ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02689687Updated May 11, 2016

Automated Hovering for Congestive Heart Failure Patients: A Pilot Study

An interventional study of Support partner and Engagement incentives in Heart Failure, sponsored by University of Pennsylvania. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-05-11.

Sponsored by University of Pennsylvania · Not applicable and Interventional

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study offers remote monitoring devices for weight and medication adherence, combined with behavioral economic approaches, to patients with congestive heart failure (CHF). This pilot study aims to evaluate the feasibility of enrollment processes and intervention roll-out to inform a randomized controlled trial, to estimate the readmission rate of participants, and to assess if and how managing clinicians respond to weight gain alerts entered into a participant's electronic medical record.

Read the detailed description

The specific aims of this study are: (1) To leverage access to the University of Pennsylvania Health System (UPHS) CHF clinic, PennChart (electronic medical record system) resources for identifying eligible patients, and the Way to Health (WTH) platform to launch a pilot study that will inform a randomized controlled trial; (2) to evaluate the feasibility of the enrollment processes and intervention roll-out to inform a randomized controlled trial; (3) to estimate the readmission rate of participants; and, (4) to assess if and how managing physicians respond to weight gain alerts entered into participant charts in PennChart. In this pilot study, no randomization will occur and all participants will receive the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

03

In context

Heart Failure

5,801 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,222 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 20 is below the median of 72 across 3,790 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Pennsylvania is the lead sponsor of 1,664 studies on the registry; 236 are open to participants now.

Of its 156 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 107 (69%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Discharged to home within the past 30 days from a UPHS hospital with a principal diagnosis of CHF
  • Aged 18 to 80 years old
  • Will receive follow-up in a UPHS outpatient clinic by a cardiologist or primary care physician

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Less than 18 years old or older than 80 years old
  • Will not or cannot provide informed consent
  • Have a markedly shortened life expectancy (listed for heart transplant, have ventricular assist device, are inotrope dependent, have metastatic cancer, or have dementia)
  • Have end-stage renal disease
  • Have a glomerular filtration rate \<25 ml/min
  • On dialysis
  • Heart failure is managed with a CardioMEMS monitor
  • Receiving another remote monitoring/telemedicine intervention
  • Receiving follow-up care outside of UPHS
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
20 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intervention

    All participants will be (1) given an electronic pill bottle for their diuretic and a Bluetooth scale; (2) asked to provide the coordinator with name and contact information of a family member or friend to serve as a support partner; (3) will be assigned a 2-digit number to be used as part of the lottery-based engagement incentives in which eligibility to win will be conditional on medication adherence and registering a weight measurement; and, (4) will determine their preferences for Way to Health platform communication methods during the study.

    Behavioral: Support partner · Behavioral: Engagement incentives · Behavioral: Electronic pill bottle · Behavioral: Bluetooth scale

Interventions

  • BehavioralSupport partner

    Participants will identify a support partner who will be contacted if the participant is non-adherent to their diuretic and/or weighing-in.

  • BehavioralEngagement incentives

    Participants will be entered into a daily lottery, for which their participation is contingent on adhering to their diuretic and to weighing-in on the previous day.

  • BehavioralElectronic pill bottle

    Participant adherence to their diuretic will be monitored on a daily basis and participants will be contacted if they are non-adherent to this medication.

  • BehavioralBluetooth scale

    Participant adherence to stepping on their scale will be monitored on a daily basis and participants will be contacted if they are non-adherent to weighing-in. Participant weight gain will also be monitored, and if weight gain exceeds a specific threshold, the managing physician will be notified through the electronic medical record system. Managing providers will also be sent a weekly report of weight measurements.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of patients successfully setup on the remote monitoring devices

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. All-cause readmission rate

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Proportion of weight gain alerts that are opened

    Time frame: 30 days

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Feb 2016, a primary completion of May 2016 and a completion of May 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 28, 2016
First posted
Feb 24, 2016
Start
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
May 2016
CompletionActual
May 2016
Last update
May 11, 2016
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 11, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02689687
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 24, 2016
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
May 2016
Completion
May 2016
Last update
May 11, 2016

Study contacts

Kevin G Volpp, MD, PhD
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania
David A Asch, MD, MBA
principal investigator · University of Pennsylvania

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion