CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02623205Updated Dec 15, 2022Results posted

Advancing Personalized Antidepressant Treatment Using PET/MRI

A Phase 4 interventional study of Escitalopram and Placebo in Depression, sponsored by Stony Brook University. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-12-15.

Sponsored by Stony Brook University · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled May 2015, registered Dec 2015).
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
85
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Despite current medications, morbidity and mortality of Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) remain high. According to the World Health Organization, MDD affects 121 million people worldwide, and is projected to be the second leading cause of global disability by 2020. Monotherapy with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) is the most widely used treatment for MDD. However, on average, SSRIs require six weeks for onset of action, and two-thirds of those on SSRIs fail to achieve remission. Compounding this problem, patients with residual symptoms are significantly more likely to discontinue treatment or relapse, be hospitalized for medical and psychiatric conditions, or die of suicide and other causes. Although eliminating ineffective treatment trials would significantly reduce patient suffering and healthcare costs,clinicians currently do not have the tools to objectively select treatment based on an individual's likelihood of remission. Therefore, there is an urgent need to identify markers predictive of an individual's SSRI treatment outcome. Developing this personalized treatment requires increased understanding of the relationship between pretreatment neurobiology, SSRI-induced biological changes, and the corresponding symptom improvements.

Read the detailed description

Aim 1: Determine a Pretreatment Marker of SSRI Effectiveness Using Positron Emission Tomography (PET). With the goal of reducing MDD burden, many studies have assessed the utility of 18F-2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) - PET in antidepressant treatment prediction. However, due to the limitations listed above, there is no consensus on which brain regions are predictive of treatment efficacy. In addition to serving as a biomarker of SSRI effectiveness, only conclusive determination of these regions will provide insight into depression pathophysiology, helping uncover SSRI mechanism of action, and aiding in the search of novel therapeutics. Based on the investigators' preliminary data and other, similar studies, the investigators hypothesize that SSRI-induced change in the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (deltaHDRS) will be correlated with pretreatment metabolic rate of glucose (MRGlu, quantified using arterial blood analysis) in three potential regions: (1) midbrain, (2) right anterior insula, and/or (3) left ventral prefrontal cortex.

Aim 2: Isolate the Neurobiological Basis of the "Loss" Research Domain Criteria (RDoc) and the Change Associated with Treatment. Using a factor analysis of the HDRS, the investigators have previously demonstrated that the "loss" RDoC criteria is significantly correlated to MRGlu in frontal cortical areas. The investigators therefore hypothesize that change in MRGlu (pre to post treatment) in these regions will be correlated with symptom improvement specifically in "loss" symptoms. As an exploratory extension, the investigators will determine whether these changes are treatment-specific (i.e. to SSRI or placebo). A validation of the hypothesis suggests a targeted mechanism of action, and provides a significant step forward for precision treatment. If regional changes in MRGlu are not correlated to improvement in this RDoC category, it suggests that SSRI (or placebo) induced changes may be a downstream effect that should be examined further.

Aim 3: Validate NonInvasive Full Quantification of MRGlu Using Simultaneous Estimation. Full quantification of brain MRGlu with FDG (as performed in this study) requires measuring FDG in arterial plasma (input function) from arterial catheter insertion and blood analysis. This costly and invasive procedure creates a barrier to widespread PET use. The investigators have developed an innovative method for Simultaneous Estimation (SimE) of input information and PET outcome measures (e.g. MRGlu). SimE fully quantifies brain MRGlu without requiring an arterial catheter. In the case of FDG, the investigators' data suggests that SimE used with a single venous sample can provide accurate results. The investigators further hypothesize that the venous sample may be entirely replaced by study data (e.g., injected dose) and biometrics (e.g., body surface area, lean body mass index). Using two different approaches (statistical imputation and physiological parametric modeling) and previously collected data, the investigators will train the SimE for accurate quantification in the absence of blood data. The rich data collected in this study will then provide a robust benchmark for validation of the SimE approach.

Aim 4: Validate Noninvasive Estimates of Plasma Radioactivity from a Novel mini-Positron Emission Tomography (miniPET) Scanner. In parallel to SimE (algorithm/software) development, the investigators will test a noninvasive method of plasma analysis using hardware. FDG concentration will be measured at the wrist, arm, ankle or leg with a novel synchronized PET scanner developed by co-Investigator, Dr. Paul Vaska.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depression

Browse trials for

03

In context

Depression

8,057 studies on the registry are indexed under Depression; 1,641 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 85 is close to the median of 84 across 6,720 interventional studies indexed under Depression.

Browse Depression studies →

Lead sponsor

Stony Brook University is the lead sponsor of 191 studies on the registry; 36 are open to participants now.

Of its 22 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (45%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Age range: over 18 years old
  2. Capacity to consent
  3. Diagnosis of MDD and suffering from a major depressive episode
  4. Score of at least 22 on the MADRS

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Significant active physical illness, particularly those that may affect the brain
  2. Need for use of medication during the study that will interact with the study medication. Need to start medication that will affect study results (anti epileptics, antidepressants, beta blockers, medications with serotonergic or GABAergic modes of action)
  3. Patients considered at significant risk for suicide
  4. Patient is unlikely to be able to tolerate medication washout or the \~3 week interval (5 for fluoxetine) following washout (drug free period). Medication washouts will be supervised by a study physician.
  5. For females: Pregnancy, currently lactating; planning to conceive during the course of study participation, or abortion in the past two months.
  6. Coumadin treatment within 10 days of PET scanning
  7. Any MRI contraindications, including metal implants, pacemaker, metal prostheses, orthodontic appliances, or presence of shrapnel that are contraindicated for MRI.
  8. Bipolar Disorder
  9. Current psychosis
  10. High potential for excessive drug/alcohol use during the treatment period (excluding nicotine or cannabis)
  11. Currently taking effective antidepressant
  12. Currently taking an effective antidepressant
  13. Prior intolerance escitalopram (ESC) for ≥ 4 weeks taking ≥ ⅔ Physician's Desk Reference (PDR) maximal dose
  14. Significant neurological deficits
  15. Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) within the past 6 months
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
85 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Escitalopram

    Active Comparator: Escitalopram (Lexapro) 10mg Week 1, 20mg Weeks 2 and 3, and 30mg for Weeks 4 to 8 (or until 12 for patients close to remission)

    Drug: Escitalopram

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Lactose pill manufactured to mimic Escitalopram pill

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • DrugEscitalopram

    Participants randomized to the escitalopram group will be given the medication for 8 weeks, after which they will be given the option to continue for 4 more weeks if they are close to remission. This additional 4-week treatment option is something offered to participants outside the clinical trial, and therefore was not treated as part of the main study.

    Also known as: Lexapro

  • DrugPlacebo

    To reduce the burden of the patients on placebo, the placebo trial will have a target of 8 weeks. To provide an opportunity for placebo non-responders to receive active drug and to aid in recruitment, we will provide 8-12 weeks of SSRI treatment to placebo non-responders. This treatment option is something offered to participants outside the clinical trial, and therefore was not treated as part of the main study.

    Also known as: Lactose pill

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 8 Weeks

    Comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 score at pretreatment and post-treatment. Minimum score 0, maximum possible score 52, with remission defined as \<=7. The higher the score on the scale, the more severe the degree of depression.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline in Metabolic Rate of Glucose (MRGlu), Quantified Using Arterial Blood Analysis, at 8 Weeks

    Difference between MRGlu Metabolism in Right Insular Cortex before treatment (baseline) and after treatment (week 8). Details on methods and criteria used to assess brain glucose metabolism rates can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551925/

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  2. Quantification of Brain MRGlu Without an Arterial Catheter by Training Simultaneous Estimation (SimE)

    Using Simultaneous Estimation, we imputed the arterial input function from a single venous sample. When we compared the resulting imputed arterial input function to the actual arterial input function collected from plasma samples, we calculated the percent difference in activity and report it here.

    Time frame: Baseline

  3. Bias of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist and Ankle

    Our goal was to determine the Bias of plasma radioactivity measurements taken at the ankle with a Novel Positron Emission Tomography (VersaPET) Scanner compared to radioactivity from arterial sampling taken at the wrist. Bias refers to the offset between the ground truth and estimated data. A bias of 0% is ideal.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Correlation Coefficient of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist or Ankle

    Arterial measurements from samples taken at the wrist were compared to the values from the VersaPET scanner (at the ankle) where the correlation coefficient between the scanner and arterial sampling are being reported. Correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the correlation or stronger the relationship.

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Results

Posted Jun 2, 2022

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneEscitalopramPlacebo
Started4243
Completed3840
Not completed43
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up or discontinued intervention43

Outcome measures

PrimaryChange From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 8 Weeks

Comparison of Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-17 score at pretreatment and post-treatment. Minimum score 0, maximum possible score 52, with remission defined as \<=7. The higher the score on the scale, the more severe the degree of depression.

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · score on a scale
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 8 Weeks
score on a scaleEscitalopramPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale at 8 Weeks11.81 ± 7.029.41 ± 5.66
SecondaryChange From Baseline in Metabolic Rate of Glucose (MRGlu), Quantified Using Arterial Blood Analysis, at 8 Weeks

Difference between MRGlu Metabolism in Right Insular Cortex before treatment (baseline) and after treatment (week 8). Details on methods and criteria used to assess brain glucose metabolism rates can be found here: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8551925/

Time frame:
8 weeks
Reported as:
Mean · mg/(min*100 ml)
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Rate of Glucose (MRGlu), Quantified Using Arterial Blood Analysis, at 8 Weeks
mg/(min*100 ml)EscitalopramPlacebo
Change From Baseline in Metabolic Rate of Glucose (MRGlu), Quantified Using Arterial Blood Analysis, at 8 Weeks0.507489448 ± 0.1023272170.068629964 ± 0.048866182
SecondaryQuantification of Brain MRGlu Without an Arterial Catheter by Training Simultaneous Estimation (SimE)

Using Simultaneous Estimation, we imputed the arterial input function from a single venous sample. When we compared the resulting imputed arterial input function to the actual arterial input function collected from plasma samples, we calculated the percent difference in activity and report it here.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Mean · Percent of Activity
Quantification of Brain MRGlu Without an Arterial Catheter by Training Simultaneous Estimation (SimE)
Percent of ActivityMixed
Quantification of Brain MRGlu Without an Arterial Catheter by Training Simultaneous Estimation (SimE)2.0 ± 7.1
SecondaryBias of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist and Ankle

Our goal was to determine the Bias of plasma radioactivity measurements taken at the ankle with a Novel Positron Emission Tomography (VersaPET) Scanner compared to radioactivity from arterial sampling taken at the wrist. Bias refers to the offset between the ground truth and estimated data. A bias of 0% is ideal.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Percent
Bias of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist and Ankle
PercentMixed
Bias of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist and Ankle5
SecondaryCorrelation Coefficient of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist or Ankle

Arterial measurements from samples taken at the wrist were compared to the values from the VersaPET scanner (at the ankle) where the correlation coefficient between the scanner and arterial sampling are being reported. Correlation coefficient ranges from -1 to 1. The closer the value is to 1, the higher the correlation or stronger the relationship.

Time frame:
Baseline
Reported as:
Number · Correlation Coefficient
Correlation Coefficient of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist or Ankle
Correlation CoefficientMixed
Correlation Coefficient of VersaPET Scanner From Measurements Taken at the Wrist or Ankle0.97

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected over a period of up to 6-weeks during the pre-treatment washout phase (when necessary), and for the complete 8-week treatment period.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Escitalopram0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)0/42 (0%)
Placebo0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)EscitalopramPlaceboTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years424385
>=65 years000
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)EscitalopramPlaceboTotal
Female272956
Male151429
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race/Ethnicity, Customized(Participants)EscitalopramPlaceboTotal
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Caucasian - White262652
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Caucasian - Non-white213
Race/Ethnicity Categories — African American / Black224
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Asian - South Asian527
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Asian - East Asian347
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Asian - Southeast Asian011
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Pacific Islander011
Race/Ethnicity Categories — Mixed4610
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)EscitalopramPlaceboTotal
United States424385
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Rating
Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) Rating(Scores on Scale)EscitalopramPlaceboTotal
Mean18.86 ± 5.0916.79 ± 3.8417.81 ± 4.59
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Stony Brook University Hospital
    Stony Brook, New York 11794, United States
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Narayan GA, Hill KR, Wengler K, He X, Wang J, Yang J, Parsey RV, DeLorenzo C. Does the change in glutamate to GABA ratio correlate with change in depression severity? A randomized, double-blind clinical trial. Mol Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;27(9):3833-3841. doi: 10.1038/s41380-022-01730-4. Epub 2022 Aug 18. PubMed 35982258 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Feb 6, 2020

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Dec 15, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02623205
Lead sponsor
Stony Brook University
Responsible party
Christine DeLorenzo (Associate Professor of Psychiatry, Associate Professor of Biomedical Engineering, Stony Brook University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Dec 7, 2015
Start date
May 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2020
Completion
Mar 2020
Results posted
Jun 2, 2022
Last update
Dec 15, 2022

Study contacts

Christine DeLorenzo, PhD
principal investigator · Stony Brook University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion