ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02688556EmeraldUpdated Aug 29, 2022Results posted

Phase 3 Study of OTX-101 in the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

A Phase 3 interventional study of cyclosporine and vehicle of OTX-101 in Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. Completed at 3 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-29.

Sponsored by Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
745
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a randomized, double-masked, vehicle-controlled study of the safety and efficacy of OTX-101 (0.09% cyclosporine nanomicellar solution) in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca to be conducted at approximately 50 sites.

02

Conditions studied

  • Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

Keywords

  • KCS
  • dry eye
  • cyclosporine
03

In context

Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca

85 studies on the registry are indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca; 1 is open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 745 is above the median of 82 across 75 interventional studies indexed under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca.

Browse Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca studies →

Lead sponsor

Sun Pharmaceutical Industries Limited is the lead sponsor of 60 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Of its 24 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 22 (92%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • History of dry eye syndrome (KCS) for a period of at least 6 months
  • Clinical diagnosis of bilateral KCS
  • Lissamine green conjunctival staining sum score of ≥ 3 to ≤ 9 out of a total possible score of 12 (scoring excludes superior zones 2 and 4) in the same eye at both the Screening and Baseline Visits.
  • Global symptom score (SANDE) ≥ 40 mm at both the Screening and Baseline Visits
  • Corrected Snellen visual acuity (VA) of better than 20/200 in each eye.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Use of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis®) within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Previous treatment failure (lack of efficacy) with cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion 0.05% (Restasis).
  • Diagnosis of Sjögren's disease ˃ 5 years prior to the Screening Visit.
  • Clinical diagnosis or any history of seasonal and/or perennial allergic conjunctivitis.
  • Use of systemic or topical medications within 7 days prior to the Screening Visit or during the study period that are known to cause dry eye.
  • Use of any topical ophthalmic medications, prescription (including anti-glaucoma medications) or over the counter (including artificial tears), other than the assigned study medication during the study period.
  • Current active eye disease other than dry wyw syndrome (i.e., any disease for which topical or systemic ophthalmic medication is necessary).
  • History of herpes keratitis.
  • Corneal transplant
  • Corneal refractive surgery within 6 months prior to the Screening Visit or postoperative refractive surgery symptoms of dryness that have not resolved.
  • Cataract surgery within 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
745 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    OTX-101 0.09%

    0.09% cyclosporine nanomicellar ophthalmic solution

    Drug: cyclosporine

  • Placebo comparator
    Vehicle

    vehicle of OTX-101

    Drug: vehicle of OTX-101

Interventions

  • Also known as: Seciera

  • Drugvehicle of OTX-101
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Tear Production

    Percentage of Eyes with Increase from Baseline of ≥ 10 mm in Schirmer's Test Score

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Conjunctival Staining

    change from baseline in total conjunctival staining score (lissamine green, modified National Eye Institute scale) at 12 weeks. Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Grades ranged from 0 (No punctate stain in zone) to 3 (Densely concentrated micropunctate stain spots)

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  2. Central Corneal Staining

    change from baseline in central corneal staining score (fluorescein, modified NEI/FDA scale) at 12 weeks. The Expanded National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop Scale for Corneal Staining Score was used to grade each of the 5 areas of the cornea on a 0 (No punctate stain in area) to 4 (Severe diffuse (coalescent) macropunctate stain of the area) scale.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

  3. Symptom Score

    change from baseline in modified Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) score at 12 weeks. A modified SANDE instrument was used to evaluate dry eye symptoms at each visit. Subjects were asked to indicate: 1. frequency of dry and irritated eyes on a scale of 0 (rarely) to 100 (all the time); and 2. severity of dry eyes on a scale of 0 (very mild) to 100 (severe) The global symptom score is the square root of the frequency score times the severity score and will be completed at each visit. (range 0 to 100) Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

    Time frame: Baseline and 12 weeks

07

Results

Posted Apr 8, 2019

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Started372373
Completed347361
Not completed2512

Outcome measures

PrimaryTear Production

Percentage of Eyes with Increase from Baseline of ≥ 10 mm in Schirmer's Test Score

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of eyes
Tear Production
Percentage of eyesOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Tear Production16.69.2
SecondaryConjunctival Staining

change from baseline in total conjunctival staining score (lissamine green, modified National Eye Institute scale) at 12 weeks. Conjunctival Lissamine Green Staining Grades ranged from 0 (No punctate stain in zone) to 3 (Densely concentrated micropunctate stain spots)

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Conjunctival Staining
score on a scaleOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Conjunctival Staining-1.53 ± 1.927-1.16 ± 2.2064
SecondaryCentral Corneal Staining

change from baseline in central corneal staining score (fluorescein, modified NEI/FDA scale) at 12 weeks. The Expanded National Eye Institute (NEI)/Industry Workshop Scale for Corneal Staining Score was used to grade each of the 5 areas of the cornea on a 0 (No punctate stain in area) to 4 (Severe diffuse (coalescent) macropunctate stain of the area) scale.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Central Corneal Staining
score on a scaleOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Central Corneal Staining-0.28 ± 0.533-0.26 ± 0.588
SecondarySymptom Score

change from baseline in modified Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye (SANDE) score at 12 weeks. A modified SANDE instrument was used to evaluate dry eye symptoms at each visit. Subjects were asked to indicate: 1. frequency of dry and irritated eyes on a scale of 0 (rarely) to 100 (all the time); and 2. severity of dry eyes on a scale of 0 (very mild) to 100 (severe) The global symptom score is the square root of the frequency score times the severity score and will be completed at each visit. (range 0 to 100) Negative change from baseline indicates improvement.

Time frame:
Baseline and 12 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Symptom Score
score on a scaleOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Symptom Score-18.8 ± 24.08-19.1 ± 23.14

Adverse events

Collected over 12 weeks. Non-serious events are listed at a 1% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
OTX-101 0.09%1/372 (0.3%)6/372 (1.6%)130/372 (34.9%)
Vehicle0/372 (0%)2/372 (0.5%)66/372 (17.7%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
DeathGeneral disorders1/3720/372
PneumoniaInfections and infestations1/3720/372
Lung neoplasm malignantNeoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)1/3720/372
Subdural haematomaInjury, poisoning and procedural complications1/3720/372
Spinal column stenosisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/3720/372
NephrolithiasisRenal and urinary disorders1/3720/372
Perforated ulcerGeneral disorders0/3721/372
Spinal osteoarthritisMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders0/3721/372
Most frequent other events
Showing 10 of 14
Most frequent other events
EventOTX-101 0.09%Vehicle
Instillation site painGeneral disorders90/37216/372
Conjunctival hyperaemiaEye disorders30/37218/372
HeadacheNervous system disorders6/3722/372
BlepharitisEye disorders5/3720/372
Eye irritationEye disorders3/3725/372
Eye pruritusEye disorders1/3725/372
SinusitisEye disorders4/3725/372
Foreign body sensation in eyesEye disorders1/3725/372
Instillation site lacrimationGeneral disorders4/3720/372
Instillation site reactionEye disorders4/3722/372

Baseline characteristics

Intent to treat population

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)OTX-101 0.09%VehicleTotal
Mean58.4 ± 14.1059.5 ± 14.6859.0 ± 14.40
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)OTX-101 0.09%VehicleTotal
Female315311626
Male5662118
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)OTX-101 0.09%VehicleTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native101
Asian111223
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander011
Black or African American414586
White310305615
More than one race81018
Unknown or Not Reported000
08

Study locations

3 sites
  • Martel Eye Medical Group
    Rancho Cordova, California 95670, United States
  • Cincinnati Eye Institute
    Edgewood, Kentucky 41017, United States
  • Fifth Avenue Eye Associates
    New York, New York 10028, United States
09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Feb 2016 to primary completion in Nov 2016, 9 months.

Results were first posted in Apr 2019, 2 years 5 months after primary completion.

Of 12 phase 3 interventional studies under Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca, half reached primary completion within 14 months of starting (the median); a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 18. This study's 9 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 13, 2016
First posted
Feb 23, 2016
StartActual
Feb 2016
Primary completionActual
Nov 2016
CompletionActual
Dec 2016
Results first posted
Apr 8, 2019
Last update
Aug 29, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 29, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02688556
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2016
Start date
Feb 2016
Primary completion
Nov 2016
Completion
Dec 2016
Results posted
Apr 8, 2019
Last update
Aug 29, 2022

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Cyclosporine

Start the discussion