CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02512874Updated Jun 23, 2020Results posted

Does Pulmonary Rehabilitation Improve Frailty?

An interventional study of Pulmonary Rehabilitation and Dynamometer in Disease, Pulmonary, sponsored by Mayo Clinic. Completed at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2020-06-23.

Sponsored by Mayo Clinic · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
65
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Frailty is a state of health with predisposition to adverse events, morbidity and mortality. Frailty consists of weakness, slowness, low physical activity, exhaustion, and wasting. Frailty is associated with increased hospitalizations and death in lung disease. It is unknown if pulmonary rehabilitation will improve frailty markers.

Read the detailed description

Individuals referred to pulmonary rehabilitation will be examined for frailty markers. After completing pulmonary rehabilitation, the same tests will be performed. The effects of pulmonary rehabilitation will be examined.

02

Conditions studied

  • Disease, Pulmonary
03

In context

Lung Diseases

3,303 studies on the registry are indexed under Lung Diseases; 355 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 65 is close to the median of 72 across 2,118 interventional studies indexed under Lung Diseases.

Browse Lung Diseases studies →

Lead sponsor

Mayo Clinic is the lead sponsor of 3,218 studies on the registry; 670 are open to participants now.

Of its 445 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 313 (70%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Referred for pulmonary rehabilitation
  • consenting to research

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria:

-Under 18 years of age

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
65 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Other
    Pulmonary Rehabilitation

    One arm study - all participants will go to pulmonary rehabilitation, received questionnaires, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scans, Dynamometer and gait speed tests and activity measured through an activity monitor.

    Other: Pulmonary Rehabilitation · Device: Dynamometer · Radiation: DEXA · Other: Gait Speed Test · Device: Activity Monitor · Other: Questionnaires

Interventions

  • OtherPulmonary Rehabilitation

    Measures of frailty taken before and after pulmonary rehabilitation.

  • DeviceDynamometer

    Grip Test

  • RadiationDEXA

    Body Composition Testing

  • OtherGait Speed Test

    15 foot walk test

  • DeviceActivity Monitor

    Measures energy expenditure and activity

  • OtherQuestionnaires

    Health-related questionnaires measuring self-reported exhaustion, emotions and disease symptoms.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Frailty Phenotype at Baseline and 6 Months

    Frailty phenotype is 3 or more of: slow gait speed, exhaustion, decreased hand grip strength, decreased activity level, or wasting. Grip strength parameters, gait speed, exhaustion per Fried et al. 2001. Wasting is defined as further decrease in fat free mass by body composition measurement using DEXA. Low physical activity would be activity monitor in lower quartile.

    Time frame: Baseline, Six months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Wasting

    DXA measurement of body mass index pre- and post- PR.

    Time frame: after pulmonary rehabilation completion, appoximately 8 weeks

  2. Change in Strength

    Change in Grip Strength as measured by hand dynamometer.

    Time frame: after completion of pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks

  3. Change in Gait Speed

    gait speed test measured over 15 feet

    Time frame: pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks

  4. Improvement in Exhaustion

    Self-reported exhaustion - measured by two questions in the Center for the Epidemiological Studies in Depression (CES-D) scale and reported as a dichotomous variable (exhausted or not exhausted).

    Time frame: pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks

  5. Change in Physical Activity Level

    Measured by Body Media armband activity monitor using total energy expenditure divided by the resting metabolic rate

    Time frame: pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks

07

Results

Posted Oct 5, 2018

Participant flow

Participant flow — Overall Study
MilestonePulmonary Rehabilitation
Started65
Completed63
Not completed2

Outcome measures

PrimaryNumber of Participants With Frailty Phenotype at Baseline and 6 Months

Frailty phenotype is 3 or more of: slow gait speed, exhaustion, decreased hand grip strength, decreased activity level, or wasting. Grip strength parameters, gait speed, exhaustion per Fried et al. 2001. Wasting is defined as further decrease in fat free mass by body composition measurement using DEXA. Low physical activity would be activity monitor in lower quartile.

Time frame:
Baseline, Six months
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Number of Participants With Frailty Phenotype at Baseline and 6 Months
ParticipantsPulmonary Rehabilitation
Baseline24
Six months15
Statistical analysis
  • Pulmonary Rehabilitation · Chi-squared · p = 0.62
SecondaryWasting

DXA measurement of body mass index pre- and post- PR.

Time frame:
after pulmonary rehabilation completion, appoximately 8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · kg/m^2
Wasting
kg/m^2Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Wasting0.04 (-0.4 to 1.1)
SecondaryChange in Strength

Change in Grip Strength as measured by hand dynamometer.

Time frame:
after completion of pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · kg
Change in Strength
kgPulmonary Rehabilitation
Change in Strength0 (-1.6 to 2.6)
SecondaryChange in Gait Speed

gait speed test measured over 15 feet

Time frame:
pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · seconds
Change in Gait Speed
secondsPulmonary Rehabilitation
Change in Gait Speed-0.6 (-1.5 to 0.5)
SecondaryImprovement in Exhaustion

Self-reported exhaustion - measured by two questions in the Center for the Epidemiological Studies in Depression (CES-D) scale and reported as a dichotomous variable (exhausted or not exhausted).

Time frame:
pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks
Reported as:
Count of participants · Participants
Improvement in Exhaustion
ParticipantsPulmonary Rehabilitation
Improvement in Exhaustion2
SecondaryChange in Physical Activity Level

Measured by Body Media armband activity monitor using total energy expenditure divided by the resting metabolic rate

Time frame:
pre and post pulmonary rehab, approximately 8 weeks
Reported as:
Median · ratio
Change in Physical Activity Level
ratioPulmonary Rehabilitation
Change in Physical Activity Level0.4 (-0.4 to 1.1)

Adverse events

Collected over Adverse event data were collected from baseline through 6 month follow up.. Non-serious events are listed at a 0% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Pulmonary Rehabilitation4/65 (6.2%)0/65 (0%)0/65 (0%)

Baseline characteristics

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Median65 (59.0 to 73)
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Female25
Male38
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
American Indian or Alaska Native0
Asian0
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander0
Black or African American0
White54
More than one race0
Unknown or Not Reported9
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(participants)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
United States63
Primary Pulmonary Diagnosis
Primary Pulmonary Diagnosis(Participants)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Obstructive35
Post Lung Transplant13
Interstitial Lung Disease10
Other5
Pulmonary Function - Forced expiratory volume
Pulmonary Function - Forced expiratory volume(liters)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Median1.3 (1.0 to 2.0)
Pulmonary Function - % Predicted
Pulmonary Function - % Predicted(percent)Pulmonary Rehabilitation
Median49 (39 to 66)
08

Study locations

1 site
  • Mayo Clinic in Rochester
    Rochester, Minnesota 55905, United States
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · Jun 23, 2015

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 23, 2020, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02512874
Lead sponsor
Mayo Clinic
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
Responsible party
Cassie C. Kennedy, M.D. (Consultant for Critical Care Medicine, Mayo Clinic) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 31, 2015
Start date
Jul 21, 2015
Primary completion
Oct 16, 2018
Completion
Oct 16, 2018
Results posted
Oct 5, 2018
Last update
Jun 23, 2020

Study contacts

Cassie Kennedy, MD
principal investigator · Mayo Clinic

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2020. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion