An interventional study of MRI and PET in Lung Cancer, sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges. Completed at 1 site in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-07-05.
Sponsored by University Hospital, Limoges · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic
Magnetic Resonnace Imaging (MRI) and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can be both used in detection of nodes in patients with cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
However, the cardiorespiratory synchronization in the MRI, allowing acquisition of synchronous images with breathing and heart movements should increase the sensitivity of detection of pathologic mediastinal lymph nodes.
Given its high sensitivity, whole-body MRI with diffusion could possibly be at least as informative as PET, while being less expensive, not radiant.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of whole-body MRI with diffusion with cardiorespiratory synchronization, on the detection of mediastinal nodes (which are known to be less well detected by MRI) compared to PET.
7,333 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Neoplasms; 1,554 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 36 is below the median of 60 across 5,345 interventional studies indexed under Lung Neoplasms.
Browse Lung Neoplasms studies →University Hospital, Limoges is the lead sponsor of 262 studies on the registry; 37 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Inclusion Criteria:
Non Inclusion Criteria:
Wholebody MRI with cardio-pulmonary synchronization At day 1 , at the afternoon, patient will undergo an MRI analysis.
Device: MRI
At day 1 , in the morning, patient will undergo an PET analysis
Device: PET
Whole body MRI with cardiac and pulmonary synchronization
Th consistency of the locations of mediastinal lesions
Node localization according to MRI and PET scan measurements on the same day
Time frame: Day 1
Plan to share: No
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
Ran from Mar 2016 to primary completion in Dec 2018, 33 months.
Of 774 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Lung Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 71. This study's 33 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 818 studies reached it within 39 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 71.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
University Hospital, Limoges →