An interventional study of TBC intervention in Hypertension, sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois. Status unknown at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-29.
Sponsored by Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a team-based care (TBC) intervention, combining physician, nurse and pharmacist care improves BP control compared to usual care at 6 months among outpatients with uncontrolled hypertension.
6,689 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 964 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 110 is above the median of 90 across 4,994 interventional studies indexed under Hypertension.
Browse Hypertension studies →Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois is the lead sponsor of 203 studies on the registry; 47 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
A structured collaborative intervention delivered by trained nurses of ambulatory clinics and by community pharmacists working in collaboration with physicians during 6-month of follow-up includes: * BP measurements; * an educational and counselling intervention on patient adherence; * an educational and counselling intervention on lifestyle (physical activity and diet). Physicians adjust antihypertensive medications based on nurse and pharmacist feedback.
Behavioral: TBC intervention
A structured collaborative intervention delivered by trained nurses of ambulatory clinics and by community pharmacists working in collaboration with physicians during 6-month of follow-up includes: * BP measurements; * an educational and counselling intervention on patient adherence; * an educational and counselling intervention on lifestyle (physical activity and diet) Physicians adjust antihypertensive medications based on nurse and pharmacist feedback.
Difference in daytime ABPM at 6-month between TBC and usual care patients
Difference in daytime ABPM at 6-month between TBC and usual care patients
Time frame: 6-month
Difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (daytime ABPM <135/85 mmHg) at 6-month between TBC and usual care patients
Difference in the proportion of patients with controlled blood pressure (daytime ABPM \<135/85 mmHg) at 6-month between TBC and usual care patients
Time frame: 6-month
Patients and healthcare professionals' acceptance and satisfaction with the TBC-intervention
Patients and healthcare professionals' acceptance and satisfaction with the TBC-intervention
Time frame: 6-month
Difference in the proportion of TBC and usual care patients with controlled blood pressure (daytime ABPM <135/85 mmHg) at 12-month (6 months after intervention stopped)
Difference in the proportion of TBC and usual care patients with controlled blood pressure (daytime ABPM \<135/85 mmHg) at 12-month (6 months after intervention stopped)
Time frame: 12-month
This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois