ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02543229Updated Nov 6, 2017

Study Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of OPT-302 With or Without Lucentis™ in Patients With Wet AMD

A Phase 1 interventional study of OPT-302 and Lucentis™ in Eye Diseases, Macular Degeneration and Retinal Diseases, sponsored by Opthea Limited. Completed at 14 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 50 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2017-11-06.

Primary conditionMacular DegenerationRegistry: Eye DiseasesReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Eye Diseases — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Macular Degeneration
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Macular Degeneration, a narrower term within Eye Diseases.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Opthea Limited · Phase 1, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
51
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
50 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this first-in-human study is to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics of OPT-302 administered as monthly intravitreal injections for 3 months with and without Lucentis™ in patients with wet age related macular degeneration (AMD). This study will be conducted in two parts: Part 1 will comprise an open label, sequential dose escalation and Part 2 a randomized dose expansion.

OPT-302 is a soluble form of VEGFR-3 comprising the extracellular domains 1-3 of human vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-3 and the Fc fragment of human IgG1. It functions by binding and neutralizing the activity of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-C and VEGF-D on endogenous VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3.

VEGF-C and VEGF-D promote blood vessel development (angiogenesis) by binding and activating VEGFR-2 and VEGFR-3. VEGF-C is also a potent inducer of vascular permeability or leakage. Angiogenesis and vascular leakage are key hallmarks of wet AMD. Approved therapies for wet AMD include Eylea™ and Lucentis™ which block the activity of VEGF-A, but not VEGF-C or VEGF-D which are alternate members of the same family of molecules.

VEGF-C and VEGF-D can stimulate blood vessel growth and leakage through the same pathway as VEGF-A (via VEGFR-2), as well as through pathways that are independent of VEGF-A (via VEGFR-3). Published studies have also indicated that VEGF-C and VEGF-D play an important role in mediating resistance to therapies that block VEGF-A such as Lucentis™ and Eylea™.

Combination therapy with OPT-302 an anti-VEGF-A agent provides a more complete blockade of the VEGF family. This strategy targets functional redundancy in the VEGF pathway and mechanisms of 'resistance' or sub-response to VEGF-A inhibition.

02

Conditions studied

  • Eye Diseases
  • Macular Degeneration
  • Retinal Diseases
  • Retinal Degeneration
  • Neovascularization, Pathologic
03

In context

Macular Degeneration Reclassified

1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 51 is close to the median of 56 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Opthea Limited is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Compared within Macular Degeneration, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Eye Diseases. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
50 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Able and willing to provide written
  • Age ≥ 50 years of either gender
  • Active CNV lesions secondary to AMD (i.e., subretinal or intraretinal fluid on SD-OCT and / or leakage on fluorescein angiography)
  • Either no previous treatment in the study eye with IVT anti-VEGF-A therapy (treatment naïve) or prior IVT anti-VEGF-A therapy (previously treated) with sub-optimal response to treatment and the need for additional treatment
  • Best corrected visual acuity in the study eye, using ETDRS testing, of 20/320 or better (Snellen equivalent) in Part 1 (dose escalation) and between 20/40 and 20/320 (Snellen equivalent), inclusive, in Part 2 (dose expansion).
  • Women of child bearing potential and male subjects with female partners of child bearing potential must be practicing effective during the trial and for at least 3 months following the last dose of study medication

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous or concurrent use of systemic anti-VEGF-A agents
  • Most recent IVT injection of bevacizumab or ranibizumab \<28 days prior to screening or aflibercept \<42 days prior to screening
  • Previous treatment with photodynamic therapy, thermal laser or external beam radiation in the study eye
  • Concurrent treatment in either eye for any ocular condition with an drug or device that has not received regulatory approval
  • Anatomic damage to the center of the fovea including fibrosis and scarring making up >50% of total lesion area including the CNV in the study eye
  • Geographic atrophy involving the center of the fovea in the study eye
  • History or presence of a retinal pigment epithelial tear
  • Presence of polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy (if in the opinion of the investigator, anti-VEGF treatment would not be of benefit) or retinal angiomatous proliferation
  • Active or recent (within 4 weeks) intraocular inflammation (grade trace or above) in the study eye
  • History of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment or macular hole in the study eye
  • History of vitrectomy
  • Active infectious conjunctivitis, keratitis, scleritis, or endophthalmitis in either eye
  • History of vitreous hemorrhage within 4 weeks prior to screening in the study eye
  • History of major ocular surgery within prior 6 months or anticipated within next 3 months following dosing on day 1
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma in the study eye (defined as intraocular pressure of >25 mmHg despite treatment with maximal medical therapy)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension ≥180 mmHg systolic or ≥110 mmHg diastolic at baseline
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (Disease must be controlled with (HgbA1c) \< 9.0%)
  • Clinical evidence of diabetic retinopathies, diabetic macular edema or any other vascular disease affecting the retina, other than AMD, in either eye that, in the opinion of the investigator, would be likely to limit improvement in the macular anatomy and/or function
  • Pregnancy or lactation
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 1
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
51 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Part 1 Dose escalation - Cohort 1

    Dose Level 1 of OPT-302 in combination with Lucentis™

    Drug: OPT-302 · Drug: Lucentis™

  • Experimental
    Part 1 Dose escalation - Cohort 2

    Dose Level 2 of OPT-302 in combination with Lucentis™

    Drug: OPT-302 · Drug: Lucentis™

  • Experimental
    Part 1 Dose escalation - Cohort 3

    Dose Level 3 of OPT-302 in combination with Lucentis™

    Drug: OPT-302 · Drug: Lucentis™

  • Experimental
    Part 1 Dose escalation - Cohort 4

    Dose Level 3 of OPT-302 monotherapy

    Drug: OPT-302

  • Experimental
    Part 2 Dose expansion - Cohort 5

    OPT-302 (at Maximum Tolerated Dose \[MTD\] or highest dose tested in Part 1) in combination with Lucentis™

    Drug: OPT-302 · Drug: Lucentis™

  • Experimental
    Part 2 Dose expansion - Cohort 6

    OPT-302 (at MTD or highest dose tested in Part 1) monotherapy

    Drug: OPT-302

Interventions

  • OPT-302 will be administered by intravitreal injection once every month for 3 months

  • Lucentis™ (0.5 mg) will be administered by intravitreal injection once every month for 3 months

    Also known as: Ranibizumab

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Safety (Adverse Events)

    Subject incidences of ophthalmic and systemic Adverse Events during study and follow-up period

    Time frame: Up to 1 month after the last dose

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean change in Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) from baseline

    Mean change in Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) BCVA from baseline

    Time frame: 6 months

  2. Mean change in central retinal thickness from baseline

    Changes in intra- or sub-retinal fluid measured as mean change in central retinal thickness or macula volume by Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Mean change in Choroidal Neovascularization (CNV) lesion area from baseline

    Change in CNV size according to fluorescein angiogram

    Time frame: 6 months

  4. Mean number of retreatment injections of anti-VEGF-A therapy during long term follow-up (week 12 to 24)

    Time frame: 3 months

  5. Need for 'rescue therapy' with ranibizumab in subjects receiving OPT-302 monotherapy

    Time frame: 3 months

  6. Assess the Pharmacokinetic profile of OPT-302 alone and in combination with ranibizumab following intravitreal administration

    Mean systemic OPT-302 Concentration-Time profile

    Time frame: Up to 28 days post-dose

  7. Anti-OPT-302 antibody formation

    Incidence of anti-OPT-302 antibody formation

    Time frame: Pre-dose and up to 3 months post-dose

Other outcomes

  1. Exploratory: Changes in the systemic blood levels of angiogenesis-related biomarkers

    Change in systemic blood levels of angiogenesis-related biomarkers including, but not limited to: Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF-A), VEGF-C, VEGF-D, soluble VEGFR-2 and soluble VEGFR-3.

    Time frame: 3 months

07

Study locations

14 sites
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Phoenix, Arizona 85014, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Beverly Hills, California 90211, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Sacramento, California 95819, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Santa Maria, California 93454, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Fort Myers, Florida 33912, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Pensacola, Florida 32503, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Winter Haven, Florida 33800, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Wichita, Kansas 67214, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Bloomfield, New Jersey 07003, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Charlotte, North Carolina 28210, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Cleveland, Ohio 44122, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    West Columbia, South Carolina 29169, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Abilene, Texas 79606, United States
  • Opthea Investigative Site
    Willow Park, Texas 76087, United States
08

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Nov 6, 2017, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02543229
Lead sponsor
Opthea Limited
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Sep 7, 2015
Start date
Jul 2015
Primary completion
Feb 7, 2017
Completion
Sep 2017
Last update
Nov 6, 2017

Study contacts

Clinical Research
study director · Opthea Limited

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Nov 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Sozinibercept

Start the discussion