An interventional study of Placebo and US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine in Crohn's Disease, Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Postoperative Pain, sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-03-27.
Sponsored by Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
Postoperative pain can pose significant challenges in the postoperative recovery of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. Traditionally, opioids have played an important role in treating postoperative pain. It is well established that opioids are highly effective in relieving pain; however opioids are associated with numerous side effects that include nausea, vomiting, constipation, ileus, bladder dysfunction, respiratory depression, pruritus, drowsiness, sedation, and allergic reaction. These opioid side effects, which range in severity, can significantly interfere with discharge home following colorectal surgery. Significant interest exists in the use of local anesthetic based regional anesthesia techniques as a means to extend the analgesic window for patients undergoing colorectal surgery. Specifically, the use of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as an adjunct in postoperative pain control has been widely reported in the anesthesia and colorectal surgery literature. Historically, the block was performed in a blind fashion with relative success and presently the block is typically performed either with ultrasound guidance or laparoscopic visualization. While TAP block has shown to be effective in post-operative pain control, the techniques used to place the block have not formally been compared.
The investigators are purposing a prospective, patient-blinded, randomized study of patients undergoing major colorectal surgery to compare TAP block under ultrasound guidance versus laparoscopic visualization versus no TAP block. The investigators hypothesize that laparoscopic-guided TAP block is non-inferior to ultrasound-guided TAP block with respect to perioperative pain control and either technique is superior to no TAP. In addition the investigators will measure procedural time, any adverse events related to the block, overall postoperative analgesic requirement, analgesic duration, postoperative pain scores, length of postoperative hospital stay, incidence of postoperative ileus, and overall patient satisfaction between the three groups.
The proposed study is a patient-blinded, prospective randomized study to compare ultrasound-guided block of the TAP versus laparoscopic-guided TAP block versus no TAP block in patients undergoing major colorectal surgery. The primary outcome measure is analgesic requirement in morphine equivalents in the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcome measures include overall postoperative analgesic requirement, postoperative pain scores, length of postoperative hospital stay, any adverse events related to TAP block, overall perioperative complications in the 30-day postoperative period and overall patient satisfaction after major colorectal surgery.
All groups will receive general anesthesia as the primary mode of anesthesia. Patients randomized to one of two treatment arms will also undergo either ultrasound-guided or laparoscopic-guided TAP block in the operating room at the conclusion of the procedure. Patients randomized to no TAP will not have a TAP block performed but will receive all routine intraoperative and postoperative analgesia as deemed appropriate by the anesthesia and primary surgical team. A standardized preoperative non-opioid pain regimen will be utilized. In the recovery room, short acting opioids for breakthrough pain will be available. Opioids will also be administered for rescue if need be. All patients will receive postoperative intravenous narcotics via patient controlled analgesia (PCA) device.
STUDY METHODS
I. Recruitment
II. In the preoperative holding area:
Group 1 n=100 Ultrasound guided TAP Block Group 2 n=100 Laparoscopic guided TAP Block Group 3 n=40 No TAP
III. During the intraoperative period
IV. PACU
Verbal rating scale (VRS) for pain will be assessed by the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) nurse upon arrival to recovery room, then every 30min interval until discharge.
o Requirements for "rescue" analgesic medication will be recorded before discharge.
V. Following completion of surgery (post-operative):
VI. Patient evaluation during hospital admission:
Pain evaluation recorded by nursing staff as per standard CSMC guidelines:
Patient satisfaction with analgesia will be assessed at the time of hospital discharge or within 30 days postoperatively by telephone using a patient satisfaction survey.
1,923 studies on the registry are indexed under Crohn Disease; 467 are open to participants now.
This study's enrollment of 127 is above the median of 66 across 1,212 interventional studies indexed under Crohn Disease.
Browse Crohn Disease studies →Cedars-Sinai Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 455 studies on the registry; 108 are open to participants now.
Of its 65 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 49 (75%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Contraindications to regional blockage including but not limited to:
No TAP block performed
Other: Placebo
Ultrasound guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Drug: US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine
Laparoscopic guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Drug: Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine
The usual intraoperative and postoperative pain control; NO TAP block performed
Ultrasound guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Laparoscopic guided bupivacaine 0.25% with epinephrine 1:400k will be injected to the transversus abdominis plane.
Morphine Requirement
Compare ultrasound-guided block of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) vs laparoscopic-guided TAP block, versus no TAP block on opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Patients hospital chart was queried for use of any intravenous opioid in the first 24 hours after surgery including fentanyl or hydromorphone and conversion to morphine per standard opioid dose conversion. Total morphine equivalents then summed for the 24 hour postoperative period and compared between groups.
Time frame: 24 hours
| Milestone | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Started | 24 | 54 | 49 |
| Completed | 21 | 45 | 41 |
| Not completed | 3 | 9 | 8 |
Compare ultrasound-guided block of the transversus abdominis plane (TAP) vs laparoscopic-guided TAP block, versus no TAP block on opioid consumption in the first 24 hours. Patients hospital chart was queried for use of any intravenous opioid in the first 24 hours after surgery including fentanyl or hydromorphone and conversion to morphine per standard opioid dose conversion. Total morphine equivalents then summed for the 24 hour postoperative period and compared between groups.
| mg | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphine Requirement | 31.4 ± 19.2 | 39 ± 35.5 | 22.8 ± 21.3 |
Collected over adverse events were recorded for the 30 day postoperative window. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.
| Group | Deaths | Serious | Other |
|---|---|---|---|
| PLACEBO | 0/21 (0%) | 0/21 (0%) | 8/21 (38.1%) |
| US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | 0/45 (0%) | 0/45 (0%) | 17/45 (37.8%) |
| Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | 0/41 (0%) | 0/41 (0%) | 15/41 (36.6%) |
| Event | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine |
|---|---|---|---|
| IleusGastrointestinal disorders | 6/21 | 11/45 | 10/41 |
| Other non-GI adverse eventsSurgical and medical procedures | 2/21 | 6/45 | 5/41 |
| Age, Continuous(years) | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | 46.7 ± 18.5 | 54 ± 16.6 | 48.4 ± 18.8 | 50.2 ± 18 |
| Sex: Female, Male(Participants) | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 9 | 23 | 25 | 57 |
| Male | 12 | 22 | 16 | 50 |
| Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants) | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| American Indian or Alaska Native | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Asian | 3 | 6 | 7 | 16 |
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 2 | 4 | 3 | 9 |
| Black or African American | 3 | 5 | 6 | 14 |
| White | 13 | 30 | 25 | 68 |
| More than one race | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unknown or Not Reported | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| American Society of Anesthesiologist Classification(Participants) | PLACEBO | US TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Lap TAP Bupivacaine/Epinephrine | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASA I/II | 12 | 28 | 34 | 74 |
| ASA III or higher | 9 | 17 | 7 | 33 |
No study locations are listed for this record.
Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.
Ran from Aug 2015 to primary completion in Apr 2017, 20 months.
Results were first posted in Mar 2018, 10 months after primary completion.
Of 280 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Crohn Disease, half reached primary completion within 46 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 23 and three quarters within 67. This study's 20 months is below that.
Counting every sponsor, half of 289 studies reached it within 45 months; a quarter within 22 and three quarters within 61.
How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.
This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2018. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.