CClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02594176OANITUpdated Feb 3, 2016

Study of FLEXISEQ® for Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Knee in NSAID-compromised Patients

An interventional study of FLEXISEQ® and Placebo in Osteoarthritis, sponsored by Pro Bono Bio. Status unknown at 1 site in Germany. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2016-02-03.

Sponsored by Pro Bono Bio · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Feb 2016), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
600
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Primary Objective To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of pain related to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs.

Secondary Objectives

  • To substantiate the efficacy of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® for the treatment of stiffness and improvement of joint function in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee.
  • To substantiate safety and tolerability of 2.2 g FLEXISEQ® in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee.
Read the detailed description

This post marketing clinical follow-up, randomised, double-blind study comparing the efficacy and tolerability of topical FLEXISEQ® with placebo for the treatment of osteoarthritis of the knee in patients contraindicated for or with clinical intolerance to NSAIDs and with OA of the knee will have a total individual treatment period of 12 weeks.

02

Conditions studied

  • Osteoarthritis

Keywords

  • Osteoarthritis
  • Pain
  • NSAID
  • Sequessome
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 583 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 600 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Pro Bono Bio as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  1. Signed and dated informed consent prior to any study-mandated procedure
  2. Willing and able to comply with study requirements
  3. Outpatients with an age ≥ 50 (starting from the day after the 50th birthday)
  4. Patient for whom their knee pain is the worst pain in the body and is able to identify the predominantly painful (target) knee
  5. Patient has a primary diagnosis of Functional Class I-III OA of the target knee and patient meets American College of Rheumatology (ACR) clinical classification criteria for osteoarthritis of the knee
  6. NSAID contraindicated or clinically intolerant
  7. Females able to conceive (including peri-menopausal women who have had a menstrual period within 1 year) must be using appropriate birth control (defined as a method which results in a low failure rate
  8. If female and able to conceive, patient has a negative urine pregnancy test at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • General exclusion criteria

    1. Planned treatment or treatment with another investigational drug within 30 days prior to randomisation
    2. Patients who are inmates of psychiatric wards, prisons, or other state institutions
    3. Investigator or any other team member involved directly or indirectly in the conduct of the clinical study
    4. Pregnancy or lactation
    5. Any planned or expected hospitalisation within the study period
    6. Patients not able to perform the WOMAC test (physically handicapped or immobile patient, e.g. wheel-chair bound)
    7. Any health condition which, in the investigator's opinion means the patient is likely to be unable to complete the 12 week study Medical history related exclusion criteria
    8. Skin lesions or dermatological diseases in the treatment area
    9. Extreme obesity (BMI > 35)
    10. Uncontrolled hypertension
    11. Requiring dialysis
    12. Hepatocellular insufficiency preventing use of paracetamol
    13. Alcohol abuse
    14. Intolerance to paracetamol
    15. Malignancy within the past 2 years
    16. Morbus Meulengracht/Gilbert Syndrome
    17. Neurological or psychiatric disorders compromising pain rating by the patient, such as but not limited to depressive disorders, schizophrenia or epilepsy
    18. Any other pain condition requiring acute or chronic use of pain medication that cannot be discontinued at screening
    19. Inflammatory arthritis including rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, gout, pseudo gout, systemic lupus erythematodes, ankylosing spondylitis, mixed connective tissue disease
    20. Symptomatic hip OA ipsilateral to the target knee
    21. Severe (axial misalignment > 10°), uncorrected genu vara and genu valga
    22. Arthroscopy of the target knee within 6 months prior or during the study
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
600 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Test Product

    2.2 g FLEXISEQ® twice daily

    Device: FLEXISEQ®

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    2.2 g placebo twice daily

    Device: Placebo

Interventions

  • DeviceFLEXISEQ®

    applicable gel

  • DevicePlacebo

    applicable gel

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. WOMAC pain score

    Change from baseline to final visit of the average of the WOMAC pain subscale scores

    Time frame: 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Patient Global Assessment of Change (PGIC)

    PGIC-Score at final visit

    Time frame: 3 months

  2. WOMAC function score

    Change from baseline to final visit of the average of the WOMAC function subscale scores

    Time frame: 3 months

  3. WOMAC stiffness score

    Change from baseline to final visit of the average of the WOMAC stiffness subscale scores

    Time frame: 3 months

Other outcomes

  1. Adverse Events (AE)

    Frequency of treatment emergent AEs per treatment group

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Bolten W, Cevc G, Rother M. A multicentre, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial comparing the efficacy and safety of topical ketoprofen in Transfersome gel (IDEA-033) with ketoprofen-free vehicle (TDT 064) and oral celecoxib for knee pain associated with osteoarthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013 Jul;52(7):1303-12. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket133. Epub 2013 Mar 28. PubMed 23542612 ↗
  • Rother M, Conaghan PG. A randomized, double-blind, phase III trial in moderate osteoarthritis knee pain comparing topical ketoprofen gel with ketoprofen-free gel. J Rheumatol. 2013 Oct;40(10):1742-8. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.130192. Epub 2013 Sep 1. PubMed 23996292 ↗
  • Kneer W, Rother M, Mazgareanu S, Seidel EJ; European IDEA-033 study group. A 12-week randomized study of topical therapy with three dosages of ketoprofen in Transfersome(R) gel (IDEA-033) compared with the ketoprofen-free vehicle (TDT 064), in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee. J Pain Res. 2013 Oct 25;6:743-53. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S51054. eCollection 2013. PubMed 24187510 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2016, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02594176
Lead sponsor
Pro Bono Bio
Collaborators
International Medical Research - Partner GmbH
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Nov 1, 2015
Start date
Oct 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2016 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 3, 2016

Study contacts

Matthias Rother, MD
Contact
m.rother@imr-partner.de
+49 89 858360925
Ilka Rother, MD
Contact
i.rother@imr-partner.de
+49 89 858360911
Matthias Rother, MD
study director · International Medical Research - Partner GmbH

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Feb 2016. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion