CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02701322Updated Oct 14, 2020

Influence of Medical Clowning in Videofluoroscopic Examination of Pediatric Speech Disorder

An interventional study of Medical clown in Velopharyngeal Insufficiency, sponsored by Meir Medical Center. Terminated. Open to participants aged 3 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-10-14.

Sponsored by Meir Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Why this study was terminated
machine malfunction and updated work rutines
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
3 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine whether a participation of a medical clown in videofluoroscopic examination of pediatric speech disorder such as velopharyngeal inadequacy, improves the collaboration of the pediatric patient, the patient's and the caregivers subjective experience, and the quality of the examination (shorter exposure to radiation, shorter time at the radiology suite, more accurate parameters retrieved from the imaging results).

Read the detailed description

Velopharyngeal inadequacy (VPI) results in reduced speech intelligibility and nasopharyngeal regurgitation. VPI is more common in patients who previously underwent cleft palate repair, in craniofacial syndromes such as 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, or in neuromuscular diseases. Part of the work-up sometimes includes videofluoroscopic examination of the palate's movement during speech. This procedure involves ionizing radiation and requires adequate collaboration by the examinee. The examination set-up is foreign to the child and can cause stres and anxiety which can hinder the examination's accuracy and completion. Medical clowns professionalise in stress relieve.

In this prospective controlled study, the study group will be accompanied by a medical clown from the arrival to the premise, through the actual examination and after exiting the exam room. The medical clown will explain about the upcoming examination and will induce a less stressed atmosphere. After the examination the clown will close the session for the patient.

The control group will do the same procedure but without a medical clown. Factors such as pulse, total time in the examination room, net time of exposure to radiation and quality of data will be collected for each patient. The patient (if 7 year old and up) and his caregivers will fill up after completion of the examination a short questionnaire about their experience.

The data will be collected and summarized and then a statistical analysis will be made in order to compare the study group and the control group.

02

Conditions studied

  • Velopharyngeal Insufficiency

Keywords

  • Velopharyngeal Insufficiency
  • Fluoroscopy
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
3 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Clinical diagnosis of velo-pharyngeal inadequacy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a patient or caregiver that did not consent to participate in the study
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
10 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Medical Clown

    the study group will be accompanied by a medical clown from the arrival to the premise, through the actual examination and after exiting the exam room. The medical clown will explain about the upcoming examination and will induce a less stressed atmosphere. After the examination the clown will close the session for the patient.

    Behavioral: Medical clown

  • No intervention
    Control

    The control group will do the same videofluoroscopic procedure but without a medical clown.

Interventions

  • BehavioralMedical clown
05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. videofluoroscopy data completeness

    The quality and completeness of radiological data that can be retrieved from the videofluoroscopy record

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. length of radiation exposure time

    The length of radiation exposure time for the subject, measured in seconds

    Time frame: 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Total (gross) time of examination

    the total time the patient is in the room, measured in minutes

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Subjective level of anxiety

    the level of patient's anxiety as defined subjectively in questionnaire

    Time frame: 1 year

  3. Pulse

    The difference in pulse measurement before and after the examination as an indirect assessment of level of anxiety

    Time frame: 1 year

06

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

07

References and documents

Publications

  • Wolyniez I, Rimon A, Scolnik D, Gruber A, Tavor O, Haviv E, Glatstein M. The effect of a medical clown on pain during intravenous access in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized prospective pilot study. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013 Dec;52(12):1168-72. doi: 10.1177/0009922813502257. Epub 2013 Sep 11. PubMed 24028842 ↗
  • Goldberg A, Stauber T, Peleg O, Hanuka P, Eshayek L, Confino-Cohen R. Medical clowns ease anxiety and pain perceived by children undergoing allergy prick skin tests. Allergy. 2014 Oct;69(10):1372-9. doi: 10.1111/all.12463. Epub 2014 Aug 4. PubMed 24943088 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02701322
Lead sponsor
Meir Medical Center
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 8, 2016
Start date
Mar 2016
Primary completion
Feb 2017
Completion
Apr 2017
Last update
Oct 14, 2020

Study contacts

Yaniv Ebner, MD
principal investigator · Meir Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Oct 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion