CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02668549Updated Apr 15, 2020

Cross-Sectional Study to Define and Validate "Doctor/Pharmacy Shopping" as Outcomes Suggestive of Abuse and/or Addiction

An observational study in Opioid-Related Disorders, Opiate Addiction and Narcotic Abuse, sponsored by Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-04-15.

Sponsored by Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
164,923
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to formulate definitions of doctor/pharmacy shopping and evaluate its association with abuse/addiction

Read the detailed description

Based on a review of the literature, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) concluded that more data are needed regarding the serious risks of misuse, abuse, addiction, overdose, and death associated with the long-term use of extended release/long acting (ER/LA) opioid analgesics. Thus, the FDA is requiring that ER/LA opioid analgesic drug sponsors conduct post-marketing studies to assess these risks. The four observational post-marketing requirement (PMR) studies are labeled Study #2065-1, Study #2065-2, Study #2065-3, and Study #2065-4.

The objective of PMR Study #2065-4 is to define and validate "doctor/pharmacy shopping" as outcomes suggestive of misuse, abuse and/or addiction.

Study #2065-4 consists of three sub-studies, Study 4A, Study 4B, and Study 4C. In the current study (#2065 sub-study, Study 4A), the IMS® LRx database, a longitudinal pharmacy database that captures both third-party and self-pay transactions, will be linked to the PharMetrics Plus™ database, which contains provider, facility and pharmacy claims. From these databases, patients with shopping behavior will be identified and evaluated against an algorithm for abuse/addiction that will be developed and validated in PMR Study #2065-3B. Study #2065-3B will review the literature for health information suggestive of abuse/addiction in medical charts and medical claims. Then, through iterative processes that involve experts reviewing claims profiles and medical charts, text searches of medical records using natural language processing and supervised machine learning will identify and create a compilation of codes and health information with the best specificity and sensitivity to identify patients with opioid abuse/addiction. The compilation of codes and health information will be used to develop the algorithm that Study 4A will apply to define abuse/addiction. Restricting the validation of shopping behavior to only patients with diagnoses related to abuse would ignore the population with undiagnosed abuse. By supplementing ICD-9 codes with other information available on claims (e.g., addiction treatments, emergency visits) to define abuse/addiction, the measurement bias will be decreased and the estimates of the association of shopping behavior with abuse/addiction will be more valid. Categories of doctor shopping will be derived from the population distributions of the multiple variables analyzed for opioid users. The 4 categories will range from no shopping behavior (lowest level) to extensive shopping behavior (most extreme). The specifics of how the categories will be defined will be driven by the data.

02

Conditions studied

  • Opioid-Related Disorders
  • Opiate Addiction
  • Narcotic Abuse
  • Drug Abuse
03

In context

Substance-Related Disorders

2,124 studies on the registry are indexed under Substance-Related Disorders; 393 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 164,923 is above the median of 250 across 296 observational studies indexed under Substance-Related Disorders.

Browse Substance-Related Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium is the lead sponsor of 11 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients (18 years of age or older) with data in both IMS LRx and PharMetrics Plus, who also have a minimum of two dispensings for IR or ER/LA opioids or two or more diuretic dispensings. The first of these dispensings will have occurred in 2012 and an additional dispensing within 18 months after the first. Dispensings will be determined from the IMS LRx database.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age ≥ 18 years
  2. Minimum of two dispensings for IR or ER/LA opioids or two or more diuretic dispensings

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

N/A

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
164,923 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients with Opioid dispensings

    Patients receiving two or more opioid dispensings within 18 months

    Other: DB review for Doctor/Pharmacy Shopping Behavior

  • Patients with Diuretic dispensings (neg control)

    Patients receiving two or more Diuretics dispensings within 18 months will serve as negative control

    Other: DB review for Doctor/Pharmacy Shopping Behavior

Interventions

  • OtherDB review for Doctor/Pharmacy Shopping Behavior

    Database review to evaluate of doctor/pharmacy shopping behaviors

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numbers and proportions of patients with shopping behavior

    Time frame: Retrospective review over 18 month period starting with first dispensing in 2012

  2. Sensitivity and predictive value of different levels of shopping behavior in relation with Algorithmically Identified Abuse and Addiction (AIAA)

    Time frame: Retrospective review over 18 month period starting with first dispensing in 2012

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Walker AM, Weatherby LB, Cepeda MS, Bradford DC. Information on doctor and pharmacy shopping for opioids adds little to the identification of presumptive opioid abuse disorders in health insurance claims data. Subst Abuse Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1;10:47-55. doi: 10.2147/SAR.S201725. eCollection 2019. PubMed 31534380 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 15, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02668549
Lead sponsor
Member Companies of the Opioid PMR Consortium
Collaborators
World Health Information Science Consultants, LLC, IMS Health
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 29, 2016
Start date
Feb 5, 2015
Primary completion
Aug 9, 2017
Completion
Aug 9, 2017
Last update
Apr 15, 2020

Study contacts

Soledad Cepeda, MD, PhD
study chair · Janssen Research & Development, LLC
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion