CClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02606799EXCESSUpdated Jul 1, 2022

Extracorporeal Elimination of Cytokines Following Abdominal-thoracic Esophagectomy

An interventional study of CytoSorb cytokine elimination in Inflammation, sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf. Terminated at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2022-07-01.

Sponsored by Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
No further recruitment possible due to changed conditions
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study evaluates the effect of extracorporeal removal of inflammatory mediators on the systemic inflammation reaction of patients admitted to the intensive care unit following elective esophagectomy. Half of the participants will be treated with an adsorption device (CytoSorbents Adsorber), while the other half will be treated according to standard care. Significant reductions of interleukin-6 plasma concentration, SOFA score and catecholamine dosage in the intervention group are expected.

Read the detailed description

Radical esophagectomy combined with extensive lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer is one of the most invasive surgical procedures. Even with progress made in surgical technique and postoperative management the rate of short- and long term complications remains high. The surgical trauma invariably causes liberation and activation of inflammatory mediators and danger associated molecular patterns, which in turn result in a pronounced systemic inflammatory reaction, leading to multiorgan dysfunction including adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in many patients. The subsequent counter regulation of the immune system induces immune paralysis, which is followed by infectious complications and increases the probability of severe sepsis. Moreover, severe systemic inflammation causes capillary leakage, resulting in impaired wound healing and endangered anastomoses.

Therefore, it seems that early and effective measures against the excessive production of mediators and cytokines are indicated without impairment of the innate and adaptive immune response as it would be expected with the administration of e.g. steroids. Instead, the removal of an excessive amount of circulating cytokines might be a desirable method having shown its effectivity in the therapy of septic shock in the past.

The aim of this study is to demonstrate the effectiveness of extracorporeal cytokine removal to dampen the systemic inflammatory response following abdominal-thoracic esophagectomy.

02

Conditions studied

  • Inflammation

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Esophagectomy Inflammation Hemoperfusion Cytokines
03

In context

Inflammation

3,439 studies on the registry are indexed under Inflammation; 629 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 5 is below the median of 50 across 2,437 interventional studies indexed under Inflammation.

Browse Inflammation studies →

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf is the lead sponsor of 403 studies on the registry; 83 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • abdominal-thoracic esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy
  • post operative admission to ICU
  • age >= 18 yrs
  • written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participation in another interventional trial
  • pregnancy or lactation
  • systemic medication with high dose steroids and/or immunosuppressants and/or radiotherapy during the last 3 months
  • known diseases of the immune system (benign and malign)
  • contraindications for extracorporeal therapy
  • Thrombocytopenia \< 50*10\^9/l
  • therapy limitations (DNR), moribund status
  • missing informed consent
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Participant)
Enrollment
5 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard Care

    intensive care therapy according to international standards and following local SOPs, including fluid therapy, mechanical ventilation, catecholamine therapy and other pharmacotherapy as required

  • Experimental
    CytoSorb

    all of the above, plus extracorporeal hemadsorption therapy (CytoSorbents Adsorber cartridge) using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (citrate anticoagulation) CytoSorb cytokine elimination

    Device: CytoSorb cytokine elimination

Interventions

  • DeviceCytoSorb cytokine elimination

    Hemoperfusion using continuous veno-venous hemofiltration (citrate regional anticoagulation) with CytoSorb cytokine elimination over a period of 48h immediately following admission to the intensive care unit

    Also known as: hemadsorption

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change of interleukin-6 plasma levels

    Change of interleukin-6 plasma levels

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in SOFA Score

    decrease of \>= 2 score points in the intervention group

    Time frame: 120 hours

  2. Change of catecholamine dose

    decrease of \>= 0.1 µg/kg/min catecholamine dosage to achieve MAP \> 65 mmHg in intervention group

    Time frame: 48 hours

  3. Fluid intake

    reduction of fluid intake to maintain MAP \> 65 mmHg of \>= 1000 ml/24h in intervention group

    Time frame: 120 hours

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
    Hamburg, 20251, Germany
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Panagiotou A, Gaiao S, Cruz DN. Extracorporeal therapies in sepsis. J Intensive Care Med. 2013 Sep-Oct;28(5):281-95. doi: 10.1177/0885066611425759. Epub 2011 Oct 25. PubMed 22027760 ↗
  • Bruenger F, Kizner L, Weile J, Morshuis M, Gummert JF. First successful combination of ECMO with cytokine removal therapy in cardiogenic septic shock: a case report. Int J Artif Organs. 2015 Feb;38(2):113-6. doi: 10.5301/ijao.5000382. Epub 2015 Feb 3. PubMed 25656010 ↗
  • Kellum JA, Song M, Venkataraman R. Hemoadsorption removes tumor necrosis factor, interleukin-6, and interleukin-10, reduces nuclear factor-kappaB DNA binding, and improves short-term survival in lethal endotoxemia. Crit Care Med. 2004 Mar;32(3):801-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000114997.39857.69. PubMed 15090965 ↗
  • Basu R, Pathak S, Goyal J, Chaudhry R, Goel RB, Barwal A. Use of a novel hemoadsorption device for cytokine removal as adjuvant therapy in a patient with septic shock with multi-organ dysfunction: A case study. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014 Dec;18(12):822-4. doi: 10.4103/0972-5229.146321. PubMed 25538418 ↗
  • Mitzner SR, Gloger M, Henschel J, Koball S. Improvement of hemodynamic and inflammatory parameters by combined hemoadsorption and hemodiafiltration in septic shock: a case report. Blood Purif. 2013;35(4):314-5. doi: 10.1159/000351206. Epub 2013 Jul 31. No abstract available. PubMed 23920222 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2022, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02606799
Lead sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
CytoSorbents, Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 17, 2015
Start date
May 2016
Primary completion
Apr 2017
Completion
Apr 2017
Last update
Jul 1, 2022

Study contacts

Axel Nierhaus, MD
principal investigator · University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Dep. of Critical Care

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jun 2022. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion