CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02639481EriCOSUpdated Aug 13, 2019

Erigo®Pro Coma Outcome Study - Study on the Effectiveness of a Robotic Tilt Table Device for Recovery of Consciousness

A Phase 3 interventional study of Standard physiotherapy and Erigo®Pro group without FES in Brain Injuries and Disorders of Consciousness, sponsored by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich. Completed at 2 sites in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-08-13.

Sponsored by Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich · Phase 3, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
47
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) often suffer from severe disorders of consciousness (DOC), such as coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), or minimally conscious state (MCS). This study examines the effect, a novel robotic rehabilitation device (the Erigo®Pro system) has on the recovery of consciousness of DOC patients. The device enables patients to be verticalized very early during acute neurorehabilitation and includes robotic leg movement training as well as functional electrical stimulation (FES) of leg nerves. Patients will be randomly allocated to one of three treatment groups: (i) control group with standard physiotherapy without the device, (ii) device treatment without FES, and (iii) device treatment with FES. Time until recovery of consciousness, rehabilitation outcome, and amount of complications will be the outcome variables.

Read the detailed description

Patients with acquired brain injury (ABI) often suffer from severe disorders of consciousness (DOC), such as coma, unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS), or minimally conscious state (MCS). These DOC can be temporary or persistent. Verticalization and multisensory stimulation are traditionally important therapeutic principles in the neurorehabilitation of such patients. These principles have not yet been tested in randomized controlled trials yet. This trial will therefore evaluate the effect that a 4 week training with a verticalization device (the Erigo®Pro system) with integrated repetitive robotic leg movements and functional electrical stimulation of the leg muscles (FES) has on the clinical course of DOC patients in an inpatient neurorehabilitation setting, following acute ABI. 156 patients will be randomized 1:1:1 to one of the following groups: (i) control group without the Erigo®Pro, (ii) treatment with the Erigo®Pro without FES, and (iii) treatment with the Erigo®Pro and simultaneous FES. There will be 4 training sessions per week for 4 weeks with each session being 60 minutes in length. This will be part of the standard neurorehabilitation program, which in Germany comprises 300 minutes of therapy per day. Patients in the active treatment groups ii) and iii) are required to be verticalized above 60° for at least 35 minutes per treatment session. Patients in the control group will be treated with conventional methods, including verticalization by therapists but without the help of the device. FES will be conducted with the following parameters: 8 channels covering the major ventral and dorsal muscles of the upper and lower, initial current 10 milli ampere (mA), pulse with 250 micro seconds (µs), frequency 25 herz (Hz), ramp 3. Current will be gradually increased to the motor threshold plus 20%.

The investigators will test the following hypotheses:

  1. Treatment with the Erigo®Pro system will lead to a quicker recovery of consciousness (increase of at least one diagnostic category of the CRS-R) than conventional therapy,
  2. Treatment with the Erigo®Pro system including FES will lead to a quicker recovery of consciousness than using the Erigo®Pro without FES, 3).) Treatment with the Erigo®Pro system will decrease spasticity and complications of neurorehabilitation (pneumonia, pressure ulcers) than conventional therapy, and

4.) Treatment with the Erigo®Pro system will lead to an improved longterm patient outcome (6 months) with regard to independence in the activities of daily living, compared to conventional therapy.

The main outcome variable is the Coma Recovery Scale - revised (CRS-R), secondary variables are the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Nociception Coma Scale (NCS), the Modified Ashworth Scale for spasticity, and quantitative HD-EEG measures for brain activity (power, variability, entropy).

Study visits will be prior to first treatment (t0), during the first treatment in vertical position (t1), directly following the first treatment in horizontal patient positioning (t2), 2 weeks after the first treatment (halfway through treatment protocol, t3), at the end of the final treatment after weeks (t4), and final outcome measurement, 6 months after the patient inclusion (t5) within the patients living environment (nursing home or home).

02

Conditions studied

  • Brain Injuries
  • Disorders of Consciousness

Keywords

  • traumatic brain injury
  • stroke
  • disorders of consciousness
  • rehabilitation
  • robotic rehabilitation device
03

In context

Brain Injuries

2,113 studies on the registry are indexed under Brain Injuries; 385 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 47 is close to the median of 48 across 1,331 interventional studies indexed under Brain Injuries.

Browse Brain Injuries studies →

Lead sponsor

Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich is the lead sponsor of 218 studies on the registry; 29 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Informed consent provided by legal representative of patient
  • unresponsive wakefulness syndrome (UWS) or minimal conscious state (MCS), defined by CRS-R
  • acquired brain injury as reason for disorder of consciousness

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • pre-existing coma, UWS, or MCS
  • permanent sedation and/or analgesia with continuous i.v.-application
  • body weight > 135 kg
  • length of leg of less than 75 cm or more than 100 cm
  • contractures in leg joints
  • unstable fractures
  • open wounds / severe skin irritations on the leg
  • severe heart failure or unstable arrhythmias
  • aggressive / uncooperative behavior
  • other medical reasons for strict bed rest
  • severe arterial occlusion disease of the legs
  • cardiac pacer
  • pregnancy
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
47 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control group standard physiotherapy

    Patients will receive standard physiotherapy for 60 minutes, including the goal of verticalization and stimulation of the patient but without the use of the robotic Erigo®Pro device.

    Behavioral: Standard physiotherapy

  • Active comparator
    Erigo®Pro group without FES

    Patients will receive 60 minutes of therapy with the robotic Erigo®Pro verticalization device but without functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles.

    Device: Erigo®Pro group without FES

  • Active comparator
    Erigo®Pro group with FES

    Patients will receive 60 minutes of therapy with the robotic Erigo®Pro verticalization device including functional electrical stimulation (FES) of the leg muscles.

    Device: Erigo®Pro group with FES

Interventions

  • BehavioralStandard physiotherapy

    Classical standard physiotherapy, including measures to verticalize patients by means of orthesis, classical tilt tables, or castings

  • DeviceErigo®Pro group without FES

    Use of the Erigo®Pro device to verticalize patients to above 60° while performing robotic stepping leg movements. FES ist not used.

  • DeviceErigo®Pro group with FES

    Use of the Erigo®Pro device to verticalize patients to above 60° while performing robotic stepping leg movements. FES is applied during then whole treatment session, providing electrical stimulation to the muscles of the upper and lower leg, synchronous to the robotic stepping movements

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Time to recovery of consciousness

    Time to improve 1 diagnostic consciousness category in the Coma Recovery Scale - Revised (CRS-R)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Independence in the activities of daily living

    How independent are patients 6 months after study inclusion, measured by the Functional Independence Measure (FIM)

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Degree of spasticity

    Degree of spasticity, measured with the modified Ashworth Scale (mAS)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  3. Occurrence of typical neurorehabilitation complications

    Do pneumonias and pressure ulcers occur in a patient (clinical observation)?

    Time frame: 4 weeks

  4. Change in bioelectrical brain activity

    Does treatment lead to increased bioelectrical brain activity, measured by high density EEG (power, variability, entropy)

    Time frame: 4 weeks

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Therapiezentrum Burgau
    Burgau, Bayern 89331, Germany
  • Department of Neurology, University of Munich
    Munich, Bayern 81377, Germany
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 13, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02639481
Lead sponsor
Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich
Collaborators
Therapiezentrum Burgau
Responsible party
Andreas Bender (Professor of Neurology, Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 24, 2015
Start date
Jan 2016
Primary completion
Mar 2019
Completion
Mar 2019
Last update
Aug 13, 2019

Study contacts

Andreas Bender, Prof.Dr.
principal investigator · Ludwig-Maximilians - University of Munich

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Aug 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion