ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06130384Updated Feb 9, 2024

Pain Reduction With Topical Bromfenac Versus Artificial Tear After Intravitreal Injection.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Use of bromfenac 0.09% to reduce intravitreal injection pain and Use of artificial tears to reduce intravitreal injection pain in Pain, Intravitreal Injection and Pain, Acute, sponsored by Wills Eye. Completed at 5 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 99 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2024-02-09.

Primary conditionAcute PainRegistry: PainReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Pain — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Acute Pain
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Acute Pain, a narrower term within Pain.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by Wills Eye · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was Aug 2023, 3 years 2 months ago, and no results have been posted to the registry.
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
97
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 99 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this prospective interventional study is to compare post-intravitreal injection pain between eyes receiving topical bromfenac versus artificial tears as an analgesic after intravitreal injection.

Read the detailed description

This proposed study is a double-masked randomized trial of adult patients receiving bilateral intravitreal injections. Patient data from March 2021 to June 2022 will be collected. Patient pain perception, quantified using the Wong-Baker FACES and the short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire, will be utilized to compare post-intravitreal injection pain between eyes receiving pre-injection bromfenac 0.09% ophthalmic solution versus artificial tears.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain
  • Intravitreal Injection
  • Pain, Acute

Browse trials for

03

In context

Acute Pain Reclassified

1,073 studies on the registry are indexed under Acute Pain; 166 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 97 is above the median of 86 across 902 interventional studies indexed under Acute Pain.

Browse Acute Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Wills Eye is the lead sponsor of 77 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Of its 12 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 10 (83%) have results posted.

Compared within Acute Pain, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Pain. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 99 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Current patient of the Wills Eye Hospital Retina Service including all Mid Atlantic Retina offices
  • Clinical indication of bilateral intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) injection as determined by the treating retina specialist for diseases such as age-related macular degeneration, choroidal neovascularization, diabetic macular edema, diabetic retinopathy, macular edema. proliferative retinopathy, or macular edema associated with retina vein occlusion.
  • Age greater than 18
  • Patient's that have had at least three prior injections in each eye

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria are:

  • Prior ocular surgery (non-cataract)
  • Herpetic eye disease
  • Uncontrolled uveitis
  • Active conjunctivitis, keratitis or keratopathy
  • Current unilateral use of prescription eye drops.
  • Allergy to NSAID
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
97 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Bromfenac 0.09%

    At the time of the injection, the first eye will be randomized to a drop of artificial tear or bromfenac 0.09% and the second eye will receive the other agent.

    Drug: Use of bromfenac 0.09% to reduce intravitreal injection pain

  • Placebo comparator
    Artificial Tear

    At the time of the injection, the first eye will be randomized to a drop of artificial tear or bromfenac 0.09% and the second eye will receive the other agent.

    Drug: Use of artificial tears to reduce intravitreal injection pain

Interventions

  • DrugUse of bromfenac 0.09% to reduce intravitreal injection pain

    The eyedrop (bromfenac) will be given to the assigned eye.

  • DrugUse of artificial tears to reduce intravitreal injection pain

    The eyedrop (artificial tears) will be given to the assigned eye.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score

    Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection

  2. Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale

    Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale, ranging from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be asked in the office for their pain rating 5 minutes after injection

  3. Change in post-injection pain at 6 hours using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score.

    Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection

  4. Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale

    from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be called for their rating 6 hours after injection

  5. Change in post-injection pain at 24 hours using the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score.

    Patients will be asked to report their pain on the Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire Present Pain Intensity score, ranging from 0 to 5, in which 5 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection

  6. Change in post-injection pain at 5 minutes using the Wong-Baker Faces pain scale

    from 0 through 10, in which 10 is the worst pain level.

    Time frame: Patients will be called for their rating 24 hours after injection

07

Study locations

5 sites
  • Ophthalmic Consultants of Boston
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
  • Mid Atlantic Retina
    Bethlehem, Pennsylvania 18017, United States
  • Mid Atlantic Retina
    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, United States
  • Retina Consultants of San Antonio
    San Antonio, Texas 78240, United States
  • University of Toronto
    Toronto, Ontario, Canada
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Only de-identified data will be shared amongst researchers.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 9, 2024, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06130384
Lead sponsor
Wills Eye
Responsible party
Sunir Garg MD (Retina Physician and Surgeon, Co-Director of Retina Research, Wills Eye) — Principal investigator
First posted
Nov 14, 2023
Start date
Mar 1, 2021
Primary completion
Aug 15, 2023
Completion
Nov 15, 2023
Last update
Feb 9, 2024

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Feb 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion