ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02655406CONFETTIUpdated Aug 5, 2022

COmpressioN Following Endovenous TreatmenT of Incompetent Varicose Veins

An interventional study of Class 2 compression stockings in Varicose Veins, sponsored by Imperial College London. Completed at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-08-05.

Sponsored by Imperial College London · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
180
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study will be looking at the effect of compression therapy in patients having endovenous treatment for varicose veins using foam sclerotherapy. Patients will be randomised to either the compression group (group A) or the no compression group (group B).

The pain scores, compliance, quality of life scores, occlusion rate at 6 months as well as the cost effectiveness of each intervention will be assessed.

Read the detailed description

This will be a randomised clinical trial looking at the impact of wearing or not wearing compression stocking following endovenous ablation using foam sclerotherapy.

Patients will be randomised to group A (compression) and group B (no compression).

Target Population Patients referred to the Imperial College NHS Trust for treatment of symptomatic varicose veins will be recruited if they are found to have varicose veins suitable for foam sclerotherapy on colour duplex scan.

Intervention

Patients will be randomised to have compression (group A) or no compression (group B). This will be done by using an online randomisation software (Sealed Envelope Ltd).

The compression therapy used will be Class II compression stockings. The treatment offered will be foam sclerotherapy of varicose veins using either Polidocanol or Sodium Tetradecyl Sulphate (STS) with the concentration used left to the discretion of the clinician.

Patients randomised to group A will be asked to wear compression stockings for 1 week.

Patients randomised to group B will be provided with bandages to wear for 24 hours only, with no further compression afterwards.

At baseline, patients will be asked to fill validated quality of life questionnaires (EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ) and will have their clinical scores assessed using a validated scoring system (CEAP and VCSS). On discharge after their varicose vein intervention, they will then be provided with a diary to record their post-procedural pain every day for 10 days using a validated visual analogue scale (VAS) as well as to record when they return to their normal activities and are back to work. They will also be asked to attend a follow-up in 2 weeks and at 6 months.

Patients' GP will also be sent a letter to inform them of their patient's participation in the study.

Follow-up

Patients will be followed up in the outpatient clinic at 2 weeks and 6 months.

Follow-up at 2 Weeks

At the 2 weeks' follow-up, the diary containing details of the pain scores and how soon patients were able to return to normal activities/work will be collected. In addition, patients will be asked about any phlebitis they have had in the two weeks after their procedure and how compliant they have been with the compression. They will be examined and the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS) will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill in the EQ-5D, AVVQ and CIVIQ scores.

Follow-up at 6 Months

At the 6 months follow-up, patients will be examined and their VCSS will be recorded. They will also be asked to fill the EQ-5D, AVVQ and the CIVIQ scores. They will have a venous Duplex scan to determine occlusion of the treated vein.

Sample Size and Study Duration

We estimated the sample size needed to observe a difference of at least 10mm in the VAS score, with a standard deviation of 20mm. With power at 80% and 5% significance equivalence, we would need to recruit 128 patients (64 per group) to show a difference.

Previous studies looking at compression stockings have shown drop out rates close to 37% at 3 months10. Therefore, if we estimate a drop out rate of about 40% by 6 months, we would need to recruit at least 180 patients. If we recruit at least 2 patients per week, this will be approximately a total of 208 patients that could potentially be randomised over the course of two years.

With 6 months follow-up, therefore, the study will be running for 24 months with a target recruitment of 180 patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Varicose Veins

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Foam sclerotherapy
  • Compression
03

In context

Varicose Veins

258 studies on the registry are indexed under Varicose Veins; 36 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 104 across 165 interventional studies indexed under Varicose Veins.

Browse Varicose Veins studies →

Lead sponsor

Imperial College London is the lead sponsor of 842 studies on the registry; 180 are open to participants now.

Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 6 (67%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adults over 18 years of age
  • Varicose veins suitable for foam sclerotherapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic to sclerosant
  • Current DVT
  • Arterial disease (ABPI\<0.8)
  • Patients unable to wear compression stockings
  • Patients who are unwilling to participate
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete questionnaires
  • Inability to attend follow-up appointments
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Compression stockings

    Patients randomised to group A will be asked to wear compression stockings for 1 week

    Other: Class 2 compression stockings

  • No intervention
    No compression

    Patients randomised to group B will be provided with bandages to wear for 24 hours only, with no further compression afterwards

Interventions

  • OtherClass 2 compression stockings
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient's pain score post-procedure using a visual analogue scale (VAS)

    Pain score

    Time frame: 10 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire (AVVQ) score

    Disease-specific quality of life score

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Chronic venous insufficiency (CIVIQ) score

    Disease-specific quality of life score

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. EuroQol's EQ-5D

    Generic quality of life score

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Venous clinical severity score (VCSS)

    Clinical

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Occlusion rate

    Occlusion rates will be assessed based on a pre-agreed scale

    Time frame: 6 months

  6. Degree of phlebitis

    Extent of phlebitis will be recorded using a scale

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Charing Cross Hospital
    London, W6 8RF, United Kingdom
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Belramman A, Bootun R, Lane TRA, Davies AH. COmpressioN following endovenous TreatmenT of Incompetent varicose veins by sclerotherapy (CONFETTI). J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2024 Mar;12(2):101729. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2023.101729. Epub 2023 Dec 9. PubMed 38081513 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jan 2016 to primary completion in Jan 2020, 48 months.

Of 72 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Varicose Veins, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50. This study's 48 months is above that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 81 studies reached it within 23 months; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 48.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 12, 2016
First posted
Jan 14, 2016
StartActual
Jan 2016
Primary completionActual
Jan 31, 2020
CompletionActual
Aug 2021
Last update
Aug 5, 2022
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 5, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02655406
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jan 14, 2016
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Jan 31, 2020
Completion
Aug 2021
Last update
Aug 5, 2022

Study contacts

Roshan Bootun
principal investigator · Imperial College London

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion