CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02703259Updated May 20, 2020Results posted

Single Dose Preoperative Gabapentin Use in Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Acute Pain Management

A Phase 4 interventional study of Gabapentin and Acetaminophen in Pain, Postoperative, sponsored by Christiana Care Health Services. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-05-20.

Sponsored by Christiana Care Health Services · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
137
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of the investigators' study is to assess the efficacy of a single dose of preoperative gabapentin within an enhanced recovery after surgery protocol in acute postoperative pain reduction for women undergoing a minimally invasive hysterectomy. Participants who consent to participate will be randomized to either a control group without gabapentin or to a study arm and receive gabapentin 600 mg prior to their planned surgery. The investigators will collect data on postoperative narcotic use, subjective pain as rated by a numeric pain scale, in addition to any adverse effects of single dose gabapentin use.

Read the detailed description

Multimodal postoperative analgesia after a hysterectomy has been mainly based on a combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids. However, adverse effects including nausea, vomiting, sedation, and pruritus may limit use of opioids. As the side effects are dose related, minimizing opioid exposure may significantly reduce these risks. Thus, there has been an interest in evaluating preemptive as well as post-operative administration of non-opioids. Additional regimens have been suggested to minimize opioid use and its associated adverse effects including injection of local anesthetics, epidural analgesia, and anticonvulsants, such as gabapentin or pregabalin.

Gabapentin, a widely used anticonvulsant used for treatment of neuropathic pain, has recently been suggested to improve postoperative analgesia and reduce opioid requirements. Gabapentin is thought to modulate calcium channels on the presynaptic nociceptive neurons, which in turn modulate or inhibit the release of excitatory neurotransmitters from activated nociceptors. In addition to inhibiting pain transmission, gabapentin may exert an analgesic effect by activating descending inhibitory noradrenergic pathways.

Many studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of gabapentin for perioperative use in a variety of procedures across disciplines including thoracotomy, laparoscopic cholecystectomy, tonsillectomy, major orthopedic surgery, cesarean sections, and abdominal hysterectomy. Several randomized trials have evaluated the effects of gabapentin administered preoperatively only as well as given pre- and postoperatively for hysterectomy. In a systematic review of 14 studies conducted between 2004 and 2013, with samples ranging from 40 to 200, investigators identified 8 trials in which gabapentin was administered only preoperatively to reduce pain associated with abdominal hysterectomy surgery. Analysis of those data clearly demonstrates that preemptive gabapentin reduced the postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain score by approximately 50% and postoperative use of morphine by approximately 37%. The incidence of pruritus and dry mouth in those receiving preemptive gabapentin appeared similar to those receiving placebo, however there was a higher rate of reported dizziness (not statistically significant) associated with gabapentin. In contrast, multiple postoperative doses of gabapentin in addition to the preoperative dose was found to have no significant effect on VAS scores at 24 hours, thus favoring a single preoperative dose.

Although initial results have been encouraging, uptake of gabapentin in routine clinical use remains limited due to mixed results and variability between gabapentin protocols, including dosing and duration. Christiana Care Health System (CCHS) plans to implement the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol which administers preoperative medications to reduce postoperative pain, including acetaminophen, celecoxib, dexamethasone, and gabapentin. Therefore the aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a single dose of preoperative gabapentin protocol to reduce acute postoperative pain in women undergoing a minimally invasive hysterectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain, Postoperative
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 137 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Christiana Care Health Services is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • undergoing a minimally invasive hysterectomy with surgeons operating within the Christiana Care Health System at the Newark location only.
  • at least 18 years of age
  • able to swallow tablets or capsules

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • liver failure
  • renal failure
  • prior gastric bypass
  • gastroparesis
  • recent or current regular gabapentin use
  • hypersensitivity to gabapentin, acetominophen, or celecoxib
  • procedure is converted to laparotomy for any indication. (Mini-laparotomy for specimen removal alone will not be excluded.)
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
137 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Gabapentin

    As per the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol at our health institution, subject will receive oral medications prior to surgery including acetaminophen, celecoxib, and gabapentin x 1 dose given preoperatively. The number of tablets and capsules will remain identical in both study arms. Medications given include: Gabapentin 600 mg (two capsules of gabapetin 300 mg); Acetaminophen 975 mg (three tablets of acetaminophen 325 mg); Celecoxib 400 mg (two capsules of celecoxib 200 mg) = Total 3 tablets, 4 capsules

    Drug: Gabapentin · Drug: Acetaminophen · Drug: Celecoxib

  • Placebo comparator
    Control

    As per the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol at our health institution, subject will receive oral medications prior to surgery including acetaminophen and celecoxib x 1 dose given preoperatively. The number of tablets and capsules will remain identical in both study arms. Medications given include: Acetaminophen 975 mg (three tablets of acetaminophen 325 mg); Celecoxib 400 mg (four capsules of celecoxib 100 mg) = Total total 3 tablets, 4 capsules

    Drug: Acetaminophen · Drug: Celecoxib

Interventions

  • DrugGabapentin
  • DrugAcetaminophen
  • DrugCelecoxib
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Narcotic Use at 24 Hours Postop

    Assessment of the amount of narcotic use postoperatively at 24 hours. will use opioid equivalence table to convert all narcotic use to oxycodone equivalents

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Subjective Pain at 24 Hours Postoperative

    Pain score assesses patient subjective pain via patient reported numeric analogue scale, range 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 24 Hours Postoperatively

    Will assess for known symptoms of gabapentin postoperatively at 24 hours. We will survey subjects regarding their experience of the following symptoms: dizziness/drowsiness, fatigue, loss of balance, blurry vision, tremulousness, swelling, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and allergic reaction

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Number of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 2 Weeks Postoperatively

    Will assess for known symptoms of gabapentin postoperatively at 2 weeks. We will survey subjects regarding their experience of the following symptoms: dizziness/drowsiness, fatigue, loss of balance, blurry vision, tremulousness, swelling, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and allergic reaction

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  3. Narcotic Use at 2 Weeks Postop

    Assessment of the amount of narcotic use postoperatively at 2 weeks. will use opioid equivalence table to convert all narcotic use to oxycodone equivalents

    Time frame: 2 weeks

  4. Subjective Pain at 2 Weeks Postop

    Assessment of the subject pain score postoperatively at 2 weeks. will use a numeric analog scale from 0-10. The pain scale ranging from 0-10 with 0 representing No Pain and 10 representing the Worst Pain Possible

    Time frame: 2 weeks

07

Results

Posted Feb 15, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Study limited by recall bias and imperfect patient blinding inherent in placebo equivalent methadology. Most patients discharged prior to 24 hours, therefore data collected dependent on patient reporting.

Participant flow

Patient were recruited from June 2016 to July 2017 via phone or in the office setting. Potential subjects were informed of the study by investigators and if they desired to participate, they either signed consents forms in the office or on the day of surgery.

24 Hours Postoperative Assessment
Participant flow — 24 Hours Postoperative Assessment
MilestoneGabapentinControl
Started7067
Completed6861
Not completed26
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up14
Withdrew: Excluded from analysis per protocol12
2 Weeks Postoperative Assessment
Participant flow — 2 Weeks Postoperative Assessment
MilestoneGabapentinControl
Started6861
Completed5851
Not completed1010
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up1010

Outcome measures

PrimaryNarcotic Use at 24 Hours Postop

Assessment of the amount of narcotic use postoperatively at 24 hours. will use opioid equivalence table to convert all narcotic use to oxycodone equivalents

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · morphine milligram equivalents
Narcotic Use at 24 Hours Postop
morphine milligram equivalentsGabapentinControl
Narcotic Use at 24 Hours Postop158.8 ± 109.6175.0 ± 162.5
PrimarySubjective Pain at 24 Hours Postoperative

Pain score assesses patient subjective pain via patient reported numeric analogue scale, range 0-10 with 0 being no pain and 10 being severe pain.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Subjective Pain at 24 Hours Postoperative
score on a scaleGabapentinControl
Subjective Pain at 24 Hours Postoperative3.4 ± 2.53.4 ± 2.5
SecondaryNumber of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 24 Hours Postoperatively

Will assess for known symptoms of gabapentin postoperatively at 24 hours. We will survey subjects regarding their experience of the following symptoms: dizziness/drowsiness, fatigue, loss of balance, blurry vision, tremulousness, swelling, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and allergic reaction

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 24 Hours Postoperatively
ParticipantsGabapentinControl
Dizziness178
Blurred Vision74
Somnolence2023
Difficulty walking1311
Tremulousness116
Nausea2425
Vomiting915
SecondaryNumber of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 2 Weeks Postoperatively

Will assess for known symptoms of gabapentin postoperatively at 2 weeks. We will survey subjects regarding their experience of the following symptoms: dizziness/drowsiness, fatigue, loss of balance, blurry vision, tremulousness, swelling, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and allergic reaction

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Patient With Gabapentin Adverse Effects at 2 Weeks Postoperatively
ParticipantsGabapentinControl
Dizziness128
Blurred vision43
Somnolence1821
Difficulty walking55
Tremulousness42
Nausea127
Vomiting01
SecondaryNarcotic Use at 2 Weeks Postop

Assessment of the amount of narcotic use postoperatively at 2 weeks. will use opioid equivalence table to convert all narcotic use to oxycodone equivalents

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · morphine milligram equivalents
Narcotic Use at 2 Weeks Postop
morphine milligram equivalentsGabapentinControl
Narcotic Use at 2 Weeks Postop167.2 ± 79.3187.3 ± 185.5
SecondarySubjective Pain at 2 Weeks Postop

Assessment of the subject pain score postoperatively at 2 weeks. will use a numeric analog scale from 0-10. The pain scale ranging from 0-10 with 0 representing No Pain and 10 representing the Worst Pain Possible

Time frame:
2 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Subjective Pain at 2 Weeks Postop
score on a scaleGabapentinControl
Subjective Pain at 2 Weeks Postop1.3 ± 2.01.4 ± 1.8

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data collected from time of enrollment to 2 weeks postoperative.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Gabapentin0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)0/70 (0%)
Control0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)0/67 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)GabapentinControlTotal
Mean49.7 ± 12.5652.3 ± 11.651.2 ± 12.17
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
Female6861129
Male000
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
Caucasian434689
African American/African251540
Other145
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GabapentinControlTotal
United States6861129
BMI
BMI(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
< 30 kg/m^2362864
>/= 30 kg/m^2323365
Narcotic Use within week prior to surgery
Narcotic Use within week prior to surgery(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
Count of participants111829
History chronic pain
History chronic pain(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
Count of participants262450
Prior abdominal surgery
Prior abdominal surgery(Participants)GabapentinControlTotal
Count of participants434487

9 further baseline measures are reported on the registry.

08

Study locations

1 site
  • Christiana Care Health System
    Newark, Delaware 19713, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Alayed N, Alghanaim N, Tan X, Tulandi T. Preemptive use of gabapentin in abdominal hysterectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Jun;123(6):1221-1229. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000289. PubMed 24807337 ↗
  • Clarke H, Bonin RP, Orser BA, Englesakis M, Wijeysundera DN, Katz J. The prevention of chronic postsurgical pain using gabapentin and pregabalin: a combined systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2012 Aug;115(2):428-42. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318249d36e. Epub 2012 Mar 13. PubMed 22415535 ↗
  • Dolin SJ, Cashman JN. Tolerability of acute postoperative pain management: nausea, vomiting, sedation, pruritus, and urinary retention. Evidence from published data. Br J Anaesth. 2005 Nov;95(5):584-91. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei227. Epub 2005 Sep 16. PubMed 16169893 ↗
  • Schmidt PC, Ruchelli G, Mackey SC, Carroll IR. Perioperative gabapentinoids: choice of agent, dose, timing, and effects on chronic postsurgical pain. Anesthesiology. 2013 Nov;119(5):1215-21. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182a9a896. No abstract available. PubMed 24051389 ↗
  • Straube S, Derry S, Moore RA, Wiffen PJ, McQuay HJ. Single dose oral gabapentin for established acute postoperative pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 May 12;2010(5):CD008183. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008183.pub2. PubMed 20464764 ↗
  • Tiippana EM, Hamunen K, Kontinen VK, Kalso E. Do surgical patients benefit from perioperative gabapentin/pregabalin? A systematic review of efficacy and safety. Anesth Analg. 2007 Jun;104(6):1545-56, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000261517.27532.80. PubMed 17513656 ↗
  • Huynh TQ, Patel NR, Goldstein ND, Makai GE. Preoperative Gabapentin for Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Feb;28(2):237-244.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.04.040. Epub 2020 May 8. PubMed 32389735 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 12, 2016

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 20, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02703259
Lead sponsor
Christiana Care Health Services
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2016
Start date
Jun 2016
Primary completion
Jul 2017
Completion
Jul 2017
Results posted
Feb 15, 2019
Last update
May 20, 2020

Study contacts

Terri Huynh, MD
principal investigator · Christiana Care Health Services
Gretchen Makai, MD
principal investigator · Christiana Care Health Services

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion