CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02571153Updated Mar 6, 2017Results posted

Low Doses of Ketamine and Postoperative Quality of Recovery

A Phase 4 interventional study of Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg and Normal saline in Postoperative Pain and Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting, sponsored by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo. Completed at 1 site in Brazil. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-03-06.

Sponsored by Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo · Phase 4, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
135
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 60 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

There are evidences that intraoperative administration of low doses of ketamine may contribute to control the postoperative pain by acting on the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) channel, reducing the effects related to the tolerance and hyperalgesia induced by opioids. This study aims to evaluate the effects of administration of this agent not only as an analgesic but also its role in the quality of recovery from anesthesia, which includes observation of emotional, psychological and physical aspects. Patients who were scheduled to undergo total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) for laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be enrolled in this clinical study. After induction of anesthesia, patients will receive one of three solutions according to the randomly selected group: ketamine 0,2 mg/kg; ketamine 0,4 mg/kg or saline. In the recovery room and on the ward, data related to the presence of pain, analgesic consumption, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations will be recorded. The next day, the quality of recovery will be evaluated by application of the questionnaire QoR40 (Quality of Recovery Questionnaire-40).

Read the detailed description

Introduction It is known that nociceptive stimuli, triggered by surgery and tissue inflammation can cause peripheral sensitization and primary hyperalgesia, increases spinal responsiveness to stimuli, whether harmful or not, due to the wind-up phenomenon, and other mechanisms, with induction central sensitization. Additionally, opioids commonly employed during general anesthesia may activate, both, the antinociceptive system and the pro-nociceptive system which can lead to acute tolerance and hyperalgesia. There is evidence that NMDA receptors are involved in the development of these changes and that low doses of ketamine (\< 1mg/kg) may control of postoperative pain to bind to the receptor phencyclidine the NMDA channel and inhibit the activation of the channel by glutamate non-competitively. Recently, there has been a change in pain management, which includes the observation of non-traditional variables such as those related to the concepts of satisfaction and quality of life related to health. To this end, a growing number of authors went on to assess the opinion of patients as a way to determine the quality of recovery from anesthesia, meaning the observation not only of pain intensity, but also aspects related to emotional state, comfort and independence physical. The QoR-40 questionnaire (Quality of recovery-40), a validated instrument for this purpose, allows an objective approach of these factors that can influence the perception of the patient and allows you to compare different therapeutic ways. There are no recent data on the application of this instrument to assess the effects of giving, or not, of low doses of ketamine on the quality of recovery of patients undergoing total intravenous anesthesia.

Methods After arrival in the operating room, standard American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) monitors will be applied. Midazolam 0.06 mg/kg and 1% lidocaine (30 mg) will be administered intravenously immediately after venoclysis. After anesthesia induction, capnographic monitoring will be added and the neuromuscular blockade will be evaluated using acceleromyography (TOF Watch). Induction and maintenance of anesthesia will be performed as follows: remifentanil, induction dose 0.5 μg/kg/min, followed by a maintenance dose of 0.3 μg/kg/min. Propofol, initial bolus (2.0 mg/kg) followed by infusion at 4 to 6 mg/kg/h. Each patient will receive rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg) before tracheal intubation. Ventilation will be controlled by adjusting the flow volume and respiratory rate to keep the end-tidal carbon dioxid (CO2) level between 30 and 40 mmHg. In the case of inadequate depth of anesthesia (movements, sweating, tachycardia, blood pressure increase >10% of the pre-induction value), propofol infusion or sevoflurane rate will be increased (by 1%); if this was not sufficient, the remifentanil infusion rate will be also increased (by 0,1 μg/kg/min). Patients who exhibit reductions in systolic arterial pressure (SAP) greater than 30% or heart rate (HR) reductions to less than 50 bpm will be given ephedrine (10 mg) and atropine (0.5 mg), respectively. After induction patients will receive one of three intravenous solutions: ketamine 0.2 mg/kg - diluted in saline until the volume of 5 mililiters (mL) (k2 group); ketamine 0.4 mg/kg diluted in saline until the volume of 5 ml (k4 group) or 5mL of 0.9% normal saline (K0 group). Hydration will be maintained with 0.9% normal saline 2 ml/kg/h. All of the participants were given dexamethasone (8 mg) and ketoprofen (100 mg) at the onset of surgery and dimenhydrinate (30 mg), dipyrone (1 g) and morphine (0.1 mg/kg) 15 minutes prior the end of the procedure. Atropine (0.01 mg/kg) and neostigmine (0.05 mg/kg) were used to achieve T4/T1>0.9 on the TOF monitor. Extubation was performed after awakening. When stable vital signs and respiration was confirmed, all patients were transferred to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Data related to the occurrence of pain, nausea, vomiting, dizziness or hallucinations at the PACU will be recorded as will be the length of stay in the PACU. Pain will be assessed every 15 minutes using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain. Morphine (1 to 2 mg) will be administered intravenously every 10 minutes to maintain the pain score below 4 (1 mg when the pain score was \<7 and 2 mg when it was ≥7). Following discharge from the PACU (minimum stay 60 minutes and Aldrete \& Kroulik index >9), all of the participants will be given ketoprofen (100 mg) every 12 hours and dipyrone (30 mg/kg, maximum 1 g) every six hours intravenously. Whenever patients judged that their analgesia was insufficient, tramadol (100 mg) will be administered intravenously at eight-hour minimum intervals as needed. Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) will be treated with dimenhydrinate (30 mg) intravenously. Pain score, use of analgesics, and the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, and other complications during the hospital ward stay will be recorded.

QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery will be assessed by the QoR40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item is rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR40 will be administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Postoperative Pain
  • Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Keywords

  • Intravenous anesthesia
  • Postoperative nausea vomiting
  • Postoperative pain
  • Patient satisfaction
  • Quality of health care
  • Ketamine
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,093 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,140 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 135 is above the median of 75 across 4,344 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo is the lead sponsor of 12 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I or II
  • Patients scheduled to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who refuse to participate in the study
  • Patients who are not able to communicate due to alterations in the level of consciousness, or neurologic, or psychiatric disease
  • Contraindication of any of the drugs used in the study
  • Patients who are superobese (BMI>40)
  • History of alcohol or drug dependence
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
135 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline group

    Normal saline 0.9% (5 mL)

    Drug: Normal saline

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 0.2

    ketamine 0.2 mg/kg (5 mL)

    Drug: Ketamine 0.2 mg/kg

  • Experimental
    Ketamine 0.4

    ketamine 0.4 mg/kg (5 mL)

    Drug: Ketamine 0.4 mg/kg

Interventions

  • DrugKetamine 0.4 mg/kg

    Intravenous ketamine 0.4 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia

  • DrugNormal saline

    Intravenous normal saline 0.9% 5 mL

  • DrugKetamine 0.2 mg/kg

    Intravenous ketamine 0.2 mg/kg after induction of anesthesia

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery

    Quality of postoperative functional recovery assessed by the questionnaire QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery was assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR-40 was administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Length of PACU Stay

    Length of stay at postanesthesia recovery room

    Time frame: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)

  2. Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting

    Percentage of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting at the PACU and during the hospital ward stay

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale

    Occurrence of pain at the PACU. Average Pain will be calculated. The pain score will be evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero mean no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: 90 minutes postanesthesia at recovery room

  4. Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU

    Morphine consumption (mg) at PACU (about 90 to 120 minutes)

    Time frame: During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)

  5. The Severity of Postoperative Pain

    The severity of postoperative pain was rated the higher score of pain (NRS) during the hospital ward stay. Pain was evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS), where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Percentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption

    Percentage of Participants with Tramadol during the ward stay

    Time frame: 24 hours

07

Results

Posted Mar 6, 2017

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Started454545
Completed393743
Not completed682

Outcome measures

PrimaryQuality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery

Quality of postoperative functional recovery assessed by the questionnaire QoR40 The quality of postoperative functional recovery was assessed by the QoR-40 questionnaire, which assesses five dimensions of recovery (physical comfort - 12 items; emotional state - 7 items; physical independence - 5 items; physiological support - 7 items; and pain - 7 items). Each item was rated on a five-point Likert scale: none of the time, some of the time, usually, most of the time, and all the time. The total score on the QoR-40 ranges from 40 (poorest quality of recovery) to 200 (best quality of recovery). The QoR-40 was administered by a blind investigator 24 hours after surgery.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery
units on a scaleSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Quality of Postoperative Recovery Assessed by QoR-40 Questionnaire 24 Hours After Surgery187.8 (177.4 to 198.2)189.6 (177.6 to 201.6)186.8 (175.5 to 198.1)
SecondaryLength of PACU Stay

Length of stay at postanesthesia recovery room

Time frame:
During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Reported as:
Mean · minutes
Length of PACU Stay
minutesSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Length of PACU Stay82.9 (59.2 to 106.6)84.5 (68 to 101)86 (52.1 to 119.9)
SecondaryOccurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting

Percentage of participants with postoperative nausea and vomiting at the PACU and during the hospital ward stay

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting
percentage of participantsSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Occurrence of Postoperative, Nausea and Vomiting30.829.739.5
SecondaryOccurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale

Occurrence of pain at the PACU. Average Pain will be calculated. The pain score will be evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale, where zero mean no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

Time frame:
90 minutes postanesthesia at recovery room
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale
units on a scaleSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Occurrence of Pain at PACU Using a 0-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale3.8 (0.2 to 7.4)2.6 (0 to 5.8)2.8 (0 to 5.8)
SecondaryMorphine Consumption (mg) at PACU

Morphine consumption (mg) at PACU (about 90 to 120 minutes)

Time frame:
During the stay at postanesthesia recovery room (about 90 to 120 minutes)
Reported as:
Mean · mg
Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU
mgSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Morphine Consumption (mg) at PACU1.6 (0 to 3.7)0.9 (0 to 2.4)1.1 (0 to 2.7)
SecondaryThe Severity of Postoperative Pain

The severity of postoperative pain was rated the higher score of pain (NRS) during the hospital ward stay. Pain was evaluated using a 0-10 numeric pain rating scale (NRS), where zero meant no pain and 10 the worst imaginable pain.

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Mean · units on a scale
The Severity of Postoperative Pain
units on a scaleSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
The Severity of Postoperative Pain3.2 (0.4 to 6)2.8 (0 to 5.5)3.6 (0.5 to 6.5)
SecondaryPercentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption

Percentage of Participants with Tramadol during the ward stay

Time frame:
24 hours
Reported as:
Number · percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption
percentage of participantsSaline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4
Percentage of Participants With Tramadol Consumption5.110.813.9

Adverse events

Collected over 24 hours. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Saline Group—0/39 (0%)0/39 (0%)
Ketamine 0.2—0/37 (0%)0/37 (0%)
Ketamine 0.4—0/43 (0%)0/43 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)Saline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4Total
<=18 years0000
Between 18 and 65 years393743119
>=65 years0000
Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Saline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4Total
Median41.8 ± 11.347.2 ± 13.344.1 ± 11.444.3 ± 12.1
Gender
Gender(Participants)Saline GroupKetamine 0.2Ketamine 0.4Total
Female313437102
Male83617
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Santa Lucinda Hospital
    Sorocaba, SP 18030-230, Brazil
09

References and documents

Publications

  • Xie H, Wang X, Liu G, Wang G. Analgesic effects and pharmacokinetics of a low dose of ketamine preoperatively administered epidurally or intravenously. Clin J Pain. 2003 Sep-Oct;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1097/00002508-200309000-00006. PubMed 12966258 ↗
  • Myles PS, Weitkamp B, Jones K, Melick J, Hensen S. Validity and reliability of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-40. Br J Anaesth. 2000 Jan;84(1):11-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bja.a013366. PubMed 10740540 ↗
  • Wu L, Huang X, Sun L. The efficacy of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists on improving the postoperative pain intensity and satisfaction after remifentanil-based anesthesia in adults: a meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2015 Jun;27(4):311-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.03.020. Epub 2015 Mar 29. PubMed 25824051 ↗
  • Pfenninger EG, Durieux ME, Himmelseher S. Cognitive impairment after small-dose ketamine isomers in comparison to equianalgesic racemic ketamine in human volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2002 Feb;96(2):357-66. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200202000-00022. PubMed 11818769 ↗
  • Kissin I, Bright CA, Bradley EL Jr. The effect of ketamine on opioid-induced acute tolerance: can it explain reduction of opioid consumption with ketamine-opioid analgesic combinations? Anesth Analg. 2000 Dec;91(6):1483-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200012000-00035. PubMed 11094005 ↗
10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02571153
Lead sponsor
Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo
Responsible party
Eduardo Toshiyuki Moro (Assistant Professor, Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Sao Paulo) — Principal investigator
First posted
Oct 8, 2015
Start date
Sep 2015
Primary completion
Mar 2016
Completion
May 2016
Results posted
Mar 6, 2017
Last update
Mar 6, 2017

Study contacts

Eduardo T Moro, PhD
principal investigator · School of Medical and Health Sciences, Pontificial Catholic University of São Paulo - PUCSP

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jan 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion