CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT02498392Updated Apr 29, 2025Results posted

An Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability Study of JNJ-42165279 in Participants With Major Depressive Disorder With Anxious Distress

A Phase 2 interventional study of JNJ-42165279 and Placebo in Depressive Disorder and Anxiety, sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Completed at 32 sites in 6 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 64 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-04-29.

Sponsored by Janssen Research & Development, LLC · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
161
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 64 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety and tolerability of JNJ-42165279 in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxiety symptoms who have had inadequate response to treatment with a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI).

Read the detailed description

This is a multicenter, double-blind (neither physician nor participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group study in participants with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) with Anxious Distress. Participants who had treatment initiated with a SSRI/SNRI allowed by the protocol will be evaluated at the investigation site. The site assessment will be reviewed and validated by an independent central rater. The review will include the clinical history of MDD, SSRI/SNRI treatment of adequate dose and duration for the current episode of depression, and current symptom severity on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17). Enrolled participants will be maintained on SSRI/SNRI treatment throughout the study to determine whether additional treatment with JNJ-4216579 can reduce the symptoms of MDD with anxious distress.The study will consist of 3 phases: a Screening Phase of up to 4 weeks, an 11-week double-blind Treatment Phase, and a 3-week post-treatment (follow up) Phase. The double-blind treatment Phase of the trial will consist of 3 periods. The first period is a placebo lead-in of double-blind duration, after which participants will enter the treatment period when they will be randomly assigned to JNJ-42165279 or continuation on placebo for 6 weeks. Participants who successfully complete the treatment period prior to the end of Week 11, will be treated with placebo for the remaining time of the double-blind phase of the study, which will vary depending on the duration of the placebo lead-in for the specific participant. The total study duration for each participant will be approximately 18 weeks. Efficacy and safety of JNJ-42165279 will be evaluated. Participants' safety will be monitored throughout the study.

02

Conditions studied

  • Depressive Disorder
  • Anxiety

Keywords

  • Major Depressive Disorder
  • Depression
  • Anxiety symptoms
  • JNJ-42165279
03

In context

Depressive Disorder

4,845 studies on the registry are indexed under Depressive Disorder; 514 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 161 is above the median of 80 across 3,999 interventional studies indexed under Depressive Disorder.

Browse Depressive Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Janssen Research & Development, LLC is the lead sponsor of 912 studies on the registry; 76 are open to participants now.

Of its 278 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 131 (47%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 64 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Participant must meet the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV (DSM-IV) or 5 diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) with Anxious Distress
  • Participants with a diagnosis of comorbid Generalized Anxiety Disorder, Social Anxiety Disorder, or Panic Disorder may be included, if the investigator considers MDD with Anxious Distress to be the primary diagnosis (confirmed by an independent central rater at screening)
  • Participants must have been treated with an approved SSRI/SNRI antidepressants for at least 6 continuous weeks, validated by an independent central rater contracted by the sponsor
  • A 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) total score greater than or equal to (>=)18 and a HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor score >=7 at screening, assessed by a site rater and reviewed by an independent central rater on Day 1
  • Participant must be willing and able to adhere to the prohibitions and restrictions
  • Participant Body mass index (BMI = weight/height2) must be between 18 and 35 kilogram per square meter (kg/m\^2) inclusive

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has other psychiatric condition, including, but not limited to, MDD with psychotic features, bipolar disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, borderline personality disorder, eating disorder, or schizophrenia
  • Has a length of current Major Depressive Episode (MDE) greater than (>) 6 months
  • Has more than 1 failed antidepressant treatment of adequate dose and duration in the current MDE, Not including the inadequate response to the current selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) antidepressant
  • Has initiated psychotherapy specific for MDD (such as cognitive behavioral, behavioral, or interpersonal therapy) for the current episode of depression within 6 weeks prior to Screening
  • Has a current or recent history of clinically significant suicidal ideation within the past 6 months, or a history of suicidal behavior within the past year
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Investigator)
Enrollment
161 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Responders-Placebo

    Participants who responded in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with Matching Placebo orally.

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Responders-JNJ-42165279

    Participants who responded in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with JNJ-42165279 orally at a dose of 25 milligrams (mg) tablets once daily for 6 weeks.

    Drug: JNJ-42165279

  • Placebo comparator
    Non Responders-Placebo

    Participants who did not respond in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with Matching Placebo orally.

    Other: Placebo

  • Experimental
    Non Responders-JNJ-42165279

    Participants who did not respond in the placebo lead-in period will be administered with JNJ-42165279 orally at a dose of 25 mg tablets once daily for 6 weeks.

    Drug: JNJ-42165279

Interventions

  • DrugJNJ-42165279

    JNJ-42165279 will be administered orally at a dose of 25 milligrams (mg) tablet once daily for 6 weeks.

  • OtherPlacebo

    Matching Placebo will be administered orally.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    HDRS17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of the 17 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale which used a rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. HDRS17 total score is calculated as sum of 17 item scores and ranges from 0 to 52. For each item as well as the total score, higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

Secondary outcomes

  1. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Subscale (HAM-A6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  2. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-A6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  3. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Subscale (HAM-D6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatics symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  4. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatic symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  5. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  6. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  7. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  8. Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

    Time frame: Baseline and Week 6

  9. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had \>=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  10. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30 % Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had \>=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 was reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  11. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had \>=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  12. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants who had \>=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  13. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  14. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  15. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  16. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  17. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score \<= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  18. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score <= 7 at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score \<= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

    Time frame: Week 6

  19. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (eITT Population)

    The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  20. Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (fITT Population)

    The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: Week 6

  21. Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-42165279

    Cmax is defined as maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Cmax.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

  22. Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Zero to Dosing Intervals (AUC[0-tau]) of JNJ-42165279

    AUC(0-tau) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to t hours post dosing (time t is the dosing interval). The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate AUC(0-tau).

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

  23. Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-42165279

    Tmax is defined as time to reach the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Tmax.

    Time frame: Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77

07

Results

Posted Apr 7, 2022
Limitations and caveats
The relationship of plasma anandamide and trough drug concentrations observed suggest that few participants had substantial recovery of fatty acid amide hydrolase activity between doses. Higher doses or exposures could have resulted in greater effects.

Participant flow

Double-blind(DB) Lead-in Period(3 Weeks)
Participant flow — Double-blind(DB) Lead-in Period(3 Weeks)
MilestonePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Started1600
Treated1530
Completed1530
Not completed70
Withdrew: Did not receive treatment70
DB Treatment (6 Weeks)+Withdrawal Period
Participant flow — DB Treatment (6 Weeks)+Withdrawal Period
MilestonePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Started7677
Completed7067
Not completed610
Withdrew: Adverse event30
Withdrew: Lack of efficacy02
Withdrew: Lost to follow-up02
Withdrew: Withdrawal by subject23
Withdrew: Other13

Outcome measures

PrimaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)-6.1 ± 5.90-6.5 ± 4.01
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs JNJ-42165279 25 mg · Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measure · p = = 0.416 · Difference of least square (ls) means: -0.2 · 60% CI -1.10 to 0.66
PrimaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

HDRS17 is a clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of the 17 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale which used a rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. HDRS17 total score is calculated as sum of 17 item scores and ranges from 0 to 52. For each item as well as the total score, higher scores indicate greater severity of depression.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)-5.0 ± 6.34-5.2 ± 4.68
Statistical analysis
  • Placebo vs JNJ-42165279 25 mg · Mixed-effects Model for Repeated Measure · p = = 0.647 (1-sided) · Difference of least square (ls) means: 0.3 · 60% CI -0.41 to 1.07
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Subscale (HAM-A6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Subscale (HAM-A6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Subscale (HAM-A6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)-2.4 ± 3.15-2.9 ± 2.47
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-A6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

The HAM-A6 is a 6-item subscale derived from the original Hamilton Anxiety scale (HAM-A) which consists of 5 psychic anxiety symptoms (anxious mood, psychic tension, fears, intellectual disturbances, and anxious behavior observed at the interview), as well as one somatic item (muscular tension). Each of the 6 items is rated by the clinician on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not present) to 4 (maximum degree). The HAM-A6 score was calculated by summing the 6 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicated greater severity of symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-A6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-A6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)-2.1 ± 3.12-2.2 ± 2.68
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Subscale (HAM-D6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatics symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Subscale (HAM-D6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Hamilton Depression Rating Subscale (HAM-D6) Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)-3.1 ± 3.20-3.6 ± 2.41
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

HAM-D6 is a 6-item subscale derived from HDRS17 and consists of depressed mood, guilt feelings, work and interests, psychomotor retardation, psychic anxiety, and somatic symptoms (tiredness and pain), rated on a 5-point scale, where 0 = not present, and 1-4 represent increasingly severe symptoms. Each of these items is rated by the clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point scale (0 to 4). The point scale used a rating of 0 (absent), 1 (doubtful to mild), 2 (mild to moderate), 3 (moderate to severe), and 4 (very severe). General somatic is scored 0 to 2 and all others are scored 0 to 4. The HAM-D6 is calculated from summing the 6 items and the score ranges from 0 (normal) to 22 (severe), with higher scores indicating greater severity of core symptoms.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Unit on a Scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Unit on a ScalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in HAM-D6 Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)-2.6 ± 3.30-2.8 ± 2.78
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in Structured Interview Guide of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (SIGH-A) Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)-5.7 ± 7.11-6.8 ± 5.62
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety; and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a Scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population
Units on a ScalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population-5.0 ± 6.95-5.6 ± 5.86
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Units on a scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Units on a scalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)-2.1 ± 2.35-2.3 ± 1.55
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

The HDRS17 anxiety/somatization factor derived from Cleary and Guy's factor analysis of the HDRS17 scale, includes six items from the original 17-item version: psychic anxiety, somatic anxiety, gastrointestinal somatic symptoms, general somatic symptoms, hypochondriasis, and insight. Each of 6 items is rated by clinician on either a 3-point (0 to 2) or a 5-point (0 to 4) scale with rating of 0:absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe and is calculated as sum of 6 item scores ranging from 0 to 18, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms for each item as well as total score.

Time frame:
Baseline and Week 6
Reported as:
Mean · Unit on a Scale
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Unit on a ScalePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Change From Baseline in the HDRS17 Anxiety/Somatization Factor Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)-1.7 ± 2.36-1.8 ± 1.69
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

Percentage of participants who had \>=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 30 Percent (%) Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)51.155.3
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30 % Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

Percentage of participants who had \>=30% improvement (responders) on HDRS17 total score at Week 6 was reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30 % Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30 % Improvement on the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)56.952.2
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

Percentage of participants who had \>=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)27.721.3
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

Percentage of participants who had \>=50% improvement (responders) in HDRS17 total score at Week 6 were reported. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants diagnosed with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point (0-2) or 5-point (0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement in the HDRS17 Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)36.127.5
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)48.951.1
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 30% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 30% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)52.852.2
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (eITT Population)29.821.3
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)

The SIGH-A was included as a means to determine the frequency and severity of signs and symptoms of anxiety and determine both their influence on treatment and their responsiveness to treatment. The percentage of participants who had \>= 50% improvement (responders) on SIGH-A total score at Week 6 was reported. The SIGH-A scale consists of 14 items with a score of 0 to 4, where 0=absent, 1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe, 4=incapacitating. The SIGH-A total score is calculated by summing the 14 item scores, and ranges from 0 to 56. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With >= 50% Improvement on SIGH-A Total Score at Week 6 (fITT Population)37.524.6
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 6 (eITT Population)

Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score \<= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7 at Week 6 (eITT Population)14.98.5
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score <= 7 at Week 6 (fITT Population)

Percentage of participants with HDRS17 total score \<= 7 were considered as remitters. HDRS17 is clinician-administered rating scale designed to assess severity of symptoms in participants with depression. Each of 17 items is rated by clinician on either 3-point(0-2) or 5-point(0-4) scale with rating of 0: absent, 1: doubtful to mild, 2: mild to moderate, 3: moderate to severe, and 4: very severe. A total score (0 to 52) was calculated by adding scores of all 17 items. For each item as well as total score, higher score represents more severe condition.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score <= 7 at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With Remission as Assessed by HDRS17 Total Score <= 7 at Week 6 (fITT Population)33.321.7
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (eITT Population)

The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participants
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (eITT Population)
Percentage of participantsPlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (eITT Population)57.455.3
SecondaryDouble-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (fITT Population)

The percentage of participants with a CGI-I score of very much improved or much improved at Week 6 was reported. CGI-I is a 7-point scale that required the clinician to assess how much the participant's illness had improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention. The CGI-I is rated as: 1=very much improved; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change; 5=minimally worse; 6=much worse; 7=very much worse. For each individual item score and total score, higher scores indicate greater severity.

Time frame:
Week 6
Reported as:
Number · Percentage of participate
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (fITT Population)
Percentage of participatePlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Double-blind Treatment Period: Percentage of Participants With a Clinical Global Impression Improvement (CGI-I) Score of Very Much Improved or Much Improved at Week 6 (fITT Population)65.365.2
SecondaryMaximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-42165279

Cmax is defined as maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Cmax.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77
Reported as:
Mean · Nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of JNJ-42165279
Nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL)JNJ-42165279 25 mg
Male217.7 (178.4 to 281.7)
Female229.3 (142.9 to 337.7)
SecondaryArea Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Zero to Dosing Intervals (AUC[0-tau]) of JNJ-42165279

AUC(0-tau) is defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to t hours post dosing (time t is the dosing interval). The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate AUC(0-tau).

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77
Reported as:
Mean · Nanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Zero to Dosing Intervals (AUC[0-tau]) of JNJ-42165279
Nanograms*hour/milliliter (ng*h/mL)JNJ-42165279 25 mg
Male2159 (1353 to 3385)
Female2432 (1137 to 4288)
SecondaryTime to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-42165279

Tmax is defined as time to reach the maximum plasma concentration of JNJ-42165279. The data was pooled across visits at different timepoints to calculate Tmax.

Time frame:
Pre-dose, 2 to 4 hours post-dose on Days 14, 35, 63, and 77
Reported as:
Median · Hours
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-42165279
HoursJNJ-42165279 25 mg
Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of JNJ-42165279NA (NA to NA)

Adverse events

Collected over Up to Week 18. Non-serious events are listed at a 5% frequency threshold.

Adverse event summary by group
GroupDeathsSeriousOther
Double-blind (DB) Lead-in Period: Placebo0/160 (0%)2/160 (1.3%)16/160 (10%)
DB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: Placebo0/76 (0%)1/76 (1.3%)4/76 (5.3%)
DB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: JNJ-42165279 25 mg0/77 (0%)1/77 (1.3%)3/77 (3.9%)
Most frequent serious events
Most frequent serious events
EventDouble-blind (DB) Lead-in Period: PlaceboDB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: PlaceboDB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: JNJ-42165279 25 mg
GastroenteritisInfections and infestations1/1601/760/77
Foot DeformityMusculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders1/1600/761/77
Most frequent other events
Most frequent other events
EventDouble-blind (DB) Lead-in Period: PlaceboDB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: PlaceboDB Treatment + Withdrawal Period: JNJ-42165279 25 mg
HeadacheNervous system disorders16/1604/763/77

Baseline characteristics

Baseline population is based on safety analysis set which included all enrolled participants who received at least one dose of study medication in the Lead-in Period and who were lead-in placebo non-responders.

Age, Continuous
Age, Continuous(years)PlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotal
Mean44.4 ± 11.9242.1 ± 11.9643.2 ± 11.96
Sex: Female, Male
Sex: Female, Male(Participants)PlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotal
Female5953112
Male172441
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotal
Hispanic or Latino7613
Not Hispanic or Latino6771138
Unknown or Not Reported202
Race (NIH/OMB)
Race (NIH/OMB)(Participants)PlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotal
American Indian or Alaska Native000
Asian101
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander000
Black or African American033
White7372145
More than one race101
Unknown or Not Reported123
Region of Enrollment
Region of Enrollment(Participants)PlaceboJNJ-42165279 25 mgTotal
MOLDOVA, REPUBLIC OF81018
RUSSIAN FEDERATION202141
SPAIN336
UKRAINE181836
UNITED KINGDOM181735
UNITED STATES9817
08

Study locations

32 sites
  • Costa Mesa, California, United States
  • Oceanside, California, United States
  • Miami, Florida, United States
  • Natick, Massachusetts, United States
  • Cedarhurst, New York, United States
  • Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
  • Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
  • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
  • Chisinau, Moldova, Republic of
  • Ekaterinburg, Russian Federation
  • Orenburg, Russian Federation
  • Saratov, Russian Federation
  • St-Petersburg, Russian Federation
  • Tomsk, Russian Federation
  • Alicante, Spain
  • Barcelona, Spain
  • Bilbao, Spain
  • Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
  • Zamora, Spain
  • Glevakha, Ukraine
  • Kharkiv, Ukraine
  • Kherson, Ukraine
  • Kyiv, Ukraine
  • Lviv, Ukraine
  • Smila, Ukraine
  • Uzhgorod, Ukraine
  • Barnsley, United Kingdom
  • Blackpool, United Kingdom
  • Liverpool, United Kingdom
  • Manchester, United Kingdom
  • South Staffordshire, United Kingdom
  • Stourton, United Kingdom
09

References and documents

Study documents

  • Study protocol · Oct 24, 2017
  • Statistical analysis plan · Feb 14, 2019

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

10

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 29, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
11

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT02498392
Lead sponsor
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jul 15, 2015
Start date
Oct 7, 2015
Primary completion
Feb 4, 2019
Completion
Feb 4, 2019
Results posted
Apr 7, 2022
Last update
Apr 29, 2025

Study contacts

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
study director · Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion