CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02683798Updated Apr 28, 2021

BEYOND Weight Loss Maintenance Study

An interventional study of Continuous energy restriction and Intermittent energy restriction in Obesity, sponsored by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. Completed at 3 sites in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 20 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2021-04-28.

Sponsored by NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
63
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
20 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A study to determine the effectiveness of two weight loss maintenance interventions in Counterweight Plus, a structured weight management programme.

Read the detailed description

Introduction: Long-term maintenance of non-surgical weight loss remains the most significant problem in obesity treatment. This study will compare the effectiveness of two different weight loss maintenance strategies used as part of the Counterweight Plus weight management programme. This study will also evaluate the behavioural impact of the Counterweight Plus interventions and include process evaluations and cost analysis.

Methods: 80 patients and 10 practitioners will be recruited into the study. Main inclusion criteria for patients are:

Completed Counterweight Plus, which includes 12-20 weeks total diet replacement (TDR), 8 weeks food reintroduction (FR) and achieved >10kg weight loss. All participants will be followed up for 18 months in total.

Results: The primary outcome of this study is the difference in weight change between the two groups at 6 months. Frequency of use of behavioural strategy will be quantified for both practitioners and patients during voice recorded consultations. The relationship between weight change and the use of behavioural strategy will be assessed.

Hypothesis: This study will establish if the novel intermittent use of formula diet strategy is more effective at preventing weight regain in comparison to usual care. It will also provide evidence of the frequency of use of behavioural strategies within routine Counterweight Plus delivery, as well as establishing the cost of the intervention.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Weight loss maintenance
03

In context

Weight Loss

1,766 studies on the registry are indexed under Weight Loss; 277 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 63 is below the median of 73 across 1,496 interventional studies indexed under Weight Loss.

Browse Weight Loss studies →

Lead sponsor

NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
20 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Completed Counterweight Plus Total Diet Replacement and Food Reintroduction stages and achieved >10kg weight loss

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • People currently participating in another clinical research trial (not including BEYOND Weight Loss study)
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
63 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Continuous energy restriction

    1 x formula food (202-209kcal) meal replacement per day

    Dietary Supplement: Continuous energy restriction

  • Experimental
    Intermittent energy restriction

    4 x formula food (202-209kcal) total diet replacement per day, on 2 days per week

    Dietary Supplement: Intermittent energy restriction

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementContinuous energy restriction

    1 x formula food (202-209kcal) meal replacement per day

  • Dietary supplementIntermittent energy restriction

    4 x formula food (202-209kcal) total diet replacement per day, on 2 days per week

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Weight change

    Difference between the two groups in change in body weight (kg)

    Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Weight change

    Change in body weight (kg)

    Time frame: Baseline, 52 weeks, 78 weeks

  2. Acceptability

    Number of clinic appointments attended as a proportion of the total number offered

    Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks, 78 weeks

  3. Behavioural strategies

    Number of times behaviour change strategies used, assessed by qualitative analysis/coding of consultations

    Time frame: 78 weeks

  4. Eating behaviours

    Change measured using Three Factor Eating Questionnaire- R18 (TFEQ-R18)

    Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks, 78 weeks

  5. Quality of life

    Change measured using EuroQoL-5D (EQ-5D)

    Time frame: Baseline, 26 weeks, 52 weeks, 78 weeks

  6. Cost of interventions

    Difference between groups

    Time frame: 78 weeks

07

Study locations

3 sites
  • NHS Lothian
    Edinburgh, United Kingdom
  • NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
    Glasgow, United Kingdom
  • NHS Highland
    Inverness, United Kingdom
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 28, 2021, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02683798
Lead sponsor
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Collaborators
University of Glasgow
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 17, 2016
Start date
Apr 12, 2016
Primary completion
Nov 22, 2019
Completion
Nov 22, 2019
Last update
Apr 28, 2021

Study contacts

Michael Lean, FRCPS
principal investigator · University of Glasgow

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2021. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion