CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02647554Updated Oct 13, 2022

Ulinastatin Treatment in Adult Patients With Sepsis and Septic Shock in China

A Phase 4 interventional study of ulinastatin and Placebo in Sepsis and Septic Shock, sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital. Completed at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-10-13.

Sponsored by Peking Union Medical College Hospital · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
347
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

A Prospective, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Trial of Ulinastatin Treatment in Adult Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in China

Read the detailed description

Investigational drug:Ulinastain for Injection

Study title: A Prospective, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Trial of Ulinastatin Treatment in Adult Patients with Sepsis and Septic Shock in China

Principal Investigator:Professor Bin Du, Medical Intensive Care Unit, Peking Union Medical College Hospital; Professor Xiangyou Yu, Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Xinjiang Medical University

Study subjects: Adult patients with sepsis and septic shock will be eligible for inclusion if all of the inclusion criteria are met within 48 hours of meeting criteria of sepsis-3 definition

Study phase: Investigator Initiated Trial(IIT)

Study objectives: The primary objective of the study is to determine whether ulinastatin, compared to placebo, reduces 28-day all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis and septic shock

Study design: Prospective, Multi-Centre, Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Clinical Trial

Medication method:

  • Ulinastain treatment group: 400,000 IU ulinastatin or matching placebo will be reconstituted in 10 mL of 0.9% normal saline, and then dissolved in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline every 8 hours for 10 days in a double-blind fashion. Intravenous infusion, The study drug will be infused intravenously over 1 hour.
  • Placebo control group:Matching with medication

Course:10 days

Sample size: 348(174 patients of treatment group, 174 patients of control group)

Sites: 15

Primary endpoint:The primary outcome measure for the study is death from all causes at 28-days.

Secondary endpoints:

  • Mortality rate at 90-days
  • Mortality rate in ICU
  • Mortality rate at hospital discharge
  • ICU-free days in 28 days
  • Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 1, 3, 6, 10,14, and 28 days after randomization
  • Incidence and duration of supportive care for organ dysfunction including vasoactive agents, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)
  • Blood lactate concentration at 1, 3, 6 and 10 days after randomization
  • Condition of fluid balance within 10 days after randomization
  • High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), IL-6, IL-10, TNF-α at 1, 3,6 and 10 days after randomization
  • ADL level at hospital discharge

Safety endpoints

  • adverse events
  • serious adverse events
  • vital signs, complete blood counts, chemistry, electrocardiograms
02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis
  • Septic Shock

Keywords

  • sepsis
  • septic shock
  • Ulinastatin
  • adult
  • China
03

In context

Sepsis

1,899 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 462 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 347 is above the median of 105 across 896 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Peking Union Medical College Hospital is the lead sponsor of 1,115 studies on the registry; 463 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria:Patients will be eligible for inclusion if all of the inclusion criteria are met

  1. Sepsis-3 criteria from Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) /European Society of Intensive Care Medicine(ESICM)
  1. Suspected or confirmed infection AND
  2. Evidence of acute organ dysfunction • in patients not known to have preexisting organ dysfunction (The baseline SOFA score can be assumed to be zero): total SOFA score ≥2 points from 48 hours before infection to 24 hours after infection.

    • in patients known to have preexisting organ dysfunction (The baseline SOFA score can be assumed according to baseline conditions): changes of total SOFA score ≥2 points from 48 hours before infection to 24 hours after infection.

    2)48 hours within diagnosis of sepsis 3)Signed and dated informed consent should be obtained prior to any screening procedures from subjects (or legal representatives). If the subject is unable to provide consent, it could be obtained from legal representatives according to local regulation. Consent from subject should be obtained afterwards when available.

    4) Fertile men or women should agree to use efficient birth control methods during the treatment period and at least 28 days after last dose. Fertile is defined as biologically fertile and sexually active from investigator's view.

    5) Non-childbearing women (meet at least one of following criteria):

    • Past hysterectomy or bilateral oothectomy;
    • Medically confirmed ovarian failure, or menopause (amenorrhea for 12 month or more and with no other pathological or physiological reason)

    Exclusion Criteria:

    1. Age \< 18 years, or age>80 years 2) Pregnancy or lactating 3) New York Heart Association Class IV congestive heart failure, nonseptic cardiogenic shock, or uncontrolled acute blood loss 4) Severe, preexisting, parenchymal liver disease with clinically significant portal hypertension, Child-Pugh C stage cirrhosis or acute liver failure 5) Receipt of a solid-organ or bone marrow transplant 6) Advanced pulmonary fibrosis or non invasive ventilation before study entry 7) Myocardial infarction within the previous 3 months 8) Cardiopulmonary resuscitation within 72 hours before study entry 9) Invasive fungal infection or active pulmonary tuberculosis 10) Full-thickness thermal or chemical burn involving 30% or more of body surface area 11) Evidence of significant drug- or disease-induced immunosuppression
    • Evidence of moderate or severe neutropenia, i.e. absolute neutrophil count (ANC) \< 1.0 x 10\^9/L
    • Administration of high doses of corticosteroids, i.e. doses of > 20 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent, for ≥ 2 weeks immediately prior to evaluation for enrollment. Hydrocortisone at dose ≤ 300 mg/d for treatment of septic shock is acceptable.
    • Immunomodulatory medication (e.g. cyclosporine, azathioprine, OKT3), chemotherapy, or radiation therapy within 2 months before study entry
    • Known HIV seropositivity
    • Any disease sufficiently advanced to suppress resistance to infection
    • Non-remission stage of hematological/lymphoid tumor 12) Previous Xuebijing, thymosin or IVIG Within 2 months before study entry 12) Inability to obtain informed consent or assent 13) Participation in an investigational clinical trial within 6 months of screening 14) Expected survival \< 2 months or chronic vegetative state 15) Lack of commitment to full, aggressive, life support 16) History of hypersensitivity to ulinastatin or any excipients or preservatives
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
347 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Ulinastatin group

    Ulinastain treatment group:400,000 IU ulinastatin will be reconstituted in 10 mL of 0.9% normal saline, and then dissolved in 100 mL of 0.9% normal saline every 8 hours for 10 days in a double-blind fashion.

    Drug: ulinastatin

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo group

    Placebo control group:Matching with medication

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Drugulinastatin

    ulinastatin 400,000 IU every 8 hours for 10 days

    Also known as: urinary trypsin inhibitor

  • DrugPlacebo

    matching placebo every 8 hours for 10 days

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. all cause mortality

    death from all causes at 28-days

    Time frame: 28 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. mortality

    mortality rate at 90 days

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. mortality in ICU

    mortality rate at ICU discharge

    Time frame: through ICU discharge, an average of 14 days

  3. mortality rate at hospital discharge

    mortality rate at hospital discharge

    Time frame: through hospital discharge, an average of 21 days

  4. ICU-free days

    The time not indwelling in ICU in 28 days

    Time frame: 28 days

  5. SOFA score

    Organ dysfunction assessed by Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score at 1, 3, 6, 10,14, and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10,14,28 after randomization

  6. incidence of supportive care

    Incidence of supportive care for organ dysfunction including vasoactive agents, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)

    Time frame: through ICU discharge, an average of 14 days

  7. duration of supportive care

    Duration of supportive care for organ dysfunction including vasoactive agents, invasive or noninvasive mechanical ventilation, continuous renal replacement therapy(CRRT)

    Time frame: through ICU discharge, an average of 14 days

  8. blood lactate concentration

    Blood lactate concentration at 1, 3, 6 and 10 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10 after randomization

  9. fluid balance

    Condition of fluid balance in ICU after randomization

    Time frame: through ICU discharge, an average of 10 days

  10. serum hsCRP

    High-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) at 1, 3,6 and 10 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10 after randomization

  11. serum IL-6

    IL-6 at 1, 3,6 and 10 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10 after randomization

  12. serum IL-10

    IL-10 at 1, 3,6 and 10 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10 after randomization

  13. serum TNF-α

    TNF-α at 1, 3,6 and 10 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1,3,6,10 after randomization

  14. complete blood counts

    Complete blood counts at 1-10, 14, 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  15. liver function (alanine aminotransferase, ALT)

    Hepatic (ALT) function tests at 1-10,14 and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  16. liver function (Aspartate transaminase, AST)

    Hepatic (AST) function tests at 1-10,14 and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  17. liver function (bilirubin)

    Hepatic (bilirubin) function tests at 1-10,14 and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  18. respiratory function

    respiratory(PaO2/FiO2) function tests at 1-10,14 and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  19. renal function

    renal (creatinine) function tests at 1-10,14 and 28 days after randomization

    Time frame: Day 1-10, 14, 28 after randomization

  20. Activities of daily living (ADL) at hospital discharge

    Activities of daily living (ADL) level at hospital discharge. This scale is used to assess the patient's ability to run a daily living

    Time frame: through hospital discharge, an average of 21 days

  21. adverse events

    incidence, duration and severity of adverse events

    Time frame: till 28 days after randomization

  22. serious adverse events

    incidence, duration and severity of serious adverse events

    Time frame: till 28 days after randomization

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Peking Union Medical College Hospital
    Beijing, Beijing, China
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Chalfin DB, Holbein ME, Fein AM, Carlon GC. Cost-effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies to gram-negative endotoxin in the treatment of gram-negative sepsis in ICU patients. JAMA. 1993 Jan 13;269(2):249-54. PubMed 8417245 ↗
  • Angus DC, Linde-Zwirble WT, Lidicker J, Clermont G, Carcillo J, Pinsky MR. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care. Crit Care Med. 2001 Jul;29(7):1303-10. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002. PubMed 11445675 ↗
  • Finfer S, Bellomo R, Lipman J, French C, Dobb G, Myburgh J. Adult-population incidence of severe sepsis in Australian and New Zealand intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):589-96. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2157-0. Epub 2004 Feb 12. Erratum In: Intensive Care Med. 2004 Jun;30(6):1252. PubMed 14963646 ↗
  • Padkin A, Goldfrad C, Brady AR, Young D, Black N, Rowan K. Epidemiology of severe sepsis occurring in the first 24 hrs in intensive care units in England, Wales, and Northern Ireland. Crit Care Med. 2003 Sep;31(9):2332-8. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000085141.75513.2B. PubMed 14501964 ↗
  • Brun-Buisson C, Meshaka P, Pinton P, Vallet B; EPISEPSIS Study Group. EPISEPSIS: a reappraisal of the epidemiology and outcome of severe sepsis in French intensive care units. Intensive Care Med. 2004 Apr;30(4):580-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-2121-4. Epub 2004 Mar 2. PubMed 14997295 ↗
  • Cheng B, Xie G, Yao S, Wu X, Guo Q, Gu M, Fang Q, Xu Q, Wang D, Jin Y, Yuan S, Wang J, Du Z, Sun Y, Fang X. Epidemiology of severe sepsis in critically ill surgical patients in ten university hospitals in China. Crit Care Med. 2007 Nov;35(11):2538-46. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000284492.30800.00. PubMed 17828034 ↗
  • Angus DC, van der Poll T. Severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2013 Nov 21;369(21):2063. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc1312359. No abstract available. PubMed 24256390 ↗
  • Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal SM, Sevransky JE, Sprung CL, Douglas IS, Jaeschke R, Osborn TM, Nunnally ME, Townsend SR, Reinhart K, Kleinpell RM, Angus DC, Deutschman CS, Machado FR, Rubenfeld GD, Webb S, Beale RJ, Vincent JL, Moreno R; Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee including The Pediatric Subgroup. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock, 2012. Intensive Care Med. 2013 Feb;39(2):165-228. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2769-8. Epub 2013 Jan 30. PubMed 23361625 ↗
  • Christaki E, Anyfanti P, Opal SM. Immunomodulatory therapy for sepsis: an update. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011 Nov;9(11):1013-33. doi: 10.1586/eri.11.122. PubMed 22029521 ↗
  • Sharony R, Yu PJ, Park J, Galloway AC, Mignatti P, Pintucci G. Protein targets of inflammatory serine proteases and cardiovascular disease. J Inflamm (Lond). 2010 Aug 30;7:45. doi: 10.1186/1476-9255-7-45. PubMed 20804552 ↗
  • Inoue K, Takano H, Yanagisawa R, Yoshikawa T. Protective effects of urinary trypsin inhibitor on systemic inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide. J Clin Biochem Nutr. 2008 Nov;43(3):139-42. doi: 10.3164/jcbn.2008059. Epub 2008 Oct 31. PubMed 19015747 ↗
  • Huang N, Wang F, Wang Y, Hou J, Li J, Deng X. Ulinastatin improves survival of septic mice by suppressing inflammatory response and lymphocyte apoptosis. J Surg Res. 2013 Jun 15;182(2):296-302. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2012.10.043. Epub 2012 Nov 9. PubMed 23158408 ↗
  • Shao YM, Zhang LQ, Deng LH, Yao HG. [Clinical study on effects of ulinastatin on patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome]. Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2005 Apr;17(4):228-30. Chinese. PubMed 15836828 ↗
  • Karnad DR, Bhadade R, Verma PK, Moulick ND, Daga MK, Chafekar ND, Iyer S. Intravenous administration of ulinastatin (human urinary trypsin inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a multicenter randomized controlled study. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Jun;40(6):830-8. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3278-8. Epub 2014 Apr 16. PubMed 24737258 ↗
  • Yuhara H, Ogawa M, Kawaguchi Y, Igarashi M, Shimosegawa T, Mine T. Pharmacologic prophylaxis of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis: protease inhibitors and NSAIDs in a meta-analysis. J Gastroenterol. 2014 Mar;49(3):388-99. doi: 10.1007/s00535-013-0834-x. Epub 2013 May 30. PubMed 23720090 ↗
  • Jiang W, Yu X, Sun T, Chai Y, Chang P, Chen Z, Pan J, Peng Z, Wang R, Wang X, Xu Y, Yu L, Zheng Q, Du B; China Critical Care Clinical Trials Group (CCCCTG). ADJunctive Ulinastatin in Sepsis Treatment in China (ADJUST study): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018 Feb 21;19(1):133. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2513-y. PubMed 29467017 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 13, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02647554
Lead sponsor
Peking Union Medical College Hospital
Collaborators
Techpool Bio-Pharma Co., Ltd.
Responsible party
Bin Du (Director of Medical ICU, Peking Union Medical College Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jan 6, 2016
Start date
Dec 2016
Primary completion
May 1, 2021
Completion
Aug 1, 2021
Last update
Oct 13, 2022

Study contacts

Bin Du, MD
principal investigator · Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion