ClinicalTrials.gg
Status unknownNCT02498782Updated Jul 15, 2015

Study to Evaluate Fexinidazole Dosing Regimens for the Treatment of Adult Patients With Chagas Disease

A Phase 2 interventional study of Fexinidazole and Placebo in Chagas Disease, Trypanosomiasis, South American and South American Trypanosomiasis, sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases. Status unknown at 2 sites in Bolivia. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2015-07-15.

Sponsored by Drugs for Neglected Diseases · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

The sponsor has not verified this record recently (last verified Jul 2015), so the status shown — last known as Recruiting — may be out of date.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-13

Among 10 studies in Chagas Disease with a site in Bolivia — 1 open to participants now, 2 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Chagas Disease · Bolivia.

Started
2014
the only one that year
Phase 2
4 of 10
none open now
Registered
4th of 10
by date
Lead sponsor
4 of 10
Drugs for Neglected Diseases

Among the 10 studies in Chagas Disease with a site in Bolivia, this one is the only one that started in 2014, is one of 4 in phase 2, and was the 4th registered.

Chagas Disease

73 studies on the registry are indexed under Chagas Disease; 5 are open to participants now.

Browse Chagas Disease studies →

Open to participants now

1 of the 10 studies in Chagas Disease with a site in Bolivia is open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

A study can be open while its sites in Bolivia have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in Bolivia →

Who these studies take

Of the 3 Chagas Disease studies recruiting now, 1 sets no upper age limit and 2 stop at 75 or younger; none take children under 18; none take healthy volunteers.

This study: 18 Years to 50 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 10 studies in Chagas Disease with a site in Bolivia, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The hypothesis is to evaluate if the treatment with Fexinidazole will lead to a better sustained clearance of the parasites at 6 months of follow-up when in comparison to placebo in patients with chronic indeterminate CD.

Read the detailed description

Chagas Disease (CD) ranks among the world's most neglected diseases. In Latin America, 21 countries are endemic for CD with an estimated 100 million people at risk of contracting the disease. Estimates from the 1980s indicated that some 16 million to 18 million individuals were infected. In the 1990s, after a series of multinational control initiatives, estimates of the number of infected people were revised to 9.8 million in 2001. The estimated burden of disease in terms of disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) declined from 2.7 million in 1990 to 586,000 in 2001. Recent estimates from PAHO (2006) indicate 7.54 million infected people and 55,185 new cases per year. New safe and effective treatments for Chagas Disease are urgently needed. Current chemotherapy options for CD have significant limitations, including long treatment durations, and safety and tolerability concerns. For many years, inhibitors of the sterol biosynthesis pathway, such as posaconazole and ravuconazole, were considered as the most promising new drugs candidates for Chagas Disease. Following the recent results of CHAGAZASOL, an investigator-initiated trial conducted in Barcelona, where a high recrudescence rate was observed in the posaconazole treatment arms (80-90%, versus 5% in the benznidazole arm), there is increased concern on the future of the class. Nitroimidazoles are a well-known class of pharmacologically active compounds, among which several have shown good activity against trypanosomes. While concerns over mutagenicity and safety have mitigated their potential as drug candidates, several members of this family are widely used as antibiotics, indicating that it is possible to select compounds with acceptable activity/toxicity profile in this class. Fexinidazole had been in preclinical development as a broad-spectrum antiprotozoal drug by Hoechst in the 1970s-1980s, but its clinical development was not pursued at the time. The molecule was ''rediscovered'' and selected for development by the Drugs for Neglected Diseases initiative (DNDi) as a new drug candidate for sleeping sickness, following a systematic review and profiling of more than 700 nitroheterocyclic compounds (mostly nitroimidazoles) from diverse sources, which included assessments of antiparasitic activity and mutagenic potential. Fexinidazole underwent extensive regulatory toxicology studies, including safety pharmacology (respiratory, cardiovascular, and general behaviour) and 4 weeks of repeated dose toxicokinetics studies in rat and dogs. 90-day toxicology studies were performed by Hoechst, allowing validation of the 3 months dosing in rat to a dose of 800 mg/kg/day and dog up to 125 mg/kg/day. Overall, Fexinidazole was found to be well tolerated, with no specific toxicity or other concerns.

During 2010-2011, DNDi carried out several Phase I clinical trials assessing the safety and pharmacokinetics of Fexinidazole in human volunteers given in single and multiple doses. A pivotal phase II/III clinical safety and efficacy study in sleeping sickness patients was started in 2012 and to-date shows encouraging safety and tolerability profile and exposure in patients.

Fexinidazole has previously been described as effective and superior to benznidazole or nifurtimox in one acute murine infection model with the T. cruzi Brazil 32 strain, but the methodologies used to establish cure are no longer considered the most accurate. More recently, in vitro studies performed at Institute Pasteur Korea (IPK) showed that Fexinidazole parent and metabolites (M1 and M2) are more or less equipotent versus T. cruzi in vitro (Tulahuen strain). Fexinidazole Sulfone (M2) is potent against a panel of T. cruzi strains (not including Colombiana or VL-10) albeit at higher concentrations than Benznidazole (2 to 4-fold). Fexinidazole Sulfone requires 72 to 96 hrs exposure at concentrations at or above 100 mM (31 mg/ml) with the Y strain; Benznidazole exhibits the same kinetics but requires exposure at the lower concentration of 12.5 mM (3.3 mg/ml).

03

Conditions studied

  • Chagas Disease
  • Trypanosomiasis, South American
  • South American Trypanosomiasis
  • Disease, Chagas

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Chagas Disease
  • Dosage forms
  • Regimens
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Confirmed diagnosis of T. cruzi infection by Serial qualitative PCR (three samples collected over a single day, at least one of which must be positive) AND Conventional serology (a minimum of two out of three positive tests must be positive [Conventional ELISA, Recombinant Elisa or IIF)
  • Women in reproductive age must have a negative serum pregnancy test at screening, must not be breastfeeding, and consistently use a highly effective method during the entire trial.
  • Normal (PR ≤200 msec, QRS ≤120 msec, and ≥400msec and ≤450 msec interval durations) at screening

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Signs and/or symptoms of chronic cardiac and/or digestive form of CD (as per Study Manual of Operations)
  • History of cardiomyopathy, heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia
  • Any other acute or chronic health conditions that, in the opinion of the PI, may interfere with the efficacy and/or safety evaluation of the study drug (such as acute infections, history of infection, diabetes, liver and renal disease requiring medical treatment)
  • Laboratory test values considered or out of the allowable range at screening as follows:

    • Total WBC must be within the normal range, with an acceptable margin of +/- 5% (3,800 - 10,500 / mm3).
    • must be within the normal range up to 550,000 / mm3
    • Total must be within the normal range Transaminases ( and AST) must be within the normal range, with an acceptable margin of 25% above the upper limit of normality (), \< 1.25 x ULN.
    • Creatinine must be within an acceptable margin of 10% above the ULN, \<1.10 x ULN.
    • Alkaline phosphatase must be within the normal range up to Grade 1 (\< 2.5 x ULN)
    • GGT must be within the normal range up to 2x ULN.
    • Potassium, Magnesium, Calcium must be within the normal range
  • History of alcohol abuse or any other drug addiction (as specified in the Study Manual of Operations).
  • Any condition that prevents the patient from taking oral medication.
  • Patients with (known ) to other nitroimidazoles, e.g. metronidazole.
  • Any concomitant use of antimicrobial or anti-parasitic agents.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(12)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

ECG (electrocardiogram)

A recording of the heart’s electrical activity, taken with stickers on the chest, arms and legs. It takes a few minutes and does not hurt.

QT and QTc

On an ECG, the QT interval is the time the heart’s lower chambers take to activate electrically and recover in each beat. QTc is that time adjusted for heart rate (QTcF by Fridericia’s formula, QTcB by Bazett’s). Some medicines lengthen it, and a long QTc can raise the risk of a dangerous heart rhythm.

The study may name a correction formula and a limit in milliseconds, often around 450–480.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Bilirubin

A yellow substance made when red blood cells are broken down, which the liver clears. A high level can mean a problem with the liver or the bile ducts.

Criteria often allow more for people with Gilbert’s syndrome, a harmless inherited condition that raises bilirubin.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

CTCAE grade

The US National Cancer Institute’s scale of how severe an adverse event is — any unwanted medical event during a study, such as a symptom, an illness or an abnormal test result, whether or not a treatment caused it. Whether it did is judged separately.

1
Mild.
2
Moderate.
3
Severe.
4
Life-threatening.
5
Death due to the event.

“Side effects of earlier treatment resolved to grade 1 or less” means they have settled to mild or gone.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1800 mg, 2 weeks

    1800mg (High Dose) 2 weeks (HD - 2 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1800 mg QD for 2 weeks, followed by placebo to complete 8 weeks (total dose: 25,2 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1800 mg, 4 weeks

    1800mg (High Dose) 4 weeks (HD - 4 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1800 mg QD for 4 weeks, followed by placebo to complete 8 weeks (total dose: 50,4 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1800 mg, 8 weeks

    1800mg (High Dose) 8 weeks (HD - 8 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1800 mg QD, for 8 weeks (total dose: 100,8 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1200 mg, 2 weeks

    1200mg (Dose 2 weeks) 2 weeks (LD - 2 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1200 mg QD for 2 weeks, followed by placebo to complete 8 weeks (total dose: 16,8 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1200 mg, 4 weeks

    1200mg (Low Dose) 4 weeks (LD - 4 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1200 mg QD for 4 weeks, followed by placebo to complete 8 weeks (total dose: 33,6 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole · Drug: Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Fexinidazole, 1200 mg, 8 weeks

    1200mg (Low Dose) 8 weeks (LD - 8 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole, 1200 mg QD for 8 weeks (total dose: 67,2 g)

    Drug: Fexinidazole

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    Placebo (8 weeks) Group: Fexinidazole matched placebo tablets QD for 8 weeks.

    Drug: Placebo

Interventions

  • Also known as: 1Himidazole,1methyl2[4methylthio)phenoxymethyl] 5nitroimidazole

  • DrugPlacebo
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Parasitological cure rate (PCR)

    Parasitological cure rate as determined by serial negative qualitative PCR results (3 negative PCR results, from 3 samples to be collected in the same day) at end of treatment (8 weeks) and sustained parasitological clearance until 6 months follow-up.

    Time frame: 8 weeks and sustained until 6 months

  2. Adverse events

    Incidence and severity of adverse events (clinical, laboratory and EKG)

    Time frame: 7 months

  3. Serious Adverse events

    Incidence of Serious Adverse Events and/or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation

    Time frame: 7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Parasite Clearance (qualitative PCR)

    Parasite clearance at weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, and at 4 and 6 months follow-up as measured by qualitative PCR

    Time frame: weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, and at 4 and 6 months follow-up

  2. Parasite load

    Change in parasite load over time assessed at weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 10, and at 4 and 6 months follow-up as measured by quantitative PCR

    Time frame: weeks 2, 3, 4, 6, 10 and 4 and 6 months

  3. Serological response

    Serological response (conventional and non-conventional serologies) (incidence of conversion to negative and changes in titers over time) assessed at week 10 and at 4 and 6 months follow-up.

    Time frame: week 10, 4 and 6 months

  4. Blood culture for parasite genotyping

    Blood culture and in vitro drug and susceptibility testing of isolated parasite strains at 6 months.

    Time frame: 6 months

Other outcomes

  1. Plasma level concentrations

    Plasma level concentrations of Fexinidazole and its metabolites M1 (sulfoxide) and M2 (sulfone) will be determined at D0 (pre-dose), at randomly selected time after first day of treatment administration (day 1, post-dose), at steady-state phase (week 2-9), and at week 10

    Time frame: D0 (pre-dose), at randomly selected time at day 1, post-dose, at steady-state phase (week 2-9), and at week 10

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Plataforma Atención Integral de Pacientes con Enfermedad de Chagas
    Cochabamba, Bolivia
    Recruiting
    • Faustino Torrico, MD · Contactfoxtorrico@yahoo.com · 59177411905
    • Cristina Alonso, MD · Contactcalonso@dndi.org · 59172211312
    • Faustino Torrico, MD · Principal investigator
  • Plataforma de Atención Integral de Pacientes con Enfermedad de Chagas
    Tarija, Bolivia
    Recruiting
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
Not marked actual or estimatedDates not marked actual or estimated

The record gives a start of Jul 2014, a primary completion of Sep 2015 and a completion of Feb 2016. It does not say whether these dates are actual or estimated.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 20, 2014
First posted
Jul 15, 2015
Start
Jul 2014
Primary completionEst.
Sep 2015
CompletionEst.
Feb 2016
Last update
Jul 15, 2015
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 15, 2015, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02498782
Lead sponsor
Drugs for Neglected Diseases
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2015
Start date
Jul 2014
Primary completion
Sep 2015 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 2016 (estimated)
Last update
Jul 15, 2015

Study contacts

Isabela Ribeiro, MD
Contact
iribeiro@dndi.org
+552125290400
Fabiana BS Rocha, MD
Contact
fbarreira@dndi.org
+552125290400 ext. 0416
Faustino Torrico, MD
principal investigator · Plataforma de Antención Integral de Pacientes con Enfermedad de Chagas, Cochabamba, Bolivia
Joaquim Gascón, MD
principal investigator · Centro de Salud Internacional, Hospital Clínico de Barcelona
Lourdes O Daza, MD
principal investigator · Plataforma de Antención Integral de Pacientes con Enfermedad de Chagas, Tarija, Bolivia

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is status unknown, as verified in Jul 2015. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Fexinidazole

Start the discussion