CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02510924AirtraqMobUpdated Jan 2, 2018

Role of Airtraq Mobile to Improve Intubation Conditions With Airtraq

An interventional study of Tracheal intubation in Nasal Obstruction and Arthrosis, sponsored by University of Lausanne Hospitals. Completed at 1 site in Switzerland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2018-01-02.

Sponsored by University of Lausanne Hospitals · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
100
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Airtraq sp has been proven effective for intubating patients presenting with difficult airway.

The Airtraq sp allows visualisation of the tracheal inlet only for the intubator.

By adding a smartphone with a dedicated app (Airtraq Mobile) to the Airtraq sp, the visualisation of the tracheal inlet is possible for all the airway providers.

The investigators aim to demonstrate that the addition of the Airtraq Mobile app improves success rate of intubation (primary endpoint), as well as confort of the airway provider, shortens time for intubation and reduces injury to the patients.

Read the detailed description

Airtraq sp has been proven effective for intubating patients presenting with difficult airway.

The Airtraq sp allows visualisation of the tracheal inlet only for the intubator.

By adding a smartphone with a dedicated app (Airtraq Mobile) to the Airtraq sp, the visualisation of the tracheal inlet is possible for all the airway providers.

The investigators aim to demonstrate that the addition of the Airtraq Mobile app improves success rate of intubation (primary endpoint), as well as confort of the airway provider, shortens time for intubation and reduces injury to the patients while their neck is imobilized by a cervical collar, creating a simulated difficult airway.

Patients will be included if they necessitate an elective general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation.

Exclusion criteria are related to difficult airway, ASA IV and patient refusal.

02

Conditions studied

  • Nasal Obstruction
  • Arthrosis

Keywords

  • Intubation
  • Airtraq
  • General anesthesia
  • Difficult airway
03

In context

Osteoarthritis

4,398 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis; 582 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 100 is above the median of 70 across 3,440 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis.

Browse Osteoarthritis studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Lausanne Hospitals is the lead sponsor of 118 studies on the registry; 9 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • American Society of Anesthesia classification 1-3, elective surgey necessitating general anesthesia and intubation, patient consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesia classification 4, patient refusal, history of difficult airway
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
100 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Tracheal intubation with Airtraq sp

    Tracheal intubation with Airtraq sp.

    Device: Tracheal intubation

  • Experimental
    Tracheal intubation with Airtraq Mobile

    Tracheal intubation with Airtraq Mobile

    Device: Tracheal intubation

Interventions

  • DeviceTracheal intubation

    tracheal intubation with Airtraq sp vs Airtraq mobile

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Success

    Success of intubation within time frame

    Time frame: 180 seconds

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of attempts

    Success of intubation within time frame

    Time frame: 180 seconds

  2. Number of injuries

    Injuries within time frame

    Time frame: 180 seconds

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Dpt of Anesthesiology, University of Lausanne CHUV
    Lausanne, VD 1011, Switzerland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Schoettker P, Corniche J. The AirView Study: Comparison of Intubation Conditions and Ease between the Airtraq-AirView and the King Vision. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:284142. doi: 10.1155/2015/284142. Epub 2015 Jun 16. PubMed 26161393 ↗
09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jan 2, 2018, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02510924
Lead sponsor
University of Lausanne Hospitals
Responsible party
Patrick Schoettker,MD PD (MD, PD, University of Lausanne Hospitals) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 29, 2015
Start date
Aug 2015
Primary completion
Nov 5, 2017
Completion
Nov 5, 2017
Last update
Jan 2, 2018

Study contacts

Patrick Schoettker, MD, PD
principal investigator · University of Lausanne Hospitals

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Dec 2017. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion