CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02526693Updated Oct 23, 2019Results posted

Is the RAPDx Pupillograph Able to Distinguish Between Glaucoma Subjects and Healthy Subjects?

An interventional study of Pupillometer in Glaucoma, sponsored by Wills Eye. Completed. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2019-10-23.

Sponsored by Wills Eye · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
104
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The Konan RAPDx (Konan Medical USA, Irvine, CA) is a newly patented pupillography device.The aims of this study are to assess the ability of the RAPDx to distinguish between healthy subjects and patients with confirmed glaucoma using standard testing sequences developed for use at the Wills Eye Hospital Glaucoma Research Center and to determine the combination of demographic, clinical, and RAPDx testing parameters which allow for maximum sensitivity and specificity.

Read the detailed description

The RAPDx utilizes noninvasive digital, high-definition, infrared machine-vision with eye-tracking and automated blink detection technology to analyze and quantify the pupillary response to light.

During the scheduled appointment, all patients will receive an undilated fundus examination by the attending ophthalmologist. The following data will be collected; Demographic information, Visual acuity, Intraocular pressure (IOP) measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry, Disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS), Vertical cup/disc ratio, Gonioscopy (if not documented in the chart within the past 2 years) and Humphrey visual field examination.

Each participant will undergo RAPDx testing with two different testing sequences. They are separated by a 10-second resting period during which the patient is instructed to close his or her eyes. The exam may be paused at any time and re-alignment may be performed during any pause. The two testing sequences are:

  1. Standard Factory Setting: 0.1-second stimuli with 2-second inter-stimuli pauses;
  2. Custom Setting: 3-second stimuli with 1-second inter-stimuli pauses
02

Conditions studied

  • Glaucoma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • glaucoma
  • relative afferent pupillary defect
  • pupillography
03

In context

Glaucoma

1,818 studies on the registry are indexed under Glaucoma; 231 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 104 is above the median of 65 across 1,272 interventional studies indexed under Glaucoma.

Browse Glaucoma studies →

Lead sponsor

Wills Eye is the lead sponsor of 74 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (83%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Glaucoma patients:

  • optic nerve damage (neuroretinal rim notch, asymmetric inter-eye cup to disc (c/d_ ratio >0.2 or disc damage likelihood scale (DDLS) >2, or absence of neuroretinal rim not due to other cause)
  • glaucomatous visual field (VF) deficits (cluster of 3 or more points on pattern deviation plot depressed below 5% level, at least 1 depressed below 1% level; OR corrected pattern standard deviation/pattern standard deviation significant at P \<0.05; or glaucoma hemifield test "outside normal limits") with good reliability indices (fixation losses, false-positive rate, false-negative rate each \< 33%).

Healthy subjects:

  • normal optic nerve exam
  • normal reliable VF (Humphrey mean deviation (MD) >-2 or Octopus MD ≤0.8; fixation losses, false-positive rate, and false-negative rate each \< 33%)
  • open angles gonioscopy.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Abnormal ocular motility preventing binocular fixation (e.g. strabismus, nystagmus).
  • Any condition preventing adequate visualization and examination of pupil or optic nerve (e.g. dense corneal opacities or lens opacities).
  • Active infection of anterior or posterior segments of the eye.
  • Any intraocular surgical or laser procedure within previous 4 weeks.
  • Any non-glaucomatous condition causing RAPD, anisocoria or corectopia (ex. optic neuropathy, Horner's syndrome, previous iris injury due to trauma or surgery, etc.).
  • Subjects under age 18 or subjects presently housed in correctional facility.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
104 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Glaucoma Patients

    Glaucoma patients recruited from Wills Eye Hospital Glaucoma Service will be tested with the relative afferent pupillary defect test (RAPDx) Pupillometer. The noninvasive RAPDx measures the pupils response during light stimulation.

    Diagnostic Test: Pupillometer

  • Other
    Healthy Controls

    Healthy subjects with no eye diseases recruited from Wills Eye Hospital Glaucoma Service staff, family and friends will be tested with the relative afferent pupillary defect test (RAPDx) Pupillometer. The noninvasive RAPDx measures the pupils response during light stimulation.

    Diagnostic Test: Pupillometer

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testPupillometer

    The Konan RAPDx (relative afferent pupillary defect) (Konan Medical USA, Irvine, CA) pupillometer utilizes digital, high-definition, infrared machine-vision with eye-tracking and automated blink detection technology to analyze and quantify pupillary response to light.

    Also known as: Relative afferent pupillary defect pupillometer

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Amplitude Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction

    Pupil size changes when light shines into the eyes making the diameter of the pupil smaller (constriction). The size of the pupil's reaction to light, measured in millimeters, is the amplitude or change in diameter. Amplitude of maximum pupil constriction (pupil size) when light is shone is compared between the right and left eyes. Asymmetry is the difference between maximum pupil size of the two eyes.

    Time frame: 1 examination, one hour

  2. Latency Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction

    Pupil size changes at different speeds when light shines into the eyes making the diameter of the pupil smaller (constriction). The speed of the pupil's reaction to light is the latency or amount of time. Latency of maximum pupil constriction when light is shone is compared between the right and left eyes. Asymmetry is the difference in time it takes for maximum pupil constriction between the two eyes.

    Time frame: 1 examination, one hour

  3. Maximum Constriction Asymmetry Duration

    Log difference between duration of maximum pupil constriction when light is shone into the right versus the left eye. The duration of maximum constriction is calculated as time in milliseconds between point of maximum constriction and time when pupil amplitude has reached 50% of peak amplitude of dilation.

    Time frame: 1 examination, one hour

07

Results

Posted Oct 23, 2019
Limitations and caveats
Small sample size. Single site design. Single light design limits pupil stimulus.

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestoneGlaucoma PatientsHealthy Controls
Started5351
Completed5050
Not completed31
Withdrew: Physician decision31

Outcome measures

PrimaryAmplitude Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction

Pupil size changes when light shines into the eyes making the diameter of the pupil smaller (constriction). The size of the pupil's reaction to light, measured in millimeters, is the amplitude or change in diameter. Amplitude of maximum pupil constriction (pupil size) when light is shone is compared between the right and left eyes. Asymmetry is the difference between maximum pupil size of the two eyes.

Time frame:
1 examination, one hour
Reported as:
Mean · millimeters
Amplitude Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction
millimetersGlaucoma PatientsHealthy Controls
Custom sequence0.8 ± 0.750.29 ± 0.27
Standard sequence0.5 ± 0.520.16 ± 0.12
PrimaryLatency Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction

Pupil size changes at different speeds when light shines into the eyes making the diameter of the pupil smaller (constriction). The speed of the pupil's reaction to light is the latency or amount of time. Latency of maximum pupil constriction when light is shone is compared between the right and left eyes. Asymmetry is the difference in time it takes for maximum pupil constriction between the two eyes.

Time frame:
1 examination, one hour
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Latency Asymmetry of Pupil Constriction
millisecondsGlaucomaHealthy Controls
Custom sequence0.22 ± 0.230.14 ± 0.14
Standard sequence0.2 ± 0.210.13 ± 0.11
PrimaryMaximum Constriction Asymmetry Duration

Log difference between duration of maximum pupil constriction when light is shone into the right versus the left eye. The duration of maximum constriction is calculated as time in milliseconds between point of maximum constriction and time when pupil amplitude has reached 50% of peak amplitude of dilation.

Time frame:
1 examination, one hour
Reported as:
Mean · milliseconds
Maximum Constriction Asymmetry Duration
millisecondsGlaucoma PatientsHealthy Controls
Maximum Constriction Asymmetry Duration2.23 ± 0.641.92 ± 0.54

Adverse events

Collected over 1 examination, one hour. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Glaucoma Patients0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)
Healthy Controls0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)0/50 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

4 participants enrolled were excluded from analysis due to other comorbidities or abnormal values of measurement parameters. Three excluded participants were from the Glaucoma Group, one was from the Control Group.

Age, Categorical
Age, Categorical(Participants)GlaucomaHealthy ControlTotal
<=18 years000
Between 18 and 65 years233457
>=65 years271643
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)GlaucomaHealthy ControlTotal
Female313364
Male191736
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)GlaucomaHealthy ControlTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian235
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American371451
White92938
More than one race246
Unknown or Not Reported000
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)GlaucomaHealthy ControlTotal
United States5050100
08

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

09

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Manuscript is has not been finalized.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Oct 23, 2019, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02526693
Lead sponsor
Wills Eye
Responsible party
George L. Spaeth MD (Principal Investigator, Wills Eye) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2015
Start date
Jun 2014
Primary completion
Aug 2015
Completion
Aug 2015
Results posted
Oct 23, 2019
Last update
Oct 23, 2019

Study contacts

George Spaeth, MD
principal investigator · Wills Eye Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2019. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion