ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT02703207Updated May 26, 2026

Neurocognitive and Health Impact of Sleep Apnea in Elderly Veterans With Comorbid COPD

An interventional study of Positive airway pressure and NIPPV and /or oxygen in Obstructive Sleep Apnea and OSA COPD Overlap Syndrome, sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 60 Years to 89 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-26.

Sponsored by VA Office of Research and Development · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2016; still recruiting 10 years 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
108
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
60 Years to 89 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Cognitive dysfunction in the aging Veteran population is a growing health concern in the Veterans Health System. It is not known whether OSA coexisting with COPD will enhance the risk for cognitive dysfunction. The investigators sought to investigate whether these two highly prevalent diseases, that often co-exist as the 'Overlap Syndrome', combine to enhance cognitive impairment in the elderly Veteran population. Thus, the investigators will study whether elderly patients with Overlap syndrome have increased cognitive deficits compared with OSA or COPD alone. Additionally, treatment of OSA with positive airway pressure (PAP) has been shown to improve neurocognitive function in moderate-to-severe OSA while cognitive decline in COPD may be reversible through treatment with long-term oxygen therapy. The investigators will also study whether treatment with positive airway pressure (PAP) and supplemental oxygen vs PAP alone will improve cognitive function and improve quality of life of elderly Veterans.

Read the detailed description

OBJECTIVE: Describe the clinical and physiological characteristics of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and comorbid chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and study the impact of treatment on neurocognitive outcomes in elderly Veterans.

RESEARCH PLAN: The investigators will study if elderly Veterans with OSA and comorbid COPD have increased neurocognitive deficits and sleepiness with reduced quality of life compared to patients with either OSA or COPD alone (Aim 3) and whether treatment with PAP/NIPPV and supplemental oxygen compared to CPAP alone in elderly Veterans with moderate-to-severe OSA and concomitant moderate-to-severe COPD will improve cognitive function, sleepiness and quality of life (QoL).

Aim A: To determine if elderly Veterans with OSA and comorbid COPD have increased neurocognitive deficits and sleepiness compared to patients with either OSA or COPD.

Hypothesis: Elderly veterans (age 60 years) with moderate-to-severe OSA and concomitant moderate-to-severe COPD will have significantly increased cognitive deficits and daytime sleepiness compared with similar patients with OSA alone or COPD alone.

To study this aim the investigators will prospectively administer and compare the results of a battery of cognitive tests, and sleepiness and QoL questionnaires in elderly patients with OSA, COPD, and the Overlap Syndrome.

Aim B. To determine if treatment with PAP/NIPPV and/or supplemental oxygen compared to CPAP alone in elderly Veterans with OSA and concomitant moderate-to-severe COPD will improve cognitive function, sleepiness, and QoL.

Hypothesis: Therapy with PAP and supplemental oxygen will reverse neurocognitive deficits in one or more domains, reduce sleepiness, and improve QoL compared with CPAP alone in patients with moderate-to-severe OSA and concomitant moderate COPD. This aim will evaluate which specific deficits in neurocognitive function in patients with moderate-to-severe Overlap Syndrome are reversible and most sensitive to the effects of positive airway pressure (PAP) and oxygen vs CPAP alone.

To study this aim the investigators will randomize patients with the Overlap Syndrome to 3months of therapy with PAP and/or oxygen vs CPAP alone for 3 months and evaluate impact on neurocognitive function, sleepiness and quality of life before and after therapy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obstructive Sleep Apnea
  • OSA COPD Overlap Syndrome

Keywords

  • obstructive sleep apnea
  • COPD
  • Overlap syndrome
  • quality of life
  • neurocognitive function
  • sleepiness
  • elderly
03

In context

Sleep Apnea, Obstructive

2,240 studies on the registry are indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; 475 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 108 is above the median of 52 across 1,472 interventional studies indexed under Sleep Apnea, Obstructive.

Browse Sleep Apnea, Obstructive studies →

Lead sponsor

VA Office of Research and Development is the lead sponsor of 1,771 studies on the registry; 392 are open to participants now.

Of its 213 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 185 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
60 Years to 89 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • OSA defined by the International classification of Sleep Disorders-322 diagnostic criteria with moderate-to-severe disease, i.e. apnea hypopnea index (AHI) 15* per hour by polysomnography
  • Moderate-to-severe defined by GOLD 2 and 3 (Global Obstructive Lung Disease) 23 criteria with /FVC ratio \<70% and FEV1 >30% and \<80% of predicted based on PFT done within the past 1 year and a past significant history (10 pack-years) of smoking
  • Age 60 years
  • Male or female gender

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mild
  • Mild OSA
  • Overlap Syndrome with mild OSA plus mild COPD
  • Central sleep apnea defined as central apnea index >5 per hour
  • Already on daytime oxygen or nighttime CPAP, NIPPV, oral appliance
  • Current smokers
  • Pregnant women
  • Disorders of hypoventilation due to known neuromuscular or chest wall diseases**
  • Patients with significant restrictive lung disease on pulmonary function testing
  • Recent admission for any acute illness within the prior 4 months
  • Current psychiatric illness requiring sedating medications
  • Use of hypnotics, anxiolytics, sedating antidepressants, anticonvulsants, sedating antihistamines, stimulants, or other medications likely to affect alertness or daytime functioning for Aim 3/4
  • For Aim 3 and 4 only, existing depression as assessed by the PHQ (Patient Health Questionnaire)-9 (score >10)
  • History of learning disability
  • Inability to sign consent
  • Epworth sleepiness score 18 or a near-miss or prior automobile accident due to sleepiness within the past 12 months
  • Patients with unstable heart disease, decompensated heart failure, \<45% or uncontrolled arrhythmias
  • Patients unable to use either a nasal or face mask (e.g., facial trauma)
  • Consumption of > 2 alcoholic beverages per day or past history of excessive alcohol use
  • Current use of illicit drugs
  • Patients who have problems with vision or dexterity and hence, cannot use CPAP/NIPPV
  • is less than 6 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

LVEF (left ventricular ejection fraction)

The share of blood the heart’s main pumping chamber (the left ventricle) pushes out with each beat, measured by an echocardiogram (heart ultrasound) or a MUGA scan. About 50–70% is normal.

Life expectancy

The study doctor’s estimate of how long someone is likely to live. Criteria use it so that people can stay in the study long enough for it to answer its question.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
108 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Positive airway pressure therapy

    Control group patients will receive standard care with PAP- positive airway pressure.

    Device: Positive airway pressure · Device: NIPPV and /or oxygen

  • No intervention
    COPD

    The COPD control group will be patients with moderate-to-severe COPD alone per the GOLD criteria.

  • No intervention
    OSA and comorbid COPD

    Eligible elderly (age \>/=60yrs) Veterans with moderate to severe Overlap Syndrome.

Interventions

  • DevicePositive airway pressure

    CPAP will be applied as standard of care for diagnosis of moderate to severe OSA

    Also known as: Standard of care control arm

  • DeviceNIPPV and /or oxygen

    supplemental oxygen will be applied to PAP/non-invasive positive pressure therapy

    Also known as: Active intervention

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Neurocognitive function

    The neurocognitive test - Trails A test will be administered to evaluate attention and psychomotor function. This score is adjusted for age, race, gender, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline neurocognitive function at 3 months

  2. Sleepiness

    Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score will be measured. This score is on a scale of 0-24, where a higher value indicates a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline sleepiness at 3 months

  3. Quality of life (Short-Form survey)

    Quality of Life (Qol) Questionnaires: QoL will be assessed using the Short-Form survey (SF-12). There are two subscale domain scores (Physical Health Composite Score-PCS and Mental Health Composite Score-MCS). These are on a scale of 0-100, where higher values indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months

  4. Neurocognitive test

    The neurocognitive test - Trails B test will be administered to evaluate attention and psychomotor function. This score is adjusted for age, race, gender, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  5. Neurocognitive test (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test)

    The neurocognitive test: Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT) will be administered to evaluate vigilance and executive function. The PASAT is recorded as the total number of correct responses (from 0-60), or the percent of correct responses out of 60 (from 0-100), where a higher value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  6. Neurocognitive test (Stroop Color-Word Interference)

    The neurocognitive test: Stroop color-word interference test will be administered to evaluate executive function. This score is adjusted for age, and years of education. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  7. Neurocognitive test (DIGIT test)

    The neurocognitive DIGIT test will be administered to evaluate short-term and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  8. Neurocognitive test (Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence)

    The neurocognitive test: abbreviated Wechsler Abbreviated Scale of Intelligence (WASI) will be administered to evaluate verbal comprehension and working memory. This score is adjusted for age. Scored on a Standard scale of 100 +/- 15 for normal ranges, above 115 is above average, below 85 is considered below average.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  9. Quality of life (Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire)

    Quality of Life (Qol) Questionnaires: Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ)-10. There are 5 subscale domains of the FOSQ (General Productivity, Social Outcome, Activity Level, Vigilance, and Intimate Relationships and Sexual Activity). There all range from 0-20, where a higher value is a better outcome. The total FOSQ is the sum of these subscale domains and ranges from 0-100, where a higher value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months

  10. Quality of life (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire)

    Quality of Life (Qol) Questionnaires: Disease specific QoL will be assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ has three subscale domains (Symptoms, Activity, and Impacts), which range from 0-100, where a higher value indicates a worse outcome. The total SGRQ is the average of these subscale domains and is on a scale of 0-100, where a higher value is a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline quality of life at 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Dyspnea

    6 minute walk test (6MWT): Participants are instructed to achieve maximal distance. There is no scale, but a larger value is a better outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  2. Hours of nightly positive airway pressure (PAP) use/NIPPV use

    Collection of PAP adherence data from the smart card of the PAP machine or from online data.

    Time frame: 90 days after start of therapy

  3. Hours of nightly oxygen use

    Adherence to supplemental oxygen (O2) will be determined by the total hours of nightly O2 use obtained from the O2 concentrator that is provided by the vendor.

    Time frame: 3 months after start of therapy

  4. Borg scale

    This measures the level of dyspnea during the 6 minute walk test. It is on a scale of 0-10, where a larger value is a worse outcome.

    Time frame: Change from baseline at 3 months

  5. Blood pressure

    Measure blood pressure at baseline visit

    Time frame: At baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI
    Detroit, Michigan 48201-1916, United States
    Recruiting
    • Lynn M Huber · Contactlynn.huber@va.gov · 313-576-3106
    • Susmita Chowdhuri, MD MS · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 26, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02703207
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 9, 2016
Start date
Aug 17, 2016
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 26, 2026

Study contacts

Ruchi Rastogi, MS
Contact
ruchi.rastogi@va.gov
(313) 576-4464
Susmita Chowdhuri, MD MS
principal investigator · John D. Dingell VA Medical Center, Detroit, MI

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion