ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07501741Updated Mar 30, 2026

Comparison of the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) and the Direct Lateral Approach (DLA) in Patients Treated With Partial Hip Replacement for Femoral Neck Fracture Based on Postoperative Functional Status

An observational study in Femoral Neck Fractures, sponsored by Meir Medical Center. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.

Sponsored by Meir Medical Center · Observational

Help build ClinicalTrials.gg — short surveys, remote interviews or testing, in your language. Take part →

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether the surgical approach used for hemiarthroplasty can improve clinical and functional outcomes in adults with displaced femoral neck fractures.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the direct anterior approach (DAA) result in superior postoperative functional recovery compared with the direct lateral approach (DLA)?
  • Are mortality, complications, hospital utilization, and readmission rates different between the two surgical approaches? Researchers will compare hemiarthroplasty performed using the direct anterior approach to hemiarthroplasty performed using the direct lateral approach to determine whether surgical approach influences postoperative function, complications, and survival.

Participants will:

  • Undergo hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture using a randomly assigned surgical approach (DAA or DLA)
  • Complete a baseline functional assessment using the Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire before surgery
  • Have perioperative data collected during hospitalization, including laboratory values, operative details, blood loss, transfusions, analgesic use, complications, length of stay, and in-hospital mortality
  • Attend follow-up clinic visits at 6 weeks and 3 months after surgery
  • Complete postoperative functional assessment using the Harris Hip Score at both follow-up visits
  • Have demographic data, complications, readmissions, and mortality monitored through review of electronic medical records
02

Conditions studied

  • Femoral Neck Fractures
03

In context

Femoral Neck Fractures

207 studies on the registry are indexed under Femoral Neck Fractures; 40 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 137 across 60 observational studies indexed under Femoral Neck Fractures.

Browse Femoral Neck Fractures studies →

Lead sponsor

Meir Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 401 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of adult patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture at Meir Medical Center during the study period.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Adults aged 18 years or older Patients undergoing hemiarthroplasty (partial hip replacement) during the study period at Meir Medical Center Ability to provide for participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Revision surgery performed during the index hospitalization Inability to complete postoperative follow-up Inability to provide (e.g., dementia or presence of a legal guardian) Pre-injury mobility status of bedbound or wheelchair-bound Polytrauma patients Prior fixation or arthroplasty of the contralateral hip within the previous year

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Year
Patient registry
Yes
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Harris Hip Score (HHS) - Postoperative Functional Outcome at 6 Weeks and 3 Months Following Hemiarthroplasty

    Functional outcome will be assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), a validated 100-point scale evaluating pain, function, deformity, and range of motion, collected at 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively.

    Time frame: 6 weeks and 3 months post-surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Treatment-Related Complications Following Hemiarthroplasty

    Number of participants with one or more complications- Including intraoperative blood loss, blood transfusions, implant dislocation, implant failure, surgical site infection, and other adverse events.

    Time frame: During hospitalization and up to 3 months post-surgery

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for May 2028, 24 months later.

Of 20 observational studies under Femoral Neck Fractures, half reached primary completion within 52 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 28 and three quarters within 120. This study's planned 24 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2026
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
May 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
May 2028
Last update
Mar 30, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 30, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07501741
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
May 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 30, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion