acnes the free fatty acid levels in the pilosebaceous unit of skin is also reduced. Clindamycin phosphate applied topically penetrates to a very great extent to open comedones and thus produces a high percentage of sterile comedones.

The combination therapy of retinoid and clindamycin for acne is preferred because it targets multiple areas of acne pathogenesis that could not be accomplished with monotherapy, thereby improving outcome. Literature review reveals that till date there is no published comparative study assessing safety and efficacy of tazarotene plus clindamycin and adapalene plus clindamycin. So the present study has been designed to compare these two combination therapy in acne vulgaris.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acne Vulgaris

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Tazarotene
  • Adapalene
  • Clindamycin
03

In context

Acne Vulgaris

730 studies on the registry are indexed under Acne Vulgaris; 86 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 60 is below the median of 69 across 628 interventional studies indexed under Acne Vulgaris.

Browse Acne Vulgaris studies →

Lead sponsor

All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar is the lead sponsor of 59 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Years to 35 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • All patients with the diagnosis of facial acne vulgaris having comedones, papules, pustules (≤5), or nodules (≤2) or Investigator's static global assessment score ≤4
  • Treatment naïve patients or patients who had not taken topical anti-acne medications in last 14 days, systemic antibiotics in last 30 days, oral retinoids in last 12 months

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Very severe acne vulgaris (Investigator's static global assessment score >4)
  • Any skin disorder that might interfere with the diagnosis or evaluation of acne vulgaris
  • Known hypersensitivity to retinoids and clindamycin
  • Any uncontrolled systemic disease or any cosmetic or surgical procedures complementary to the treatment of acne in the preceding 15 days
  • Patients who were on oral contraceptive pills in last 12 weeks
  • Pregnant and nursing women
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Tazarotene group

    This group will receive tazarotene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Tazarotene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel

  • Active comparator
    Adapalene group

    This group will receive adapalene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel for 4 weeks.

    Drug: Adapalene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel

Interventions

  • DrugTazarotene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel

    Medications will be advised to apply once daily in the evening after facial cleansing. Clindamycin will be applied first and tazarotene will be applied 5-10 minutes later.

  • DrugAdapalene 0.1% gel plus clindamycin 1% gel

    Medications will be advised to apply once daily in the evening after facial cleansing. Clindamycin will be applied first and adapalene will be applied 5-10 minutes later.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The number of facial acne lesions

    Total number of facial acne lesions (inflammatory and non-inflammatory) will be counted

    Time frame: Change from baseline over 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Severity of acne

    Severity of acne will be assessed by Acne global severity scale

    Time frame: Change from baseline over 4 weeks

  2. Severity of acne

    Severity of acne will be assessed by Investigator's static global assessment (ISGA) score

    Time frame: Change from baseline over 4 weeks

  3. Quality of life

    Quality of life will be assessed by Acne-specific quality of life questionnaire (Acne-QoL).

    Time frame: Change from baseline over 4 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • AIIMS, Bhubaneswar
    Bhubaneswar, Odisha 751019, India
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Millikan LE. The rationale for using a topical retinoid for inflammatory acne. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2003;4(2):75-80. doi: 10.2165/00128071-200304020-00001. PubMed 12553848 ↗
  • Jeremy AH, Holland DB, Roberts SG, Thomson KF, Cunliffe WJ. Inflammatory events are involved in acne lesion initiation. J Invest Dermatol. 2003 Jul;121(1):20-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2003.12321.x. PubMed 12839559 ↗
  • Do TT, Zarkhin S, Orringer JS, Nemeth S, Hamilton T, Sachs D, Voorhees JJ, Kang S. Computer-assisted alignment and tracking of acne lesions indicate that most inflammatory lesions arise from comedones and de novo. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008 Apr;58(4):603-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2007.12.024. Epub 2008 Feb 4. PubMed 18249468 ↗
  • Talpur R, Cox K, Duvic M. Efficacy and safety of topical tazarotene: a review. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2009 Feb;5(2):195-210. doi: 10.1517/17425250902721250. PubMed 20213916 ↗
  • Thiboutot D, Gollnick H, Bettoli V, Dreno B, Kang S, Leyden JJ, Shalita AR, Lozada VT, Berson D, Finlay A, Goh CL, Herane MI, Kaminsky A, Kubba R, Layton A, Miyachi Y, Perez M, Martin JP, Ramos-E-Silva M, See JA, Shear N, Wolf J Jr; Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne. New insights into the management of acne: an update from the Global Alliance to Improve Outcomes in Acne group. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2009 May;60(5 Suppl):S1-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jaad.2009.01.019. PubMed 19376456 ↗
  • Draelos ZD, Tanghetti EA; Tazarotene Combination Leads to Efficacious Acne Results (CLEAR) Trial Study Group. Optimizing the use of tazarotene for the treatment of facial acne vulgaris through combination therapy. Cutis. 2002 Feb;69(2 Suppl):20-9. PubMed 12095065 ↗
  • Piskin S, Uzunali E. A review of the use of adapalene for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Aug;3(4):621-4. PubMed 18472984 ↗
  • Feldman SR, Werner CP, Alio Saenz AB. The efficacy and tolerability of tazarotene foam, 0.1%, in the treatment of acne vulgaris in 2 multicenter, randomized, vehicle-controlled, double-blind studies. J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Apr;12(4):438-46. PubMed 23652892 ↗
  • Adityan B, Kumari R, Thappa DM. Scoring systems in acne vulgaris. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2009 May-Jun;75(3):323-6. doi: 10.4103/0378-6323.51258. No abstract available. PubMed 19439902 ↗
  • Martin AR, Lookingbill DP, Botek A, Light J, Thiboutot D, Girman CJ. Health-related quality of life among patients with facial acne -- assessment of a new acne-specific questionnaire. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2001 Jul;26(5):380-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2230.2001.00839.x. PubMed 11488820 ↗
  • Maiti R, Sirka CS, Ashique Rahman MA, Srinivasan A, Parida S, Hota D. Efficacy and Safety of Tazarotene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel Versus Adapalene 0.1% Plus Clindamycin 1% Gel in Facial Acne Vulgaris: A Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial. Clin Drug Investig. 2017 Nov;37(11):1083-1091. doi: 10.1007/s40261-017-0568-2. PubMed 28913735 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 18, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02721173
Lead sponsor
All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar
Responsible party
Chandra Sekhar Sirka (Associate Professor, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 29, 2016
Start date
Apr 2016
Primary completion
Dec 2016
Completion
Jan 2017
Last update
Jan 18, 2017

Study contacts

DEBASISH HOTA, DM
study director · AIIMS, Bhubaneswar

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion