ClinicalTrials.gg
TerminatedNCT02591199Updated Feb 3, 2026Results posted

Engage 24: Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of URG101 in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome

A Phase 2 interventional study of URG101 and Placebo in Interstitial Cystitis and Bladder Pain Syndrome, sponsored by Urigen. Terminated at 11 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-03.

Sponsored by Urigen · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Why this study was terminated
Prematurely terminated due to data inconsistent with the experimental plan and lack of funding
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
91
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination product (URG101) is safe and effective versus its individual components (Heparin Sodium and Lidocaine Hydrochloride) for the treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome. The study is randomized and double-blinded such that neither the subject nor doctor will know which drug or placebo is received.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2a, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, multicenter, single-dose, pharmacokinetic study designed to determine the efficacy and safety of the combination product (URG101) compared with its individual components (Heparin Sodium and Lidocaine Hydrochloride).

Eligible subjects exhibiting moderate to severe symptoms of bladder pain associated with their diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome who have signed informed consent, will be screened and provisionally enrolled for intravesical treatment.

On the day of study drug administration subjects will be randomized (2:1:2:1; URG101:placebo:lidocaine:heparin) and will receive a single administration of one of four intravesical treatments in a blinded fashion, based on random assignment:

  1. URG101 (buffered lidocaine-heparin)
  2. Placebo (phosphate buffer)
  3. Lidocaine hydrocholoride buffered alone
  4. Heparin sodium buffered alone

Efficacy and safety assessments will be completed for 24 hours after study drug administration. End of Study Follow-up will be completed by telephone 48 to 72 hours after study drug administration.

02

Conditions studied

  • Interstitial Cystitis
  • Bladder Pain Syndrome
03

In context

Cystitis, Interstitial

236 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 91 is above the median of 51 across 158 interventional studies indexed under Cystitis, Interstitial.

Browse Cystitis, Interstitial studies →

Lead sponsor

Urigen is the lead sponsor of 3 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects diagnosed with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome must meet all of the following criteria to participate in the study:

  1. Have provided written to participate in this trial
  2. Be male or female, ≥ 18 years of age
  3. Have moderate-to-severe symptoms of bladder pain of bladder origin for at least 9 months prior to the study
  4. May or may not have received a cystoscopy in association with their diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome prior to or at time of screening
  5. Have a score of ≥ 15 and \< 30 on the PUF questionnaire, completed at screening
  6. A minimum score of 5 is required on the VAS
  7. Have been using a stable dose of hormone therapy for ≥ 3 months, if female and currently taking hormone therapy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Pregnant or breastfeeding. For females of child bearing potential and males, if sexually active, must be willing to commit to an acceptable method of for the duration of the study.
  2. Have a known to heparin or lidocaine
  3. Have used any local anesthetic by any route within 24 hours prior to study drug administration, or used a lidocaine patch within 14 days prior to study drug administration
  4. Have used a tricyclic antidepressant or a gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue (gabapentin or pregabalin) unless taking the medication for ≥ 3 weeks. The stable dose of gabapentin may not exceed 1,200 mg per day, and the stable dose of pregabalin may not exceed 150 mg per day.
  5. Have used any pain medication within 6 hours prior to study drug administration
  6. Have used narcotics or medical marijuana ≤ 3 weeks prior to study entry (generic names: fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, levorphanol, medical marijuana, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, propoxyphene, tramadol). Subjects who have received codeine within this time period may be admitted if the use is not chronic, and not within 6 hours of enrollment, such that they are not at risk for GI or opiate withdrawal symptoms that in the opinion of the investigator would impact the subject's study participation due to their ability to follow the study protocol or bias study results.
  7. Have used prohibited drugs as determined by self-report, positive urine drug screen, or in the opinion of the investigator be under the influence of drugs affecting mentation precluding their ability to follow the study protocol or bias study results
  8. Have a known abnormal laboratory test value defined by the investigator
  9. Have a neurogenic bladder or other disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may cause neurogenic bladder (including Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, myasthenia gravis, movement disorders, spinal cord damage)
  10. Have pain or a pain disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make it difficult to discriminate pelvic pain of bladder origin from the other pain
  11. Have severe depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, or other major central nervous system disorder
  12. Have history of arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, or cardiac disease, or any coexisting medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may be significant or interfere with study procedures or interpretation of study results
  13. Had bladder instillation therapy within 7 days prior to study entry or had a prior bladder instillation with heparin and lidocaine and did not respond
  14. Had dilatation (hydrodistention) of bladder within 3 months of study entry
  15. Evidence or suspected presence of cancer detected during cystoscopy prior to or at time of initial screening.
  16. Has received any drug or device within 30 days prior to screening
  17. Is currently enrolled in another investigational drug or device study
  18. Is unwilling or unable to abide by the requirements of the study
  19. Have an actively bleeding lesion or area in the bladder as detected by dipstick urinalysis and investigator assessment, immediately prior to randomization
  20. Have had any of the following: bacterial, chemical (including ketamine and cyclophosphamide) or radiation cystitis; gynecological, urological or rectal cancer; current chemotherapy; tuberculous cystitis; urinary schistosomiasis; bladder or uretal calculi; vaginitis or genital herpes; urethral diverticulum or bladder fistulae.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator)
Enrollment
91 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    URG101

    A single 15 mL dose of URG101,a mix of buffered Lidocaine (200 mg) and Heparin (50,000 IU), delivered to the bladder via catheter.

    Drug: URG101

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    A single 15 mL dose of placebo delivered to the bladder via catheter.

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Lidocaine

    A single 15 mL dose of buffered Lidocaine (200 mg) delivered to the bladder via catheter.

    Drug: Lidocaine

  • Experimental
    Heparin

    A single 15 mL dose of buffered Heparin (50,000 IU) delivered to the bladder.

    Drug: Heparin

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Average of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity

    A calculation of average bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12). A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. The average SPID-12 is calculated by multiplying the Pain Intensity Difference score at each time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. A lower, negative average SPID-12 difference is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score, whereas a positive score indicates an increase in pain intensity compared to baseline. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.

    Time frame: 12 hours

  2. Change of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity

    A calculation of bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12) after administration of URG101 compared with the SPID-12 after administration of lidocaine alone, heparin alone, and placebo. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. A negative value indicates lower SPID-12 values for URG101. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.

    Time frame: 12 hours

07

Results

Posted Feb 3, 2026
Limitations and caveats
The IDMC reported a trend toward significance for URG101; but it was determined that \>300 subjects would be required to reach significance. The data showed inconsistencies between different sites that could affect the ability to pool the data and could not be explained in a blinded analysis. Therefore, at 92 subjects enrolled, the study was terminated early due to data inconsistent with the experimental plan, lack of funding. There is no SAP. Results are limited to primary endpoint and safety.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneURG101HeparinLidocainePlacebo
Started31152916
Completed31152916
Not completed0000

Outcome measures

PrimaryAverage of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity

A calculation of average bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12). A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. The average SPID-12 is calculated by multiplying the Pain Intensity Difference score at each time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. A lower, negative average SPID-12 difference is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score, whereas a positive score indicates an increase in pain intensity compared to baseline. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.

Time frame:
12 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale*hours
Average of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity
units on a scale*hoursURG101HeparinLidocainePlacebo
Intent to Treat / Safety Population-30.81 ± 21.641-22.50 ± 25.918-27.50 ± 26.121-19.63 ± 18.558
Per Protocol Population-33.41 ± 20.89-24.11 ± 26.11-26.43 ± 26.76-15.42 ± 17.74
Per Protocol-Instillation (history of receiving bladder instillations) Population-37.51 ± 18.06-12.38 ± 22.38-23.27 ± 25.96-16.28 ± 19.66
PrimaryChange of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity

A calculation of bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12) after administration of URG101 compared with the SPID-12 after administration of lidocaine alone, heparin alone, and placebo. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. A negative value indicates lower SPID-12 values for URG101. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.

Time frame:
12 hours
Reported as:
Least squares mean · units on a scale*hours
Change of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity
units on a scale*hoursURG101 Minus HeparinURG101 Minus LidocaineURG101 Minus Placebo
Intent-to-Treat / Safety Population-11.65 (-25.61 to 2.31)-4.31 (-16.00 to 7.38)-12.46 (-26.59 to 1.68)
Per Protocol Population-15.69 (-29.57 to -1.81)-9.21 (-21.13 to 2.72)-21.28 (-36.07 to -6.49)
Per Protocol-Instillation (history of receiving bladder instillations) Population-26.02 (-43.62 to -8.43)-14.64 (-31.47 to 2.20)-26.04 (-44.07 to -8.01)

Adverse events

Collected over From the time of study drug administration through 72 hours post-dose. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
URG1010/31 (0%)0/31 (0%)3/31 (9.7%)
Heparin0/15 (0%)0/15 (0%)1/15 (6.7%)
Lidocaine0/29 (0%)0/29 (0%)5/29 (17.2%)
Placebo0/16 (0%)0/16 (0%)3/16 (18.8%)
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventURG101HeparinLidocainePlacebo
NauseaGastrointestinal disorders2/310/152/290/16
HeadacheNervous system disorders2/311/152/291/16
Burning in BladderRenal and urinary disorders0/311/150/290/16
Pain with UrinationRenal and urinary disorders0/311/150/290/16
VomitingGastrointestinal disorders0/310/150/291/16
VertigoNervous system disorders0/310/151/291/16

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)URG101HeparinLidocainePlaceboTotal
Mean46.7 ± 15.0652.2 ± 16.8645.3 ± 15.4150.2 ± 16.1547.8 ± 15.66
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)URG101HeparinLidocainePlaceboTotal
Female3014281385
Male11136
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)URG101HeparinLidocainePlaceboTotal
Hispanic or Latino515415
Not Hispanic or Latino2614241276
Unknown or Not Reported00000
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)URG101HeparinLidocainePlaceboTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native00000
Asian22105
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander00000
Black or African American25018
White278281578
More than one race00000
Unknown or Not Reported00000
08

Study locations

11 sites
  • IC Study, LLC
    Escondido, California 92025, United States
  • University of California San Diego
    San Diego, California 92103, United States
  • Georgia Urology
    Cartersville, Georgia 30120, United States
  • The Urogynecology Center
    Overland Park, Kansas 66209, United States
  • Rutgers Women's Health Clinic
    New Brunswick, New Jersey 08901, United States
  • The Arthur Smith Institue for Urology- North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System
    Lake Success, New York 11042, United States
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences
    Winston-Salem, North Carolina 27103, United States
  • MetroHealth System, Center for Advanced Gynecology
    Cleveland, Ohio 44109, United States
  • Medical University of South Carolina
    Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States
  • Sanford Research
    Sioux Falls, South Dakota 57105, United States
  • Urology of Virginia, PLLC
    Virginia Beach, Virginia 23462, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

10

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Sep 2015, a primary completion of May 2018 and a completion of Jun 2018. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

Results were first posted in Feb 2026, 7 years 8 months after primary completion. A results delay was requested in Aug 2020.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Oct 28, 2015
First posted
Oct 29, 2015
Start
Sep 2015
Primary completionActual
May 14, 2018
CompletionActual
Jun 18, 2018
Results delay requested
Aug 13, 2020
Results first posted
Feb 3, 2026
Last update
Feb 3, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 3, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02591199
Lead sponsor
Urigen
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Oct 29, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
May 14, 2018
Completion
Jun 18, 2018
Results posted
Feb 3, 2026
Last update
Feb 3, 2026

Study contacts

C. Lowell Parsons, MD
study chair · Urigen

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is terminated, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Lidocaine · Heparin

Start the discussion